I thought I'd welcome assisted dying after mum's drawn-out death but vote terrifies me… MPs must stop ignoring experts

EVERYBODY deserves the right to have a dignified death, and many will welcome the passing of the assisted dying bill.
After watching my own mother suffer a drawn-out, hideous death I have often thought I would have welcomed a law like this too.
10
10
But Friday's vote terrifies me.
I now fear for those of us who want an assisted death, as well as those of us who do want to stay alive.
A decision of this magnitude should never have been a private members' bill, it should have been presided over by Government ministers.
Corners have been cut, fundamental decisions left up in the air, and advice ignored in a desperate bid to rush it through.
That seems senseless when this bill really is a matter of life and death.
The first frightening milestone was when the plans to have a High Court judge approve each case were changed because the court doesn't have the capacity to preside over it.
But the NHS doesn't have the staff to spare either.
Now, to have an assisted death it will need two doctors, a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist.
Anybody who has been stuck in the NHS system needing to see any of those knows that there are not enough to go round as it is.
And if anybody voting on Friday had stopped to listen, they would have heard many doctors saying they want no part in assisting suicide.
Which means that dying people spend their final — precious — days battling to get an assisted death.
Our own Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was opposed to it because it would mean the NHS now has less money for other priorities. But he was ignored.
Former Home Secretary Sir James Cleverly warned a 'blank cheque' would be needed to get the service up and running. But he was ignored.
Doctors said it will be a 'real threat' to patients and medics because the NHS, already under-resourced and overspent, can't cope with this extra burden.
Again, they were ignored.
And nobody, cruelly, bothered to listen to the charities involved in hospices and disability who voiced their concerns.
I just hope the House of Lords does the decent thing now and stops to listen — and stop this bill going ahead.
Because our crumbling NHS hasn't got the time, or money, to deal with it.
Added pressure
Figures released on Friday show that the establishment of a voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and panels will cost about £13million a year. I imagine that really is the tip of the iceberg.
This huge sum will have to come from somewhere — and one of the biggest areas will be palliative care.
The bill's backers say healthcare costs at the end of life could be reduced by almost £60million after ten years. Which is great news, unless you actually don't want to die.
Now our underfunded palliative care will get less cash, there will be fewer places for vulnerable and weak people to access, more pressure on them, well . . . to die.
They may feel they have no other option but to say yes to the doctor — who is now actually legally allowed to ask them if they want an assisted death.
We will watch helplessly as people who have fought to live all their lives give up because they have little other option.
Just how scandalous is that?
Our NHS can't cope right now.
They are paying BILLIONS a year in compensation claims for clinical negligence. This added pressure will see those cases rise.
Meanwhile, NHS waiting lists will get longer and we will see more people dying who could have been saved.
While those who actually wanted help with their death will die long before they get to the front of the queue.
I THOUGHT we'd seen it all when Sharon Stone uncrossed her legs in Basic Instinct.
But in a racy new shoot for Vogue, the 67-year-old actress strips off to be worshipped by a sultry pile of hunky male models.
10
10
Nice work if you can get it. And yet she claims to struggle with everyday concerns because: 'When it comes to life, we're all the same.'
I get the sentiment Shaz. But when you're a millionaire film star I imagine there's an awful lot less to worry about.
HUE 'N' CRY IS CRAZY
AFTER touring a lab in Norwich with Prince William to learn about fabric dye, actress Cate Blanchett says she will reconsider the colour of clothes she wears in the future.
Apparently, colours such as black, green, blue and even white are difficult to make without causing damage to the environment.
10
You've got to feel sorry for the celebs who may now be judged on their colour choices as well as fashion ones.
Take Geri Horner, who has vowed to wear only white and hails it as 'a symbol of purity, cleanliness, immaculacy and perfection'.
Nope, now it also means you don't care about the environment.
AS a farmer's daughter I have always had a touch of vegaphobia, finding vegans a bit smug and self righteous.
So I couldn't help smirking when the founder of the toxic gossip website Tattle Life was unmasked and turned out to be Sebastian Bond, a very annoying, vegan blogger.
Perfect.
THERE are two words that are guaranteed to send a shiver down the spine of 'booze o'clock' mums and they are 'wine shortage'.
But start stockpiling, ladies, as it's about to happen.
10
Workers at the country's biggest bottling plant are going on strike.
Gallons of New World wines are shipped to the UK in containers and bottled here to save transporting millions of heavy glass bottles.
I predict Prime-style stampedes for the last bottle of Sauvignon Blanc in Tesco.
CAN'T KID ME KATE
APPARENTLY if parents tell their kids they are naughty, the chances are that they are going to be naughty.
Sounds madness but child therapist and former BBC newsreader Kate Silverton explains that children internalise what we tell them and start to believe 'that's who I am'.
So instead, parents should say: 'I didn't like that behaviour.'
Which, when you think about it, does actually make sense.
And I was fully on board with Kate's advice until she added that children 'are not making conscious choices for the majority of the time'.
Hmm, she clearly didn't see the grin on my six-year-old's face this morning – trust me, he was definitely choosing to be naughty and most certainly knew what he was doing wrong.
ANGE'S BUZZIN'
SHE'S blunt, bolshie and terrifies the Tories.
And this week Angela Rayner did battle in the Commons with one of her four tattoos on display.
10
As she took to the dispatch box, the Deputy Prime Minister did not seem to care who saw Celtic love knot on her wrist.
It may have raised a few eyebrows in the debating chamber, but she also has a red rose on her leg and a geometric design on the back of her neck.
Then there is the bee on her right shoulder, a symbol of Manchester's resilience and community spirit in the wake of the 2017 terrorist attack.
Even her harshest critics can't argue with that.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

10 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Starmer has made Britain utterly irrelevant

Two weeks is a short time in politics. In a bid to halt Israel's bombing campaign in Iran, Foreign Secretary David Lammy flew to Washington DC on Friday. Following meetings with secretary of state Marco Rubio and Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict', Lammy emerged to declare: 'A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution.' Less than 48 hours later, Iran's uranium enrichment and nuclear technology facilities are in smoulders. Far from two weeks to negotiate, there were two days until the bombs went off. Donald Trump's decision to target the sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan has shaken the regime in Tehran, but the tremors extend far beyond the Islamic Republic. The US president has demonstrated in emphatic fashion exactly what he thinks of the UK Government and the people who lead it. Just three days ago, Keir Starmer said that while a nuclear Iran was a major threat, it was 'better dealt with by way of negotiation than by way of conflict' and that 'we need to de-escalate'. It is being briefed that the UK took no part in the overnight bombing – boasting of your bystander status as a new world order is being born is certainly a choice – and that the Prime Minister was informed in advance. That latter crumb-searching looks especially pitiful. If there was a relationship between Trump's White House and Number 10, beyond the formal and functional, the administration would not have allowed Starmer to embarrass himself by giving on-the-record quotes about the risks of a course of action the president was days away from taking. Starmer and Lammy favoured yet more talks with Tehran, a regime that demonstrated with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action that it regards negotiations and even agreements as a stalling tactic to gull naive Western leaders while its nuclear ambitions continue unabated. There are few leaders as naive as Starmer and Lammy, two men keenly interested in foreign and military affairs but fantastically out of their depth in both. If the UK has been swept aside in Trump's decision to hit Iran, it is not the US president but Britain's own Prime Minister who has made his nation irrelevant. It makes little sense to speak of a Starmer foreign policy, for Starmer's policy is merely a copy and paste of the various positions of the European Union. But the world does not belong to the likes of Ursula von der Leyen, Friedrich Merz or Emmanuel Macron anymore, and it certainly does not belong to their eager echoes Starmer and Lammy. Israel and the United States have not only exploded Iran's nuclear capabilities; they have blown to smithereens the delusions of liberal multilateralism. Those delusions appeal to Starmer because they regard negotiation as an end in itself, rather than a means to achieving an outcome. They are about process, and if there is anything the Prime Minister believes in, its process. Process is always the answer, even when it does not work, because process is the god of lawyers. The god of lawyers is dead, at least on the international stage. Peace through strength is back, with the United States and Israel in its vanguard.

The Guardian

10 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Thousands of UK government laptops, phones and tablets have been lost or stolen

Thousands of UK government laptops, phones and tablets worth more than £1m have been either lost or stolen, freedom of information disclosures have revealed, triggering warnings of a 'systemic risk' to the nation's cybersecurity. The Department for Work and Pensions recorded 240 missing laptops and 125 missing phones in 2024; while in the first five months of this year the Ministry of Defence recorded 103 missing laptops and 387 missing phones. The Cabinet Office, which coordinates government activity, lost or had stolen 66 laptops and 124 phones in 2024. The replacement cost of the more than 2,000 missing devices recorded across 18 Whitehall departments and public authorities in the last year for which figures are available is running at about £1.3m annually, according to Guardian analysis of freedom of information responses. The Bank of England, HM Treasury and the Home Office were among other departments where dozens of phones and laptops went missing. Cybersecurity experts said the losses could enable hackers to create backdoors into government systems even if large parts of the hardware were encrypted. One called it 'a huge national security risk', but the government downplayed the danger, saying that encryption prevented access to bad actors. 'These are surprisingly large numbers,' said Prof Alan Woodward, a cybersecurity expert at the University of Surrey. 'When you are talking about so many [it creates] a large attack surface [for hackers]. If 1% were system administrators who had their phones stolen, that's enough to get in.' He said that if devices were open when stolen, as frequently happens with phones snatched on the street, criminals could keep them open and 'drill down into the device and once the phone is open, by design it is readable and accessible'. The Ministry of Defence said it had robust policies and procedures to prevent losses and thefts. It said: 'Encryption on devices ensures any data is safeguarded and prevents access to the defence network.' The Bank of England said it 'takes the security of devices and data very seriously and has suitable protection in place'. A government spokesperson said: 'We take the security of government devices extremely seriously, which is why items such as laptops and mobile phones are always encrypted so any loss does not compromise security.' It added that every loss or theft was investigated. 'The device loss seems quite high,' said Nick Jackson, the chief information security officer at Bitdefender, a cybersecurity firm. 'It only takes one lost [device] to compromise a network. It poses a systemic risk and is something that could potentially be taken more seriously especially given the access and connections that department will have.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion He said laptops were likely to have encryption, but tablets or phones presented a greater risk. Jackson said: 'The biggest risk is that the devices themselves will have access to sensitive information and authentication tokens. If someone was able to gain access to those they would be able complete authentication processes on any government application or government website that they shouldn't be able to access.' The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, which is responsible for cybersecurity, recorded 83 phones and 18 laptops lost or stolen in the year to May 2025. In 2024, the Home Office, which oversees policing, had 147 devices go missing at an estimated replacement cost of more than £85,000. An MoD spokesperson said: 'We treat all breaches of security very seriously and we require all suspected breaches to be reported. All incidents are subjected to an initial security risk assessment, with further action taken on a proportionate basis.' David Gee, the chief marketing officer of Cellebrite, a digital forensics and cybersecurity firm that works with the Metropolitan police, said: 'Missing devices pose a huge national security risk, especially coming from public sector departments where they hold vast amounts of sensitive data. From healthcare departments to defence, staff phones and laptops must be protected at all costs, and keeping data safe in these government agencies should be a top priority.'

Daily Mail​

11 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

What your TONGUE says about you, according to science

It's the muscle we use every day for speaking, swallowing and tasting. But our tongue could also be an important indicator of our health and provide clues about what's going on within our body, experts say. Different colours, textures, coatings and shapes of the tongue can indicate different conditions. And keeping track of the muscular organ could help us detect issues we may otherwise be oblivious to. 'A healthy tongue is pink in colour with a slightly rough surface,' Sarah Ramage, clinical director at Bupa, said. 'What gives it this texture are the tiny bumps on top, called papillae.' Any shift from this may signal an issue or a sign that you need to work on your oral health. So, have you noticed any of these changes? RED OR WHITE PATCHES Abnormal looking patches, lumps or spots could be a sign of mouth cancer, Ms Ramage warned. Red patches could signal a condition called erythroplakia and white or grey patches may be leukoplakia, which could lead to cancer if untreated. Your dentist will look out for these when you go for a check-up, she said, and refer you to a GP or specialist if they have any concerns. 'Mouth cancer rates have increased by almost 60 per cent in the last decade, so it's important to be aware of any changes,' she added. WHITE SPOTS (LESIONS) Creamy white spots or lesions on the tongue could indicate a fungal infection, such as oral thrush. While it's usually harmless it may spread to other parts of your mouth if left untreated, causing an unpleasant taste or pain or difficulty eating and drinking. Dr Leslie Anthony is a dentist who runs her own practice in Montana. 'A red tongue may indicate heat in the body like a fever or a hormonal imbalance,' she said. 'A reddish purple tongue is a sign that there may be inflammation or an infection in the body. 'Meanwhile a pale pink tongue may be a sign of a vitamin deficiency, a weak immune system or a lack of energy.' COATING A thick coating reflects poor intestinal health or digestive issues, Dr Anthony explained. A yellowish coating indicates there may be an infection in the body, while a grey or blackish coating suggests a long-term digestive disorder or that 'something may be very wrong with your body's health'. And a thick white coating means there may be poor circulation to the extremities or possibly a yeast infection. SHAPE 'If the tongue is puffy with scalloped edges or indented teeth marks it may indicate malabsorption of nutrients,' she added. Meanwhile, a very thin tongue may be a sign of dehydration. A BLOTCHY 'GEOGRAPHIC' TONGUE A map-like pattern on the tongue's surface – with normal patches and smooth red patches – occurs when the 'old' surface of the tongue replaces itself and the top layer doesn't come off properly. It can leave a red, sore area like a scratch, but is normally harmless. The experts said it is good practice to look at young tongue in the mirror and notice the colours, textures, bumps and coating. It is best to inspect your tongue before brushing your teeth, they added. HOW TO CLEAN YOUR TONGUE Experts recommend brushing your tongue regularly to help prevent a build-up of bacteria. Tongue brushing is simple enough to do using the bristles of your toothbrush. 'The tongue harbours bacteria and food debris trapped under a thin layer of mucus,' Colgate's website reads. 'Remove this odour-causing build-up by using a small dab of toothpaste and carefully brushing the top of the tongue. 'Start by reaching to the back of the tongue, and then work forwards towards the opening of the mouth. Brush the entire top surface of the tongue using gentle pressure, and then rinse your mouth with mouthwash or water.' For those wanting a more thorough cleaning, a tongue scraper gently peels the thin mucus-based layer of debris from the tongue. WHAT IS MOUTH CANCER? Mouth cancer, also known as oral cancer, is where a tumour develops in the lining of the mouth. It may be on the surface of the tongue, the insides of the cheeks, the roof of the mouth (palate), or the lips or gums. Tumours can also develop in the glands that produce saliva, the tonsils at the back of the mouth, and the part of the throat connecting your mouth to your windpipe (pharynx). However, these are less common. Symptoms of mouth cancer include: sore mouth ulcers that don't heal within several weeks unexplained, persistent lumps in the mouth that don't go away unexplained, persistent lumps in the neck that don't go away unexplained looseness of teeth, or sockets that don't heal after extractions unexplained, persistent numbness or an odd feeling on the lip or tongue sometimes, white or red patches on the lining of the mouth or tongue – these can be early signs of cancer, so they should also be investigated changes in speech, such as a lisp See your GP or dentist if these symptoms don't heal within three weeks, particularly if you drink or smoke heavily.