Hawaiian Electric seeks approval for wildfire safety work
Typical residential customers of the state's largest utility could see their monthly bill rise between $1 and $5.50 to cover costs of an expanded three-year wildfire safety plan.
Hawaiian Electric disclosed the cost estimates in a plan update filed with the state Public Utilities Commission on Friday.
The safety plan for work through 2027 is subject to PUC approval, and the utility anticipates that bills won't likely increase for plan work until 2026.
Ratepayer cost estimates vary by island where the cost and scope of planned improvements are different and add up to $350 million for Maui County, Oahu and Hawaii island. Kauai has an electric utility owned by ratepayers.
The biggest Hawaiian Electric investments in wildfire safety are slated for Maui, where a wind-driven inferno determined to have originated from a downed company power line killed 102 people and destroyed most of Lahaina on Aug. 8, 2023.
Hawaiian Electric said it plans to spend $181 million on wildfire safety work throughout Maui County, but mainly on Maui where the state's wildfire risk is highest. This work, the company said, should cost a typical residential customer $5.41 more per month.
Work on Maui is to initially include putting underground about two miles of overhead power lines in critical safety areas in Lahaina determined with the help of a community working group providing area-specific knowledge and input.
Hawaiian Electric said this initial work in Lahaina will be a pilot project that informs planning for future undergrounding of power lines in the West Maui town and other areas.
On Oahu, safety plan work is expected to cost $68 million and result in a typical residential customer's monthly bill rising by $1.05.
Work on Hawaii island is expected to cost $101 million and have a $2.86 monthly bill impact.
A typical residential customer uses 500 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month.
Not all of the cost for wildfire safety work under the plan will be borne by ratepayers. Hawaiian Electric said some of the expense is being covered by existing programs, including a $95 million federal grant for grid resilience received in 2024.
Hawaiian Electric in a news release noted that bill impacts from the planned work may be reduced if the company can use a financing strategy that the Legislature approved in a bill passed April 30.
Senate Bill 897 authorizes the PUC to let the company issue long-term bonds that finance safety infrastructure work and are repaid through customer billing. This form of financing, known as securitization, is less costly for Hawaiian Electric than other forms of available debt.
Gov. Josh Green has yet to act on SB 897. His office in written testimony raised some concerns about various drafts of the bill that were different than what lawmakers passed.
'The Companies will take advantage of that option if /when it becomes available, ' Hawaiian Electric said in the filing, referring to its subsidiaries on different islands.
Hawaiian Electric said about two-thirds of wildfire safety work will be capital investments in upgraded physical infrastructure, with the other third to be spent on operations and maintenance that includes enhanced equipment inspections and removal or trimming of thousands of hazardous trees.
Other specific work to be done under the plan include :—Insulating wire power lines in highest risk areas to prevent sparking if a line touches another line or falls to the ground.—Replacing and strengthening poles.—Installing more weather stations and hazard-detection cameras.—Expanding AI-assisted video camera stations to enable 100 % coverage of all high and medium wildfire risk areas.—Creating a wildfire watch office that includes a meteorologist to monitor media reports, internal and external weather information and field reports to provide more situational awareness for operations.—Using a wildfire risk model to inform real-time decision-making and to refine the company's Public Safety Power Shutoff program so that shutoffs, if necessary, can be more precise and shorter.
'The (plan ) is designed to provide public safety, wildfire risk mitigation, reliability and resilience benefits for the Companies' customers and the State as a whole, ' Hawaiian Electric said in the filing.
The plan filed with regulators Friday updates a less-detailed 'blueprint ' filed with the PUC in January that had a $450 million estimated cost and scope of work that Hawaiian Electric then said could change with refinements.
Hawaiian Electric created its first wildfire mitigation plan in 2019, which did not include a power safety shutoff program. The plan was updated in the months after the Maui wildfire disaster, and many upgrades and operational changes have been implemented since then, including the shutoff program begun in July.
The wildfire that struck Lahaina caused an estimated $5.5 billion in property damage. A $4 billion settlement of fire victim litigation is to be mostly paid for by the utility, the state and landowner Kamehameha Schools.
Hawaiian Electric's share of the settlement is $2 billion. It is to be paid over four years and not add to customer bills. The parent of the utility, Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc., raised capital for the first payment by selling new shares of stock. Additional payment funding is expected to be raised through issuing debt and equity in HEI.
BY THE NUMBERS Hawaiian Electric 2025-2027 wildfire safety plan estimated costs :—Total : $350 million—Maui County : $181 million—Hawaii island : $101 million—Oahu : $68 million Monthly bill impacts ----Maui County : $5.41—Hawaii island : $2.86—Oahu : $1.05 —Residential customer using 500 kilowatt-hours of electricity
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
NV Energy asking to raise rates by more than twice as much as needed, say experts
(Photo: Ronda Churchill/Nevada Current) The Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection says NV Energy requires less than half of the $224 million rate hike it's asking the Public Utilities Commission to approve for Southern Nevada customers, and criticized the utility for attempting to charge ratepayers for lavish spending on lodging and limos for company gatherings. The 9% proposed rate hike is expected to cost the average customer an additional $15 to $20 a month. An expert witness testifying on behalf of the BCP, Mark Garrett, says NV Energy, based on a formula used to determine its revenue requirement, needs a rate hike of $106 million to provide service to its customers in the south. The utility is asking the PUC to include in the rate hike the cost of constructing Greenlink, a massive transmission line project, while it is still under construction and not benefitting ratepayers. Greenlink's cost has ballooned from just under $2.5 billion to more than $4.2 billion, and could increase even more, depending on the outcome of President Donald Trump's trade wars with Mexico and Canada. The increase related to Greenlink alone would hike rates by $60.6 million, or about $3.60 a month, for a little more than two years. The company argues that including the cost of construction while in progress, which is usually not permitted because it requires customers to pay for a service not yet provided, will generate cash flow, and help maintain credit ratings. In 2021, NV Energy's then-CEO Doug Cannon told state lawmakers that 'Nevadans will not be asked to pay for this investment until at least five to six years down the road.' Cannon left the company last month, following the revelation that the utility overcharged some 80,000 customers, some going back as far as 20 years. 'The company is faced with meeting the demands of growth, addressing system reliability, resource adequacy, legislative goals and mandates, and operational needs as it relates to sufficient levels of staffing, technology, and insurance – all of which necessitates investments above those currently reflected in the existing revenue requirement,' NV Energy vice president and chief financial officer Mike Behrens said in testimony submitted to the PUC, justifying the utility's rate requests. Behrens testified that including the costs of constructing Greenlink, while work is in progress, would help avoid a bond rating downgrade and higher interest rates on future debt. Garrett, on behalf of the BCP, recommended the cost of constructing Greenlink not be included in the upcoming rate case. 'The company has not demonstrated a financial need,' Garrett countered, and said the claim that charging customers now for constructing the project would save money 'is inaccurate.' While including the cost of construction in progress in the base rate would save the company $35 million in interest, it would cost customers $52.7 million in higher rates, and 'makes no economic sense for ratepayers,' Garrett testified. NV Energy is also seeking to recoup $16.4 million in affiliate expenses incurred by the company or its affiliates, such as Berkshire Hathaway Energy, its holding company. Among the expenses is an invoice for just under $1.3 million for Red Rock Resort, including $14,940 for incidentals, $152,156 for 'guest room attrition,' $575,068 for banquet food and beverages, $17,140 for internet, $78,482 for audio/visual services, and $3,248 for luggage porters. Nichole Loar of the BCP recommended the PUC disallow all $16.4 million in affiliate expenses – including: Chauffeured transportation services; Washington, D.C. office building and related labor; 'Excessive lodging charges' at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C. and the J.W. Marriott in Phoenix; Lobbying expenses; Outside counsel; Corporate airfare; Alcoholic beverages; Entertainment; and Charitable donations 'The utility needs to be reminded they operate with a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (given by the PUC), which is a privilege to serve as a monopolistic entity, not a right,' Loar testified. 'The recent proposed increases are placing vulnerable demographics at a heightened risk for heat-related illnesses, such as heatstroke,' Las Vegan Angel DeFazio of the National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation said in a news release following a consumer input session last week on the proposed increase. She noted that seniors and others on fixed incomes are challenged to cover essential expenses, such as food and medicine, and pay for energy, especially during the summer months when bills skyrocket. The PUC is expected to hold hearings on the proposed rate hike in September. If approved, rates would increase on Oct. 1.
Forbes
11-06-2025
- Forbes
Hawaii Governor To Veto Medical Cannabis Expansion Bill
Lawmakers in Hawaii are shifting focus to refining the state's medical cannabis system, after efforts to legalize adult-use stalled. In a recent announcement, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green outlined 19 bills he intends to veto in the upcoming weeks, one of which would have allowed primary care physicians to recommend medical cannabis for any condition, regardless if it is included on the state's list of qualifying conditions. Originally, HB 302 sought to expand the state's medical cannabis program by allowing telehealth visits to qualify. However, the governor vetoed the bill, citing a 'grave violation of privacy' in a revision that could have compromised the confidentiality of medical cannabis patients. After revisions, the bill would have allowed the Hawaii Department of Health to inspect qualifying patients' medical records they received from a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or hospice provider. Last month, the Hawaii Senate and House of Representatives approved the bill, but Reps. Kim Coco Iwamoto and Della Au Belatti pointed out some concerns over privacy. In addition, amendments to the bill would limit recommendations for medical cannabis for conditions outside of the state's current list to only a patient's primary care physician, prompting opposition from advocacy groups. These amendments, they believe, would only complicate things. 'This administration remains committed to Hawai'i's existing medical cannabis program and supports efforts to expand access to medical cannabis for any medical condition," the governor's office said in a statement. "Although this bill's authorization of medical cannabis certifications via telehealth expands access to medical cannabis, provisions authorizing the inspection of patients' medical records without warrant constitute a grave violation of privacy. Given that the federal government classifies cannabis as a Schedule I substance, patients' reasonable fears of repercussions based upon information gained from inspection of their personal medical records may deter patients from participating in the medical cannabis program.' Hawaii currently allows medical cannabis recommendations for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cancer, glaucoma, lupus, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, HIV, AIDS, and PTSD, many of which were added in subsequent revisions. The bill would have amended and added definitions for purposes of the medical use of cannabis law to any condition. It would have authorized provider-patient relationships via telehealth. It would have also set a limit on fees that can be assessed by providers and authorize the sale of hemp products and accessories for the medical use of cannabis at retail dispensing locations, except in waiting rooms. It would have also clarified transportation requirements for certain inter-dispensary sales of cannabis and manufactured cannabis products, established penalties for the unlicensed operation of a medical cannabis dispensary. Additionally, it would have authorized expenditures from the state's Medical Cannabis Registry and Regulation Special Fund to fund programs to help control illegal cannabis and hemp products. The themes of other bills Gov. Green will veto include bills for environmental stewardship, educational access, and public safety. 'Let me be clear: of the 320 bills passed by the Legislature this session, 19 are on our Intent-to-Veto list,' said Gov. Green. 'Our team has completed a review of every measure and the overwhelming majority of legislation will become law. Each bill on today's list is based on thorough legal and fiscal analysis, and as always, was guided by what will best serve the people of Hawai'i, protect our resources and strengthen our future.' Meanwhile, fewer Hawaii residents are using regulated medical cannabis dispensaries and lawmakers worry that they resorting to unlicensed CBD stores and the black market. For the time being, legislation is aimed at improving these flaws. Last February, two Hawaii House of Representatives committees approved a bill—HB 1246—that would legalize adult-use cannabis in the state, but the bill was killed in the Hawaii Senate in April.
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Judge recommends approval of site permit for Gopher State Solar near Bird Island, Minnesota
Jun. 10---- An administrative law judge overseeing the permit application process for a proposed utility-scale solar farm in Renville County is recommending its approval. Judge Kristien R.E. Butler in findings filed June 2 recommended that the Public Utilities Commission approve a site permit for the Gopher State Solar Project. Butler found that the project meets environmental and other requirements, and that Gopher State Solar made commitments to address issues raised by and a neighboring landowner during hearings on the project. The Public Utilities Commission is expected to consider the permit application possibly as early as July, according to information provided at the public hearings. Gopher State Solar is proposing a 200-megawatt solar farm north of Bird Island in Kingman, Osceola and Bird Island townships. The company has secured a 1,645-acre area and will place solar panels on 977 of those acres. The land is currently in agricultural production. The company estimates it will cost $187.75 million to $242.5 million to develop, including construction and all of the associated engineering and permitting needs. It estimates the operation will generate $32 million in tax revenues over an expected 40-year life span. In the findings, Butler addresses the issues raised by the county and neighboring landowners. Renville County has objected to Gopher State Solar's plan to provide a bond to cover an estimated $1.4 million in decommissioning costs. The county stated that it believes the decommissioning costs could be as high as $21 million and that there is no way to know the value of the recycled materials to offset some of those costs. Gopher State Solar has agreed to pay for the costs of an independent engineering analysis of the potential decommissioning costs as part of its permit. Butler noted the company's offer to address the county's concerns and includes it as part of the proposed permit. Butler also cited the visual aesthetic concerns raised by the owners of a residential property located in close proximity to the project site. He recommended the permit include the company's commitment to work with the property owners to address screening needs by planting trees. Butler found that the noise of the transformers and inverters from the site should not adversely affect the residential site. The distance is sufficient that the expected sound level will be below the threshold of human hearing, according to the finding. The judge's finding also acknowledged the potential that the project could affect property values, but stated the impact cannot be known. If its permit application is approved by the PUC, Gopher State Solar expects that construction would start in the spring of 2027 and the site would be in commercial operation in late 2029. More about the project can be found on the Minnesota Department of Commerce website at under the tab that includes solar farms. Look under open projects to find a link to the permit application and supporting documents.
