‘I told them I was allergic': Passenger sues Singapore Airlines after shrimp meal triggers emergency landing
SINGAPORE, June 20 — A Singapore Airlines flight from Germany to the United States was forced to make an emergency landing in France last October after a business class passenger suffered a severe allergic reaction to shrimp — a food she had warned cabin crew she could not consume.
The passenger, Doreen Benary, 41, has since filed a negligence lawsuit against Singapore Airlines in a US federal court, according to court documents dated June 17, as reported by Mothership.
Benary boarded Flight SQ026 from Frankfurt to New York on October 8, 2024. In her complaint, she alleged that she had informed flight attendants of her 'specific' allergy to shrimp at the start of the flight.
'Despite the aforesaid warnings,' a crew member allegedly served her a meal containing shrimp, the lawsuit stated.
Benary reportedly began to feel unwell 'nearly immediately' after consuming part of the meal.
When she alerted the crew, the flight attendant admitted to the mistake and apologised, according to the complaint.
The aircraft was then diverted to Paris, where Benary received emergency medical care at two separate facilities.
The lawsuit described the treatment as 'painful', and claimed the incident left Benary with 'great pain, agony, and mental anguish' as well as financial losses.
It was not stated whether Benary was carrying an epinephrine injector, commonly used to treat severe allergic reactions.
The lawsuit accuses Singapore Airlines of breaching its duty of care and failing to follow its own safety protocols. The airline has yet to respond publicly to the allegations.
This is not the first time the airline has faced scrutiny over allergy incidents.
In 2017, a toddler with a severe peanut allergy began vomiting on board a Singapore Airlines flight after peanut snacks were opened nearby.
In response, the airline stopped serving peanuts as snacks across all cabin classes in April 2018. These were replaced with alternatives such as peas and crackers.
While Singapore Airlines offers passengers the option to request non-strict nut-free meals at least 48 hours before departure, it does not guarantee an allergy-free environment on board.
On its website, the airline advises travellers with severe allergies to consult their doctor prior to flying and to take necessary precautions.
'We request that you take every necessary precaution, bearing in mind the risk of exposure,' the advisory reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
2 hours ago
- Daily Express
Paediatrician sues SIA over shrimp allergy incident mid-flight
Published on: Friday, June 20, 2025 Published on: Fri, Jun 20, 2025 Text Size: For illustrative purposes only. - Getty Images SINGAPORE: A New York-based paediatrician is suing Singapore Airlines (SIA) after allegedly being served shrimp despite informing the cabin crew of her shellfish allergy, The Straits Times reported. According to a lawsuit filed in the US District Court, Dr Doreen Benary, 41, was flying Business Class on SIA flight SQ026 from Frankfurt to New York on 8 October 2024 when she consumed a meal that reportedly contained shrimp. Advertisement She began feeling unwell shortly after eating and was told by a crew member that a mistake had been made, prompting an emergency diversion to Paris where she received medical treatment. Benary claims she suffered a severe allergic reaction and is seeking unspecified damages for physical pain, mental anguish, and diminished quality of life. SIA declined to comment on the case, citing ongoing court proceedings, while Benary's lawyer also withheld remarks pending her consent. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘I told them I was allergic': Passenger sues Singapore Airlines after shrimp meal triggers emergency landing
SINGAPORE, June 20 — A Singapore Airlines flight from Germany to the United States was forced to make an emergency landing in France last October after a business class passenger suffered a severe allergic reaction to shrimp — a food she had warned cabin crew she could not consume. The passenger, Doreen Benary, 41, has since filed a negligence lawsuit against Singapore Airlines in a US federal court, according to court documents dated June 17, as reported by Mothership. Benary boarded Flight SQ026 from Frankfurt to New York on October 8, 2024. In her complaint, she alleged that she had informed flight attendants of her 'specific' allergy to shrimp at the start of the flight. 'Despite the aforesaid warnings,' a crew member allegedly served her a meal containing shrimp, the lawsuit stated. Benary reportedly began to feel unwell 'nearly immediately' after consuming part of the meal. When she alerted the crew, the flight attendant admitted to the mistake and apologised, according to the complaint. The aircraft was then diverted to Paris, where Benary received emergency medical care at two separate facilities. The lawsuit described the treatment as 'painful', and claimed the incident left Benary with 'great pain, agony, and mental anguish' as well as financial losses. It was not stated whether Benary was carrying an epinephrine injector, commonly used to treat severe allergic reactions. The lawsuit accuses Singapore Airlines of breaching its duty of care and failing to follow its own safety protocols. The airline has yet to respond publicly to the allegations. This is not the first time the airline has faced scrutiny over allergy incidents. In 2017, a toddler with a severe peanut allergy began vomiting on board a Singapore Airlines flight after peanut snacks were opened nearby. In response, the airline stopped serving peanuts as snacks across all cabin classes in April 2018. These were replaced with alternatives such as peas and crackers. While Singapore Airlines offers passengers the option to request non-strict nut-free meals at least 48 hours before departure, it does not guarantee an allergy-free environment on board. On its website, the airline advises travellers with severe allergies to consult their doctor prior to flying and to take necessary precautions. 'We request that you take every necessary precaution, bearing in mind the risk of exposure,' the advisory reads.
Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Some Singapore diners petition for free tap water where service charge is imposed
SINGAPORE, June 20 — A petition calling for food and beverage (F&B) outlets in Singapore to serve free tap water to diners has gained momentum, with more than 900 people signing on since it launched on May 24. The petition, hosted on appeals to the Singapore government to require restaurants that already impose a 10 per cent service charge to offer what petitioners describe as a 'basic necessity' without additional cost. Its creator, Dr Yee Yucai, a consultant with the Internal Medicine department at Singapore General Hospital, said the initiative was sparked by what he sees as a growing trend of restaurants pushing customers to purchase drinks instead of offering free water — despite official efforts to curb sugar intake. 'The last straw that broke the camel's back for me was when I recently brought my family to an expensive buffet, about US$60 (RM200) per person,' he told AsiaOne yesterday. 'And they had the audacity not to serve water and instead requiring us to pay an extra US$5 for free-flow beverages. I thought it was going too far.' According to the 2022 National Nutrition Survey, Singaporeans consume an average of 56g of sugar daily, with more than half of that intake coming from sweetened drinks. The idea of mandating complimentary tap water at eateries is not new. In 2021, Singapore MP Christopher de Souza asked whether restaurants could be required to provide free table water, highlighting the safety of Singapore's tap water. During this year's Budget debate in March, Workers' Party MP Gerald Giam also raised the issue, urging Singapore's Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) to work with F&B outlets, hawker centres and shopping malls to offer low-cost or free drinking water as a standard practice. In response, Singapore's Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu pushed back against the idea of making it compulsory under the Environmental Public Health Act, citing the cost implications for businesses. 'While Singapore's water is safe to drink straight from the tap, it is not free as food and beverage (F&B) establishments have to pay for the water,' she reportedly told Parliament. 'They also incur cost in providing table water such as cost of washing the glasses and containers and in serving the water.' Dr Yee said he was unaware the topic had previously been brought up in Parliament and expressed disappointment that the proposal appeared to have been 'sort of dismissed'. While acknowledging the ministry's and businesses' concerns, he believes the added cost to F&B outlets is marginal. Citing data from the Public Utilities Board, Dr Yee calculated that two cups of tap water — roughly 400ml — would cost just 0.13 cents per person based on Singapore's non-domestic water rate of US$3.24 per cubic metre. 'This is negligible when compared to water used for cooking, washing, and other operational needs,' he said. 'I feel something like this [eateries providing free water] is considered a necessity, a basic service.'
