Explained: Why Southampton vs Arsenal Isn't on TV in the UK Today
Why Southampton vs Arsenal Is Not on TV in the UK Today
As the Premier League season draws to a close, all eyes are naturally on the biggest narratives of the final day. Yet, for Arsenal supporters keen to watch their side sign off against Southampton, the news is not what they might have hoped for — the match is not being televised live in the UK.
Advertisement
While other fixtures with higher stakes have been selected for broadcast, this particular match has slipped through the net, leaving fans to search for highlights or follow via live updates. It is a curious yet entirely logical outcome in a season where broadcasting priorities are increasingly driven by final-day drama.
Arsenal's Season Concludes Quietly on the South Coast
Arsenal arrive at St Mary's having already secured a second-place finish in the Premier League and with it, a return to the Champions League. Their 1-0 victory over Newcastle in the penultimate round was a case of businesslike execution, underlining the progress made under Mikel Arteta, even if the title challenge ultimately fizzled out sooner than many had hoped.
Photo: IMAGO
What's left is a match devoid of consequence, at least from a standings perspective. Southampton, long relegated, have endured a dismal campaign, and for them, this final fixture is more a formality than a farewell parade. For Arsenal, the game serves as a punctuation mark to what has been a season of tangible improvement yet lingering frustration.
TV Rights and the Final-Day Puzzle
So why isn't Southampton vs Arsenal on TV in the UK?
Advertisement
The answer lies in how final-day broadcast rights are allocated. Sky Sports, which had the first two picks, opted to show Liverpool vs Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest vs Chelsea — matches where the result carries significant weight in the race for European qualification.
Liverpool, crowned Premier League champions, will lift the trophy at Anfield. That ceremony, plus the atmosphere surrounding it, guarantees compelling television. Meanwhile, Forest and Chelsea are both still mathematically in the fight for a Champions League place, making their encounter another prime selection.
TNT Sports, with the third choice, selected Manchester United vs Aston Villa. Again, it is a match laced with narrative tension. Villa, still harbouring hopes of European football, must beat a wounded United side, bruised from their Europa League final loss to Tottenham.
All of which leaves Arsenal, already confirmed runners-up and facing a Southampton side with nothing to play for, as an afterthought — at least in the eyes of broadcasters.
Advertisement
Need a VPN to watch the match? Our preferred VPN to watch UK TV from anywhere is LibertyShield.com – they offer a 48 hour no-obligation free trial and have apps or all popular devices including Mac, Windows, FireTV, iPhone/iPad and Android.
Premier League's Broadcast Focus Reflects Drama, Not Prestige
That Arsenal, one of the biggest clubs in England, are not on TV on the final day might seem surprising. Yet it's a reflection of how live broadcast decisions are made. Prestige and pedigree alone no longer guarantee coverage. Stakes matter more than status.
With five clubs still in the mix for Champions League qualification, broadcasters are naturally drawn to fixtures with live permutations. That Southampton vs Arsenal is a 'dead rubber' is not a slight on the Gunners, but rather a sign of how broadcast priorities are evolving.
Arsenal's Attention Turns to Summer and Beyond
For Arsenal supporters, the lack of TV coverage is a minor annoyance in what has otherwise been a year of forward momentum. A return to Europe's elite competition has been achieved, and while the Premier League title remains elusive, the squad and style of play offer genuine reasons for optimism.
Advertisement
Mikel Arteta now faces a crucial summer. Recruitment will be key, particularly with Champions League football on the horizon. There's also the need to deepen the squad, sharpen the attack, and instil the sort of resilience that saw Manchester City pull away in the title run-in.
As for today, the match may be off-screen for UK fans, but its implications — however minimal — still form part of the broader Premier League tapestry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
🌎 The Club World Cup guide to...Porto
Our guide to all 32 clubs participating at the FIFA Club World Cup continues. You can check out the full list so far here. Today we're looking How did they qualify for the Club World Cup? 📸 Alex Livesey - 2004 Getty Images Advertisement Porto are a club with great European pedigree, having won the European Cup in 1987 and the Champions League in 2004. They qualified for the Club World Cup via the UEFA ranking pathway thanks to some strong Champions League showings between 2021 and 2024. History at the Club World Cup Porto have never played at the Club World Cup but did win the Intercontinental Cup in 1987 (beating Uruguayan side Peñarol 2-1 after extra-time in a one-off match) and in 2004 (beating Colombian outfit Once Caldas in a penalty shoot-out). How did they perform in the 2024/25 season? It's been a tough campaign for Porto with the Portuguese giants finishing third in their domestic campaign, failing to win any of the cups and getting knocked out of the Europa League and the first post-group stage hurdle. Who is the coach? 📸 Hector Vivas - 2025 Getty Images Advertisement Argentine coach Martín Anselmi has only been in charge of Porto since January 2025, having previously coached in Chile, Ecuador and Mexico respectively. He has a reputation as a progressive, detail-oriented manager focused on high-intensity, possession-based football. Who is their star player? 📸 Octavio Passos - 2024 Getty Images Spain international forward Samu Aghehowa will be one to watch at the Club World Cup. Since joining Porto from Atlético de Madrid in the summer of 2024, the 20-year-old has been in impressive form, scoring 25 goals in 42 games, earning himself a call-up to Spain's senior squad last November, having won a gold medal for La Roja at the 2024 summer Olympic Games. Expected performance at the Club World Cup The Dragões will fancy their chances of emerging from Group A, where they will face Al Ahly, Inter Miami and Palmeiras. Advertisement But a disappointing season on the domestic front means it's difficult to imagine them doing much in the knockout stages, if indeed they get that far. A quarter-final berth would represent a solid achievement. 📸 FILIPE AMORIM - AFP or licensors
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
The World Cup of underrated Arsenal players
Who is the most underrated player in Arsenal's recent history? Ian Stone is joined by Amy Lawrence, Adrian Clarke and James McNicholas for a special Handbrake Off, in which the panel attempt to pick the player who has done the most for the club with the least fanfare. Ian, Amy, Adrian, James and The Athletic's Art de Roché gave producer Jay names of the Arsenal players they believe should be in the conversation. The only names they were aware of pre-recording were those they submitted individually. Advertisement The players were drawn out of a hat in knockout competition style, going up against each other head to head being put to a vote each time. In the spirit of the confusing Club World Cup, the tournament began with 17 names, meaning one had to be eliminated immediately. This left the panel deliberating on what it means to be underrated… Ian: We've got to get rid of one name who we believe is so terrible that he's not underrated. James: Or that he's too rated! It's funny because by definition the most underrated players won't be on this list. Adrian: Well I've got to say I put Alexis Sanchez in there because I think he is much much better than he is remembered for among Arsenal supporters. Amy: I think he's still my son's favourite player so I think he's quite highly rated in our house. James: It's hard because 'underrated', it's all relative isn't it. You could be an average player with a lot of positive perception, it's not necessarily about you ability it's about how you're perceived. Ian: I cannot believe Alexis Sanchez is even on the table… Adrian: Don't get me wrong I rate Alexis, that's why I put him in there. I just don't think he's as rated among certain sections of the support, as he should be. That for me is the ultimate underrated player. The round of 16 began as follows… Tune in to The Arsenal World Cup of underrated players on The Athletic's Arsenal podcast, Handbrake Off to find out who the team crowned as their underrated champion, and let us know in the comments below who your choice would be. (Top photo of Alexis Sanchez and Santi Cazorla: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images)
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Kamara, Rogers, Martinez – Who should Aston Villa sell?
Stories of Aston Villa's profit and sustainability problems are bordering on the monotonous. It is a matter well-told and widely reported, but few know what it takes to fix the deficit in Villa's accounts, thought to be around £50million ($67m) after failing to qualify for the Champions League. Factor in Villa having to distinctly reduce their wage bill to comply with UEFA's Squad Cost Rule (SCR), then the water becomes even murkier. Advertisement Rules dictate that 'spending on player and coach wages and transfers and agent fees' must be capped at 70 per cent of a club's revenue from the 2025-26 season onwards. Villa are expected to incur a substantial fine from UEFA following last season's breaches and if guilty this time, could face points deductions. Club sources, who have spoken on the condition of anonymity, state Villa's wage-to-turnover costs are projected in the mid-eighties, meaning they will have to remove further salaries from the books. In some respects, UEFA's (SCR) — with Villa participating in the Europa League next season — is more alarming than PSR. So, with Villa needing to sell, who should be the player(s) to go? Please allow The Athletic to argue with itself… At the end of last season, Martinez felt his race was run at Villa, hence the tears following the final home match against Tottenham Hotspur. The Athletic reported last month that an exit was the likely direction of travel, yet no move can materialise unless a club makes an offer. Saudi Arabian sides have expressed an interest but this, as it stands, does not entice Martinez, who aims to continue playing at the highest level while his wife, Amanda, has businesses in England. The argument for his sale: Martinez is 32, his performances showed a stark decline last season and his exit would help Villa with PSR — due to fetching a significant fee — plus SCR, with the Argentina international the squad's highest earner. Against: Villa are unlikely to find an oven-ready replacement as large a presence or with Martinez's charisma and pedigree. A replacement would be costly, especially as Villa also require a No 2. Digne, 32 in July, is on Atletico Madrid's list of left-back options, alongside Andy Robertson. Villa accept PSR means they cannot carry top-level players in the same position, with the salaries at left back — between Digne and Ian Maatsen — far too high. Digne's contract expires next summer and no talks have started. For: He is on a £120,000 a week, has a year left and Villa boast a £37.5m signing in Maatsen waiting to stand in. Against: Despite Maatsen waiting, he is young, defensively vulnerable compared to Digne and has not yet shown he can be trusted to play every week, especially in important games. Digne's exit would not fix Villa's financial problems entirely, even though the other left-back, Alex Moreno, has been told he can leave. Advertisement Kamara adores playing for Unai Emery but not securing Champions League football has increased uncertainty. A contract has been on the table for several months and is still unsigned. European and Saudi clubs have asked to be kept informed of discussions, with Kamara keeping his options open. For: With two years left on his deal, this is the final window to sell Kamara for a substantial fee. He has had injury issues since joining in 2022 and with club record signing Amadou Onana — who, admittedly, has received his own speculation — plus other alternatives, Villa are well-stocked in midfield. Against: Many close observers believe the Frenchman is Villa's most important player. He is the midfield anchor and critical to Emery's structure. There is an acceptance that Bailey will leave, barring interest shown not materialising. His representatives have discussed moving to Saudi Arabia, with Villa keen to grant a departure. For: The winger's form has fallen off a cliff since extending his contract in February 2024. The 27-year-old scored just twice last season as faith dwindled and he looked void of confidence. Against: Like Digne, Bailey's sale will not be the instant remedy for the financial complexities. Villa will need to replace him — they have approached Real Betis for Jesus Rodriguez — adding to the list of tasks in this window. Ramsey has long been a potential fall guy in helping to arrest the PSR issues. As a homegrown product, the 24-year-old midfielder offers pure bookable profit. However, injury issues and failing to hit the heights of when he first broke through have seen his market value decrease. For: When he has been available, performances have been solid, though not eye-catching. Villa have shown they can live without him and have solid alternatives in the left No 10 role. Against: One of Villa's own. Being an academy graduate gives him an emotional connection as well as appearing as a homegrown talent, vital for when Villa register their Europa League squad. If Ramsey can recapture form, his value will rise considerably again. If he stays, a new deal is not out of the question. Advertisement Rogers is Villa's greatest asset. He has several Premier League suitors, who know they will have to pay a sizeable fee to land him. Villa do not want to sell Rogers, owing to his talent ceiling, importance and that he can play multiple positions across the frontline, which is handy in a trimmed squad next season. Yet, money talks. For: Villa will solve their PSR at the click of a finger. Rogers would provide a considerable profit on the £15m paid for him from Middlesbrough in January 2024. Against: The 22-year-old is not on a huge salary, so this aspect can be managed. The player he is and can become is frightening — Emery would love to keep working with a talent who contributes so much. Villa rejected a £40m offer from Arsenal in January. The club were not pleased with the timing of the story surfacing hours before a crucial Champions League fixture against Celtic and dismissed the overall package, offered to be paid in several instalments. Watkins was behind Jhon Duran and then Marcus Rashford at different times last season, which caused frustration and created doubts over his future. Tellingly, Villa were not totally opposed to selling him in January, before Duran left for Al Nassr for €77m (£64.3m, $79.9m). For: Watkins is 29 and this summer may be the last chance for a big move. Emery has begun to show he is prepared for life without Watkins, instead picking Rashford in crucial games after the England international's form dipped. Against: How many players on the market consistently score 15 or more league goals a season? Despite his form concerns, niggling injuries and time out of the starting XI, Watkins was still Villa's top scorer. Replacing him would be a chasmic task, financially and from a scouting perspective, especially with no Duran in the squad or a striker of his ilk. It remains to be seen if any team is prepared to stump up the cash to persuade Villa to sell, so keeping Watkins would be the safe option.
