It's Time To Talk About Love Island — & Those Tans

Welcome to Sun Blocked, Refinery29's global call to action to wake up to the serious dangers of tanning. No lectures or shaming, we promise. Instead, our goal is to arm you with the facts you need to protect your skin to the best of your ability, because there's no such thing as safe sun.
Love Island wouldn't be the same without the blazing sun setting the scene. Even the more recent winter edition was relocated to South Africa in search of that 'summer of love' climate. You wouldn't expect a bombshell to don a bikini in sub-zero temperatures now, would you? Like it or not, Love Island is built on the premise of young, slim people wearing swimwear and flirting with each other somewhere hot, but beyond valid concerns about the lack of body diversity represented on the show, that amount of bare skin combined with intense sun exposure also presents another ethical dilemma.
Tanning has become the unspoken backdrop to the Love Island visual, be it tense chats on the sun loungers or girl huddles by the pool. It's not uncommon to watch the Islanders' skin tones significantly deepen before our very eyes, nor is it abnormal to see pink-tinged noses and chests after a day outside in the villa's famous pool area. Who could forget Dr Alex George, whose red, raw sunburn became one of the main narratives of his Love Island story? Or Molly Mae Hague's mum spotting a changing mole on her leg while she was on the show? It was later found to be cancerous. Besides Hague, Faye Winter, Liberty Poole, Olivia Attwood and Paige Turley are among the former Islanders who have also reported mole scares since leaving the villa.
The truth is, it goes beyond the contestants. Concerningly, skin cancer cases are at an all-time high in the UK. According to Cancer Research UK, cases of melanoma — the type of skin cancer Molly Mae had removed, and which can spread to other areas of the body if not caught early — have spiked by almost a third over the past decade. Nine in 10 of those cases are caused by too much UV radiation from the sun and tanning beds.
Of course, there's no official prerequisite to be tanned on Love Island, but it certainly seems to be an unspoken beauty standard — one that's practically unavoidable given the constant sun exposure the Islanders face. It begs the question: Is this bronzed ideal quietly influencing the rest of us, too?
'
The cases of Islanders reporting mole removal following their time in the villa are hard to ignore, as is the amount of screen time given to the contestants lying in the sun.
'
Consultant dermatologist Dr Alia Ahmed describes the day-to-day sun exposure shown on Love Island as 'pro-tanning behaviour', which normalises habits that increase the risk: 'Having a tan is a sign of skin damage caused by UV rays from the sun,' she explains. 'Every time you tan or burn, you damage the DNA in your skin, and the more you damage your DNA, the greater your risk of getting skin cancer.' The Skin Cancer Foundation reports that just one severe sunburn during childhood or your teen years can more than double your risk of melanoma later on.
Dr Ahmed doesn't mince her words: 'There is no such thing as a safe tan. As a dermatologist who treats skin cancer daily, I think showing pro-tanning behaviour in the media is highly dangerous,' she warns. Dr Ahmed adds that it's up to broadcasters to be more responsible in the images that are being portrayed. But of course, a golden tan seems to be part of the Love Island look, be it from the bottle or, sadly, sunbeds. As you might expect, some former Islanders have admitted to using sunbeds before entering the villa, aiming to appear tanned from day one. In 2022, season seven star Liberty Poole said that she'd used sunbeds beforehand, but after finding a 'weird mole' that appeared on her stomach when she returned home, she shared that she had given up sunbeds for good.
Still, it seems the pressure to appear tanned to fit in on the show is very real. I asked former Islander Abigail Rawlings, who also appeared on series seven, whether she felt any need to be tanned before she entered the villa: 'Absolutely,' she said. 'The year that I went in, they had banned fake tan,' Rawlings told me, referring to a baffling former rule which was thought to be introduced to prevent staining on the villa bed sheets. Rawlings continued, 'I hated going in there when everyone else already had a tan. Me and Chloe [Burrows] were using a bronze-tinted face moisturiser on our bodies just so we didn't look as pale next to everyone else who was already in the villa.'
Fake tan is now allowed on the show again, meaning Islanders can opt for a sunless glow, but according to season 11's Harriett Mae Blackmore, it isn't a popular choice. Speaking on GK Barry's Saving Grace podcast, she claimed that during her season, no one used fake tan due to concerns about streaks, and that many of the women were using sunbeds before the show to develop a deeper tan on-screen. Laura Anderson and Olivia Attwood have also spoken about previously using sunbeds, and both admitted they didn't realise the dangers.
'
Seeing those 10/10 stunning girls on my TV screen every night, especially during the summer, has definitely influenced my decision to use sunbeds. That's why a lot of people, including myself, turn to products like tanning accelerators, drops and even nasal sprays.
Kelsie, 21
'
While Love Island has improved its welfare measures in recent years due to the potential mental health impact of appearing on the show, it is worth noting that this includes the Islanders' physical health, too. ITV told Refinery29 that, owing to its partnership with Boots, factor 30 and 50 sunscreen is readily available in the villa, as are hats and sunglasses. According to the former Islanders interviewed for this article, the show's 24-hour health and welfare team is attentive to sun safety. Rawlings tells me, 'I remember that I burnt my bum one day, and then the welfare team was on my case after that.' She continued, 'Both welfare and production were advising me on limiting my sun exposure and telling me, 'No sun today.' It was my fault that I burnt myself, as I was lying on the wrong side of the day bed, being silly. There are plenty of areas of shade.'
Amy Hart, who appeared on series five, also shares that in her experience, the Love Island team was vigilant: 'The welfare producers came in twice a day to chat to us and check we had drunk enough water and had sun cream on,' she says. 'If we were down at the challenge stage, they would be coming over and checking if we needed more SPF. Because I'm a bit more fair, they would often check in with me.'
Hart also shared that lunch was always served under big umbrellas to provide some extra shade. Rawlings adds: 'I think the only time that you are at risk of getting burnt is when they do a re-coupling or activity during the day in the sun, but they are constantly reminding you and advising you to make sure you have sun cream on. But I never felt like I didn't want to be outside. Because it's nice and warm, you naturally want to be out there.' Both women added that there was no specific requirement to be out in the sun, apart from challenges, but since these make good TV, that's what we tend to see more of, which can send the wrong message.
Despite precautions, it's undeniable that most Islanders are seen spending significant periods of the day out in full sunlight, which, though perhaps their prerogative, far exceeds the amount recommended by dermatologists: 'No one should be exposed to as much sun as the Love Islanders are,' says Dr Ahmed. Dermatologists advise avoiding exposure to the sun between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. when UV rays are most intense. Dr Ahmed adds, 'Though I agree that sun exposure probably has some mood-boosting benefits, the serious risk of dangerous outcomes like skin cancer or tanning addiction is real. Many skin cancer patients tell me that they were irresponsible in the sun when they were younger because they didn't know any better,' she says. 'I'd hope that if people were correctly informed, they would avoid such prolonged sun exposure.'
'
Watching how tanned [the Love Islanders] become as the weeks go on definitely influences me, 100%.
Grace, 24
'
As for whether this so-called 'pro-tanning behaviour' is having an impact on audiences is hard to quantify, but there's certainly been a recent shift towards sunbed use and tanning, particularly among Gen Z. Earlier this year, The Times reported that the UK's two biggest sunbed chains have experienced rapid growth in recent years, and sunbed tanning has shown alarming popularity among younger generations on TikTok. On the social media platform, influencers often film themselves inside tanning booths, even promoting high-risk treatments such as Melanotan II nasal sprays — illegal in the UK — to stimulate pigment in the skin.
A 2024 study by Melanoma Focus found that 28% of UK adults still use sunbeds, and that figure rises to 43% among 18 to 25-year-olds. Even more worryingly, 23% of that age group think sunbed use can reduce your risk of skin cancer, with many believing the 'base tan' myth — the idea that preparing your skin with a tan before spending time in the sun is a means of ensuring you won't burn. In reality, any form of UV exposure is a sign of skin damage that can increase the risk of skin cancer.
Multiple experts believe that we are being influenced by online discourse promoting sunbeds as a 'wellness' tool. Many tanning shops are framing sunbed sessions as a form of self-care and relaxation, or introducing red light hybrid sunbeds, which use red light therapy and UV, leading users to believe they are rejuvenating their skin rather than damaging it. But here's the thing: there are no health benefits to using sunbeds, just health risks — a fact often overlooked in tanning's recent rebrand.
Since Love Island 's core audience is 16 to 24-year-olds, it's not wildly assumptive to infer that the show has had some impact on attitudes to tanning. After all, we're already aware of its undeniable influence across fashion, aesthetic treatments like filler and wider cultural conversation.
I spoke to 21-year-old Kelsie from Belfast (dubbed the ' sunbed capital' of the UK), who recently began using sunbeds again regularly. Kelsie says she was exposed to tanning culture from a very young age and doesn't feel like herself without a tan: 'Most of the influencers we see online are always perfectly bronzed, and over time that just became the standard,' she says.
'I actually stopped using [sunbeds] for a couple of years, trying to stick to fake tan instead,' she says, 'but it's a full-time job trying to keep it looking decent with all the scrubbing, reapplying and patchy ankles. A few weeks ago, I'd just had enough. I was so pale that people were asking if I was feeling okay, which definitely didn't help my confidence.'
Do the Love Island contestants influence you, I ask? 'Without a doubt. Seeing those 10/10 stunning girls on my TV screen every night, especially during the summer, has definitely influenced my decision to use sunbeds,' she says. 'That's why a lot of people, including myself, turn to products like tanning accelerators, drops and even nasal sprays. Tanning has just become so ingrained in how we see beauty and feel good about ourselves.'
Grace, 24, explains that she uses sunbeds in the run-up to the summer every year; the majority of her friendship group does the same. It's hard to hear her reasons: 'Being pale makes me feel like I look ugly, especially in the face. When I'm tanned, I get praised a lot. I get a lot of compliments on my tan and how quickly I tan on holidays, so it could also come from the external validation,' she tells me.
Of the potential health implications of tanning, Grace muses: 'I do worry about the risk, but I have quite sallow skin naturally and I think as long as [sunbeds are] used in moderation it would be okay.' Since the Skin Cancer Foundation reports that just one sunbed session before the age of 35 can increase your risk of developing skin cancer by 75%, it's another worrying trend. Grace continues, 'I'm probably more concerned about ageing my skin more than anything, so I hide my face while in the sunbed to prevent sun damage.' As for the Love Island influence, she agrees with Kelsie: 'Watching how tanned they become as the weeks go on definitely influences me, 100%,' she says.
Beyond my instinct to reassure these young women of their beauty and shield them from our image-obsessed world, I'm struck by how openly they share both their insecurities and their sunbed use with me. Later, I reached out to a couple of nationwide skin safety organisations to get their take on the portrayal of sun exposure in the media. Both stated that everyone — Love Islanders included — should be able to 'enjoy' the sun, but safely. Dr Rachel Orritt, health information manager at Cancer Research UK, commented: 'On-screen portrayals of people sunbathing or not protecting their skin can give the misleading impression that tanning is harmless or even good for us.' As such, Dr Orrit recommends using sunscreen with an SPF of at least 30 and a rating of four or five stars, applying it generously and regularly. If you're out and about in direct sunlight, you should generally be reapplying SPF every two to three hours.
Will Love Island ever take a different approach to showing sun exposure on screen? It's a tough one. Ultimately, the clue's in the name. The odds are that the show's not going to relocate to Iceland for the next series. As for whether it could be doing more to protect the Islanders from the sun, ITV did not provide an official comment for this article, though it's clear that the channel does include sun safety within its welfare protocols. But the cases of Islanders reporting mole removal following their time in the villa are hard to ignore, as is the amount of screen time given to the contestants lying in the sun. As a precaution, Dr Ahmed would suggest full skin checks before, during and after the show for all contestants: 'I'd also like to see the Islanders encouraged to promote sun safety more frequently on screen,' she says, 'like applying and reapplying sunscreen on camera.'
It's doubtful that Love Island will be pieing off its sun-drenched settings anytime soon, but perhaps it's time the show updated its duty of care procedures to address sun safety, as Dr Ahmed suggests. Currently, it's missing from the show's (publicly shared, at least) welfare information. Maybe those infamous morning debriefs could include a dedicated SPF session. After all, a summer of love shouldn't lead to a lifetime of sun damage.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

7 hours ago

• Yahoo

Alcohol should have labels warning drinkers of cancer risks, charities say

Cans and bottles of beer, wine and spirits should explicitly warn drinkers that alcohol causes cancer, an unprecedented alliance of doctors, charities and public experts have said. Warning labels would tackle 'shockingly low' public awareness in the UK that alcohol is proven to cause seven forms of cancer and 17,000 cases a year of the disease, they claim. Dozens of medical and health organisations have written to Keir Starmer urging him to take the radical step of compelling alcohol producers to include such warnings in order to improve public health. The labels must be 'bold and unambiguous', said the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), which coordinated the letter. 'The evidence is clear: health labelling on alcoholic drinks is urgently needed in the UK to help save lives,' it said. 'They should carry strong, clear messages about the health risks, which include the risk of cancer, far beyond vague advice like 'consume in moderation'.' Kate Oldridge-Turner, the WCRF's head of policy and public affairs, said: 'Providing alcohol warning labels would empower millions to make informed choices by clearly understanding the risks.' Evidence cited by charities such as the WCRF and Cancer Research UK shows that alcohol increases the risk of breast, bowel, stomach, head, neck, liver and mouth cancer. Ireland is to become the first country in the world to include cancer warning labels on alcoholic products. From next May, alcohol sold in the republic will have to carry a warning that 'there is a direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers'. The labels will also warn that drinking can cause liver disease and affect foetuses. Prof Sir Ian Gilmore, the chair of the Alcohol Health Alliance, urged the UK to follow suit. He said: 'We must look to the fearless work of our neighbours in Ireland whose new labelling policy provides a level playing field for all producers, leaving no room for loopholes or hiding information behind QR codes or tiny print. 'Improved alcohol labelling, including clear health warnings about the link to cancer, is not just a public health measure, it's a fundamental consumer right. People deserve to know the risks so they can make informed choices about their health. But current labels and weak regulations are keeping drinkers in the dark.' The drinks industry dismissed the call and said warnings would make drinkers anxious. A spokesperson for the Portman Group, a drinks industry-funded body that oversees alcohol labelling in the UK, said: 'Whilst we do not dispute the link between alcohol and certain cancers, and that drinking at harmful levels is dangerous and increases risks, blanket cancer warning labels are not a proportionate policy measure and do not put the risks into an appropriate context. 'This can create unnecessary anxiety, eroding trust in health advice and alienating the very people who require support.' The spokesperson said most alcohol products already included advice from the chief medical officers of the UK's four home nations to drink no more than 14 units of alcohol a week. 'Most people already drink within this guidance, which means their risks for associated diseases are low', they said. In February, the World Health Organization's European office declared: 'Clear and prominent health warning labels on alcohol, which include a specific cancer warning, are a cornerstone of the right to health.' In a report, it urged governments to introduce them to help reduce alcohol-related harm and raise awareness of the link between drinking and cancer. Dr Gauden Galea, a WHO adviser, said in the report that policymakers should 'resist all the pressure that will inevitably come from commercial actors' who claim such warnings do not work. In January, Vivek Murthy, the US surgeon general under the then president, Joe Biden, said cancer warning labels were needed because drinking led to about 100,000 cancer diagnoses a year in the US. It was the third most common preventable cause of cancer after tobacco and obesity, he added. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Drinking alcohol increases the risk of a range of health issues, including several cancers. That is why we recommend people drink within the UK chief medical officer's alcohol guidelines of fewer than 14 units a week, and strongly recommend these are displayed clearly on all alcohol products. 'We recognise the need for more action on the impact of alcohol on health; for too long there has been an unwillingness to lead on this issue. Our plan for change will shift healthcare towards prevention, including through early intervention, to support people to live longer, healthier lives across the UK.'

Yahoo

a day ago

• Yahoo

How much sunscreen do you actually need? Your summer SPF guide.

If summer had a signature scent, it would be sunscreen, but that doesn't necessarily mean everyone is applying it poolside, at the beach or before hopping out to pick up popsicles at the store. Here's why you should: While you're soaking up the warmer weather outside — or even just driving in your car or sitting near an office window — you're also being exposed to the sun's harmful ultraviolet rays. These rays can damage the DNA in your skin cells, which can lead to skin cancer. Skin cancer has been on the rise in the U.S. for years, with 1 in 5 people developing the disease by age 70, according to the Skin Cancer Foundation. The good news? There's a simple and effective way to help reduce that risk, while also protecting against premature skin aging. Yep, it's sunscreen. So which SPF level should you use? How long does sunscreen last? And does SPF-infused makeup count as sun protection? We asked dermatologists these common questions and more. Here's everything you need to know about sunscreen and how to best protect your skin this summer and beyond. The SPF, or sun protection factor, measures how well sunscreen protects against sunburn, according to the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). So how do the different levels of SPF measure up? According to the MD Anderson Cancer Center, an SPF 15 sunscreen blocks 93% of the sun's harmful UVB rays, and SPF 30 blocks 97%. Once you get higher than that, you're only getting a small boost in protection. For example, SPF 50 stops 98% of UVB rays, while SPF 100 blocks 99% of them. No sunscreen provides 100% protection from damaging UV rays. The AAD recommends using a broad-spectrum sunscreen — meaning it protects against both UVA rays (which prematurely age skin) and UVB rays (which cause sunburn) — with SPF 30 or higher. 'Above that can be helpful but the really profound cancer protection starts at SPF 30,' Dr. Daniel Butler, a dermatologist in Tucson, Ariz., tells Yahoo Life. The main differences are their ingredients and how they protect against the sun's rays. 'Chemical sunscreens,' such as avobenzone, oxybenzone and octinoxate, 'absorb UV rays, while mineral sunscreens — zinc oxide or titanium dioxide — act as a physical barrier preventing UV rays from hitting the skin,' Dr. Jason Miller, a dermatologist at Schweiger Dermatology Group in Freehold, N.J., tells Yahoo Life. 'Both offer good protection.' However, chemical sunscreens can cause allergic reactions in some people. 'There is an increased chance of irritation and stinging due to the combination of multiple ingredients in order to provide both UVA and UVB protections,' Dr. Cula Svidzinski, a cosmetic dermatologist at Sadick Dermatology in New York City, tells Yahoo Life. Mineral (also known as physical) sunscreens, on the other hand, are naturally broad spectrum, blocking both UVA and UVB rays as well as blue light, says Svidzinski. While these sunscreens can leave a white cast — the minerals themselves are white and sit on top of the skin — the formulations have come a long way. Experts say that sunscreen should be an everyday habit. 'I recommend people use sunscreen daily in the morning and then reapply if they're deliberately out in the sun,' says Butler. But it's worth noting that even on overcast days, you're still exposed to some harmful UV rays. That's why Dr. Vicky Zhen Ren, assistant professor of dermatology at Baylor College of Medicine, tells Yahoo Life that sunscreen should be worn 'even on cold or cloudy days' and 'especially near reflective surfaces such as water, snow or sand.' Even if you're indoors, it's still a good idea to wear sunscreen since UV rays, specifically UVA, can penetrate windows, Dr. Marisa Garshick, a dermatologist in New York City and Englewood, N.J., tells Yahoo Life. 'It is also important to note that blue light may be emitted from computer screens and phones and can contribute to skin changes, and using sunscreen may help to protect the skin,' she says. Butler agrees, adding: 'While indoor and computer light are unlikely to cause cancerous changes, photoaging can still occur when indoors or when in front of a computer screen. Because of this, I recommend wearing sunscreen on the face if indoors or in front of a computer for extended periods of time.' 'In order to achieve the SPF on the label, you need about one shot glass of sunscreen — most people tend to use less,' says Miller. Ren adds that sunscreen should also be applied 15 minutes before going outside. And remember to slather it on commonly forgotten areas, such as the back of your ears, the back of your hands and the top of your feet, along with wearing lip balm with SPF 30 or higher. As one expert put it: 'Lip gloss that doesn't contain SPF is like applying baby oil to your lips.' In general, sunscreen lasts about two hours. If you're staying cool and dry indoors and aren't near any windows, you can stretch that to four to six hours, according to the Skin Cancer Foundation. But sunscreen should be reapplied about every two hours if you're outdoors, more often if you're swimming or sweating. Water-resistant sunscreens can protect your skin, even when wet, for 40-80 minutes tops and then they need to be reapplied. (There's no such thing as waterproof or sweat-proof sunscreen so manufacturers are not allowed to make those claims, according to the Food and Drug Administration.) 'Even if you go for a high SPF sunscreen, you're not reaping the full benefits of that high SPF sunscreen unless you're thoroughly covering the sun-exposed areas and reapplying,' says Ren. Sunscreen doesn't last forever, so it's worth checking your cabinets and beach bags for expired products. FDA regulations require all nonprescription drugs, including sunscreen, to have an expiration date, though there's an exception to that rule if a manufacturer's stability testing shows the product will remain stable for at least three years. 'Many sunscreens include an expiration date,' says Svidzinski. 'If the sunscreen doesn't have an expiration date, write the date you bought it on the bottle and discard it three years later.' Not sure how old your sunscreen is? Discard it, per the FDA. Avoid leaving sunscreen in hot cars or in direct sunlight, which Garshick says can impact how effective it is. 'Leaving sunscreen in a hot car can make the preservatives break down, which can lead to colonization with bacteria or yeast,' explains Butler. You should also keep an eye out for changes in sunscreen color, smell or consistency. 'Signs that should make you throw it away is if it smells badly or if it's extra watery when it comes out,' he says. The most important factor in choosing the "right" sunscreen is selecting the recommended SPF of 30, says Svidzinski. 'After that, the 'right sunscreen' is the one that you are going to use,' she says. Butler tells his patients to try three or four different options before deciding on an everyday sunscreen that they're happy with. For those with sensitive skin, Garshick says it's best to opt for a mineral sunscreen 'as they tend to be less irritating and less likely to cause an allergic reaction.' Those with acne-prone skin 'should look for sunscreens that are non-comedogenic or oil-free to help minimize any potential for breakouts,' she says. For those with darker skin, Garshick says that chemical sunscreens may be preferred 'as they tend to absorb in easily without leaving a white cast.' However Svidzinski says that with the improved formulation of mineral sunscreens 'there are a lot more options for skin of color.' Garshick adds that tinted sunscreens are also an option to best match a specific skin tone. 'Sunscreen sprays and sticks can offer the same amount of protection as lotions if a proper amount is applied,' says Garshick. 'The issue for most sprays and sticks is people do not typically apply enough or do not apply an even coat so there are skip areas that may be at risk of burn. Sunscreen sprays are not bad for you but it is important to use them properly. Ultimately, some sunscreen is better than no sunscreen, but either way it is important to ensure enough sunscreen is applied.' However, some dermatologists recommend caution around using spray sunscreen. 'Sprays are popular due to their ease of use, however little is known about the effects of inhaling particles of sunscreen into the lungs, making it difficult to recommend their use,' Miller says. Butler adds that 'regarding spray sunscreens, if aerosolized, they may contain benzenes which, at high levels, can cause negative health impacts.' But if you're determined to use them, Svidzinski says it's 'essential to rub spray sunscreen in to ensure even coverage.' And given that there's some concern about inhalation, she recommends applying them in a well-ventilated area and avoiding spraying directly on the face. Dermatologists are mixed as to whether makeup and facial moisturizers with SPF offer enough sun protection. (Also worth noting: They only help protect your face — any other exposed skin needs sunscreen too.) 'These are great for everyday sun protection,' says Butler. 'Ideally, they would be SPF 30 or greater to ensure the cancer protection impact as well as the benefits of aging prevention.' However, Garshick says that even though a daily moisturizer or foundation with SPF may indicate that it provides sun protection, 'it is not typically considered enough because most often people do not apply a sufficient amount of moisturizer or foundation to get the amount of protection as indicated on the label.' Svidzinski agrees. 'SPF makeup is not a substitute for a stand-alone sunscreen,' she says. 'Daily moisturizer with a minimum SPF of 30 may be OK if your day consists of very little time outdoors.' But, she says, along with not putting on enough to provide full protection, you likely won't reapply SPF-infused makeup or moisturizer throughout the day. 'This is why I recommend using a dedicated physical sunscreen SPF 30 in addition to your moisturizer or makeup with SPF.' Although sunscreen typically gets the most attention, it isn't the only way to avoid harmful UV rays. There are other steps you can and should take, say experts — namely, seeking shade when the sun's rays are strongest. Typically, that's between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. 'But of course this may vary depending on your location,' says Ren, 'so more importantly, seek shade whenever your shadow is shorter than you.' Also, wear sun-protective clothing. This includes tightly woven, long-sleeved shirts and pants with Ultraviolet Protection Factor (UPF), wide-brimmed hats and large-framed sunglasses with UV protection, says Ren.

Health Line

4 days ago

• Health Line

Lung Biopsy for Lung Cancer

Key takeaways A lung biopsy may be used to diagnose lung cancer. There are many kinds of lung biopsies, but common ones include needle, transbronchial, and open. In some cases, prior tests like chest X-rays or CT scans indicate lung cancer may be present, and a lung biopsy may confirm a diagnosis. Scans like a CT scan, MRI scan, or chest X-ray scan may show signs of cancer. If your doctor suspects cancer, a lung biopsy is often used to confirm the diagnosis. A biopsy is a relatively quick procedure that can cause mild discomfort. There are a few different types, but a needle biopsy is one of the most common. Read on to learn more about lung biopsies, how long they take, and what happens when the test is over. How long does a lung cancer biopsy take? There are different types of lung biopsies, and each may take varying amounts of time. Needle lung biopsy A needle biopsy, also called a percutaneous biopsy, means that a doctor will place a needle through the skin and into the lung. Then, they'll draw out a small tissue sample. This procedure takes place under local anesthesia and uses either an ultrasound or CT scanner as a guide. Cancer Research UK reports that a needle lung biopsy usually takes 30 to 45 minutes. Transbronchial biopsy A transbronchial biopsy uses a flexible tube called a bronchoscope to take a sample of tissue from the lungs. The tube is inserted through the nose or mouth and down into the lungs. This procedure involves sedation and usually takes about an hour. Open lung biopsy An open lung biopsy involves making an incision in the side of the body toward the back of the lung. A sample of tissue from the lungs is taken, and the incision is closed with stitches. During this procedure, a chest drain is also inserted to help in the expansion of the lungs during the procedure to allow fluid to drain out. You'll be under anesthesia, and you may need to wait a bit before you can go home. How long does it take to get lung biopsy results? Once a sample is taken from a lung biopsy, it's sent to a laboratory for testing. At the laboratory, a doctor called a pathologist will conduct tests on the sample to determine whether cancer cells are present. During this process, the pathologist may also conduct tests to help classify the type of cancer. Results will then be detailed in a pathology report and sent to your doctor. This report is usually available within a week of the lung biopsy, and your doctor will call you with the results. What does a lung biopsy show? A lung biopsy doesn't technically 'show' anything. However, the tissue sample is tested to determine which type of cells are in your lungs. If cancerous cells are present, the results can confirm a cancer diagnosis. Is a lung biopsy painful? Typically, a lung biopsy causes minor discomfort or no discomfort at all. Sometimes, general anesthetic is used which means you'll be asleep and won't be aware of or feel anything that is happening. If you're not under a general anesthetic, a mild sedative may be administered to help you relax during the procedure. A local anesthetic will be used to numb the area where the needle will be inserted. When this happens, you may feel a slight prick and pressure, but it shouldn't be painful. Some biopsies, like an open biopsy, may require a few days' stay in the hospital. For other procedures with only a light sedative, you may be able to go home once the sedative wears off. You might experience some slight pain at the site of the biopsy once local anesthesia begins to wear off. This will decrease with time, and you'll be given pain relief medication if needed. Sharp pain or pain in the shoulders with breathing can be a sign of a collapsed lung. While uncommon, this can sometimes occur with a needle biopsy. Other symptoms of a collapsed lung may include: rapid heart rate shortness of breath bluish tint to the skin If you have any of these symptoms, you should seek immediate medical attention. Can a lung biopsy cause cancer to spread? Tumor seeding, also called needle seeding, is when a biopsy needle inserted into the body to sample a tumor dislodges cancer cells and allows them to spread along the track of the needle. Studies on this have produced mixed results. While some instances of tumor seeding have been reported, including in lung cancer cases, it is very uncommon. According to the National Cancer Institute, the chance of cancer spreading through a biopsy or surgical procedure is extremely low. Physicians take steps to prevent the spread of cancer cells during biopsies and when removing tumors. For example, if taking tissue from more than one part of the body, different tools are used for each area. Will my doctor help me plan my next steps after results? Once your biopsy results arrive, your doctor will have a discussion with you about the next steps. If cancer is found, more tests may be needed to determine the stage of cancer. Staging refers to the size of a tumor and the extent to which it has spread. Knowing the staging will help determine what treatment options may be best for you. Your doctor will discuss the possible treatment options available to you as well as the pros and cons of each. They'll also discuss the goals of treatment. For instance, sometimes curing lung cancer completely isn't always a realistic goal, so treatment may be focused on controlling cancer and reducing symptoms. It's important to ask questions during this period. It's also a good idea to get a second opinion if you'd like one.