Islet cell transplant trial outcome ‘major milestone' toward cure for diabetes
When Amanda Smith learned at the age of 25 that she had late-onset Type 1 diabetes, she considered the diagnosis a death sentence.
The nurse, from London, Ont., had a particularly dim view of the disease because she grew up watching her mother struggle with it. Her mother would slur her words and lose consciousness when her blood sugar bottomed out. Once, Ms. Smith's grandfather had to break a window to reach her mother, who was passed out in her home holding a banana she had tried to consume to raise her blood sugar.
'It literally eats you from the inside out,' said Ms. Smith, now 36. 'It rots your teeth, it destroys your body, your vision. The complications that come with Type 1 diabetes are so extreme.'
Ms. Smith is confident now that those complications won't be in her future. In February of 2023, she became the first Canadian to receive a transplant of islet cells – the cells in the pancreas that make insulin – derived from embryonic stem cells.
The transplant freed her from insulin and gave her blood sugar control akin to a non-diabetic. It was performed at Toronto General Hospital, the institution where insulin was first tested more than 100 years ago.
On Friday, the results of the clinical trial in which Ms. Smith participated were published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The early-phase trial was small, and the procedure has a significant downside in that patients must take anti-rejection drugs for life, just like recipients of organ transplants.
For people living with diabetes, the push for medical coverage isn't political, it's personal
Nonetheless, the study's outcome counts as 'spectacular,' according to James Shapiro, who holds the Canada Research Chair in transplant surgery and regenerative medicine at the University of Alberta and was not involved in the study. Ten of the 12 participants who received a full dose of the cells were insulin-independent one year later.
'This is a major advance and a major milestone along the journey towards a cure,' he said.
Dr. Shapiro was himself responsible for an earlier breakthrough on that path. In 2000, he and his colleagues at the University of Alberta published a seminal paper on a method they developed for safely and effectively transplanting islet cells from deceased donors into patients with Type 1 diabetes. They dubbed their regimen the 'Edmonton Protocol.'
'We used to call it the drive-through transplant,' Dr. Shapiro said, because giving patients islet cells was less risky and burdensome than a whole pancreas transplant. The cells are infused into patients under mild sedation with an IV-drip into the portal vein of the liver.
The breakthrough described in the new paper is that the islet cells transplanted into Ms. Smith were derived not from deceased donors but from embryonic stem cells, which function as a type of source code that scientists can coax into becoming any cell in the human body.
The supply of such lab-created islets could, in theory, be limitless, unlike the supply of deceased donor islets.
Semaglutide, or Ozempic, reduces symptoms of feared diabetes' complication, study finds
Trevor Reichman, director of the pancreas and islet transplant program at the University Health Network's Ajmera Transplant Centre, said the most encouraging result is that the islet-cell transplants eliminated dangerous blood sugar 'lows' that can cause confusion, seizures and unconsciousness. He ran the study site at UHN and is an author of the new paper.
'All of them, essentially, were able to get rid of their hypoglycemic episodes,' Dr. Reichman said, 'so all of the real risks to them, all of the lows, were essentially eliminated.'
Still, the international trial, funded by Boston-based Vertex Pharmaceuticals, wasn't without its challenges.
The company paused it temporarily last year after two participants died, though not from taking Zimislecel, the brand name of the new islet therapy. Vertex expects to apply for regulatory approval of Zimislecel starting next year.
One participant died of severe dementia 30 months after the infusion. That patient had pre-existing neurocognitive impairment and, before joining the trial, had suffered a brain injury during a motor-vehicle accident caused by a severe blood sugar low.
The other died of cryptococcal meningitis, a fungal infection caused by a sinus surgery. The death was related to the immunosuppressant medication that the participant was taking to preserve the islet transplant, the study said.
That death underscores the tradeoff that people with Type 1 diabetes would have to make with Zimislecel, said Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, director of the Metabolic Diseases Research Unit and The Diabetes Clinic at the Montreal Clinical Research Institute.
He wonders how many people with Type 1 would be willing to take anti-rejection drugs for life, especially now that advances such as insulin pumps have made diabetes easier to manage for some patients.
'It's probably going to be a very narrow population,' Dr. Rabasa-Lhoret said.
The next step for scientists is finding a way to genetically engineer or encapsulate islets so the immune system won't view them as hostile invaders.
In the meantime, Ms. Smith said taking three pills, three times a day to suppress her immune system is a breeze compared with the round-the-clock work of keeping her blood sugar in check.
Her 10-year-old daughter, Draya, used to say she wanted to become a doctor to cure diabetes. Now, she talks of being a pilot or engineer.
'I would do this a million times over compared to the maintenance I used to have to do to keep myself alive,' Ms. Smith said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
The U.S. is cutting billions from science. Canadian researchers say it's time to step up
Social Sharing Scientists in Canada are scrambling. Over the past few months, the U.S. government has cut billions of dollars in funding from scientific research as part of sweeping cost-cutting measures. "It's really shocking. It's really like this big cloud over science," Kate Moran, CEO of Ocean Networks Canada, told Quirks & Quarks. Ocean Networks Canada participates in a project called the Argo system, an international program that collects information from on and under the ocean using a fleet of robotic instruments that drift with the ocean currents. But that program, which is led by researchers in the U.S., could be at risk. Many Canadian research groups rely heavily on U.S. partners for support and data. But since Donald Trump was elected president of the United States, that support has taken a massive hit. The New York Times reported in March that the administration plans to reduce the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) workforce by up to 20 per cent, which Moran says could have a direct impact on their work. Some of those staffing cuts at the NOAA have already happened. "Because the U.S. is such a big player, I'm not sure we could step up and be like the U.S.," said Moran. And cuts are happening across the board. The administration terminated $1 billion US in cuts to the National Institutes of Health, a move ruled "void and illegal" and blocked by a district judge earlier this month. The government has also been in a battle with Harvard University, putting billions of dollars of potential funding in jeopardy. Layoffs across a number of government agencies have been put on hold by a federal judge in California. In an executive order issued by the White House in May, Trump said that "over the last 5 years, confidence that scientists act in the best interests of the public has fallen significantly." "My Administration is committed to restoring a gold standard for science to ensure that federally funded research is transparent, rigorous, and impactful, and that Federal decisions are informed by the most credible, reliable, and impartial scientific evidence available." Environment and Climate Change Canada told CBC in a statement it "has a long-standing relationship with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) on operational and research activities related to weather, climate, satellites, and water monitoring," and that the "department has not been formally informed of any changes to its collaboration with NOAA." The trickle-down effect of cuts has left Canadian researchers trying to figure out how to adapt to these uncertain times, while others say it's now Canada's responsibility to step up. Targeting climate science Environmental science and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts seem to be a direct target of the Trump administration's cuts. More than 1,000 scientists and other employees are set to be laid-off from the Environmental Protection Agency's research office. The effects have been felt in Canada. Researchers here filling out forms for U.S. government grants have had to answer questions such as "Can you confirm this is not a climate or 'environmental justice' project or include such elements?" and "Can you confirm that this is no DEI project or DEI elements of the project?" The political climate has Deborah Wench on edge. She relies heavily on information from long-term monitoring projects to fuel her research into the carbon cycle. Wench studies how carbon flows between different climates. To do that, she needs long-term data sets collected from satellites. Wench says the U.S. operates a lot of the satellites used in her research. "I'm not really sure how to express this. It's mostly, for me, a sense of impending doom," said Wench, an associate professor at the University of Toronto. "It's taken decades and the careers of thousands of people to build up these measurement records, and it looks like it will take months to destroy them." Though she didn't want to specify which specific instruments she uses, she says she's concerned it's on the chopping block in the U.S., which would mean a loss of long-term monitoring. Then there's HAWC, a project that will use three Canadian-built instruments to measure the amount of aerosols, water vapour and thin ice clouds in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. The information could be used to improve future climate projects, assuming it continues to receive NASA support. Trump's 2026 budget, released in May, proposed a $6 billion US funding cut to the space agency, amounting to 24 per cent of NASA's current budget. WATCH | Canadian scientists trying to keep world's ocean sensors afloat: Canadian scientists trying to keep world's ocean sensors afloat 12 minutes ago Duration 1:32 These robot scientists dive deep into the ocean to measure the vital signs of planet Earth. But proposed funding cuts in the U.S. could mean critical climate data is on the chopping block. "Much of it is just so speculative, right?" said Chris Fletcher, an associate professor at the University of Waterloo. "We're still kind of on the descent.... So it's unclear yet exactly how all of this will shake out, and it's quite unsettling." One of the HAWC instruments was supposed to be attached to a NASA satellite. But Fletcher says that's now in question. "I'm confident from the Canadian side that because of this tremendous investment that Canada has made, that our instruments will fly. The question is about which components of the proposed NASA mission will fly," said Fletcher. CBC reached out to the Canadian Space Agency, but did not recieve a comment before publication. What happens next Canada's Department of Innovation, Science and Industry did not provide an interview or comment to CBC about how Canada plans to respond to funding cuts in the U.S. Frédéric Bouchard says the turmoil in the U.S. means a greater responsibility for Canada to assert its scientific sovereignty. He was part of the federally funded Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System, which, in 2023, took a deep dive into how Canada could better support scientific research. "It's our own responsibility to make sure that we have a strong and generous science capacity so we have access to the experts we need, when we need them," said Bouchard, a philosopher of science and dean of the faculty of arts and sciences at the Université de Montréal. "We shouldn't wait for other countries to do all the hard work and hope that we can benefit from it." He says that as American scientists leave the United States, Canada could welcome some of those researchers. He also said it will be important to invest in the future, including support for graduate students both in Canada and abroad in the United States, to make sure they're able to continue work in their field. Even so, Bouchard says, what's happening in the U.S. is going to have an impact — there's no stopping that. "What's happening is destabilizing science across the world," said Bouchard. "We need to make sure we play a larger role and that we build our own muscle mass, if you will, to be able to withstand more of the disruption." Moran says Ocean Networks Canada, and other organizations like it, are ready to do so. She says they are prepared to do simple things, such as download data to protect the long-term data sets. And if there are more cuts in the U.S., she says she's prepared to make the case to the Canadian government and request more funding. "We're talking about what we could do to fill those gaps," said Moran. "Canada has all the skills and knowledge and scientists." Politically-driven chaos is disrupting U.S. scientific institutions and creating challenges for science in Canada. Science is a global endeavour and collaborations with the U.S. are routine. In this special episode of Quirks & Quarks, we explore what Canadian scientists are doing to preserve their work to assert scientific sovereignty in the face of this unprecedented destabilization. Canadian climate scientists brace for cuts to climate science infrastructure and data U.S. President Donald Trump's attacks on climate science are putting our Earth observing systems, in the oceans and in orbit, at risk. Canadian scientists who rely on U.S. led climate data infrastructure worry about losing long-term data that would affect our ability to understand our changing climate. With: Kate Moran, the president and CEO of Ocean Networks Canada and Emeritus Professor of Oceanography at the University of Victoria Debra Wunch, Physicist at the University of TorontoChris Fletcher, Department of Geography and Environmental Management at the University of Waterloo U.S. cuts to Great Lakes science and monitoring threaten our shared freshwater resourceU.S. budget and staffing cuts are jeopardizing the long-standing collaboration with our southern neighbour to maintain the health of the Great Lakes, our shared resource and the largest freshwater system in the world. With: Jérôme Marty, executive director of the International Association for Great Lakes Research and part-time professor at the University of OttawaGreg McClinchey, policy and legislative director with the Great Lakes Fishery CommissionMichael Wilkie, Biologist at Wilfred Laurier UniversityBrittney Borowiec, research associate in the Wilkie Lab at Wilfred Laurier UniversityAaron Fisk, Ecologist and Canada Research Chair at the University of Windsor Unexpected ways U.S. culture war policies are affecting Canadian scientists One of the first things President Trump did after taking office was to sign an executive order eliminating all DEI policies in the federal government. This is having far-reaching consequences for Canadian scientists as they navigate the new reality of our frequent research partner's hostility against so-called 'woke science.'With:Dr. Sofia Ahmed, Clinician scientist, and academic lead for the Women and Children's Health Research Institute at the University of Alberta Angela Kaida, professor of health sciences and Canada Research Chair at Simon Fraser University in VancouverDawn Bowdish, professor of immunology, the executive director of the Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health and Canada Research Chair at McMaster UniversityKevin Zhao, MD/PhD student in immunology in the Bowdish Lab at McMaster UniversityJérôme Marty, executive director of the International Association for Great Lakes Research Canada has a 'responsibility' to step up and assert scientific sovereigntyA 2023 report on how to strengthen our federal research support system could be our roadmap to more robust scientific sovereignty. The Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System made recommendations to the federal government for how we could reform our funding landscape. The intent was to allow us to quickly respond to national research priorities and to make Canada a more enticing research partner in world science. With: Frédéric Bouchard, Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences and professor of philosophy of science at the Université de Montreal. Chair of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System.
CBC
43 minutes ago
- CBC
How an Indigenous health centre in Montreal is making care more welcoming
As Shirley Pien-Bérubé walks through the halls of the Indigenous Health Centre of Tio'tia:ke, she pauses to point out all the ways the Montreal-based clinic has grown since it opened in 2023. "Our services have expanded so much," she said. "We have a diabetic foot-care clinic, we have an optometry clinic, physiotherapy, mental health, clinical psychologist, addictions worker, a spiritual healer." Just inside the main entrance, a table is set up with sage and sweetgrass. Patients are invited to smudge or make their own medicine bundles. Care here is offered in several Indigenous languages, including Inuktitut and Cree. Pien-Bérubé works as a health navigator, accompanying patients and advocating for them within the health-care system. She says that's just one of the services offered here. The clinic aims to close gaps in health outcomes for Indigenous patients, which was one of the 94 calls to action of Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Clinic staff also work to overcome deep-rooted mistrust in the health-care system. Data from a recent Statistics Canada survey found about one in five Indigenous people reported experiencing unfair treatment, racism or discrimination from a health-care professional over the previous year. Pien-Bérubé says patients at her clinic can feel safe and understood. "They are finally being heard — after how many centuries? We are finally being heard," she said. Indigenous clinic aims to close gaps outlined by TRC 7 hours ago Duration 2:14 10 years after TRC's calls to action It's been 10 years since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which looked to document the impact of residential schools, released its final report. In it, the commissioners pointed to "troubling gaps in health outcomes between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Canadians." Those include disparities in the rates of infant mortality, diabetes and suicide. Seven of the TRC's 94 calls to action focused on health, including a call to identify and close gaps in health outcomes, funding for existing and new Indigenous healing centres and recognizing the value of Indigenous healing practices. Fay Virginia Desjarlais, the family violence prevention co-ordinator at the Indigenous Health Centre of Tio'tia:ke, says the clinic is a sign there has been some progress. "There were gaps in the health system to really understand the needs of the Indigenous people living in Montreal," she said. "People didn't feel safe. A lot of advocates, elders and different organizations came together to say 'We need to do something.' " Desjarlais says hospitals and other health-care settings can be unwelcoming for many Indigenous people. She has seen patients face discrimination and racism, and has been through it herself with a family doctor. "I'm diabetic and I was explaining that I'm not feeling well," she said, adding that when she described her symptoms, the doctor replied that when people feel that way, "that's because you're drinking." She says the doctor then dropped her as a patient because she had missed a single appointment. "I couldn't believe it," Desjarlais said. Improving access to health care According to the website Indigenous Watchdog, which tracks progress on the calls to action, while four of the seven calls related to health are in progress, three have stalled, and none are complete. The site's publisher, Douglas Sinclair, says the call to identify and close gaps around health outcomes has stalled in part due to a lack of access to government data. "There's just no political will across the country to sort of co-ordinate activities to identify that information and make it available," Sinclair said. "You can't develop policy if you're working in a vacuum." The federal government tracks its response to the recommendations on its website. It includes a health inequalities data tool available for users to visualise and "understand the size of inequities in social determinants of health and health outcomes." Sinclair says that where there has been progress, it hasn't been enough. He says access to health care remains a major issue for a lot of communities. Building treatment centres in the North In Iqaluit, Nunavut, an addictions and trauma treatment centre called Aqqusariaq is currently under construction that will allow people to receive culturally-based treatment in the territory, in Inuktitut, rather than having to travel south. "Travelling all the way down south to have to take part in treatment and care, you are being removed from your language and culture," said Kylie Aglukark, program director with addictions and trauma at Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated, a treaty organization that represents Inuit in Nunavut. "I'm hopeful that once this is up and running that we have an opportunity to build centres in each of Nunavut's regions," she said. Beyond that, Aglukark wants to build up the Inuit workforce for the centre and other services and to establish more treatment centres in more communities. "It's very important for Inuit to lead and have that opportunity to provide the services in Inuktitut," she said. Dr. Terri Aldred, academic lead with the National Collaborating Centre for Indigenous Health, says progress on the calls to action around health has been "moderate." While she's impressed with new Indigenous health clinics and healing centres like the ones in Montreal and Iqaluit that are "rooted in our ways of knowing and being," Aldred says such projects need to be scaled up to meet the need. She says they also need sustainable, long-term funding. "Indigenous people that are able to access those services will start to have a different relationship with accessing health care," she said. "And we'll be able to build trust with those providers, and we'll have a positive ripple effect.
CBC
43 minutes ago
- CBC
National vaccine registry needed amid measles resurgence, Canada's outgoing top doctor says
As Dr. Theresa Tam retires as Canada's top doctor, she's calling for a national vaccine registry. Tam says the COVID-19 pandemic, which began in early 2020 and killed at least 60,000 Canadians, showed how badly one is needed to track vaccines and protect vulnerable communities. A national vaccine registry, she says, could help prevent and manage crises like the resurgence of measles that the country now faces. Tam says she's in favour of a "nationally interoperable network of vaccine registries" that connects all of the provincial and territorial health systems and helps identify pockets of the population where there is poor vaccine coverage. While the majority of measles cases so far have occurred in communities that are historically under-vaccinated, she told Dr. Brian Goldman, host of CBC's White Coat, Black Art, "we don't actually know exactly where the situation with vaccine coverage lies." Tam spoke to Goldman from Ottawa for a feature interview reflecting back on her career as the country's chief public health officer. The pandemic proved that the technology for a registry is there, she says, given that almost all provinces and territories made COVID-19 vaccine records available electronically during that time. Although it was the pandemic that made her both a household name — and a target for hate — Tam came to the role of top doctor three years earlier, in June 2017, after occupying a series of other leadership positions within the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), including deputy chief. She has also served as an expert on a number of World Health Organization committees. WATCH | Dr. Theresa Tam on facing personal attacks during the pandemic: Leading Canada's public health response to COVID-19 was as much a personal challenge as it was a professional one, given Tam was also on the receiving end of racist and sexist vitriol during that time. "What I try to do, certainly at the time and even now, is just to focus on the job that I'm trying to deliver," she said. Those attacks were even harder on her staff — those monitoring the channels where the messages would come in, and who tried, as much as possible, to shield her from the worst of it, Tam says. "And one member of my staff used to also read me the incredibly lovely cards and messages that the public sent to encourage me to carry on. It was like the antidote to the other messages as well. So that really helped." One of Tam's provincial counterparts, Dr. Robert Strang, chief medical officer of health in Nova Scotia, says he has "huge respect for Dr. Tam." "Certainly working with her during COVID, we were all kind of in this kind of team together. Having her leading us as chief medical officers was a real pleasure and a privilege." Getting cross-Canada support for registry The challenge with getting a network of vaccine registries operating to help with measles and other infectious disease crises in future, Tam says, lies in getting all of the jurisdictions to sign on and co-operate to make their systems speak to one another. "There's in fact quite a lot of work on the way right now to develop those agreements with the provinces, as well as the more technical aspects of this," she said. A national registry, she says, will make things "so much easier" for public health departments, doctors, patients and parents. "That's the most important thing, that you will know whether your kids got the vaccine and that your health provider can have that information as well." Strang says there's agreement on the principle, but "the devil is always in the details." There are a number of groups, including PHAC, working to get the federation to do a better job of sharing health data, he says. "There's certainly support and agreement amongst the chief medical officers and public health leaders of this being a priority," Strang said. But Dr. Iris Gorfinkel, a Toronto family physician and researcher, says she suspects political considerations are behind some of the provinces "literally hoarding their medical data." "When politics stands in the way of science moving forward or health being prioritized, it becomes a serious, potentially life-threatening problem," said Gorfinkel, who is also the founder of PrimeHealth Clinical Research. Some provincial governments may be afraid voters will dislike sharing their health data, she says. But that shouldn't be a factor, given how easy it is to remove identifying details from the information so no one apart from an individual and their health-care provider knows their vaccine status, Gorfinkel says. We're already paying a heavy price — in lives and dollars — for not having a national registry, she says. "First, there's a tremendous waste of vaccines," Gorfinkel said. We saw that during COVID-19, she says, when Canada over-bought vaccines and struggled to administer them before they expired, eventually drawing international criticism for doing so while other parts of the world went without. In the case of the measles outbreaks, she says, "if we don't know where those are happening and we can't ship vaccines to where they're most needed, then what that means is we're not going to make the best use of the vaccines we have." And, of course, people and health systems pay when hospitals fill with people who have become ill from vaccine-preventable illnesses, Gorfinkel says. Looking abroad Other countries have made this work, among them Sweden, France, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain. In Norway, for example, a national registry that began in 1995 and at first tracked only routine childhood vaccinations, was expanded in 2011 to require mandatory reporting for all vaccines and age groups. Gorfinkel says some of these countries better embrace the sentiment that "what happens to my neighbour does affect me." Public health expert Amir Attaran, a vocal critic of Tam and PHAC during the pandemic, says far more could have been done at the federal level to get a national registry in place in this country, too. WATCH | Tam on why Canada needs better real-time health data: A professor in the faculties of law and school of epidemiology and public health at the University of Ottawa, Attaran says infectious disease experts like Tam have known since the SARS outbreak in 2003 that the country was woefully unprepared to properly track and respond to an outbreak due to poor data sharing. "And because of the experience of SARS in Canada, we should have been very switched on about this," said Attaran, who holds both a law degree and a PhD in biology. He says Canada's Statistics Act empowers the federal government to "require the provinces to cough up statistics," and that's exactly what public health data is. Canada's public health culture is self-defeating, Attaran says, because it recognizes the necessity of accurate and timely data but proceeds "under this false assumption that you can't get those data unless everybody agrees and everybody's happy with it. And then you fail to put in the political energy to bring about that consensus by agreement or coercion." Masking controversy While the pandemic highlighted the need for a national vaccine registry to manage outbreaks better, it also exposed challenges in public health communication. One of the most debated issues was masking. Attaran was among those who said Tam bungled the advice around masking in the earlier stages of the pandemic, for example. "Early in the pandemic, she told people, 'No, you don't need to mask,'" he said. Yet by then the virus had been identified as SARS-CoV-2, and we'd already learned from the 2003 SARS crisis that it required masking, he says. But in Nova Scotia, Strang says, the information scientists were working with early on suggested the virus behaved like an influenza, which spread through droplets, not aerosols. "We don't recommend widespread masking, necessarily, for everybody for influenza." Tam says public health leaders "need to do a better job in explaining to people how the scientific information are coming through, how we analyze it and how we turn them into guidance."
