Latest news with #Jenny
The Irish Sun
6 hours ago
- Entertainment
- The Irish Sun
‘This is brilliant' – Ireland AM host leaves fans in stitches after cheeky innuendo clip with wife
AN Ireland AM star has left his fans in hysterics after he posted a cheeky innuendo clip with his wife. Popular presenter, relationship with their fans over on social media . Advertisement 3 Martin and Jenny posted a hilarious clip on social media 3 Martin covered himself up in bed 3 The host then revealed he was wearing Jenny's clothes underneath Martin and Jenny are renowned for their shared sense of humour and even have their own podcast together titled Yesterday, the funny couple left fans in stitches when they posted a hilarious innuendo video to their social media. In the short clip, Jenny was sat on the end of their bed saying: "Take my clothes off." The camera then panned to Martin who was laying underneath the bed sheets as he replied: "No!" Advertisement READ MORE IN IRELAND AM Jenny gave a stern look to her husband and responded: "Take my clothes off now!" A frustrated Martin reappeared and sighed: "Ugh fine." However, in a hilarious twist, when the star lifted the covers off himself he was wearing one of Jenny's sun dresses. Martin stood up from the bed wearing a strapless maxi dress with frills and a stripe pattern. Advertisement Most read in News TV He then humorously walked off sulking into the next room dragging the dress with him. A caption over the video wrote: "My wife is very demanding." Martin King gets revenge on wife And fans were all left in tears of laughter as they flocked to the comment section. Kellie wrote: "This is brilliant hahahah." Advertisement Wendy said: "I'm weak! This really made me laugh." 'I'M DEAD' Majella remarked: "You two are a scream!!" Biddy added: "Oh for f*** sake! Ye are hilarious." While Pete commented: "Brilliant, I can see a comedy sketch coming shortly." Advertisement And Sonya laughed: "I'm dead, just gas !!" The clever video has since gone viral on TikTok with over 15,000 views.
![[김대균의 영어산책] 최근 토익에 출제된 onto와 on을 구분하자! 헷갈리기 쉬운 전치사 총정리](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F15%2Fnews-p.v1.20250615.60dc04e149b64118bf3201e233c84a43_T1.png&w=3840&q=100)
![[김대균의 영어산책] 최근 토익에 출제된 onto와 on을 구분하자! 헷갈리기 쉬운 전치사 총정리](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[김대균의 영어산책] 최근 토익에 출제된 onto와 on을 구분하자! 헷갈리기 쉬운 전치사 총정리
다음 문장은 최근 토익 시험에서 출제된 문제를 바탕으로 재구성해서 만들어 본 문제이다. 저작권에 걸리지 않는 문제로 기억을 통해 비슷하게 만들어봤다. After logging in, you will be able to access the documents and move them ------ your personal computer. (A) onto ✅(B) on (C) beyond (D) against ▶ 로그인하면 문서를 열람하고 자신의 개인 컴퓨터로 전송할 수 있습니다. ▶ Key Point: 문맥에 맞는 전치사 선택! '컴퓨터로 전송하다'는 동작을 설명하는 문장이므로, 정적인 위치를 나타내는 on보다는 이동을 강조하는 onto가 적절하다. 'on'은 단순한 위치를 나타내는 반면, 'onto'는 '어디 어디 위로' 이동해 가는 방향성을 포함한다. 이런 차이를 토익은 정답을 결정하는 기준으로 삼습니다. ❌ (B) on: ~위에 → 동작의 의미가 없어서 부적절 ❌ (C) beyond: ~을 넘어서 → 컴퓨터 범위를 넘어선다는 의미로 부적절 ❌ (D) against: ~에 반대하여 → 의미상 부적절 정답: (A) onto 이 문제는 '컴퓨터로 파일을 전송하다'라는 맥락에서, 방향성과 이동이 강조되는 전치사를 묻는 문제였다. 정적인 상태가 아닌 움직임을 포함하는 표현이기 때문에 'onto'가 정답으로 적절하다. 'on'은 위치를 나타낼 때 쓰이며, onto는 동작의 의미가 포함된다. 필자가 토익 500회 최다응시 만점강사인데 필자의 기억으로는 onto가 정답인 문제가 이번에 최초로 출제되었다. 이처럼 on과 onto, in과 into, below와 beneath, over와 above 는 한국 학습자들이 가장 자주 헷갈려 하는 전치사 쌍입니다. 아래에서 그 차이와 예문을 통해 확실하게 정리해 보자! ✅ on vs. onto ● on: ~위에 (정지된 상태, 접촉) The book is on the table. (책이 테이블 위에 있다 — 고정 상태) There is a vase on the shelf. (선반 위에 꽃병이 있다) ● onto: ~위로 (움직임 동반) The cat jumped onto the table. (고양이가 테이블 위로 뛰어올랐다) He poured water onto the floor. (그는 바닥 위로 물을 부었다) ▶ 요약: 정적인 위치는 on, 동작/이동은 onto ◎ 좀 더 긴 예문으로 연습해 보자! The worker placed the toolbox on the bench and then lifted a heavy crate onto the truck. (그 작업자는 벤치 위에 도구 상자를 놓고, 무거운 상자를 트럭 위로 들어 올렸다) She carefully arranged the dishes on the table before sliding the centerpiece onto the linen cloth. (그녀는 식기들을 테이블 위에 정성스럽게 배치한 후, 중앙 장식을 천 위로 밀어 넣었다) ✅ in vs. into ● in: ~안에 (정지 상태, 내부에 있음) The keys are in my bag. (열쇠가 가방 안에 있다) There's water in the bottle. (병 안에 물이 있다) ● into: ~안으로 (이동, 변화 강조) He walked into the room. (그는 방 안으로 걸어 들어갔다) She poured milk into the cup. (그녀는 컵 안으로 우유를 부었다) ▶ 요약: 정적인 내부 상태는 in, 동작이 수반되면 into ◎ 좀 더 긴 예문으로 연습해 보자! After returning from school, Jenny put her books into her backpack, which was already in her closet. (학교에서 돌아온 제니는 책을 자신의 가방 안으로 넣었고, 그 가방은 이미 옷장 안에 있었다) The chef scooped the soup into the bowls, which were neatly arranged in a row on the counter. (요리사는 수프를 그릇 안으로 떠 넣었고, 그릇들은 조리대 위에 정렬되어 있었다) ✅ below vs. beneath ● below: ~보다 아래에 (수직 거리, 비교 느낌 강함) The temperature dropped below zero. (기온이 0도 아래로 떨어졌다) Her scores are below average. (그녀의 점수는 평균 이하다) ● beneath: ~아래에 (물리적/추상적 위치, 문어적 느낌) The valley lay beneath the mountains. (계곡이 산 아래에 있었다) He felt the job was beneath him. (그는 그 일이 자기 수준 이하라고 느꼈다) ▶ 요약: below는 수직 거리 중심, beneath는 문학적/감정적 의미 포함 ◎ 좀 더 긴 예문으로 연습해 보자! The ancient city was buried beneath the desert sands, several meters below the current ground level. (고대 도시는 현재 지표면보다 수 미터 아래, 사막 모래 아래에 묻혀 있었다) His pride would not allow him to work at a position he believed was beneath his abilities, though the salary was well below industry standards. (그는 그 일이 자신의 능력 이하라고 믿었기에 자존심상 그 일을 할 수 없었고, 그 급여는 업계 평균보다 훨씬 낮았다) ✅ over vs. above ● over: ~위에 (덮음, 수직 정렬, 이동 가능성 포함) The painting hangs over the sofa. (그 그림은 소파 위에 걸려 있다) A helicopter flew over the city. (헬리콥터가 도시 위로 날아갔다) ● above: ~보다 위에 (비교 느낌, 상대적인 위치 강조) The clouds are above the mountains. (구름이 산 위에 있다) Her grades are above average. (그녀의 성적은 평균 이상이다) ▶ 요약: over는 수직으로 덮거나 이동 포함, above는 상대적 위치 강조 ◎ 좀 더 긴 예문으로 연습해 보자! The bridge was built over the river, rising far above the surrounding forest. (그 다리는 강 위에 지어졌으며, 주변 숲보다 훨씬 높은 곳에 솟아 있다) The painting extended over the entire wall, while the lighting was installed just above eye level for optimal viewing.
CTV News
3 days ago
- CTV News
Missing Calgary woman last seen in Mayland Heights: police
Jenny was last seen at a home in the 1900 block of 10 Avenue N.E. at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, May 27. (CPS handout) Calgary police are looking to the public for help finding a woman who went missing from the community of Mayland Heights. Police say Jenny was last seen at a home in the 1900 block of 10 Avenue N.E. at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, May 27. It's believed she went for a walk but didn't return. Police say it's out of character for Jenny to be out of contact with her family for this long, and they are concerned for her well-being. She is described as 5'1' tall (155 cm) and 300 pounds (136 kg) with brown eyes and long black hair. She was wearing a black shirt, a plaid jacket and black pants. Anyone with information about Jenny's whereabouts is asked to call police 403-266-1234. Tips can also be submitted anonymously through Crime Stoppers. NOTE: The Calgary Police Service announced last year it would no longer be sharing the last names of those who are reported missing – or sharing details of whether any of those individuals are located deceased – as a standard practice moving forward.
Metro
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Metro
Mum suing Cineworld after horror film trailers played before Lilo & Stitch
A mum is taking legal action against a cinema chain after they 'traumatised' her young children. Jenny and Robert Ellice took their two sons, four-year-old Max and Bertie, five, to see Lilo & Stitch at Cineworld in Enfield, London. In total they paid £85 for the '4DX' viewing which promises 'an extreme sensory experience' which moves the seat while watching the film. The family settled down to watch the film on June 7 and sat through several adverts and trailers for other upcoming films, as is expected at the cinema. Generally, cinemas only show trailers for films with the same or lower age rating than the film audiences are actually there to watch. But Jenny, 43, was shocked when instead of trailers for other PG-rated films, Cineworld showed trailers for PG-13 rated films Jurassic World Rebirth and horror film Megan, as well as a second horror film. 'The first one was Jurassic World, and I thought that seems a bit off, but I thought it could be a PG film like Lilo & Stitch,' Jenny explained. 'The seats move really violently and my boys like dinosaurs so it's fine. 'The next one was Megan, and I was sure that wasn't a PG – it got really graphic really quickly. 'It's like those Chuckie movies.' When combined with the moving seats, and despite covering her sons eyes, Jenny says both of her sons were left 'rigid with fear' and 'terrified' by the horror trailers. They were so scared that they left the cinema altogether, missing out on the film they were supposed to see in the first place. Cineworld staff apologised for the mistake and offered free tickets, but Jenny says this doesn't go far enough. Describing the impact on her sons, she explained: 'Max has been waking up screaming and Rob said to his teacher yesterday that he was scared from the cinema. 'But you just don't know with kids, they're like sponges, you think they're not listening, but they are. 'They were pretty graphic trailers. There was swearing and screaming in them – my eldest was rigid with fear. I had my hands over their eyes. 'I had no idea why they were showing these trailers for a U movie – these are four-year-olds exposed to graphic swearing and violence. 'They were terrified.' Jenny reached out to Cineworld via Instagram to complain further, but was told the cinema would take no further action after they had been offered free tickets. So the mum has now instructed her solicitors to take further action, contacting Cineworld as well as Enfield council and the film licensing/rating body. She explained: 'We were the only ones who went into the 4CX showing. 'We got popcorn and drinks, and they were so excited. They were all happy with their 3D glasses. 'Max hasn't even started school yet, with a big corporation this shouldn't be happening. 'If they had just put me in touch with someone from head officer then it would show they care. More Trending 'I want to ensure this never happens again as the cinema are not taking it seriously at all. 'Had the cinema had the decency to speak to me about it I probably wouldn't have taken legal action, but they have treated my complaint as more of an annoyance. 'Children at that age are like sponges and so impressionable, even just the noises of violence can leave a lasting impression and it's just not something two young children, especially one of pre-school age should ever be exposed to.' Metro has contacted Cineworld for comment. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Why Evita fans think Rachel Zegler's balcony performance is actually great for theatre MORE: London-bound Air India flight 'cancelled last minute over technical issues' MORE: Man arrested after woman in her 30s sexually assaulted in London cinema
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Daily Mirror
'We paid £85 to see Lilo and Stitch - what we saw before film horrified us'
While waiting for kids' blockbuster Lilo & Stitch to start at Cineworld in Enfield, four-year-old Max and his five-year-old brother Bertie were left "traumatised" when trailers for two horror movies were shown Two young kids were left "traumatised" after being forced to watch two horror film trailers before a screening of Lilo & Stitch, their furious mum has said. Jenny Ellice, 43, and husband Robert took their two boys, Max, four, and Bertie, five to watch the kids' favourite at the Enfield branch of Cineworld on June 7. The family splashed out £85 for the 4DX viewing option - which Cineworld says delivers "an extreme sensory experience". Usually, cinemas ensure the trailers they play are appropriate for the age of the viewers of the main film. Rather than showing PG-rated films, the cinema showed PG-13 trailers. One was Jurassic World Rebirth, while the other two were horrors, including M3GAN 2.0, which is about a murderous robot. Her boys were fine with Jurassic World, but the two horror adverts left the youngsters "terrified" and "rigid with fear". They left minutes later because her children were too scared to stay and watch Lilo & Stitch. Staff apologised for the mistake and offered free tickets, but Jenny says it doesn't go far enough. The TV journalist from Epping, Essex, said: "Max has been waking up screaming and Rob said to his teacher yesterday that he was scared from the cinema. "But you just don't know with kids, they're like sponges, you think they're not listening, but they are. "They were pretty graphic trailers. There was swearing and screaming in them - my eldest was rigid with fear. I had my hands over their eyes. "I had no idea why they were showing these trailers for a U movie - these are four-year-olds exposed to graphic swearing and violence. They were terrified." Jenny says it's "lucky" that they were the only ones in the 10:10 screening of the film. She added: "We were the only ones who went into the 4CX showing. We got popcorn and drinks, and they were so excited. They were all happy with their 3D glasses. The ads were on and then it goes into age-appropriate trailers for the film. "The first one was Jurassic World, and I thought that seems a bit off, but I thought it could be a PG film like Lilo & Stitch. The seats move really violently and my boys like dinosaurs so it's fine. The next one was Megan, and I was sure that wasn't a PG - it got really graphic really quickly. It's like those Chuckie movies." Jenny reached out to Cineworld on Instagram but was told after the offer of free tickets, her complaint couldn't go any further. She has now instructed her solicitors to take further action. She said: "Max hasn't even started school yet, with a big corporation this shouldn't be happening. If they had just put me in touch with someone from head office then it would show they care. "We have sent a letter from our solicitors who will likely be making a complaint to Enfield council and the film licensing/rating body. "I want to ensure this never happens again as the cinema are not taking it seriously at all. Had the cinema had the decency to speak to me about it I probably wouldn't have taken legal action, but they have treated my complaint as more of an annoyance. "Children at that age are like sponges and so impressionable, even just the noises of violence can leave a lasting impression and it's just not something two young children, especially one of pre-school age should ever be exposed to."
