Texas startup sells plastic-eating fungi diapers to tackle landfill waste
AUSTIN, June 19 — Could baby poop and fungi work together to tackle landfill waste?
That's the idea behind a new product launched by an Austin, Texas-based startup that sells disposable diapers paired with fungi intended to break down the plastic.
Each of Hiro Technologies' MycoDigestible Diapers comes with a packet of fungi to be added to the dirty diaper before it is thrown in the trash.
After a week or two, the fungi are activated by moisture from feces, urine and the environment to begin the process of biodegradation.
Disposable diapers contribute significantly to landfill waste.
An estimated 4 million tons of diapers were disposed of in the United States in 2018, with no significant recycling or composting, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Diapers take hundreds of years to naturally break down.
That means the very first disposable diaper ever used is still in a landfill somewhere.
To tackle this, Hiro Technologies turned to fungi.
These organisms — which include mushrooms, molds, yeasts and mildew — derive nutrients from decomposing organic matter.
In 2011, Yale University researchers discovered a type of fungus in Ecuador that can feed on polyurethane, a common polymer in plastic products.
They figured the fungus, Pestalotiopsis microspora, would be capable of surviving on plastic in environments lacking oxygen, like landfills.
Hiro Technologies co-founder Tero Isokauppila, a Finnish entrepreneur who also founded medicinal mushroom company Four Sigmatic, said there are more than 100 species of fungi now known to break down plastics.
'Many, many moons ago, fungi evolved to break down trees, especially this hard-to-break-down compound in trees called lignin. ... Its carbon backbone is very similar to the carbon backbone of plastics because essentially they're made out of the same thing,' Isokauppila said.
Three sealed jars at Hiro Technologies' lab show the stages of decomposition of a treated diaper over time.
By nine months, the product appears as black soil — 'just digested plastic and essentially earth,' Isokauppila said.
The company says it needs to do more research to find out how the product will decompose in real-world conditions in different climates and hopes to have the data to make a 'consumer-facing claim' by next year.
It also plans to experiment with plastic-eating fungi on adult diapers, feminine care products and other items.
For now, it is selling 'diaper bundles' for US$35 a week online.
Co-founder Miki Agrawal, who was also behind period underwear company Thinx, said the MycoDigestible Diapers had been generating excitement from consumers and investors since launching about a month ago, declining to give details.
Agrawal said the company had chosen to focus on diapers as the top household plastic waste item.
'There is a deleterious lasting effect that we haven't really thought about and considered,' Agrawal said.
'Because when you throw something away, no one's asking themselves, 'Where's away?'' — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
‘I told them I was allergic': Passenger sues Singapore Airlines after shrimp meal triggers emergency landing
SINGAPORE, June 20 — A Singapore Airlines flight from Germany to the United States was forced to make an emergency landing in France last October after a business class passenger suffered a severe allergic reaction to shrimp — a food she had warned cabin crew she could not consume. The passenger, Doreen Benary, 41, has since filed a negligence lawsuit against Singapore Airlines in a US federal court, according to court documents dated June 17, as reported by Mothership. Benary boarded Flight SQ026 from Frankfurt to New York on October 8, 2024. In her complaint, she alleged that she had informed flight attendants of her 'specific' allergy to shrimp at the start of the flight. 'Despite the aforesaid warnings,' a crew member allegedly served her a meal containing shrimp, the lawsuit stated. Benary reportedly began to feel unwell 'nearly immediately' after consuming part of the meal. When she alerted the crew, the flight attendant admitted to the mistake and apologised, according to the complaint. The aircraft was then diverted to Paris, where Benary received emergency medical care at two separate facilities. The lawsuit described the treatment as 'painful', and claimed the incident left Benary with 'great pain, agony, and mental anguish' as well as financial losses. It was not stated whether Benary was carrying an epinephrine injector, commonly used to treat severe allergic reactions. The lawsuit accuses Singapore Airlines of breaching its duty of care and failing to follow its own safety protocols. The airline has yet to respond publicly to the allegations. This is not the first time the airline has faced scrutiny over allergy incidents. In 2017, a toddler with a severe peanut allergy began vomiting on board a Singapore Airlines flight after peanut snacks were opened nearby. In response, the airline stopped serving peanuts as snacks across all cabin classes in April 2018. These were replaced with alternatives such as peas and crackers. While Singapore Airlines offers passengers the option to request non-strict nut-free meals at least 48 hours before departure, it does not guarantee an allergy-free environment on board. On its website, the airline advises travellers with severe allergies to consult their doctor prior to flying and to take necessary precautions. 'We request that you take every necessary precaution, bearing in mind the risk of exposure,' the advisory reads.
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
Elon Musk's SpaceX Starship explodes during ‘routine' Texas test, no injuries reported
HOUSTON, June 19 — One of tech billionaire Elon Musk's SpaceX Starships exploded during a routine test late yesterday in Texas, law enforcement said, adding that no one was injured. The Starship 36 suffered 'catastrophic failure and exploded' at the Starbase launch facility shortly after 11pm (0400 GMT Thursday), a Facebook post by the Cameron County authorities said. Musk's Space X said the rocket was preparing for the tenth flight test when it 'experienced a major anomaly while on a test stand at Starbase'. 'A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for,' Space X added on social media. 'There are no hazards to residents in surrounding communities, and we ask that individuals do not attempt to approach the area while safing operations continue.' Starbase on the south Texas coast, near the border with Mexico, is the headquarters for Musk's space project. Standing 123m tall, Starship is the world's largest and most powerful rocket and central to Musk's long-term vision of colonizing Mars. The latest setback follows an explosion of a prototype Starship over the Indian Ocean in late May. The biggest and most powerful launch vehicle ever built had lifted off on May 27 from the Starbase facility, but the first-stage Super Heavy booster blew up instead of executing its planned splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico. The previous two outings also ended poorly, with the upper stage disintegrating over the Caribbean. — AFP
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
US Supreme Court upholds Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for trans minors
WASHINGTON, June 19 — The US Supreme Court yesterday upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors — an issue at the heart of the American culture wars. The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18. The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented. Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country. 'This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field,' wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion. 'The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees,' Roberts said. 'It does not. Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.' The Supreme Court heard the case in December and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others. Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19. While there is no US-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures. Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) said it 'sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine.' 'Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus,' the AAP said. 'Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, it robs them of basic human dignity.' 'Must end' The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, welcomed the ruling as a 'huge win for children' and a 'step toward ending dangerous experiments on kids.' During oral arguments in December, Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court the law was designed to 'protect minors from risky, unproven medical interventions' with 'often irreversible and life-altering consequences.' Chase Strangio, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a Memphis-based doctor, countered that the law has 'taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering.' 'What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment,' said Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court. Trump, in his inauguration speech, said his government would henceforth only recognize two genders — male and female — and he issued his executive order a week later restricting gender transition procedures for minors. 'Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children,' the executive order said. 'This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end.' Trump's order said it would now be US policy that it would 'not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another.' The order bars funding for gender transition under the Medicaid health insurance program for poor families, the Medicare scheme used by retirees, and Defence Department health insurance that covers some two million children. According to a study by UCLA's Williams Institute, an estimated 1.6 million people aged 13 and older in the United States identify as transgender. — AFP
