logo
What today's crucial assisted dying vote is all about

What today's crucial assisted dying vote is all about

Yahoo8 hours ago

MPs are preparing to take part in a crucial vote on Friday on the issue of assisted dying.
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater says she is confident that her Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will get the backing it requires in the Commons to then move on to the House of Lords.
She introduced the bill to the house in October last year, and the proposed legislation has undergone a number of changes since.
On the eve of the vote, Leadbeater said: 'We have the most robust piece of legislation in the world in front of us tomorrow."
It is the first time the bill has been debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic 'yes' vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55.
Leadbeater said of Friday's vote: 'There might be some small movement in the middle, some people might maybe change their mind one way, others will change their mind the other way but fundamentally I don't anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded so I do feel confident we can get through tomorrow successfully.
'If we don't pass this law tomorrow, it could be another decade before this issue is brought back to Parliament."
The legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales who have been told they have fewer than six months to live to apply for an assisted death.
This would need to be approved by two doctors and a panel that has a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist.
If approved, the terminally ill person would take an approved substance to end their life, provided by a doctor but administered by the person themselves.
The third reading of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday will be the last vote in the Commons and will determine if the proposed legislation goes to the House of Lords, where peers may suggest their own amendments.
The first reading of a bill is its formal presentation, before the Commons debates it during the second reading, and any amendments made at committee and report stage.
Once the Commons and the Lords are agreed on the contents of a bill, it receives royal assent and becomes law.
MPs can have a free vote on the bill, meaning they do not have to follow party lines.
It has been reported that about 15 MPs who supported the bill or abstained at its second reading vote last November have changed their minds and plan to vote against it.
Supporters say the bill has better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it so far, but opponents say the process has been rushed, weakening the legislation.
Sir Keir Starmer has indicated he will back the bill, having already done so in a vote last November. He said this week position on the issue is 'long-standing and well-known', suggesting he has not changed his mind.
HOW YOUR MP VOTED LAST TIME
He said: 'There has been a lot of time discussing it, both in Parliament and beyond Parliament, and quite right too. It's a really serious issue."
However, both his health secretary Wes Streeting and justice secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against the bill in November.
Dan Carden, the MP for Liverpool Walton and leader of the so-called Blue Labour group, who previously abstained, said he will vote against the proposals.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch voted against the bill in November, as did Lib Dems leader Sir Ed Davey and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.
One major change is that, if the bill did become law, the implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years after royal assent, rather than the initial suggestion of two.
That means if the bill did eventually pass both houses later this year then assisted dying may not be offered until 2029.
In addition, the initial requirement for a High Court judge to approve assisted dying applications has been scrapped, replaced by expert panels made up of a senior legal figure, a social worker and a psychiatrist, which opponents said weakened the bill.
But Leadbeater said: "We are adding the expertise and experience of psychiatrists and social workers to provide extra protections in the areas of assessing mental capacity and detecting coercion while retaining judicial oversight."
There were also changes made to ensure the establishment of independent advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions, while there is also a proposal to set up a disability advisory board to advise on the impact on disabled people.
Assisted dying adverts will be banned if the bill does become law, following an amendment added earlier this month during the report stage, and doctors will be prohibited from talking to under-18s about assisted dying.
A group of more than 50 Labour MPs wrote to the leader of the house Lucy Powell asking her to postpone Friday's vote because of the sheer number of amendments, saying more parliamentary time is need to scrutinise the bill.
They wrote: "MPs will be arriving at Westminster on Friday morning without sight of the final version of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US and UK sign a trade deal, but steel imports are still in question
US and UK sign a trade deal, but steel imports are still in question

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US and UK sign a trade deal, but steel imports are still in question

US president Donald Trump and British prime minister Keir Starmer said Monday that they had signed a trade deal that will slash tariffs on UK auto and aerospace industry imports — but they are still discussing how to handle steel production. "We just signed it, and it's done," Trump said, as the pair spoke to reporters at the Group of Seven summit (G7) in the Canadian Rockies, with the US president brandishing the pages of what he said was a long-awaited agreement. The rollout was anything but smooth, however, as Trump dropped the papers and said at first that his administration had reached an agreement with the European Union when he meant the United Kingdom. The president said that the pact is "a fair deal for both" and would "produce a lot of jobs, a lot of income." British prime minister, Keir Starmer, said it meant "a very good day for both our countries, a real sign of strength." Reaching this agreement is a significant step as Trump has threatened much of the world with steep import tariffs that have unsettled markets and raised the possibility of a global trade war. Related President Trump says he'll set unilateral tariff rates within weeks UK economy contracts sharply in April: Will the BoE respond? He has since backed off on many of his proposed levies but also continued to suggest that administration officials were furiously negotiating new trade pacts with dozens of countries — even if few have yet to materialise. Trump said, "the UK is very well protected" from tariffs. "You know why? Because I like them." The signing of the deal at the G7 followed Trump and Starmer's announcement in May that they'd reached a framework for a trade pact that would slash US import taxes on British cars, steel and aluminium in return for greater access to the British market for US products, including beef and ethanol. But Monday's agreement fully covers only British cars and aerospace materials, with more work to come on steel. The British government said the new agreement removes US tariffs on UK aerospace products, exempting Britain from a 10% levy the Trump White House has sought to impose on all other countries — a boost to British firms, including engine-maker Rolls-Royce. It also sets the tax on British autos at 10% from the end of the month, down from the current 27.5%, up to a quota of 100,000 vehicles a year. UK Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the deal protects "jobs and livelihoods in some of our most vital sectors." Mike Hawes, chief executive of Britain's Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said it was "great news for the UK automotive industry." There was no final agreement to cut the tax on British steel to zero as originally anticipated — seen as vital to preserving the UK's beleaguered steel industry. Britain's steel output has fallen 80% since the late 1960s due to high costs and the rapid growth of cheaper Chinese production. Related EU 'strongly regrets' Trump's announcement to double steel and aluminium tariffs to 50% Spring 2025 economic forecast: How much will Trump's tariffs hinder EU growth? After the two leaders spoke, the White House released a statement seeking to clarify matters, saying that with respect to steel and aluminium, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will "determine a quota of products that can enter the United States without being subject" to previous tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The British government said Monday that the plan was still for "0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed." Trump's executive order authorising the deal contained several references to the security of supply chains, reflecting the US administration's concerns about China. It said the UK "committed to working to meet American requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium products intended for export to the United States." There was also no final deal on pharmaceuticals, where "work will continue," the UK said. The deal signed Monday also confirms that American farmers can export 13,000 metric tons (29 million pounds) of beef to the UK each year, and vice versa — though a British ban on hormone-treated beef remains in place.

Minister Says Labour Whip Who Quit Over Welfare Cuts Has 'Done The Honourable Thing'
Minister Says Labour Whip Who Quit Over Welfare Cuts Has 'Done The Honourable Thing'

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minister Says Labour Whip Who Quit Over Welfare Cuts Has 'Done The Honourable Thing'

Cabinet minister Lisa Nandy claimed a government whip who just quit over the government's welfare cuts has 'done the right thing'. Vicky Foxcroft resigned on Thursday night over Labour's plans to slash the welfare budget by £5 billion, in a major blow to Keir Starmer. She is the first Labour frontbencher to quit over the controversial proposed cuts to benefits which will be voted on by the Commons on July 1. It comes after more than 100 Labour MPs wrote to the government's chief whip opposing the plans to cut Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and Universal Credit. Speaking to Times Radio on Friday, Nandy downplayed the impact of her departure and warded off fears of further resignations. She said: 'I know Vicky very well, and she is the only frontbencher that I've had any discussions with about her resigning. 'I know she really wrestled with the decision. There's no disagreement between us on the principle of wanting to help people who can work, get work, protecting those who can't ever work and making sure that we reform the system so it works for everybody.' She said the disagreement came down to the 'practicalities' of the policy. 'I think she's done the honourable thing. If you can't stick with collective responsibility in government, you have to resign,' Nandy said. 'It will enable her to have a voice and she, as the former shadow disabilities minister, is very keen to use it. 'I think most Labour MPs, including her, agree with the principles of the reforms we are making. We had too many people being written off for far too long.' She said every MP has to 'look to their conscience and vote the way they believe is right' when they vote on the proposals. In her resignation letter published on X, Foxcroft suggested it was her former job as the shadow minister for disabled people which influenced her decision. 'I had no idea the impact this role would have on me,' the MP for Lewisham North said. While accusing the Tories of leaving 'many in poverty' and acknowledging the 'difficult economic times', she said it now seems that this Labour government will not introduce 'the changes I desperately wanted to see' within the UK. She wrote: 'I know I will not be able to do the job that is required of me and whip – or indeed vote – for reforms which include cuts to disabled people's finances.' Blow For Keir Starmer As Labour Whip Vicky Foxcroft Quits Over Welfare Cuts

The best sunscreen of 2025 – and the two to avoid
The best sunscreen of 2025 – and the two to avoid

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The best sunscreen of 2025 – and the two to avoid

With hot weather sweeping the UK and an amber heatwave warning in place, sunscreen is something we should all be wearing on the parts of our bodies exposed to the sun. But how can you be sure your go-to bottle is doing what it promises? To help shoppers find suncreams they can trust, consumer group Which? tested a range of high street and premium options using official British and international standards. SPF (which protects against UVB rays that cause sunburn) was checked by applying sunscreen to volunteers' skin and exposing it to controlled UVB light. UVA protection (which guards against long-term skin damage and ageing) was tested in the lab by measuring how much of the sun's rays were absorbed through the cream. This year, 13 products passed with flying colours – but two missed the mark in at least one test. This supermarket-own product passed the UVA part of the testing but fell short on SPF protection. According to Which?, lab results showed an SPF of 25.7 and then 20.7 on retest – lower than the SPF30 claim and below the threshold needed to pass. The supermarket told Which? it's "looking closely at the results" and is carrying out further independent testing with its supplier. Ultrasun met the SPF requirement in testing, but failed to hit the minimum UVA protection. Which? recorded a UVA protection factor of 9.1 and 9.5 across two tests, just below the required level of 10. Ultrasun told Which? it is "fully confident in its testing protocols and that its detailed testing processes continue to not only meet, but surpass industry standards." It also said its chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available. Tested and approved – here are the sunscreens Which? says deliver on sun protection: Boots Soltan Protect & Moisturise Lotion, £5.50 Boots Soltan Protect & Moisturise Spray, £5.50 Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Lotion, £7.90 Lidl Cien Sun Protect Spray SPF30, £3.79 Sainsbury's Sun Protect Moisturising Lotion, £5.50 Superdrug Solait Sun Spray, £5.50 Garnier Ambre Solaire Sensitive Advanced Spray SPF50+, £11 Sainsbury's Sun Protect Moisturising Spray Lotion SPF50+, £5.75 Aldi Lacura Sensitive Sun Lotion SPF50+, £2.99 Boots Soltan Protect & Moisturise Lotion SPF50+, £5.50 Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Spray SPF50+, £7.90 Childs Farm Fragrance-Free Sun Cream SPF50+, £12 Soltan Kids Protect & Moisturise Lotion SPF50+, £5.50 When it comes to SPF, Which? and NHS guidance suggest looking for: A minimum SPF of 30 for UVB protection A UVA protection seal (a circle with 'UVA' inside) or Boots' four- or five-star UVA rating Water resistance if you're swimming or sweating Reapplication every two hours (more if swimming or towelling off) It's worth checking the expiry date too — suncream can lose its effectiveness over time. Kids' skin is around 30% thinner than adults', which means UV rays can cause damage more quickly. Their skin also produces less melanin – the pigment that helps protect against sunburn – so they need extra protection. Look for suncream with SPF 30 or higher, ideally labelled for children or sensitive skin. Water-resistant options are a good bet too, especially if they're splashing about. Wide-brimmed hats, rash vests and UV-protective sunglasses can all help keep them covered. And if you're unsure of a brand to go for before your next top up, Which? has lots of sunscreen information on its website. Suncream helps, but it's just one part of the picture. Here's what the NHS and British Skin Foundation recommend for staying protected during exposure to the sun: Stick to the shade (11am–3pm): UV is strongest midday, so take breaks under trees, parasols or cover –just remember rays can still reflect off water or sand. Cover up well: Wear loose, tightly woven clothes, a wide-brimmed hat, and sunglasses with a CE mark, UV‑400 or 100% UV protection. Pick sun-safe fabrics: Look for clothing labelled UPF 30+ – UPF 50+ gives the best protection. Apply early, reapply often: Use sunscreen 30 minutes before heading out, then reapply every 2 hours – or sooner if you're swimming or towelling off. Use enough: Aim for 6–8 teaspoons to cover your whole body – most of us don't use enough. Check the label: Go for SPF 30+ and either 4–5 stars or a UVA-in-a-circle symbol to ensure broad protection. Don't ditch it on cloudy days: UV still gets through clouds and bounces off sand, water and snow – protection's still essential. Read more about suncream: The 4 most important things to check on your sunscreen, according to a dermatologist (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read) Why you need sunscreen all year round, even indoors (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read) The 8 best sunscreens for kids and adults – and the correct SPF to use for your age (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store