Children missing school over uniform and trips costs, miserable study shows

Some 16% of pupils aged 11-18 have missed school at least once because their parents couldn't afford something they needed to attend, such as branded uniform or kit
Some 16% of pupils aged 11-18 have missed school at least once because their parents couldn't afford something they needed to attend, polling shows.
This rises to 26% among pupils who receive free lunches, according to the Child Poverty Action Group's (CPAG) poll.
‌
Almost half (47%) of young people who missed school said they did not have the correct uniform or kit. More than a quarter (26%) skipped school because they couldn't afford transport to get to school, while 27% didn't turn up because of a lack of money for going on trips.
‌
Children who receive free school meals (FSM) were more than twice as likely to be sent home from school for not having the right uniform or kit as their peers (8% compared to 3% of all pupils). More than one in five (21%) young people in receipt of FSM have missed school because of mental health challenges, such as feeling anxious or depressed, compared to 17% in families who aren't eligible.
One secondary school staff member told CPAG they sometimes receive calls from parents to say a pupil can't come in because they 'only have one uniform and that's in the washing and it's not dry'. And a student told the charity: 'A lot of people lose confidence over their financial problems...they're embarrassed about how they're poor, they tend to be quieter.'
‌
Another pupil said: 'I sometimes have to buy my friends their food because they don't have any money in their accounts.' And one student added: 'All the trips are too expensive and a lot of parents can't afford them even when they work, especially if they have more than one child attending school.'
More than two-thirds (68%) of secondary pupils in the UK attend schools that still require branded uniforms, although this varies across the nations, according to CPAG. The government is bringing in legislation in England to restrict the number of branded items to three in secondary schools or four if one item is a tie.
It comes as Keir Starmer comes under mounting pressure to reverse the two-child benefit limit, which could lift thousands of kids out of poverty.
‌
Bridget Phillipson on Tuesday said scrapping the controversial two-child benefit limit is "on the table". CPAG demanded the Tory-era policy be ditched and also called for an expansion of free school meals.
The Mirror is campaigning for free school meals for all primary school children.
‌
Kate Anstey, head of education at CPAG, said: 'Children in poverty aren't getting the real deal at school because they don't have money to participate – or even get to the school gates. From not being able to afford meals or uniform to poor mental health, lack of money at home means young people are missing school – effectively priced out of the system.
'Government must do more to support living standards for families so kids aren't locked out of learning – including scrapping the two-child limit and expanding eligibility for free school meals.'
A government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to reduce child poverty through wide-ranging action as part of our Child Poverty Taskforce, breaking the unfair link between background and opportunity.
‌
'This government has inherited a system with baked-in inequalities.
'Through our Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, we are also changing the law to limit the number of branded items schools can require, which alongside free breakfast clubs could put £500 a year back into working parents' pockets.'
::: Survation surveyed 1,701 state secondary school students aged 11-18 living in the UK between April 17 and May 1.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scotsman

3 hours ago

• Scotsman

BBC presenter Martine Croxall makes 'quite a ride' comment after JK Rowling hails 'pregnant people' refusal

BBC presenter Martine Croxall has spoken out following a flurry of interest in her intervention live on air. Sign up for the daily Trending Today. Get the stories the internet is talking about to your inbox. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A BBC News presenter has described a flurry of social media interest in her after she corrected an autocue live on air as 'quite a ride'. Martine Croxall, 56, was introducing a report for the BBC on the risk of heatwave-related deaths when she changed the phrase 'pregnant people' contained in an autocue line to 'women'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad BBC presenter Martine Croxall | BBC News The presenter said: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people - women - and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.' The autocue change was hailed by Harry Potter author and outspoken women's rights campaigner JK Rowling, who said: 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter.' Ms Rowling shared a video from a post by SEEN in Journalism that included the clip of Ms Croxall and read: 'Good to see accuracy on BBC News.' Ms Croxall, who has seen followers of her official X account surge to 104,000 in the wake of the clip, posted on social media on Sunday night: 'A huge thank you to everyone who has chosen to follow me today for whatever reason. It's been quite a ride… ' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is believed the term 'pregnant people' had been written by the researchers, rather than by the brodcaster, and was being quoted by the BBC. The gender-neutral phrase 'pregnant people' has become used more widely to include transgender men and non-binary individuals who may be pregnant. Ms Croxall first joined the BBC in 1991 and started working for the BBC News team in 2001. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Axed news reader, Martine Croxall, returns to BBC after being let go in controversial merger. Picture: BBC | BBC She found herself mired in controversy in 2022 when she was taken off air amid claims she showed bias after former prime minister Boris Johnson pulled out of the Tory leadership contest. During her introduction to Sunday night's edition of The Papers at the time, in which members of the press and experts look at how the main stories of the day were covered, Ms Croxall said of the update on Mr Johnson: 'Well this is all very exciting, isn't it?' adding: 'Am I allowed to be this gleeful? Well I am.' Some viewers, including several Tory MPs reacted to a clip on social media, complained it displayed bias. A statement from the broadcaster at the time said: 'BBC News is urgently reviewing last night's edition of The Papers on the News Channel for a potential breach of impartiality. 'It is imperative that we maintain the highest editorial standards. We have processes in place to uphold our standards, and these processes have been activated.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

Daily Mirror

17 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

Nuclear troops given unnecessary x-rays in Britain's first atomic bomb test

A hidden document has revealed that troops were given unnecessary x-rays on their way to take part in Britain's first atomic bomb test in the 1950s Troops were given potentially harmful x-rays in a secret biological monitoring programme as part of Cold War weapons tests. Hundreds of Royal Engineers were ordered to submit to the medical examinations without any clinical reason or benefit. The evidence has emerged from a medical officer's journal, hidden for decades at the Atomic Weapons Establishment behind top secret security classifications. Thousands of servicemen were subject to similar orders as Britain developed its nuclear arsenal over the decade that followed. ‌ Pam Hill, whose dad Jim Stephenson took part in Operation Hurricane in 1952, said: 'He was sent to do his duty and he did it. Afterwards he had serious gut problems, and 40 years of a severe lung disease which eventually killed him. Seven months are missing from his medical records. It was always on his mind that the whole lung thing was caused by being out at Montebello. If he had chest x-rays at the time, it might have answered all our questions.' ‌ Jim's lung condition, bronchiectasis, can be caused by radiation. His children have also suffered unexplained illness, with miscarriages, coeliac disease, and spinal issues. His teenaged grandson has almost no adult teeth. While the cancer risk of an x-ray is small, it increases if done repeatedly. It can be justified only if there is a therapeutic benefit - and for healthy troops already examined and found to be A1-fit, there was none. The Mirror 's three-year investigation of the Nuked Blood Scandal has already uncovered thousands of blood and urine tests given to troops, with the results withheld from their medical records. Now we can reveal there was a third and potentially-harmful form of monitoring, using x-rays. If men had damage as a result of inhaling radioactive particles, it could show up as dark shadows on their lungs. What happened to healthy people living amid fallout was unknown, but since 1947 human experiments have needed informed consent, full communication of the risks involved, and the right to withdraw. A consultant radiologist told the Mirror: 'There was a clear understanding at the time that radiation caused tumours. From a military standpoint you'd probably get ethical approval because it's an unknown and there were civil defence concerns. You would want to know what proportion later developed a problem, what the damage was, whether it rectified itself or led to longer term damage. There would always be a duty of care to the patients. 'To not keep those records long-term would be considered a massive breach of research protocol. There would be redress, and punitive fines. Perhaps more importantly for the veterans, someone would have looked at all these x-rays and made an assessment, written a report on the outcomes. Where is that now?' ‌ READ MORE: Video emerges of Defence Secretary saying nuke veterans scandal "shames us as a country" The medical journal covers the weeks shortly before Operation Hurricane in 1952, Britain's first nuclear bomb test, which detonated in the hull of an old warship off the Montebello Islands in Australia. Just over 200 Royal Engineers were ordered to join the fleet, to build jetties, camps and laboratories near Ground Zero. The journal states: 'They came aboard only a few hours before we sailed, and I did not discover until after that it is not a routine in the army to have the chest x-rayed at yearly intervals. Accordingly I had them all done at Royal Naval Hospital Malta.' ‌ The log was discovered on a top secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, locked on the grounds of national security risks. Labour ministers have ordered the entire archive to be published, but have not commented on why it was a state secret, or why it is not one any more. The Ministry of Defence has spent decades denying it experimented on troops. Few survive from that first operation, and government studies have found they have increased risks of bladder, skin, stomach and 'unspecified' cancers. They also have elevated rates of suicide. ‌ Jim's former comrade, Dixie Kidd, 92, said: 'At one point after the bomb we were ordered on to shore to collect things the scientists had left behind, tins of food, raw vegetables. Others were picking up dead sea birds. After we left, I was in a contingent ordered to take readings from the things we had found, two hours on, two hours off. The numbers were to establish the radioactive half-life. 'On the way home, our pay books were taken off us and they put into each one we had been exposed to 5 rads of radiation. All of us the same. I wondered how that was possible, and why I never got ill when so many of my mates did.' Documents seen by the Mirror state that anyone with a dose over 5 rads could no longer be employed on the operation. A higher recorded dose may also have led to war pensions. ‌ Another ex-sapper, Eric Waterfield, from 71 Field Squadron, has seen his daughters suffer reproductive issues. He said: 'Three years after Hurricane, a surgeon found a growth in my lung. He said it was better in the bucket than in my chest, so he had it out, and that was the last I heard of it. If there were chest x-rays, it might explain things.' The bogus classification of information about the experiments is now the subject of a criminal complaint to the Met Police, which is considering further action. The missing medical records are being sought in a civil suit estimated to cost the MoD up to £5bn in aggravated damages. ‌ Campaign group LABRATS has asked the Prime Minister for a meeting to find a cheaper, quicker route to truth and justice, but has received no reply. Founder Alan Owen said: 'This biological monitoring was done to see what would happen to the British civilian population if attacked. Troops were the only people who could be ordered into fallout and told to stay there, under threat of a court martial. 'We have found veteran after veteran has medical records that are missing this vital data. Without it, medical diagnosis and treatment are harder and war pensions next to impossible. 'All we want is for the most mistreated veterans in British history to get a fair deal - to be heard, to get justice, and to get an apology.' A spokesman for the MoD said: 'The Minister for Veterans and People has commissioned officials to look into unresolved questions regarding medical records as a priority, and this is now underway. This work will enable us to better understand what information the department holds regarding medical testing of service personnel.'

The National

a day ago

• The National

Tony Blair think tank 'advising' Scottish Labour on health policy

The Sunday Times reports that the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) is working with Anas Sarwar's party to develop new policies for the health service ahead of the Scottish Parliament election next year. Former prime minister Blair has previously suggested the NHS should use private healthcare providers to cut waiting times. He also joined ex-Tory leader William Hague in suggesting the NHS should sell anonymised medical records to boost public services and research in 2024. The SNP said the move was 'truly beyond belief'. READ MORE: Fergus Ewing says SNP will 'throw everything' at his MSP bid The newspaper reports that the TBI is working for no fee and is believed to be developing a 'specific piece of work' for Scottish Labour. This is understood to be related to how to improve access to GPs and prevention of health issues, as well as proposals on how 'more effective use of technology solutions' could be used to drive down record waiting lists for operations. The TBI has more than 800 staff and works in more than 40 countries, with a focus on harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) and new technologies to reform how governments run and deliver public services. However, the Times added that even senior figures close to Sarwar admitted they were not aware of Blair's involvement in the Holyrood campaign. Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's health spokesperson, said: 'Our NHS is stretched to breaking point and technology is a way to ease that pressure — but the SNP is squandering the opportunity. 'From GP practices using fax machines to doctors relying on pagers, the SNP is running an analogue health service in a digital age. GPs have been sounding the alarm about how a woeful lack of basic IT is holding them back — it's time we have a government that will listen. 'A Scottish Labour government will put Scotland on the cutting edge of medical innovation and modernise our NHS so it is fit for the future.' A Tony Blair Institute spokesman said: 'We are always happy to talk to any and all political parties who are interested in our work, all of which is published and publicly available. 'The conversations we have had with Scottish Labour are specifically around how our health policy proposals could apply to healthcare in Scotland. We intend to publish this work regardless of the outcome of the election.' READ MORE: Keir Starmer accused of 'gaslighting' statement on US bombing of Iran Angus Robertson, Constitution Secretary and chair of the SNP's campaign committee said the move showed Scottish Labour have 'no vision for Scotland's future'. 'Rather than listening to the people of Scotland, they can only look backwards at a discredited, unpopular figure like Tony Blair,' he said. SNP MSP Clare Haughey added: 'That Anas Sarwar is taking advice on health from an organisation which has previously called for the selling of NHS patient's data for money is truly beyond belief. 'It is unbelievable that Scottish Labour are looking to the man that led us into the disastrous Iraq war to tell them what is best for Scotland. "The SNP is the only party with a clear plan to build a better future for Scotland - improving our NHS, supporting families and workers through the cost-of-living crisis and creating new opportunities with the powers of independence."