Calcutta HC restraints Bengal from paying monthly stipend to sacked non-teaching staff
The Calcutta High Court on Friday directed the West Bengal government to stop paying monthly stipends to a group of non-teaching staff who had been sacked after the Supreme Court in April found irregularities in the 2016 recruitment process, Live Law reported.
On June 9, Justice Amrita Sinha had reserved the judgement in the matter but had stayed the state government's plan to provide monthly stipends of Rs 20,000 to Rs 25,000 to the persons.
In its Friday order, the court reinforced that restriction, prohibiting such payments till at least September 26.
Sinha issued the direction on a writ petition challenging the provision of the allowance to the staff whose services had been terminated. The petition was filed by a candidate on the waitlist who was not recruited despite being on the merit list, allegedly due to irregularities in the hiring process.
On April 3, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's April 2024 order terminating the appointment of about 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff by West Bengal's School Service Commission. The bench passed the order after observing that the recruitment process was 'vitiated by manipulation and fraud'.
The top court on April 17 permitted 'untainted' teachers to be retained until the end of the academic year or until fresh appointments are made, whichever was earlier. However, it did not grant relief to the non-teaching staff, or Group C and Group D employees, whose appointments were also cancelled.
In response, the state government had announced in April that the sacked non-teaching staff would receive a monthly allowance until the Supreme Court delivered a verdict on its review petitions.
On Friday, the High Court criticised the state for attempting to financially assist individuals whose employment had been declared fraudulent by the Supreme Court and directed 'tainted' candidates to 'refund any salary/payment received', Live Law reported.
By introducing a stipend scheme, the state was undermining the Supreme Court's decision, the High Court observed.
'Once the highest court of the land has decided the issue of illegal appointment conclusively and opined that the appointments were result of fraud, no person who was the beneficiary of a fraudulent act of the statutory authority ought to be provided any support, that too, from the public exchequer,' the court said.
The court also instructed the state government to submit its counter-affidavit addressing the petitioners' claims within four weeks, and allowed the petitioners two weeks after that to file their response, PTI reported.
In April 2024, the High Court had passed its direction on the termination of the appointments based on the findings of a re-evaluation of the Optical Mark Recognition sheets from the 2016 recruitment examination in the case.
The re-evaluation found that the selected teachers had been recruited against blank Optical Mark Recognition sheets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Disturbed Areas Act: HC directs Vadodara police to redress grievance of petitioner seeking to ‘enjoy property' bought in 2020
Stating that 'it is the duty of the state to maintain law and order', the Gujarat High Court has directed the Vadodara city police to remedy the grievance of a petitioner seeking police protection to 'enjoy their property' — four years after it ruled in favour of the petitioners following a controversy under the Disturbed Areas Act. In an oral order on June 19, Justice HD Suthar stated, 'Considering the orders passed in Special Criminal Application, Review Application as well as in Letters Patent Appeal, it appears that as the petitioners are owners of the property in question and they want to enjoy their property, (they) have approached the authority, more particularly the Police Inspector, Panigate Police Station, Vadodara on July 7, 2024… till date, nothing has been done…' According to the order, 'In view of the facts of the case and looking to the grievance of the petitioner, the respondent authority concerned is hereby directed to redress the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law as it is the duty of the State to maintain the law and order. If any adverse outcome is there, the petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum.' The owners of the property, Onali Ezazuddin Dholkawal and Iqbal Hussain Asgarali Tinwala, had moved the court in 2024 seeking directions against the Vadodara city police, particularly Panigate police station, 'to facilitate and effectuate the petitioners to enter and use their commercial property and repair and rehabilitate it'. The petitioners cited notices received from the Vadodara Municipal Corporation (VMC) with warning of the property being in a dilapidated condition and ordered it to be repaired during the period of the long-drawn litigation under the Disturbed Areas Act with multiple petitions. 'The petitioners were receiving notices dated July 1, 2019, September 24, 2021, and June 26, 2023, along with undated notices affixed on the premises by VMC as the property is in a dilapidated condition and is dangerous for the neighbours. But since the petitioners were not being allowed to enter inside the property, the petitioners could not take any steps for the same,' the petition stated. Stating that the petitioners requested police protection to enter the property by way of representation dated October 9, 2021, and also filed a written complaint against the neighbours in April 2022, the petitions stated, 'But somehow, the protection is not granted and no action was taken by the city police and eventually, the petitioners avoided entering the property in order to prevent any law and order situation or untoward incident… The petitioners sought such police protection last April 2024. But unfortunately, even thereafter the petitioners have not been able to enter and use the property… the neighbours and local corporators are creating hurdles and law and order situation.' The petition pointed out that despite being 'assured police protection', the city police has denied the same 'under one pretext or the other'. The petition stated that on July 22, 2024, accompanied by the city police, the petitioners tried to enter the property but 'the neighbours, along with politically influential persons and particularly local corporators… obstructed the entry of the petitioners in presence of police. The said incident was videographed and thus some of the photographs were also taken, which shows the corporators and other persons objecting to the entry of the petitioners.' Following alleged threats, the petitioners also submitted a written complaint to the police the next day, seeking an FIR, 'which has not been filed.' The petition stated that the Vadodara City police 'failed to discharge their statutory duties and obligations', which has 'resulted in gross violation of the Fundamental Rights of Article 14, 19 and 21 as enshrined under the Constitution of India' and also a violation of the previous orders of the Gujarat HC. The case pertains to a property located in the old city area of Vadodara, which falls under the purview of the The Gujarat Prohibition of Transfer of Immovable Property and Provision for Protection of Tenants from Eviction from Premises in Disturbed Areas Act, 1991, also known as the Disturbed Areas Act. The petitioners had sought permission under the Disturbed Areas Act in August 2016 from the Deputy Collector, Vadodara, which was rejected vide in January 2017. Therefore, the petitioners appealed before the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Appeals), which was also rejected in June 2018. In March 2020, the HC ruled in favour of the petitioners in a Special Civil Application and granted permission under the Disturbed Area Act. Thus, the sale deed of the petitioners' property was registered December 15, 2020. Even as the petitioners were not allowed to enter their property, the HC order in the Special Civil Application was challenged by way of review petition being filed by some private persons who were panchas (independent witnesses) to the panchnama prepared for grant of permission. Some 'disgruntled neighbours' also filed an application for being joined in the said review petition, which was rejected by the Gujarat HC in March 2022. The HC, in August 2023, dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal of private persons and imposed costs of Rs 50,000 on two panchas who had raised an objection to the sale of a property. The HC had questioned the motive of the two panchas and noted that they had made their declaration, expressing their 'no objection' to the transfer in 2016, and hence, the court had upheld the sale to be valid and not a distress sale in March 2020. Commissioner of Police, Vadodara, Narasimha Komar was unavailable for comments on Saturday.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
4-year-old daughter of migrant labourer couple dragged into forest by leopard, found dead
A four-year-old girl from a family of migrant labourers was found dead on Saturday morning, nearly 17 hours after a leopard dragged her into the forested tea estates of the Anamalai Tiger Reserve (ATR), in what officials described as a rare and tragic incident near Valparai in western Tamil Nadu. The child, M Roshini Kumari, had arrived in the Pachamalai estate area with her parents from Jharkhand just a week earlier. Her father, Manoj Munda, and mother, Monica Devi, were newly employed tea estate workers in the hilly region. On Friday evening, around 6.30 pm, Roshini was standing beside her mother, who was fetching water near their line house, when a leopard emerged from the tea bushes and pounced. The child was dragged away in full view of the mother. 'The family raised an alarm, and local workers alerted the nearest forest office. There was an intense overnight search operation that spanned nearly two square kilometres, involving 40 forest personnel, a sniffer dog named Bairava, drone surveillance, and help from local fire and police departments. But there was no sign of the girl until late Friday night,' said a forest range officer who was part of the team. By 11.30 am on Saturday, Roshini's partially eaten body was discovered 700 meters from her home in a eucalyptus grove. The remains were taken to the Valparai Government Hospital for post-mortem. Officials said the department has been preparing to place 20 camera traps to monitor the animal movements in the area by Saturday evening. Roshini's family will receive Rs 50,000 as immediate compensation, with an additional Rs 9.5 lakh expected to be disbursed on Sunday under Tamil Nadu's human-wildlife conflict relief provisions. Official sources said that no bloodstains were initially found at the site due to light drizzle at the time of the attack, complicating the tracking. A local estate worker claimed to have seen the leopard dragging the child, but the dense terrain and presence of other wildlife made the operation especially challenging. The estate has a number of migrant labourers and their families living there. Many have only recently relocated to Valparai for seasonal work. The official said they have started awareness campaigns and urged families not to allow young children outdoors unaccompanied, especially during early morning and evening hours.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Prathidhwani contributes to chief ministers distress relief fund for landslide rehabilitation
Thiruvananthapuram: Prathidhwani, the welfare and recreation forum of IT employees at Technopark, contributed over Rs 28 lakh to the chief minister's distress relief fund (CMDRF) for the rehabilitation of landslide-hit communities at Chooralmala and Mundakkai in Wayanad district. The relief fund was handed over to chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan at his office by state convenor of Prathidhwani Rajeev Krishnan. Prathidhwani president at Technopark Vishnu Rajendran and other office bearers Rahul Chandran, Saneesh KP and Prasanthi PS were also present. Prathidhwani's units in three IT Parks in Kerala — Technopark, Infopark, Kochi, and Cyberpark, Kozhikode — collected the contributions from around 1,156 techies. The amount is intended for building a house (Rs 20 lakh) and other facilities in the township project (Rs 8.67 lakh) for the communities devastated by the massive landslide last year.
