Italy expects NATO to raise defence spending target to between 3.5% and 5% of GDP

By Angelo Amante, Giuseppe Fonte
ROME (Reuters) -NATO will raise the defence spending target for its member nations to between 3.5% and 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) from the current 2% at the next alliance summit in June, Italy's Defence Minister Guido Crosetto said on Wednesday.
Under pressure from the United States to raise its outlays on security, Italy said it would meet this year the 2% target through a series of accounting changes.
Proposals have been drafted to boost Italy's defence budget while limiting any impact on its strained state coffers.
"The Italian government will express itself and discuss its ideas (at the June summit), and there NATO will make a decision," Crosetto said, replying to questions in the lower house of parliament.
Raising Italy's defence budget to a target level of 5% of GDP on paper would require more than 60 billion euros ($68 billion), a commitment that might be tough to meet for Italy, which sees its massive public debt rising to almost 138% of GDP in 2026 before edging down the following year.
However, Crosetto said the defence budget ought to include a series of items that were already factored into the overall government budget, such as money spent for operational capabilities, communications and space policies.
He also mentioned spending aimed at increasing the resilience of critical infrastructure and improving military mobility.
In reply to the opposition in parliament, who believe boosting the defence budget would take money away from Italy's social spending, Crosetto said it was ultimately up to parliament to set out the target.
"We are a parliamentary republic and the budget is discussed in this Chamber and voted on in this Chamber, so I will take note of what NATO decides and what parliament subsequently decides," he said.
($1 = 0.8822 euros)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

20 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Oil prices climb on fears Iran will blockade supplies

STORY: Oil prices climbed to their highest in five months on Monday as fears grew over what conflict in the Middle East could mean for supplies. Traders are waiting to see what Iran does next, after the U.S. struck its key nuclear facilities. Media reports say the country's parliament has approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz. That's the narrow waterway between Iran and Oman, through which around a fifth of the world's oil is moved. Although there are also pipeline routes out of the region, experts say they won't be enough to make up for a halt to shipping. The concerns saw international benchmark Brent crude up around 1.5% in Asian morning trade Monday, with U.S. crude posting similar gains. Both are up 10% or more since the conflict began. One analyst told Reuters that a move by Iran to disrupt shipping could see oil hit $100 per barrel, up from around $78 now. That could spur inflation and mean higher gasoline prices around the world. Stock prices headed the other way on Monday, with Japan's Nikkei index down 0.5% early on. But analysts said there was no sign yet of panic selling across markets. Optimists cited hopes that regime change in Iran could bring a more moderate government to power. Though analysts at JPMorgan cautioned that past episodes of upheaval in the Middle East typically resulted in oil prices spiking by 76%.

Bloomberg

33 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

Spain Wins Exemption From NATO's 5% Defense Spending Goal

Spain obtained an exemption from NATO's ambitious defense spending target of 5% of GDP after several days of diplomatic wrangling that drew scorn from Donald Trump, right before leaders of the military alliance gather on Tuesday. 'We fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries of increasing their defense investment but we won't do it,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said on Sunday afternoon. The country can get defense expenditure up to 2.1%, 'nothing more, nothing less.'

CNBC

an hour ago

• CNBC

Trump calls 'obliteration' an accurate description of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities

U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday disputed Iranian attempts to downplay the strikes on its nuclear facilities, stressing that "obliteration" was an accurate description, even though the full extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear capabilities was not immediately clear. "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. The U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday that there was "severe damage and destruction" to the facilities at Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, but did not go so far as to say that Iran's nuclear capacities had been "obliterated." "Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Caine said. Meanwhile, the U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Sunday that while the damage assessment is ongoing, "all of our precision munitions struck where we wanted them to strike and had the desired effect." When asked if Iran still retains any nuclear capability, Caine said that "BDA is still pending, and it would be way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there." Battle Damage Assessment, or BDA, is a military term that refers to the process of evaluating the effects of military operations on a target. It usually involves a physical or functional check on the extent of damage, beyond visual signs, and whether the target remains operable These assessments are usually conducted by intelligence analysts and reconnaissance teams, using data from drones, satellites, radar, or ground reports. It helps commanders decide if the mission achieved its objectives and if follow-up strikes are needed. The UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi also struck a cautious tone, saying that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done at the Fordo nuclear facility. Adding to the uncertainty, Reuters reported, citing a senior Iranian source, that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordo had been moved to an undisclosed location ahead of the U.S. strikes on the enrichment site. The strikes began early on Saturday, when six U.S. Air Force B-2 stealth bombers dropped six GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) - a 30,000-pound bomb known as the "bunker buster," - on Iran's Fordo nuclear facility, which is built into the side of a mountain. A seventh U.S. B‑2 bomber released two GBU‑57 bombs on the Natanz Nuclear Facility, while a U.S. Navy submarine also launched a volley of 30 Tomahawk missiles, targeting Natanz and a third site, Isfahan. The mission, code named Operation Midnight Hammer, involved more than 125 aircraft in total.