TSA refutes rumors about using Costco cards as an airport ID alternative
The Brief
TSA officials are debunking reports that a Costco membership card can be used at airport security checkpoints.
Officials stressed that the big-box membership card is not an acceptable form of TSA identification.
They said trying to use the cards will result in significant delays for the traveler and others at the checkpoint.
OAKLAND, Calif. - Federal transportation officials are strongly refuting internet rumors that suggest a Costco membership card can be used as a form of identification to get through airport security.
What they're saying
"That is not considered an acceptable form of identification. It's not a government-issued ID," said Transportation Security Administration Spokesperson Lorie Dankers, who noted that the agency has been very clear about what constitutes an acceptable form of identification for air travel, especially in the context of the REAL ID.
The new law replacing the traditional driver's license with a REAL ID-compliant license for domestic air travel went into effect last month after years of delays.
In addition to REAL IDs, other acceptable forms of identification include a passport, a U.S. passport card, a Veteran Health Identification Card, and a Department of Homeland Security trusted traveler card like Global Entry and NEXUS.
"Adult passengers 18 and older must show valid identification at the airport checkpoint in order to travel," the TSA specified on its website, with a list of acceptable IDs.
The agency also noted that the list is subject to change without notice, and advised travelers to recheck it before getting on a flight.
SEE ALSO: Traveling to the UK? You'll need this document to enter the country
Dankers addressed the Costco card rumors by saying that every few months, this fallacy circulates on the internet, and people are misled to believe the membership card will be accepted at TSA security checkpoints. But she warned against depending on a Costco card or any non-governmental card to get you cleared to board a plane.
A Reddit post from last month has gotten a lot of traction with many people discussing their experiences.
"It's mostly click-bait," Dankers said.
She did note that Costco cards and other identification that uses a photo can be used in extreme cases to support those travelers who find themselves in a bind due to lost or stolen identification.
Dankers said that in the situation where a traveler only has a non-governmental-issued photo ID on them, anything from a Costco membership card to a library card or student identification, the cards can be used to establish a launching point in the strict and detailed process of proving their identity.
It's better than not having any form of a photo ID.
"At least we know that some place has given them an ID," the TSA spokesperson explained, while stressing, "That in itself is not considered an acceptable ID but is considered a baseline."
That baseline would allow TSA officials to begin a vetting process, involving a series of verification steps to try and confirm someone's identity.
But travelers are warned that it's not a process anyone would want to go through, as it's time-consuming, and if the person's identity can't be confirmed, they will be denied access to fly.
"There is no upside to doing this because all it does is delay you," Dankers said, adding that it's not only going to delay the traveler without their proper ID on them, but the process can lead to long delays for others.
A TSA agent working on your case will affect the workflow at the checkpoint and threaten the schedules of other travelers who are rushing to catch a flight.
"It causes our resources to be taken," Dankers said, stressing, "It should only be used in the most extreme of cases."
And even then, there's no guarantee your Costco or other non-governmental photo card will lead to a verification of your ID and allow you to get on that flight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mom Refuses to Let Daughter Sleep Over at In-Laws' House. But They Don't Take ‘No' for an Answer
A mother on Reddit is wondering if she's wrong for not letting her in-laws have overnight sleepovers with her 5-year-old daughter Though she's insistent that it's not allowed, partly because they're struggling to get their daughter on a good sleep schedule, her in-laws keep asking Commenters on Reddit pointed out that this could be a red flag for more concerning behaviorA mother on Reddit is wondering if she's in the wrong for continuously denying her in-laws' request to have her 5-year-old daughter over for sleepovers. The mom took to Reddit's r/AmIOverreacting forum to explain the situation, noting that she and her husband "have been together almost 20 years" and welcomed their first child five years ago. "Since basically day one, my in-laws (but specifically FIL) have asked to have sleep overs with her," the mother explains in the post. "FIL is a step parent to my husband so already a bit removed for a grandparent sleepover in my opinion," she continues. "They moved their entire lives to be closer to us after our daughter was born which I initially loved. But they have no sense of boundaries and can be a lot." The decision to deny her in-laws the right to a sleepover isn't just out of concern for her daughter's well-being. The poster explains that her daughter has had issues adjusting to a sleep schedule, and she's worried about throwing it off by allowing sleepovers. "My partner and I are on the same page that we have spent a lot of time on getting her into a good sleep routine but it's not great," she writes. "We'd rather stick with her schedule and let her spend as much time as she wants with them basically." Despite the couple's firm stance, her in-laws "won't leave me alone about the sleepovers." "They stopped asking my husband 'because he said no' yet continue to hound me," she shares. "Am I crazy for thinking it's weird af for adults to be asking/demanding a sleepover with my child?" Regardless of her in-laws' insistence, she clarifies that she's "firmly in the 'no sleepovers for anyone' camp," regardless of family relation. "I'm going to keep her safe first and foremost. But they also make me feel like an a-hole so I guess I'm checking myself." The comments on the post are squarely on the mother's side, with many pointing out that her in-laws' repeated requests to get her daughter alone could be a sign of something more sinister. "When it comes to abuse, the clearest red flag is inisistence and/or manipulation to get alone with a child," one user cautions in the comments. "That is quite often the only red flag you get." Even if the worst-case scenario isn't true, other commenters pointed out that the continued asking is still an indicator that their boundaries won't be respected. "Well I can speak from my experience, my mother is exactly like this. It wasn't abusive in a worst-case scenario, but her insistence on sleep overs and everything happening at their house is because she does not like to be told what to do," another commenter shares. "She does not respect what we say." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Single Dad Says His Siblings ‘Effectively Cut Me Off' After He Started a Relationship with His Kids' Much Younger Au Pair
A widowed father of four began what he thought was a discreet relationship with his kids' 24-year-old au pair His mother found out about the relationship and "went nuclear," telling his siblings that the children were upset Reddit users questioned the judgment of the father for being involved with someone whom he employsA widowed father of four says his relationship with his children's much younger au pair has caused a family rift. In a post on Reddit's 'Am I the A------' forum, the single father, 40, explained that he's been widowed for the past five years and has relied on au pairs and childminders to help provide care. 'I have always treated them well and never had any issues,' he wrote. is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! His mother has also been a help, but he added that their relationship was more fraught. 'We have a complex relationship. She constantly gossips about me and my siblings to each other. She has done this for as long as I can remember,' he said, adding that she goes to his house more than two to three times a week. He is an executive who works long hours for a medium-sized company and uses that time to go to the gym. The man said that last December, his 24-year-old au pair 'confessed she had feelings for me.' He said he rebuffed her due to their age difference and their dynamic in the home. She went away for a month and when she returned after Christmas, 'things went back to normal.' 'However, I confess I did develop feelings for her," he said. "In late February she said her feelings hadn't changed and in her words 'She is a grown a-- woman who knows what she wants' and the age gap doesn't bother her.' The man said he began a 'discreet relationship' with the au pair, but his son and mother both found out. 'My mother suspected something too and my eldest son told her," he said. "My mother went nuclear and told all my siblings what had been going on and that my kids went to her because they were extremely upset about this. This is despite me asking her to respect my privacy and allow me to handle it my way. My mother was shouting, making insinuations about both my au pair and me." The man said that his relationship with his siblings is now compromised. 'My siblings have all effectively cut me off and I was uninvited to my brother's housewarming after he got his new place," he wrote. "Two of my siblings have told me they are tired of the way I've been treating my mother and one accused me of being verbally aggressive to her and shouting at her, even though it was actually the other way around.' He also said that his two sons have told him that his mother 'would regularly criticise me and my parenting style.' The man said his mother 'wants things to go back to the way they were but I don't trust her,' and need guidance. He acknowledged that people would have strong opinions about his relationship with the au pair. Many commenters found it difficult to get past the man getting involved with not only someone much younger, but one who he employs. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'You engaged in pretty solidly inappropriate behavior with someone you employ. You know it's inappropriate, and that's why you kept it a secret. Your secret was found out and now you're deep in it,' a commentator wrote, continuing, 'YTA [you are the a------], of course you are. If you can't be up front about something, don't do it. You've lied to everyone and now they've found out. Good luck.' Other users also faulted the mother and believed a form of 'parental alienation' was at play, given her behavior. 'What your mom is doing is called triangulation. She is managing the story (lying) to stay in control of the family dynamics,' the commentator said. ' She is also turning your own children against you. She is basically enmeshing them in a co-dependent or abusive relationship with her. This is what we call a toxic parent.' Read the original article on People
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
TSA Just 'Banned' These 7 Surprising Snacks From Carry-On Bags
Packing snacks before a flight is a tried-and-true travel hack—saving money, cutting down on sodium-packed airport food, and keeping hunger at bay on long hauls. But if you're not careful, your go-to favorites might be headed straight for the TSA's trash bin. The Transportation Security Administration has recently cracked down on a handful of surprisingly common foods. These snacks violate the 3.4-ounce rule for liquids, gels, and spreadable items. While that rule is nothing new, travelers often forget it applies to more than just toiletries. This summer, it's catching people off guard at security checkpoints nationwide, according to The Mirror. Spreadable and scoopable snacks like hummus and peanut butter are high on the list of problematic items. Even if paired with pretzels in a handy travel pack, those creamy containers often exceed the carry-on limit. Yogurt and pudding, fan favorites among frequent flyers and parents alike, fall under the same category. Many individual-sized cups still cross the 3.4-ounce threshold, meaning they'll get flagged during bag checks. Soft cheeses like Brie and Camembert are also considered too spreadable to pass muster. And it's not just dairy that's a problem—sweet items like honey and savory staples like salsa have joined the list as well. All are considered liquid or gel-like substances under TSA guidelines, and anything over the limit won't make it through. While the rules themselves haven't changed, enforcement appears to be tightening. More travelers are reporting confusion over which items are allowed, especially when they look solid but fall into the "spreadable" or "gel" category. Even foods in resealable containers or single-serve packs can trip the alarm if they exceed the size limit. The consequences? Delays, tossed snacks, and the occasional argument at security—all of which can derail an otherwise smooth travel day. If you're flying soon, it's worth double-checking not only what you pack, but how much of it is going into your carry-on. Anything remotely creamy, gelatinous, or spreadable should be under 3.4 ounces or stowed in checked luggage. In short, TSA is reminding travelers that if you can smear it on toast or eat it with a spoon, it probably counts as a liquid. And if it's over the limit, it's not coming on Just 'Banned' These 7 Surprising Snacks From Carry-On Bags first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 22, 2025
