Ferrari Might Build Its First New Manual Transmission in Over a Decade
Ferrari could be about to make a lot of enthusiasts very happy.
The Italian marque is considering bringing back the gated manual transmission following a decade-plus absence, according to Carsales. There's a catch, though. The coveted mechanical feature would only be available on special models.
More from Robb Report
Bill Gates's Former Waterfront Mansion in Florida Can Be Yours for $23.5 Million
Inside a Stunning, Fire-Resistant Family Retreat on a Sunny Hilltop in NorCal's Wine Country
Bermuda: Preserving the Past, Inspiring the Future
In an interview with the magazine, Ferrari's chief product development officer, Gianmaria Fulgenzi, revealed that the company is 'reaching the limit of performance' with its road cars. That's not because the company can't wring more power out of its engines, but because its customers wouldn't be able to handle it—unless they were to put in the kind of training required of professional race car drivers.
'I don't think all our customers want to have to train every morning just to drive our cars,' he told the magazine.
Ferrari hasn't sold a car with a third pedal since the California was discontinued back in 2012. The stick shift was sacrificed in the name of performance, so, at a time when the company has pushed things just about as they can go in that area, it makes sense that it's thinking about bringing the gearbox back. Fulgenzi said this would involve 'limiting performance' to manage the heavy clutch.
If Ferrari does bring back the manual, don't expect it to be available line-wide. Fulgenzi made clear that the option would not be available on the company's standard production models. Instead, it would only be available on its more exclusive releases, like the Icona series.
'Probably an Icona car, because it's a car that represents our heritage, a car to be admired and to be driven in a certain way,' he said.
Fulgazi also revealed that the marque hasn't reached this softened stance on its own. Unsurprisingly, the executive says that 'customers are already asking' for the company to bring back the manual. It's not hard to imagine a gated manual making the next Icona model even more desirable. Not that the seven-figure cars need much help on that front.
At the very least, this all sounds like good news for Ferrari Formula 1 driver Lewis Hamilton, who, earlier this season, expressed interest in helping the marque build an F40 tribute—with a manual.
Best of Robb Report
The 2024 Chevy C8 Corvette: Everything We Know About the Powerful Mid-Engine Beast
The World's Best Superyacht Shipyards
The ABCs of Chartering a Yacht
Click here to read the full article.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Google's Quiet Confirmation Of The Pixel 10
Google's "Talking Phones Podcast" title card Google is having a little bit of fun in its latest iPhone vs Pixel video. While the Pixel 9 Pro takes pride of place, there's also a surprising cameo for what comes next… the Pixel 10. The Pixel 10 Easter Egg The details come at the end of Google's latest promotional video posted on its Made By Google YouTube channel. In it, an iPhone and a Pixel talk about the recent advances made by Apple's smartphone, with a not at all surprised Pixel noting when that feature arrived on Pixel and Android. These include live translation, hold assistance and call screening arriving four, five and seven years ago respectively., Of course, the capabilities of all these features have improved significantly over the last few years, so there are shades of Oranges to (ahem) Apples here, but it makes Google's point effectively. The story of Android being ahead of iOS is here for all to hear. The little easter egg at the end is part of another story, leading into the next Pixel release. The iPhone quietly asks the Pixel 9 Pro, 'so, what are you working on for Pixel 10… just out of curiosity?' Naming The Pixel 10 It's no secret that Google is working on the next family of Pixel smartphones. Neither is it a secret that we're expecting an entry-level Pixel 10, a premium Pixel 10 Pro, a larger Pixel 10 Pro XL and an innovative Pixel 10 Pro Fold. Yet this is the first time Google has publicly acknowledged that the new handsets will carry the Pixel 10 branding. Although the sharp-eared watchers will note that it was the iPhone confirming the new Pixel 10, not the Pixel 9 Pro. So, did Apple confirm the new name, rather than Google? Google is expected to announce the Pixel 10 family at an upcoming Made By Google event. While dates have not been confirmed, talk within the community picks out Wednesday, Aug. 20 for the launch, and Thursday, Aug 28. for the first handsets to go on sale to the public. Now read how the Pixel 10 will impact every Android smartphone in 2025 and beyond…
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
7 Most Valuable Vintage Apple Products — Could Yours Be Worth Thousands?
Now that Apple sells over hundreds of millions of iPhones a year, it's easy to forget that it all began with two college dropouts in a garage with some trademark old Apple computers. Since 1976, Apple has seen its share of ups and downs, but the company's nearly 50-year-long resume is packed with tech milestones. Discover More: Find Out: To the untrained eye, obsolete or antiquated products should be put in the bin rather than distributed for sale. The term vintage typically doesn't come with as much of a resale value when applied to electronics as opposed to designer clothing. However, some vintage Apple products have fetched over $100,000 at auction. Though not every used Apple device you have will get this much, the value of certain products collecting dust in your closet might be worth more than a pretty penny. From the very first Macintosh to the MacBook Pro or even iPhone 16, Apple is known just as much for high price tags as it is for innovation. Here's a look at the most significant products Apple has introduced over the years — what they cost then and what they could be worth today. Cost then: $1,298 Potential resale value: $35,655 Compared to 1976's Apple I, the Apple II was a revelation. While the first Apple lacked a monitor, separate keyboard or casing, the Apple II included the whole package, complete with the introduction of five-color on-screen graphics. Adjusted for inflation, you could buy a used car for what the Apple II costs, but its price tag had brought the budding company $7.8 million in sales by 1978 — about $40 million in today's money. Read Next: Cost then: $2,495 Potential resale value: $150,075 This is when the world started calling Apple computers 'Macs' and the company stopped not being a household name. While dropping more than six grand on a computer today is cringeworthy, the original Macintosh was considered the first relatively affordable computer with a graphical interface at the time. Its specs included a whopping 128 KB of RAM, 400 KB of storage, a floppy disk drive and a nine-inch monochrome display. The original 128K prototype was auctioned for $150,075. Cost then: $700 Potential resale value: $2,520 Developed while legendary Apple co-founder and former CEO Steve Jobs was away from the company — and famously derided by him — the tablet-like touchscreen Newton paved the way for the success of the PDA and, later, the iPad. This small, hand-held product didn't catch on at the time, but it played a role in inspiring today's 'all-in-one' device design and even featured ahead-of-its-time handwriting recognition capabilities. Cost then: $1,299 Potential resale value: $1,299.99 The introduction of the iMac in 1998 marked the first time Apple used its 'i' branding. At the time, the 'i' in 'iMac' stood for 'internet,' as the all-in-one desktop computer featured a built-in modem, which was uncommon when it launched. The first model came in a blue-green hue, called 'bondi blue and ice' by Apple, but it was later available in a rainbow of colors. It marked the first major Apple work by iconic designer Jony Ive. The iMac line looks a lot different — and less colorful — today, but it's still kicking. Cost then: $1,799 Potential resale value: $1,799 The Power Mac G4 Cube's beautiful design couldn't offset the high price tag, which, consequently, led to its marketplace struggles. By 2001, its entry-level price had been slashed to $1,299. The cube-shaped brains of the box live today in the form of the Mac Mini series, however. Though the Mini doesn't include a monitor, keyboard or speakers like the G4 Cube, it starts at a much more reasonable $599 and the used vintage model can sell for just under that. Cost then: Starting at $399 Potential resale value: $29,000 From 2001 to 2011, Apple sold 300 million original iPods. Though the idea of a dedicated MP3 player seems outdated today, the at-the-time appeal of carrying 1,000 songs on the original, scroll-wheel-equipped model's 5 GB hard drive cannot be overstated. The iPod line eventually included a wide variety of models — from the Nano to the Shuffle — but Apple discontinued it in 2022. However, nostalgic collectors tend to scoop up the rare 1st Generation models if they have never been used or are in like-new condition. Cost then: Starting at $499 Potential resale value: $190,353 Before you can sell a billion, you've got to start with one. The iPhone might not have been the first all-in-one handheld device, but its mainstream appeal and standard feature set established the baseline for the modern smartphone. If your current device has Wi-Fi support, Bluetooth, a camera, a glass screen, an accelerometer and multi-touch, you probably can thank the iPhone. The vintage first edition can sell for thousands of dollars online to enthusiastic gearheads. Caitlyn Moorhead, Andrew Lisa, Ruth Sarreal and Jennifer Taylor contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on 7 Most Valuable Vintage Apple Products — Could Yours Be Worth Thousands?
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How The Big Beautiful Bill Will Handicap Clean Energy
The Capitol Building, home of the United State Congress. Green Technologies At Risk In Current Mega Bill As it was written, the Big, Beautiful Bill (Mega Bill) passed by The House of Representatives in May would handicap certain green projects (solar, wind, and batteries) that are in line to receive tax credits made available by the Biden government. The handicap is hard to understand because in the U.S. over 90% of new energy projects in 2023 and 2024 was generated by solar, wind, and batteries. What is the handicap? The Mega Bill mandates that such projects must begin within two months of passage of the bill, and would have to be completed, and in service, by the last day of 2028, or the tax credits would be canceled. To see what impact this would have on green projects, one analysis looked at clean electrical projects that are currently in the interconnection queue, and due to go online during 2028 or later (it wouldn't be uncommon for projects slated to complete in 2028 to spill over to 2029, which would cancel the tax credits.) The total for all these at-risk projects in Figure 1 amounts to 600 GW (gigawatts). The largest three projects are CAISO of California at 183 GW, ERCOT of Texas at 128 GW, and MISO (Midwest and South) at 111 GW. Figure 1. The truth is, current electrical production in U.S. is 1200 GW, and this will need to grow rapidly to power new AI data centers. So, if all these seven green projects lost their tax credits and dropped out of the interconnection queue, it would represent a huge loss that is 50% of current electrical production in the U.S. This loss would be like tossing away 600 traditional power plants that added up to 50% of current U.S. electricity supply. Granted, a number of projects in Figure 1 would drop out of the queue anyway, due to other factors such as financial commitments that fall through. But still, a loss of remaining projects that would stand to boost current U.S. power by 30% or 40% or 50% would be an unforgiveable loss—especially since solar, wind and battery projects have all the market momentum in the past few years. Speaking of momentum, in 2023 and 2024 in the U.S., the vast majority (93%--94%) of new energy sources were solar, wind, and batteries. The only commercially proven competitor is gas-fired power plants, which are facing serious delays, and they cost more. What if projects that lost their tax credits were to go ahead to completion? They might, but it's obvious this would translate to higher cost of electricity for consumers. Mega Bill Changes Suggested By Senate. The House Mega Bill has gone to the Senate, and on Monday June 16 they have proposed some changes. UtilityDive reports that the harsh 'start by – complete by' House requirement to access the tax credits has been removed. In one box, nuclear, geothermal and hydropower can claim the tax credits so long as they start construction by 2033. But in another box, wind and solar can obtain only 60% of the tax credits and only if they break ground by 2026. Or 20% if by 2027. Or zero if after that. This is a serious handicap for the frontrunners, solar and wind, that have provided over 93% of new electrical capacity in 2023 and 2024. And it comes at a crucial time, because the U.S. needs to quickly boost its power capability by a massive amount to supply AI data centers. One positive: battery storage or BESS (battery energy storage systems) can access tax credits until 2036, although the credits will be tapered down, according to Canary Media. Also, some solar and wind projects would be able to keep the tax credits beyond the end of 2028—provided they exist on federal land, generate 1 GW or more power, and have obtained right-of-way approval from the BLM (Bureau of Land Management). The next steps are: the Senate as a whole has to pass these changes, and then attempt to reconcile with the House. The timeline is short as the goal is to get the final version of the Mega Bill to President Trump's desk by July 4. Coming out of all the discussion and debate, it seems the Mega Bill wants to handicap wind and solar and batteries. But why? Reasons Why The Mega Bill Would Handicap Wind And Solar Energy. First, the Bill will cause electricity prices to rise. If cheap wind, solar and batteries are handicapped in preference to expensive almost-defunct coal power plants, commercially unproven SMRs (small modular nuclear reactors), and next-gen geothermal methods, then prices of electricity will rise. Table 1 lays this out, using the most recent LCOE data from Lazard. Table 1. Most recent LCOE estimates for various electrical sources. With tax credits and based on a utility scale, solar PV + BESS and wind + BESS are cheaper than geothermal with tax credits, and much cheaper than gas-fired power, nuclear, and coal. If the Mega Bill handicaps wind and solar in the race, electrical costs will zoom upwards. Second, the Bill seems to be unaware of green energy success in Australia. In the state of South Australia renewables plus batteries have been providing 72% of grid electricity continuously for three years, and this is expected to rise to 100% by 2027. Solar, wind, and batteries have proven the stability and reliability of renewables commercially. The first grid-scale BESS was started in 2017 by Elon Musk in South Australia, and BESS are expanding rapidly in the U.S. as well as in Australia. Intermittent power is no longer a reason to dismiss renewables, despite what the Energy Secretary says, because BESS have solved this problem and electricity from solar and wind renewables with BESS is dispatchable. Third, the Bill assumes new investments in old energy (coal, natural gas, and nuclear) will be embraced by the U.S. population. However, global spending on low-carbon power has doubled in the past five years. Solar PV is the leader in this space, with investments that will reach $450 billion in 2025. Coal is too dirty when it burns, and in the U.S. the market share has dropped from 50% in 2011 to 11% in 2024. Natural gas burns cleaner than coal, but the market for new gas-fired power plants has dropped out in the past two years, due to cost and delays in permitting and supply chains. The cost of new nuclear reactors, whether traditional reactors or SMRs, is substantially higher than renewable energies (Table 1). There is also the ubiquitous threat of being exposed to nuclear radiation, either from nuclear accidents or from underground storage of nuclear waste. It has been reported that U.S. nuclear reactors that were decommissioned some time ago can be recommissioned, but at a heavy cost of around $1 billion per unit. Fourth, the Bill enables China to forge ahead with a green energy economy, while the U.S. goes backward. Energy from solar, wind, and batteries is cheap, and has a short new-build time. It will continue to provide jobs and grow the economy, and benefits include lower electricity prices and less pollution. A key advantage is already-commercialized power for data centers that will enable the U.S. to compete with China in the race for AI. The handicap and setbacks of a thriving clean industry in the U.S. would be China's gain. Fifth, the Bill will force job losses by handicapping green industries. If projects in the above list of seven in Figure 1 were to be canceled due to the Mega Bill handicaps, there could be serious job losses. To illustrate by results in 2024, one report quotes $80 billion invested in clean power in 2024, which supported 1.4 million jobs in the U.S. Another answer is that current tax credits would enable strong economic growth by 2035: almost $2 trillion of monetary growth and almost 14 million jobs. This amounts to a return on the federal investment by four-times. The green energy benefits and financial returns of wind and solar with battery storage apply to both Republican and Democratic states in the U.S.. But so do the losses, if Congress decides to handicap wind and solar renewables. The biggest losses may be soaring electricity costs in the U.S., and the U.S. bending to China's clean energy boom of surging solar and BESS projects that will reliably service their AI data center programs.
