NHS launches new drive to find more people with deadly pancreatic cancer
Hundreds of GP practices in England are being given extra funding to comb patient records looking for people with the disease, which has the lowest survival rate of all cancers.
GPs and their teams will look for people over 60 who may have signs of the cancer, such as a recent diagnosis of diabetes and sudden weight loss.
Figure suggest that around half of people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer have been diagnosed with type 1 or 2 diabetes recently.
Family doctors taking part in the NHS England pilot will then contact patients and send them for urgent blood tests and CT scans to rule cancer in or out.
Pancreatic cancer can have vague symptoms and is often diagnosed in the late stages.
According to researchers, newly-diagnosed diabetes patients often have similar symptoms as a person with early-stage pancreatic cancer.
This is because the cancer destroys the same insulin-producing cells that are also destroyed in diabetes.
Around 10,500 people in the UK are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer every year and only around one in 20 survive the disease for 10 years or more.
More than half of people die within three months of diagnosis.
For the new three-year pilot, more than 300 GP practices in England will be involved, with all practices up and running by the autumn.
Almost £2 million in targeted funding has been invested to help practices find people most at risk and give patients the best chance of being diagnosed early.
Professor Peter Johnson, NHS national clinical director for cancer, said: 'Pancreatic cancer is responsible for so many deaths because patients don't usually notice symptoms until the cancer is at an advanced stage, which is why we need to find new ways to pick it up.
'Through initiatives like this and the upcoming 10-year health plan, the NHS is determined to go a step further – not just treat people at an advanced stage but to go out into communities and seek people out who might be unwell without any symptoms so we can provide people with the most effective treatment.
'The NHS is seeing and treating more people with cancer than ever, and early diagnosis is key to ensure patients have the best chance of receiving effective treatment.
'If your GP practice identifies you as at risk of pancreatic cancer, I urge you to come forward for testing as soon as possible.'
Health minister Karin Smyth said: 'This targeted approach to identify people at risk of one of the most lethal cancers could give more people a fighting chance and spare the heartbreak of countless families.'
We're delighted to see the Government commit to boosting clinical trials as part of their forthcoming 10 year plan. Clinical trials are a crucial treatment option for people with #PancreaticCancer & improving access to them could be key to driving up treatment & survival rates 🧪 https://t.co/QT1gQvZXR2
— Pancreatic Cancer UK (@PancreaticCanUK) June 16, 2025
Alfie Bailey-Bearfield, head of influencing and health improvement at Pancreatic Cancer UK, said: 'Diagnosing more people with pancreatic cancer earlier, when the disease is most treatable, would make the single biggest difference to improving survival, so we are delighted to see significant further investment from NHS England towards that incredibly important goal.
'We're proud to have been involved in shaping this new case finding pilot, which will support GPs to proactively find people with pancreatic cancer among one of largest groups known to be at increased risk: those aged over 60, with new onset diabetes who have recently lost weight without trying to do so.
'Many of the people who are referred for a CT scan during the pilot will not have pancreatic cancer, but for those that do, the impact could be lifesaving.
'Subject to the pilot's success, we will be calling for this pilot to be expanded across the country to help give more people affected by the deadliest common cancer the very best chance of survival.'
Previous research has shown that people over 50 with a new case of type 2 diabetes have a higher chance of being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer within three years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
I thought I'd welcome assisted dying after mum's drawn-out death but vote terrifies me… MPs must stop ignoring experts
EVERYBODY deserves the right to have a dignified death, and many will welcome the passing of the assisted dying bill. After watching my own mother suffer a drawn-out, hideous death I have often thought I would have welcomed a law like this too. 10 10 But Friday's vote terrifies me. I now fear for those of us who want an assisted death, as well as those of us who do want to stay alive. A decision of this magnitude should never have been a private members' bill, it should have been presided over by Government ministers. Corners have been cut, fundamental decisions left up in the air, and advice ignored in a desperate bid to rush it through. That seems senseless when this bill really is a matter of life and death. The first frightening milestone was when the plans to have a High Court judge approve each case were changed because the court doesn't have the capacity to preside over it. But the NHS doesn't have the staff to spare either. Now, to have an assisted death it will need two doctors, a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. Anybody who has been stuck in the NHS system needing to see any of those knows that there are not enough to go round as it is. And if anybody voting on Friday had stopped to listen, they would have heard many doctors saying they want no part in assisting suicide. Which means that dying people spend their final — precious — days battling to get an assisted death. Our own Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was opposed to it because it would mean the NHS now has less money for other priorities. But he was ignored. Former Home Secretary Sir James Cleverly warned a 'blank cheque' would be needed to get the service up and running. But he was ignored. Doctors said it will be a 'real threat' to patients and medics because the NHS, already under-resourced and overspent, can't cope with this extra burden. Again, they were ignored. And nobody, cruelly, bothered to listen to the charities involved in hospices and disability who voiced their concerns. I just hope the House of Lords does the decent thing now and stops to listen — and stop this bill going ahead. Because our crumbling NHS hasn't got the time, or money, to deal with it. Added pressure Figures released on Friday show that the establishment of a voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and panels will cost about £13million a year. I imagine that really is the tip of the iceberg. This huge sum will have to come from somewhere — and one of the biggest areas will be palliative care. The bill's backers say healthcare costs at the end of life could be reduced by almost £60million after ten years. Which is great news, unless you actually don't want to die. Now our underfunded palliative care will get less cash, there will be fewer places for vulnerable and weak people to access, more pressure on them, well . . . to die. They may feel they have no other option but to say yes to the doctor — who is now actually legally allowed to ask them if they want an assisted death. We will watch helplessly as people who have fought to live all their lives give up because they have little other option. Just how scandalous is that? Our NHS can't cope right now. They are paying BILLIONS a year in compensation claims for clinical negligence. This added pressure will see those cases rise. Meanwhile, NHS waiting lists will get longer and we will see more people dying who could have been saved. While those who actually wanted help with their death will die long before they get to the front of the queue. I THOUGHT we'd seen it all when Sharon Stone uncrossed her legs in Basic Instinct. But in a racy new shoot for Vogue, the 67-year-old actress strips off to be worshipped by a sultry pile of hunky male models. 10 10 Nice work if you can get it. And yet she claims to struggle with everyday concerns because: 'When it comes to life, we're all the same.' I get the sentiment Shaz. But when you're a millionaire film star I imagine there's an awful lot less to worry about. HUE 'N' CRY IS CRAZY AFTER touring a lab in Norwich with Prince William to learn about fabric dye, actress Cate Blanchett says she will reconsider the colour of clothes she wears in the future. Apparently, colours such as black, green, blue and even white are difficult to make without causing damage to the environment. 10 You've got to feel sorry for the celebs who may now be judged on their colour choices as well as fashion ones. Take Geri Horner, who has vowed to wear only white and hails it as 'a symbol of purity, cleanliness, immaculacy and perfection'. Nope, now it also means you don't care about the environment. AS a farmer's daughter I have always had a touch of vegaphobia, finding vegans a bit smug and self righteous. So I couldn't help smirking when the founder of the toxic gossip website Tattle Life was unmasked and turned out to be Sebastian Bond, a very annoying, vegan blogger. Perfect. THERE are two words that are guaranteed to send a shiver down the spine of 'booze o'clock' mums and they are 'wine shortage'. But start stockpiling, ladies, as it's about to happen. 10 Workers at the country's biggest bottling plant are going on strike. Gallons of New World wines are shipped to the UK in containers and bottled here to save transporting millions of heavy glass bottles. I predict Prime-style stampedes for the last bottle of Sauvignon Blanc in Tesco. CAN'T KID ME KATE APPARENTLY if parents tell their kids they are naughty, the chances are that they are going to be naughty. Sounds madness but child therapist and former BBC newsreader Kate Silverton explains that children internalise what we tell them and start to believe 'that's who I am'. So instead, parents should say: 'I didn't like that behaviour.' Which, when you think about it, does actually make sense. And I was fully on board with Kate's advice until she added that children 'are not making conscious choices for the majority of the time'. Hmm, she clearly didn't see the grin on my six-year-old's face this morning – trust me, he was definitely choosing to be naughty and most certainly knew what he was doing wrong. ANGE'S BUZZIN' SHE'S blunt, bolshie and terrifies the Tories. And this week Angela Rayner did battle in the Commons with one of her four tattoos on display. 10 As she took to the dispatch box, the Deputy Prime Minister did not seem to care who saw Celtic love knot on her wrist. It may have raised a few eyebrows in the debating chamber, but she also has a red rose on her leg and a geometric design on the back of her neck. Then there is the bee on her right shoulder, a symbol of Manchester's resilience and community spirit in the wake of the 2017 terrorist attack. Even her harshest critics can't argue with that.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
NHS sends patients abroad after waiting lists hit record high
The NHS is paying to send rising numbers of British patients abroad for treatment after waiting lists in England hit record highs. The health service is funding treatments across Europe in countries including Poland, Lithuania and the Czech Republic. Treatments being carried out abroad range from routine operations, including hip replacements and cataract operations, to more complex cancer surgery. The number of people having such procedures overseas has jumped by 42 per cent in just two years, The Telegraph can reveal. The Health Secretary described the situation as 'unacceptable', saying a 'broken NHS' had left patients waiting 'far too long for treatment, forcing many to go private or even seek healthcare abroad'. The revelations come as Wes Streeting prepares to publish a 10-year health plan that aims to clear backlogs and reform the way services are delivered. On Friday night, he pledged his plan would 'catapult the NHS into the 21st century and get people seen on time in a modern health service on British shores'. Experts said the rising cases were a 'terrible indictment' of the state of the NHS, with Poland, Germany, Italy and Belgium among the main beneficiaries. Under a little-known post-Brexit healthcare agreement, the NHS will pay another European country to treat UK patients where there is 'undue delay' to them accessing equivalent treatment on the NHS within a 'medically acceptable timeframe'. Patients desperate to have gynaecology surgery and hip replacements were the most likely to get NHS approval to travel overseas for their treatment. Those waiting for cancer treatment, and surgery to repair hernias, remove gallbladders and treat cataracts also fled Britain to get help more quickly, the investigation reveals. The treatment or surgery must be provided by a state healthcare system, not a private clinic, and patients must fund their own travel and accommodation costs. There has been a rapid rise in the number of UK patients using the scheme, as the NHS battles to reduce waiting lists, which peaked in 2023. In the last three years, the NHS has spent £4.32 million sending 352 patients overseas for treatment, according to data from the NHS Business Services Authority, which handles the payments. The number of overseas treatments paid for by the NHS jumped from 99 in 2022-23 to 112 in 2023-24 and rose again to 141 in 2024-25, according to figures obtained by The Telegraph under Freedom of Information laws. Mr Streeting said: 'This Government inherited a broken NHS, with patients left waiting far too long for treatment, forcing many to go private or even seeking healthcare abroad. This is unacceptable and, since day one in office, we have been delivering the investment and reform needed to turn the NHS around. 'We are focused on delivering for patients, so they get the treatment they need, when they need it, closer to home. In less than a year, we've delivered 3.6 million more appointments, cut the waiting list by almost a quarter of a million, and diagnosed an extra 100,000 suspected cancer patients on time. 'There's a long way to go, but we are finally putting the NHS on the road to recovery. 'Our forthcoming 10-year plan will lay out how we catapult the NHS into the 21st century and get people seen on time in a modern health service on British shores.' Dennis Reed, from Silver Voices, said: 'This is a terrible indictment of the state of the NHS. People have to be desperate to think about having hospital treatment in another country, hundreds of miles away. 'It is really worrying and it's also worrying about the inequalities – most of us wouldn't know about this scheme, and many could not afford the travel and hotels, so the vast majority of the population just have to put up with really long waits.' 'Says a lot about pressures on NHS' There are currently 1.4 million people waiting for NHS gynaecology or orthopaedic procedures, including hip replacements, in England. Of these, nearly 43,000 have waited more than a year for treatment since being diagnosed, latest figures for April 2025 show. Siva Anandaciva, director of policy at The King's Fund, said it was 'striking' that more Britons were getting treatment overseas. 'It was only a few years ago that the concerns about medical tourism were that too many people were coming to the UK to seek treatment. It says a lot about the pressures the NHS is under that the concern now is that too many people [from the UK] are seeking treatment overseas,' he said. 'The NHS has made substantial progress in tackling the very longest waits for care that built up before and after the Covid-19 pandemic, but the reality is that it will be several years before national waiting list targets are routinely met again.' Patients were most likely to travel to Poland for treatment, with the NHS paying for 72 procedures to be carried out there between 2022-23 and 2024-25. This was followed by Germany (59 procedures), Italy (32), Belgium (31) and Ireland (26). But the NHS spent the most money on treatments performed in Ireland, which cost around £3.15 million over the last three years. It also spent £224,000 on NHS patients having treatment in Germany; £147,000 on treatments in Poland; £138,000 in Switzerland; £138,000 in Italy; and £134,000 in Austria. Payment figures were recorded by the NHS in the local currency and converted to pound sterling by The Telegraph based on currency exchange rates at the time of writing. Separate NHS England figures also revealed that nearly two out of every five applications (37 per cent) made by patients wanting to travel abroad for treatment were approved in 2024, up from just one in five (21 per cent) in 2022, suggesting more applications are meeting the criteria for 'undue delay'. Rachel Power, chief executive of The Patients Association, said when patients felt compelled to seek treatment abroad, it was 'a reflection of the state of the waiting lists and the very severe problems of the NHS'. Mrs Power suggested the system could worsen 'inequalities', as the scheme is only accessible to those able to work out the application process and who have the means to pay for travel and accommodation. 'To do this, you have to have the confidence and ability to navigate the system – we talk to patients all the time who can't navigate and access treatment [on the NHS],' she said. Prof Ranee Thakar, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said the fact patients were travelling long distances for treatment was 'clear evidence that they can't access the care they need, when they need it'. She added the Government must tackle the 'critical issue' of long waits for gynaecology treatment in its upcoming NHS 10-year health plan. 'There are more than three quarters of a million women in the UK waiting for hospital gynaecology care, with serious conditions that have a devastating impact on almost every aspect of their lives,' said Prof Thakar.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Medics arrested at eco protests should not be struck off, say doctors
Doctors who are arrested while demonstrating at climate change protests should not be struck off, a union is being urged to say. A series of motions to be put before the British Medical Association (BMA) are calling for unwavering support to be given to NHS staff who take part in 'non-violent' eco action. If successful, the union would call for a ban on disciplinary proceedings being brought against activist doctors who are arrested for protest stunts that may include inflicting criminal damage on property and businesses. One motion submitted to the annual representative meeting in Liverpool, which begins on June 23, says the BMA should recognise ' climate change is a public health emergency ' so doctors 'have an ethical duty to advocate for direct action'. It adds that medics should 'condemn' any complaints or disciplinary actions brought 'against doctors who engage in non-violent climate activism'. 'Non-violent climate advocacy' It also calls for 'explicit protections within employment contracts… to ensure doctors do not face career detriment for engaging in non-violent climate advocacy'. Another motion asks BMA members to formally recognise 'that it is a mark of tyrannical regimes that they seek to destroy the careers of those who challenge them' and for the union to refuse to take part in any disciplinary action against medics convicted of 'forms of civil disobedience which do not involve violence to the person'. The moves follow a series of high-profile court cases that have seen doctors sanctioned for taking part in climate activism. In January, Dr Sarah Benn lost an appeal against the suspension of her medical license after she was jailed for breaching a court order by taking part in climate protests. She took part in three Just Stop Oil protests at an oil terminal in Warwickshire in 2022 before being suspended from practising for five months by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) in April 2024. Dr Benn, who had worked in Birmingham and has since retired, sought to challenge the tribunal's findings at the High Court. However, a judge rejected her case after concluding she 'intended to act in a way that did not meet the standards of behaviour to be expected of a doctor'. Also in January, Dr Patrick Hart was jailed for a year after being found guilty of causing criminal damage after damaging petrol pumps with a hammer and chisel at an M25 service station. In total, 16 fuel pumps at Thurrock Motorway Services, in Grays, Essex, were attacked by Hart on Aug 24, 2022. When the doctor is released from prison, he will face a tribunal after being referred for a disciplinary hearing by his medical regulator, the General Medical Council. A spokesman for the GMC said at the time that Dr Hart was not currently suspended. Before he was sentenced, Dr Hart told the court: 'Right now, the greatest health threat to all of us is the unfolding climate catastrophe. 'It is the greatest health threat we have ever faced. All healthcare workers have a responsibility to protect the health of their patients. 'If we do not stand up to the oil and gas executives who are wreaking havoc on our climate and the politicians who enable them, if we do not end the burning of fossil fuels, then we will have failed as a profession and the health systems that we have developed over centuries will collapse. 'I will continue to fight against the death sentence of fossil fuels for as long as I have strength in me. I have no greater duty as a doctor at this moment in history.'
