GP's 'unnecessary' genital exams on male patients

A former GP conducted "unnecessary" genital examinations on nine male patients, including young teenagers, a court has heard.
Gregory Manson, 56, is alleged to have carried out the exams for complaints including coughs, headaches and knee sprains.
His accusers said they did not recall him wearing gloves, offering a chaperone or giving "proper explanations" for the examinations before they took place.
Appearing at Canterbury Crown Court on Monday, Dr Manson, of Tower Way, Canterbury, denied 18 offences of sexual assault and six of indecent assault.
The court heard that he worked as a GP between 1994 and 2017, along with working as a GP trainer and programme director of GP training, and as a GP appraiser for the General Medical Council.
The first complaint of sexual assault against him was filed to Canterbury Police in 2017, followed by an NHS England exercise which saw more alleged victims come forward.
In a police interview, he said he had never touched a patient for improper or sexual purposes and said every examination was conducted for justified medical reasons, the court was told.
Prosecuting, Jennifer Knight KC told jurors Manson also failed to document in patients' notes any potential findings or the fact such examinations had taken place at all.
The first two alleged victims were brothers and both saw Manson before and after they were 16, the court heard.
Both said they were told to pull down their trousers and boxer shorts during a number of examinations.
Ms Knight said that the elder brother initially "assumed" this was necessary but had gradually become "uncomfortable".
Their mother told investigators she never met Dr Manson when her sons were young teenagers as she would always stay in the waiting room, the court heard.
Another alleged victim saw Dr Manson twice in 1999 when he was 35 and then 12 years later in 2011, each time with abdominal pain.
On all three occasions, a genital examination was undertaken and, on both occasions in 1999, his underwear was removed without consent, the court heard.
Dr Manson told police this had been necessary to check lymph nodes and femoral pulses in the victim's groin area.
However, Ian Wall, a forensic medicine professor and GP, noted there would be no reason to do this, especially without permission.
The trial continues.
Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
HM Courts & Tribunals Service

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Tom's Guide

43 minutes ago

• Tom's Guide

Ditch the gym — strengthen your whole body in under 30 minutes with this workout

Finding the time for a workout is challenging, even for fitness pros like me. Fortunately, it doesn't take hours a day to get stronger and build muscle — if you've got some dumbbells and a half hour, you can make major strides in your health and wellness goals. I was just cleared to resume exercise after having a baby, but fitting the gym into my schedule has been impossible. I scrolled through Instagram to find an at-home workout to do instead, and stumbled on Lauren Jayne Lawler's recent 24-minute full-body workout. Here's what I thought of her routine. Working out at home is great, but I always recommend meeting with a certified personal trainer first to learn proper exercise form and technique. If you're recently postpartum like me, always follow the recommendations of your medical team. A post shared by Laurén Janyne Lawler ♡︎ (@lauren_janyne) A photo posted by on In addition to a set of dumbbells, you'll also want to roll out a yoga mat for some cushioning. All of the exercises can be done with just two light dumbbells, but it's best to have a moderately-heavy and a heavy pair available as well. There are six exercises in this program, each done for 45 seconds in three circuits. You'll rest for 15 seconds in between each move, and rest for 30 seconds at the end of each circuit. The exercises are: When Lawler said this workout was 'full body,' she wasn't kidding. Here's what I noticed: All of the exercises in Lawler's workout are compound moves that target multiple areas at once, so you'll be working almost all of the major muscles in your body (more on the 'almost' part below). Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Compound exercises are a great option when you're limited on time. Movements like the static bridge to chest press require effort from your hamstrings, glutes, deep core, and pecs all at once — in 45 seconds, you'll have effectively worked your upper body, lower body, and core. By the time I finished my third circuit, my entire body felt fatigued. That's a pretty impressive feat given the workout's relatively short duration. I was sore the next day, but it didn't impact my normal routine, so I knew I had worked at an appropriate level. The triceps didn't get much attention in Lawler's program, at least not in the same way that the quads, glutes, biceps, and shoulders do. It's not that these muscles weren't working at all, but it was in a more supportive or stabilizing manner. I wanted to bring my triceps into action, so I altered one of Lawler's exercises a bit. During the second circuit, I added an overhead tricep extension to the overhead reverse lunge knee drive. This felt like a natural place to insert the exercise, and it didn't interrupt my flow at all. This routine is pretty comprehensive on its own, so you certainly don't have to throw in anything extra. However, you can add a tricep move and still keep the workout under half an hour. This workout's structure is similar to HIIT (or high-intensity interval training), with short exercise bursts followed by even shorter rest periods. The beauty of timed intervals is that you can go at your own pace — if you're a beginner or you want to focus on building strength, you can perform the movements more slowly. If you want a cardiovascular challenge, you can move quickly. Since I hadn't exercised in a while, I chose to do Lawler's routine at a moderate tempo. My heart rate stayed elevated the entire time, but it never got into a 'high intensity' range. This allowed me to get the best of both worlds — I was able to use heavier weights on moves like the supine grip RDL and overhead reverse lunge knee drive, while also breaking a sweat and getting a little breathless. I finished all three circuits in a little over 23 minutes, which is close to what Lawler estimates. I'd given myself a full half hour for my workout, so I got to squeeze in some stretches and mobility work at the end. Most '30-minute workouts' tend to be closer to 35 minutes in length, so I appreciated Lawler's accuracy. That being said, what usually makes these programs longer than advertised is the inclusion of a warm-up and cool-down. You can fit both into those extra six minutes.

Time Business News

4 hours ago

• Time Business News

Have You Seriously Considered The Option Of Orale Steroïden?

Steroid tablets may cause side-effects if taken for an extended period, such as osteoporosis and weight gain. You can minimize these side effects by taking calcium and vitamin D supplements, exercising regularly and refraining from smoking. Always carry with you a red or blue steroid emergency card provided by the person prescribing or dispensing your medicine, which outlines your dosage and medical condition to healthcare providers. Trustworthiness Online purchasing of steroids offers convenience, yet also poses certain risks to buyers' health and legal repercussions. Furthermore, counterfeit or unregulated products could be purchased. Therefore, buyers should ensure their vendors are legitimate by doing a detailed investigation and reviewing customer feedback as well as looking for professional website designs, secure payment options and transparent shipping policies from them. Steroids are powerful substances that can dramatically change how the body functions if taken under medical guidance and with other substances. If taken alone or taken by people not familiar with them, however, steroids can be potentially lethal. Google-owned YouTube and Facebook make it easy for potential steroid users to obtain appearance and performance-enhancing drugs (APEDs) without prescriptions, with searches for specific names of APEDs leading to videos providing contact details and instructions on purchasing them; other searches pointed towards bodybuilding or fitness model websites hosting content about steroids containing relevant terms relating to them. In addition, most websites did not present accurate information about use or risks and declined legal responsibility when selling illegal substances – all making life easy for steroid buyers. Customer service Purchase of steroids online requires taking into consideration several aspects to ensure its legality and safety, such as regional regulations, product authenticity and effectiveness, payment security measures and shipping policies. Users also often evaluate customer service by testing responsiveness and helpfulness of support teams. Steroids may be illegally used to enhance athletic performance, such as marathon running or swimming. Unfortunately, long-term or high dose use of these substances can have adverse side effects; to ensure safety it's important to consult a doctor first when considering taking steroids. As mentioned previously, steroids may interact with certain medicines, increasing your risk of side-effects. This is particularly relevant if taken in combination with NSAIDs that cause stomach ulcers; additionally, steroids can make you less sensitive to pain – this could pose problems if recovering from surgery or experiencing injury and this could result in serious health complications if left unchecked. Payment options Steroids may help treat flare-ups of rheumatoid arthritis, lupus or gout. Steroids can be taken in various forms; from tablets to liquids or creams or injections. Some individuals experience side effects from taking steroids; usually mild and they subside once treatment stops; this is more likely to happen when dosage levels are increased or taken for extended periods. Your treating provider will monitor your symptoms closely and may adjust dosage if symptoms worsen over time. Steroid tablets often cause more side effects than creams or injections because they enter the bloodstream, where they can have widespread impact. Steroid tablets may lead to weight gain and increased appetite; increase infection risks; raise pre-diabetes risks and bolster diabetes or pre-diabetes risks; slow growth rates among children or teenagers and require periodic height checks for those taking them; these adverse reactions must all be carefully considered before choosing which form of treatment would work best. Some individuals combine multiple anabolic steroids together, or 'stack', in order to enhance their effects. Others may 'pyramid' their use by gradually increasing doses over a period of time before stopping for a time so their bodies can recover. Product availability Steroids are powerful tools that can help increase muscle mass, boost strength, and enhance performance. But to avoid unwanted side effects and legal complications, orale steroïden must only be purchased from reliable licensed providers like myroidshop1 net/nl/. Steroids carry potential side effects and may even be illegal in certain countries, making it essential to understand the various legal implications when purchasing online. Doing your research thoroughly on this subject will enable you to make wiser purchase decisions while avoiding potential legal ramifications. Dianabol, Clenbuterol and Trenbolone are among the most widely available anabolic steroids on the market. All three compounds are known to accelerate muscle growth and fat loss and can be found in high doses on the market. Be wary of untrustworthy suppliers who sell counterfeit or substandard steroids that could pose health risks to users. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Refinery29

a day ago

• Refinery29

There's A Bigger Problem With The Viral ‘Propaganda I'm Not Falling For' Trend

TW: This article discusses disordered eating.⁠ Videos with the text 'Propaganda I'm not falling for' and a list that might include diet culture, something about the rise of conservatism and alternative milk choices — to name a few — have been dominating our social feeds of late. The videos seem to suggest that if you can spot a "trend" or the 'problem', then you can choose whether to participate in it or not. But in a world where we seem to be at the behest of the algorithm, and with social media increasingly becoming an avenue for mental health support, how much agency do we have in choosing whether or not we participate? Let's start with the algorithm, which, despite what we're sometimes led to believe, is not inherently evil. It can actually be great, showing us content and advertisements that we find engaging based on specific signals, such as what posts we like, comment on, and share, how much time we spend viewing a post, and what similarities we have with users we interact with. However, when social media platforms use them to further their cause, algorithms can lead us to content we didn't necessarily choose. For example, in 2018, Facebook saw a decline in engagement and reconfigured its recommendation algorithms. A 2021 study says that the reconfiguration increased the virality of outrageous and sensationalised content. And no, this was not just a coincidence, Facebook's internal documents stated that "Misinformation, toxicity, and violent content are inordinately prevalent among reshares.' Similarly, a 2020 study found YouTube recommendations can lead people to more extremist content. The bigger issue is that even if a user decides to step away from polarising content, a New York Times article reported that viewing 20 widely-shared TikToks sowing doubt about election systems will push more 'election disinformation, polarising content, far-right extremism, QAnon conspiracy theories and false Covid-19 narratives' despite using neutral search terms. In this case, while we click or scroll away, it becomes clear that the algorithm can encroach on our autonomy. Besides misinformation and polarising content, we can't talk about social media algorithms without discussing thinness culture or 'thinspo.' What once existed on Tumblr sites, thinness culture, also known as 'pro-ana' type content, has now made its way to TikTok, claiming its niche as ' SkinnyTok.' This side of TikTok is filled with low-calorie recipe videos, What I Eat In A Days, exercise routines and more which glorify thinness culture and disordered eating, veiled as a "healthy" lifestyle. In June, TikTok "blocked search results for #skinnytok since it has become linked to unhealthy weight loss content." However, how much impact does this have when our algorithms deliver us this content regardless of needing to search for it? Users who are currently diagnosed with an eating disorder are 4137% more likely to have the next video delivered by the TikTok algorithm to be eating disorder-related. Similarly, for those struggling with disordered eating, it is 322% more likely that the next video will be diet-orientated. The recent Butterfly Body Kind Youth survey also found that 57.2% of young people (aged 12-18) report that social media makes them feel dissatisfied with their bodies. At the same time, 73% of young people use social media for mental health support. However, the number of young people using social media for support rather than the mental health care system is worrying when, in June 2025, an investigation by The Guardian found that over half of the top 100 mental health TikToks contain misinformation. From suggesting that everyday experiences are symptoms of borderline personality disorder to misusing therapeutic language, social media has increasingly seen users self-diagnosing based on a 10-second sound bite. As someone who could not access mental health support for a couple of years for an eating disorder, I've experienced the pipeline of content where helpful tips for recovering turn into glorifying low-calorie, high-protein diets and strength training in the name of "health". But as a 16-year-old, it was impossible not to fall for this, and even now, at 22, it can be a battle on worse days, and I have to delete the apps altogether. While we like to think we have full control over what we do or do not 'fall for', our algorithms clearly also have a say in that. But the long-term answer to extremist or thinspo content is not to delete or ban social media. We should all be cautious of what we see on the internet, perhaps take things with a pinch of salt, and do our research, of course — but social media platforms and governments have a role to play in safeguarding us from risks. We need more than just a hashtag ban; we need social media platforms to stop pushing content that leads us down this path in the first place. We need our government to regulate content such as deepfakes and misinformation and, instead of banning social media, implement education on how to use and be safe on it. Funding the mental health system so that fewer people turn to social media for help would also be a great place to start.