Pierce County sheriff scoffs at WSP's apology for disrupting Pride flag ceremony
Pierce County Sheriff Keith Swank called out the Washington State Patrol on social media Thursday after the statewide law enforcement agency apologized for interrupting the raising of the Pride flag at the state capitol.
Swank didn't call out the State Patrol for disrupting the Wednesday ceremony. He said the agency should be 'embarrassed' for apologizing in a post that explained why troopers marched through the ceremony and reiterated its mission to protect, defend and respect the rights of all.
'You should be embarrassed by this post,' Swank wrote on his X account. 'Any WSP who wants to work for a real law enforcement organization should come work at the Pierce County Sheriff's Office.'
The post from the State Patrol read: 'The Washington State Patrol offers our heartfelt apologies for disrupting the raising of the Pride Flag on Capitol Campus today. The team leading our cadets to their graduation ceremony did not adequately communicate about the alternate route planned around the crowd.'
The post went on: 'It was never our intention to disrupt an important community event. Our motto is 'Service with Humility,' and our mission is to protect, defend and respect the rights of all. We apologize for our misstep on what should be a great day for us all as we celebrate Pride.'
Swank did not immediately return a phone call and text message Thursday asking if he would explain why the State Patrol should be embarrassed by the post.
Chris Loftis, a spokesperson for the State Patrol, declined to comment on Swank's comment.
The event was sponsored by the state's LGBTQ commission and was attended by Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson and Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Dave Upthegrove, the Olympian reported. Citing statistics showing a significant number of LGBTQ youth have considered suicide in the past year, Upthegrove — also a Democrat — told the newspaper that giving visibility to the LGBTQ community by raising the Pride flag shows people they can live full, meaningful lives.
At some point during the ceremony, two lines of troopers marched through the event instead of taking an alternate route around the crowd. Videos of the incident on social media caused some to speculate that the troopers had deliberately disrupted the event to intimidate the crowd.
In a written statement, Loftis said there was no intent to offend or distract from the event. He said it was a simple mistake, not any sort of statement.
'We had a miscommunication in our planning, and it led to us inadvertently disrupting another public event being held by citizens we are sworn to serve, protect, and respect,' Loftis wrote.
'We quickly and rightfully apologized to the impacted parties,' he added. 'That was the right things to do as public servants, as a law enforcement agency, and as friends and neighbors.'
Swank has a track record of being provocative on social media. He once posted on X that a transgender legislator from Montana, Democratic Rep. Zooey Zephyr, was a man with mental health issues who should be called by her given male name. He's also posted that men and women who pretend to be the opposite sex are 'appropriating gender.'
Swank retired from the Seattle Police Department in 2023 as a captain after 33 years on the force. But his conduct on social media — denigrating trans people and defending the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol — led former Seattle Police Department Chief Sue Rahr to declare earlier this year that he would have been fired if he had stayed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Welcome to the Resistance? Tucker Carlson Is Leading New Anti-War Movement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Comedian Jon Stewart never expected to nod in agreement with Tucker Carlson. But as the former Fox News host grilled Senator Ted Cruz over U.S. involvement in Israel's war on Iran, Stewart, a longtime critic of Carlson, found himself aligned with an unlikely ally. "We're in such a bizarro world, you've got me nodding my head to Tucker Carlson videos," Stewart said on his podcast Thursday. "You got Tucker Carlson going, 'Why are we going to war with Iran again?' And I'm like, 'Yeah, you tell him, brother!'" The fiery exchange between Carlson and Cruz, part of a now-viral two-hour interview, illustrated the public civil war erupting among Trump allies over the conflict between Israel and Iran, and redefined Carlson's role in the current landscape — not just as a conservative firebrand, but as one of the leading critics of Trump-era foreign policy. Carlson, once a full-throated supporter of the Iraq War, is now one of the most vocal anti-interventionists on the American right. His opposition to military action in Iran isn't particularly surprising for those who have followed him from his perch at Fox News to his role as a podcast host and independent content creator. He holds similar views on the war in Ukraine. But the force of his criticism, especially toward figures like Cruz, caught many off guard. That includes many on the left, like Stewart, who wondered why Carlson was asking some of the more pointed questions in the media about the U.S. role in the latest Mideast conflict. Former Fox News television personality Tucker Carlson speaks to guests at the Family Leadership Summit on July 14, 2023 in Des Moines, Iowa. Former Fox News television personality Tucker Carlson speaks to guests at the Family Leadership Summit on July 14, 2023 in Des Moines, Iowa. Photo byWelcome to the Resistance? Carlson's interview and opposition to intervention has found support beyond his usual base. Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, former Obama staffer Tommy Vietor, and liberal pundits like Mehdi Hasan and Hasan Piker all praised Carlson for confronting Cruz in ways mainstream media often do not. The reason it matters Ted that you didn't know Iran has over 90 million people is that it makes any regime change war far more difficult, costly, and prolonged than Iraq which had about 25 million in 2003. — Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) June 18, 2025 "I haven't seen Ted Cruz get pummeled like this since Trump insulted his wife and father during the 2016 primary," Vietor said. "If he keeps these interviews up, Tucker Carlson is going to have to start selling body bags." Mehdi Hasan, the former MSNBC host turned Substack creator, said he was struck by the contrast with mainstream interviewers. "I remain amazed that it took Tucker Carlson to ask these obvious questions of a U.S. senator, and expose the nonsense that he peddles about Israel and God and the Bible," Hasan said. "All these years, all of the Sunday show interviewers and the rest never asked these simple questions." Hasan Piker, the popular podcaster considered by some to be the "Joe Rogan of the left," added: "Why is Tucker Carlson capable of conducting an adversarial interview about the dangers of American intervention in Iran with Ted Cruz better than everyone else in legacy media? Shame." Eric Alterman, a CUNY distinguished professor of journalism at Brooklyn College, told Newsweek the interview "made quite a splash" because major outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and MSNBC rarely press Republican politicians with such direct, confrontational questions. He said traditional media often avoid challenging topics like Israel out of fear of appearing partisan or facing backlash. "Mainstream media usually want to present both sides. They're hesitant to seem biased," Alterman said. "And with Democrats currently lacking clear direction, many outlets are reluctant to take the lead themselves." He added that mainstream pundits also tend to be strongly supportive of Israel. "So when Trump signals support for Israel in a possible war with Iran, there's often little pushback," he said. Carlson, unconstrained by such limits as a now self-employed online gadfly, didn't hesitate to press Cruz on his support for Israel. "You don't know anything about Iran," he told the Texas senator during the interview, even questioning his understanding of Israel's significance to Christians. Cruz responded by accusing Carlson of antisemitism, saying, "You're asking, why are the Jews controlling our foreign policy. That's what you just asked." Carlson pushed back, in another clip from the one-on-one that went viral: "That does not make me an antisemite, and shame on you for suggesting otherwise." Yet his interrogation of Cruz—raising accusations of antisemitism and criticizing the influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)—revealed a deeper divide over what "America First" means in 2025. MAGA loyalists like Laura Loomer, in a particularly profane post, called Carlson a "c--- warmer for Arabs", while Trump mocked Carlson publicly, calling him "kooky" and suggesting he should find a TV network to hire him if he wanted anyone to listen. The full interview with Cruz is approaching 8 million views on Carlson's X account, and another 2.5 million on YouTube — or more than three times Fox News' average primetime audience. For Alterman, the media analyst, the virality of the exchange with Cruz underscored Carlson's unique media position. "Tucker can do this because he has his own platform and audience," he said. "Even if Trump denounces him, his followers will stick with him. He's not beholden to the traditional media structure, and he's not scared of Trump like many others are." A Media Giant Of His Own Senator Ted Cruz pictured in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on April 02, 2025 in Washington, DC (left) and Tucker Carlson at a Turning Point Action campaign rally at the Gas South Arena on October... Senator Ted Cruz pictured in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on April 02, 2025 in Washington, DC (left) and Tucker Carlson at a Turning Point Action campaign rally at the Gas South Arena on October 23, 2024 in Duluth, Georgia (right). More Win McNamee/Anna Moneymaker/GETTY Carlson's growing influence, particularly on platforms like X and YouTube, reflects a broader shift identified in the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025. According to the report, Americans—especially younger, conservative-leaning men—are increasingly turning away from traditional outlets in favor of personality-driven voices across digital platforms. The study found that 54 percent of U.S. adults now primarily access news through social media and video networks, with trust in conventional journalism continuing to erode. The report also revealed a striking finding: 14 percent of Americans encountered political content from Tucker Carlson in the week following the Trump inauguration, placing him ahead of many institutional media brands in terms of reach among key demographics. The authors noted that "right-leaning audiences now dominate the conversation on platforms like X," with Carlson cited as one of the most influential figures in the new fragmented media environment. That independence has allowed Carlson to shape political narratives in ways mainstream journalists often cannot—or will not. "The media landscape is splintering," Alterman said. "Different groups trust different voices. Tucker is speaking directly to a segment of the Trump base that's skeptical of endless war and not particularly attached to the old neocon worldview." As The Independent's Richard Hall observed of Carlson: "He knows the ways of the neocons — their secrets, their tricks, their dodges — because he was once one of them." In that way, Carlson's transformation from a cheerleader of the Iraq War to one of its fiercest critics on the right is what makes his case against Iran so potent—and so politically disruptive.
San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
North Carolina Green Party retains official status despite failing vote thresholds
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The Green Party will remain an official party in North Carolina, able to field candidates statewide through the 2028 elections, even though their 2024 nominees for governor and president failed to get the votes required by state law. The Republican-led State Board of Elections voted 3-2 on Thursday to continue recognizing the North Carolina Green Party, potentially affecting close contests for president, U.S. Senate and governor or other statewide and local offices. Without Thursday's action, the party would have joined four other small parties who also failed to reach the vote thresholds necessary and are thus no longer recognized — the Constitution, Justice for All, No Labels and We the People parties. None of their candidates received at least 2% of the total vote for governor or president to remain an official party. That means voters who are registered with those four parties are moved to unaffiliated status on voter rolls starting next week. Those groups also would have to collect about 14,000 signatures to regain official party status — an effort that takes time and money. But the North Carolina Green Party petitioned the board this spring to apply another standard. State law also says a group of voters can become a political party if they 'had a candidate nominated by that group on the general election ballot' in at least 35 states in the prior presidential election. The group presented a Federal Election Commission document showing Jill Stein, the Green Party nominee, appeared on the November 2024 ballot in 38 states. In seven states, however, she was not the nominee of the party or of a Green Party affiliate, according to the commission document. For example, she was an independent candidate in three of the seven. Democratic board member Jeff Carmon said he wasn't convinced the standard was met because Stein failed to be nominated in 35 states by the Green Party or an affiliate. Republican members decided otherwise. Although Stein may have been listed as the nominee for a different party or as independent, she was the national Green Party candidate, board Chairman Francis De Luca said. The three Republican members agreed that the North Carolina Green Party could remain an official party. The two Democrats voted no. The board shifted from a Democratic majority to a Republican majority last month after a 2024 state law took appointment authority away from the governor and to the state auditor. With Thursday's action, there will be four recognized political parties in North Carolina — Democratic, Republican, Libertarian and Green. As of last week, the largest bloc of North Carolina's 7.53 million registered voters are unaffiliated, at 2.85 million. About 4,000 voters are registered with the Green Party.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State Sen. Emil Jones III to face retrial on bribery charges in 2026 — when he'll also be up for reelection
State Sen. Emil Jones III will face retrial on bribery charges in January 2026, a year when he'll also be up for reelection to a seat bequeathed in classic Illinois fashion by his well-known father. U.S. District Judge Andrea Wood on Friday set a trial date of Jan. 12, which will be nine months after his first trial ended in a mistrial when a jury deadlocked on all counts. If he chooses to run, Jones will have to submit signatures to get on the ballot by late November, a little over a month before his trial. The case, which is expected to last three or four weeks, would be long over before the Democratic primary in March, and a conviction would almost certainly force him from the ballot. The timing of the retrial also means Jones, the son of former state Senate President Emil Jones Jr., will have served out almost an entire four-year term in the General Assembly while the charges were pending. After he was charged in October 2022, Jones resigned from his leadership post and position as chairman of the Senate Licensed Activities Committee, and some Democratic leaders, including Gov. JB Pritzker, called on him to resign from his $72,906-per-year Senate seat entirely. Instead, Jones remained on the ballot in the November 2022 election, where he was running unopposed, and was reelected to a fourth term that expires in January 2027. Jones' 14th District covers parts of the city's South Side as well as near south suburbs such as Riverdale, Calumet Park, Blue Island and Robbins. Jones, 46, a Chicago Democrat, is accused of agreeing to take bribes from an executive of a red-light camera company in exchange for Jones' protection in Springfield against legislation that would hurt the company's bottom line. Wood declared a mistrial April 24 after the jury at least twice reported they could not reach a verdict. The jury of seven women and five men had deliberated for about 24 hours over four days before announcing they were deadlocked. During Friday's hearing, prosecutors said they expect to call up to five additional witnesses the second time around, including former state legislators who will testify about the process of legislation and other nuts-and-bolts of the General Assembly in Springfield. Jones' retrial will come more than six years after FBI agents confronted Jones at his Roseland neighborhood home as part of a sweeping investigation into bribery schemes involving red-light cameras, liquor licenses and other graft across the west and southwest suburbs. At the heart of the probe was Omar Maani, co-founder of SafeSpeed LLC, who agreed to work undercover for federal investigators after being confronted with evidence he was paying off officials in Oak Lawn in exchange for political support to add SafeSpeed cameras at additional intersections. According to the charges, Jones agreed to accept $5,000 in campaign funding from Maani in exchange for Jones agreeing not to file a bill calling for a statewide study of red-light cameras, which SafeSpeed considered potentially damaging to its bottom line. Jones also offered to 'protect' the company from his friend, then-state Rep. David McSweeney, who had filed bills of his own calling for an all-out ban of red-light cameras, according to prosecutors. The charges allege Jones also asked Maani to give his former office intern a part-time job, which led to $1,800 being paid to the intern in exchange for no work. At his first trial, Jones made the risky decision to testify in his own defense, telling the jury his namesake father, who spent nearly 40 years in the General Assembly before retiring in 2008, inspired him to go into politics. 'Ever since I was a child, I always wanted to be a state senator like my father and I decided to run,' Jones testified in April, leaving out that his father had retired abruptly after winning the primary and pitched his son as his replacement to favorable Democratic committeemen. Jones told the jury he's run unopposed ever since winning that first election. Asked by his attorney, Victor Henderson, if he still had to raise money, Jones said, 'I never had an election. I never had an opponent to run against. So … no.' But he still had a fund, Friends of Emil Jones, 'to raise funds for my campaign if I ever had one,' Jones said. State campaign records show that campaign fund had about $148,000 in its coffers as of the last filing in mid-April. jmeisner@
