Child custody case: Allahabad HC directs Maharashtra DGP, Pune CJM to declare father absconder
The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court has directed the Maharashtra director general of police (DGP) and the Pune chief judicial magistrate (CJM) to initiate proceedings under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) to declare a man an absconder after he repeatedly failed to produce his three-year-old child before the court in a habeas corpus plea filed by the child's mother.
Justice Rajeev Singh, presiding over the vacation bench, on June 12 also ordered the attachment of the father's property under Sections 84 and 85 of the BNSS (corresponding to Sections 82 and 83 of the CrPC), emphasising the urgency of securing his appearance. The court listed the matter for the next hearing on August 1, 2025.
The petitioner, the child's mother, had approached the court last year alleging that the father, originally from Ayodhya and currently residing in Pune, had taken away the child illegally from her lawful custody and denied her access to the child. She maintained that only she could care for the child due to the child's age and well-being.
The court expressed strong displeasure over the father's conduct, noting that although he appeared on some earlier dates, he later began evading the court.
Despite multiple directions, he has failed to present the child, prompting the bench to issue a non-bailable warrant (NBW) on a previous occasion.
However, when Pune police attempted to execute the NBW, they found the father missing, and a missing person report was filed by his mother.
The court further ordered the senior registrar to communicate its June 12 order/ directions to the Maharashtra DGP and the Pune CJM for immediate compliance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Calcutta HC restraints Bengal from paying monthly stipend to sacked non-teaching staff
The Calcutta High Court on Friday directed the West Bengal government to stop paying monthly stipends to a group of non-teaching staff who had been sacked after the Supreme Court in April found irregularities in the 2016 recruitment process, Live Law reported. On June 9, Justice Amrita Sinha had reserved the judgement in the matter but had stayed the state government's plan to provide monthly stipends of Rs 20,000 to Rs 25,000 to the persons. In its Friday order, the court reinforced that restriction, prohibiting such payments till at least September 26. Sinha issued the direction on a writ petition challenging the provision of the allowance to the staff whose services had been terminated. The petition was filed by a candidate on the waitlist who was not recruited despite being on the merit list, allegedly due to irregularities in the hiring process. On April 3, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's April 2024 order terminating the appointment of about 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff by West Bengal's School Service Commission. The bench passed the order after observing that the recruitment process was 'vitiated by manipulation and fraud'. The top court on April 17 permitted 'untainted' teachers to be retained until the end of the academic year or until fresh appointments are made, whichever was earlier. However, it did not grant relief to the non-teaching staff, or Group C and Group D employees, whose appointments were also cancelled. In response, the state government had announced in April that the sacked non-teaching staff would receive a monthly allowance until the Supreme Court delivered a verdict on its review petitions. On Friday, the High Court criticised the state for attempting to financially assist individuals whose employment had been declared fraudulent by the Supreme Court and directed 'tainted' candidates to 'refund any salary/payment received', Live Law reported. By introducing a stipend scheme, the state was undermining the Supreme Court's decision, the High Court observed. 'Once the highest court of the land has decided the issue of illegal appointment conclusively and opined that the appointments were result of fraud, no person who was the beneficiary of a fraudulent act of the statutory authority ought to be provided any support, that too, from the public exchequer,' the court said. The court also instructed the state government to submit its counter-affidavit addressing the petitioners' claims within four weeks, and allowed the petitioners two weeks after that to file their response, PTI reported. In April 2024, the High Court had passed its direction on the termination of the appointments based on the findings of a re-evaluation of the Optical Mark Recognition sheets from the 2016 recruitment examination in the case. The re-evaluation found that the selected teachers had been recruited against blank Optical Mark Recognition sheets.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: No headway in Maharashtra man's murder case
Failing to make a breakthrough in a Maharashtra-based devotee's murder a year ago, the police have released the pictures of some of the suspects wanted by the Jagraon police for allegedly poisoning him. The man was found dead during a religious event held in Jagraon in August 2024. However, the Jagraon City police station took five months to register an FIR, that too on the orders of Punjab and Haryana high court. A CCTV grab of one of the wanted suspects released by the Ludhiana rural police. (HT Photo) CCTV grab of the wanted suspects released by the Ludhiana rural police. (HT Photo) The suspects were captured on cameras in the religious event. The police assured that the name and identity of the informer would be concealed. On August 26, 2024, Gurusharanjeet Singh of Nagpur, Maharashtra, and his wife Kawaljeet Kaur had visited a religious site in Jagraon to pay obeisance. At the site, three unknown individuals offered them juice packets as prasad. Both drank the juice, with Gurusharanjeet Singh consuming the entire packet. Moments later, the couple fell unconscious. Kawaljeet Kaur was rushed to a government hospital and regained consciousness after treatment, but her husband was declared dead. Earlier, the police had inquested proceedings under Section 194 of the BNSS. CCTV grab of the wanted suspects released by the Ludhiana rural police. (HT Photo) After the police did not file any case, Kawaljeet moved the high court, alleging that her gold bangles, her husband's gold bracelet and a gold ring were stolen during the incident. Acting on the HC's directive, the police registered a case under Sections 123, 103 and 305 of the BNS which pertain to murder and theft. According to Inspector Varinderpal Singh Uppal, station house officer (SHO) of the Jagraon City police station, said the case was being investigated thoroughly. 'We are pursuing leads and are actively searching for the accused,' he stated. He said some suspects were captured on camera during the event. The reason behind the murder will be ascertained after questioning the suspects, he added. With the release of pictures, the police are hoping to receive information from people about the suspects.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC refuses to confer mother's caste status to 18-yr-old student as his father belongs to Agri community
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Friday refused to grant an 18-year-old student the Scheduled Category (SC) status of his mother as his estranged father belonged to the Other Backward Class (OBC) category. The bench said the student 'was never discriminated against and did not suffer any disadvantages on account of his mother belonging to a Scheduled Caste community.' (Shutterstock) In his petition, the teenager stated that his parents married on April 22, 2004, in Pali, Raigad district. Due to a matrimonial discord, they annulled their marriage by a decree of divorce passed by the Alibag court on July 2, 2016. In 2022-23, when the petitioner enrolled in junior college, his mother applied for his caste certificate as she belonged to the Chambhar community. The competent authority issued a certificate on February 7, 2023, declaring the student belonged to the Chambhar community. The petitioner's college forwarded the caste certificate to the caste scrutiny committee in Raigad for validation, as per the prevailing rules. On April 15, 2024, the scrutiny committee invalidated the caste claim and cancelled the caste certificate, prompting the student to approach the high court. He contended his father belonged to the Hindu Agri community; however, he never cared for his son, who hence did not benefit from it. On the contrary, he claimed, he suffered deprivations, indignities, and humiliation for being a member of the SC community. The argument, however, failed to impress the bench of Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Justice Dr Neela Gokhale. According to the vigilance report, there was no evidence that the 18-year-old did not face the challenges suffered by a person from the Chambar community. The bench rejected the student's petition based on the vigilance report. 'His maternal grandparents neither appear to be living in a backward area nor are their living conditions bereft of necessities, food, clean water, sanitation, and health care. Their lifestyle is satisfactory,' the court said. 'The scrutiny committee, therefore, concluded that the petitioner did not suffer any humiliation nor was he deprived of a good education.' As he had an advantageous start in life without suffering from any disability, the bench said they were unable to accept that he was eligible to be declared as a person from the Chambhar community.
