G7 is unviable Kremlin

Moscow has no interest in the format as the members no longer represent the global majority, spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has said
Russia has zero interest in the 'Group of Seven' (G7) format, as it is no longer viable, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has stated. He explained that the global dominance of the countries making up the group is nearing its end.
Established in the 1970s, the G7 comprised Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the US and the UK. In 1998, with Russia's inclusion the group was expanded to a G8. However, the country's membership was suspended in 2014 following Crimea's reunification with Russia, following a referendum on the peninsula.
On Friday, Peskov said that "our attitude toward the [G7], it's well known. It has long since stopped being an interesting and in-demand format."
According to the Kremlin spokesperson, "Russia does not consider such a format viable because global trends indicate that the G7's share in global affairs and global economy will be inexorably shrinking." The official noted that "this is not seasonal volatility," but a long-term trend.
Alternative formats, such as BRICS, which comprises Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia as full members, have already overtaken the G7 in terms of their combined share in global economy, Peskov argued.
The presidential spokesperson's comments echoed those made at the 28th annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF 2025) by Maksim Oreshkin, the deputy head of President Vladimir Putin's administration, on Wednesday.
"Power centers are changing. The so-called 'Big Seven', which hasn't been 'big' for a long time, is being replaced by new growth hubs," he said, pointing to the rise of countries in the Global South and East.
Speaking at the G7 summit in Canada on Monday, US President Donald Trump expressed regret over the removal of Russia from the group back in 2014.
"I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in," he argued.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Toronto Star

5 hours ago

• Toronto Star

I worked side-by-side with Justin Trudeau. This is what I think of Mark Carney's first big mistake

Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to invite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Canada for the G7 has generated a lot of chatter. Unfortunately, there's a lot that has been missing in the conversation. For starters, the Indian government's belief that Canada is soft on extremists seeking to establish an independent Sikh state known as Khalistan isn't exactly new. In fact, despite the fact I have now entered middle age, it's about as old as I am. But as India-Canada relations appear to be entering a new phase under Prime Minister Carney, it's worth considering what we are giving up by welcoming the Modi government back into our good graces.

Calgary Herald

7 hours ago

• Calgary Herald

Opinion: Cynicism masquerades as insight, but at heart, it's a defence of disengagement

Rick Bell's recent column (G7 protest in Calgary: One hell of a goat rodeo on the streets, June 15) is a classic entry in a long-standing tradition: the takedown of public expression of discontent. Whether it's community members gathering at city hall to protect an urban wild space they've come to know as a commons, or protesters rallying against injustice in Palestinian territories, this column performs the same move — it belittles them. Article content Article content With phrases such as 'play-acting and posturing,' the writer seems to ask: What's the point? Article content Article content Article content But here's what's telling. In these dismissives, the heroic figure is always the one who does not. Not the one who protests. Not the one who speaks at city hall. Not the one who marches. Article content The hero is the one who stays home. Who says nothing. Who drinks their beer undisturbed while the world burns on the livestream in the background. Article content It's not insightful to mock protesters for being performative. All protest is performance. It always has been. But it's also effort, presence and sometimes desperation. It's what people do when all the other doors are closed — when letters, meetings and 'appropriate channels' fail. Article content What Bell fails to address is the kind of dissent that erupted in Fort Macleod at the UCP 'town hall' on coal — where 70 per cent of the crowd took vivid, emancipatory glee in tearing apart the optics of a 'consultation,' whose real purpose was to manufacture a media image of monolithic consent. Article content Article content That was protest in its unruly, disruptive form. And yet, even that kind of collective defiance is dismissed when it doesn't fit the right caricature. Article content And still, I find myself partially in agreement. A young Communist I met two weeks ago said something that stayed with me: That once upon a time, power didn't know what to do when the streets flooded with people. That unpredictability disturbed them. Article content Now, norms and containment define protest. Marches follow routes agreed upon with police. Cordiality reigns. The site is remote from where decisions are actually made — just as Calgary City Hall is from Kananaskis. Article content And yes, the recent protest was a bazaar of causes. That's what happens when people are told they have one designated chance to be heard — when the system reduces democratic expression to a side-stage act, offered once every few years.

Canada News.Net

9 hours ago

• Canada News.Net

G7 is unviable Kremlin

Moscow has no interest in the format as the members no longer represent the global majority, spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has said Russia has zero interest in the 'Group of Seven' (G7) format, as it is no longer viable, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has stated. He explained that the global dominance of the countries making up the group is nearing its end. Established in the 1970s, the G7 comprised Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the US and the UK. In 1998, with Russia's inclusion the group was expanded to a G8. However, the country's membership was suspended in 2014 following Crimea's reunification with Russia, following a referendum on the peninsula. On Friday, Peskov said that "our attitude toward the [G7], it's well known. It has long since stopped being an interesting and in-demand format." According to the Kremlin spokesperson, "Russia does not consider such a format viable because global trends indicate that the G7's share in global affairs and global economy will be inexorably shrinking." The official noted that "this is not seasonal volatility," but a long-term trend. Alternative formats, such as BRICS, which comprises Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia as full members, have already overtaken the G7 in terms of their combined share in global economy, Peskov argued. The presidential spokesperson's comments echoed those made at the 28th annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF 2025) by Maksim Oreshkin, the deputy head of President Vladimir Putin's administration, on Wednesday. "Power centers are changing. The so-called 'Big Seven', which hasn't been 'big' for a long time, is being replaced by new growth hubs," he said, pointing to the rise of countries in the Global South and East. Speaking at the G7 summit in Canada on Monday, US President Donald Trump expressed regret over the removal of Russia from the group back in 2014. "I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in," he argued.