logo
She was just ousted as JoCo Commissioner. Now, Republican will run for Kansas governor

She was just ousted as JoCo Commissioner. Now, Republican will run for Kansas governor

Yahoo11-03-2025

Former Johnson County Commissioner Charlotte O'Hara has filed to run for governor in 2026.
O'Hara, an Olathe Republican who served the 3rd District, lost by seven percentage points to Democrat Julie Brewer in November, making her the only incumbent in a contested County Commission race not to win re-election.
O'Hara previously served one term in the Kansas House of Representatives from 2011-2013 and ran unsuccessfully for Overland Park mayor and Johnson County Commission Chair.
She joins Secretary of State Scott Schwab in a Republican primary field where voters will select their challenger after two gubernatorial losses at the hands of term-limited Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly. Democratic candidates have yet to step forward 17 months ahead of the primary.
O'Hara told The Star she's undeterred by her recent loss and focused on spreading her message about discontinuing 'corporate welfare' tax incentives and overhauling public school curriculum.
'Because I've been involved in politics for so long, my name recognition, especially in Johnson County, is well-known,' said O'Hara, who owns a casino chip manufacturing business and recently returned from a nine-day listening tour with stops along the way from Frankfort to Garden City.
As a member of the County Commission from 2021 until January, she was fiercely opposed to COVID-19 masking and vaccine mandates. She's still critical of Schwab's directive to Johnson County to destroy 2020 mail ballots last spring in accordance with state law over the objection of former Sheriff Calvin Hayden.
On issues of election security, tax incentives and public education, O'Hara said she sees herself as more conservative than Schwab and other gubernatorial hopefuls who have yet to announce their bids.
'The status quo in the Republican Party, they have long been controlled by the Koch brothers, Koch Industries, and the Chamber,' O'Hara said.
A former general contractor who dabbled in development, O'Hara said it was her own experience receiving a tax incentive in 2004 that turned her against industrial revenue bonds, tax increment financing and state STAR bond subsidies.
'This is handing out candy to the well-connected,' O'Hara said.
She said as governor, she would take it upon herself to lead the charge against common incentive programs, which have been enshrined in state statute and would require legislative action to be undone.
'I would be in front of the Legislature demanding that they take a look at these statutes and at least start rolling them back,' O'Hara said.
She said high property taxes are 'crushing small businesses' and admonished state and local officials for their 'cruel indifference' toward soaring tax bills for homeowners.
Tax policy has also featured in O'Hara's political newsletter poetry, including a nine-stanza composition that begins:
'Oh, how do we, the BOCC
Raise the tax on YOUR property?
With cruel indifference,
Maniacal glee!!'
O'Hara supports President Trump's call to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education and wants to minimize the Kansas state school board's role in determining classroom curriculum.
'In my opinion, the closer to the local level, the better,' she told The Star.
'We've got to get away from DEI. We've got to get away from this woke agenda and we've got to get back to basics — phonics, just regular core math — stop all this ridiculous confusing the kids with drawing boxes and all that stuff,' O'Hara said. 'Six plus six equals twelve, period.'
She declined to offer specific examples of diversity initiatives in Kansas schools she wants to see eliminated but issued a blanket appraisal of diversity, equity and inclusion as 'discriminatory.'
However, O'Hara said she's wary of school vouchers because she believes they would come with strings attached to what can and can't be taught in private schools and homeschools.
Newly elected Kansas Republican Party Chair Danedri Herbert did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. Neither did Johnson County Republican Party Chair Sue Huff. Johnson County Commission Chair Mike Kelly, who defeated O'Hara in 2022, declined to comment on her entrance into the race.
The Star's Taylor O'Connor contributed reporting

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows
Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows

Miami Herald

time9 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows

Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows Republicans and Democrats alike are less likely to support renewable energy than they were five years ago, according to a survey released June 5 by the Pew Research Center. Floodlight examines the survey results, which mirror growing pockets of opposition to solar farms, reignited political support for coal plants and moves by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans to kill federally funded clean energy projects. This shift in opinion dates back to when Democratic President Joe Biden took office, said Brian Kennedy, Pew senior researcher and one of the study's authors. "This isn't a new trend," he said. Still, Kenneth Gillingham, professor of environmental and energy economics at the Yale School of the Environment, was surprised. "I see this shift … as a successful effort to link climate change and renewable energy to broader culture war issues," Gillingham said. He added that in the past, "prominent" Republicans supported renewables and sought solutions to climate change, but those stances could now be seen as "disloyal" to Trump. The survey of 5,085 U.S. adults taken April 28 to May 4 revealed that while 79% of Americans favored expanding wind and solar production in 2020, that number has dropped to 60%. And 39% of Americans today support expansion of oil, coal and natural gas - almost double the 20% that supported it in 2020. Combustion of fossil fuels - in transportation, energy generation and industrial production - is the No. 1 cause of climate change. Much of the change in opinion is driven by Republicans, whose support of oil and gas grew from 35% in 2020 to 67% today. But Democrats also indicated less support for renewable energy and more for fossil fuels than five years ago. While many results reflect Trump's policies opposing most renewables and boosting fossil fuels, Pew found a few notable exceptions: 69% of all respondents favor offshore wind - a technology Trump has specifically targeted. Both Democrats and Republicans indicated stronger support for nuclear power, with Republicans' favorable opinions increasing from 53% in 2020 to 69% in 2025. Democrats' support rose from 37% to 52%. The Trump administration has signaled support for a nuclear renaissance, despite its high cost. There were wide partisan splits on several topics. In March, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced it would scale back environmental regulations. Pew asked whether it was possible to do that and still protect air and water quality: 77% of Republicans said yes and 67% of Democrats said no. Pew didn't ask the respondents why their attitudes have shifted. But Kennedy said in Pew's past surveys, Republicans have expressed concern about the economic impacts of climate change policies and transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. Mike Murphy, a Republican consultant and electric vehicle backer, said when the environmental benefits of clean technologies are touted, it polarizes Republicans. Instead, Murphy said messages should be about pocketbook issues - like lower fuel costs - and jobs. "It's hard for pro-climate people to understand," said Murphy, who has advised dozens of state and national GOP campaigns including John McCain's 2008 presidential bid. "(They think) we just need to shout louder and hit people over the head about climate, climate, climate. The key is you want to talk about jobs and national security and other events that naturally resonate a lot more with right-of-center people." That's what Murphy's groups, the EV Politics Project and the American EV Jobs Alliance, are trying to do to depoliticize electric vehicles. "Whenever electric cars are seen through a climate lens," Murphy said, "their appeal narrows." It's a strategy also being used by the Electrification Coalition, a left-of-center pro-EV group. Ben Prochazka, the coalition's executive director, echoed Murphy's strategy, adding that EVs have "become overly politicized and caught in the culture wars, impacting markets and ultimately hurting our ability to realize their many benefits for all Americans." Prochazka noted that once introduced to EVs, consumers support them: "EV drivers love their vehicles, with more than eight out of ten reporting that their next car will also be electric." Perhaps those practical messages are getting through. In the Pew survey, electric vehicles were the one item that saw an uptick in support - 4 percentage points in the past year. But popular support might not be enough to stop Congress from killing a $7,500 electric vehicle credit, which Murphy said would be "policy disaster." Republicans, he said, are in a "real squeeze," because "they don't have enough money for the tax cuts the president has promised." Murphy said: "It's easier for Republicans to cut Biden electric cars … than it is for them to cut more Medicaid." Gillingham is still optimistic that solar, wind and other greenhouse gas-reducing technologies will move forward - because they are the cheapest. "The continued decline in the price of renewable energy and battery technologies, as well as other new technologies, is a reason to continue to have hope that the worst impacts of climate change can be addressed," he said. Published by Canary Media, Renewable Energy World Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powers stalling climate action. This story was produced by Floodlight and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.

Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election, reviving longstanding grievance
Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election, reviving longstanding grievance

San Francisco Chronicle​

time12 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election, reviving longstanding grievance

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Friday called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden, repeating his baseless claim that the contest was marred by widespread fraud. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favorably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!' Trump's post, made as his Republican White House is consumed by a hugely substantial foreign policy decision on whether to get directly involved in the Israel-Iran war, is part of an amped-up effort by him to undermine the legitimacy of Biden's presidency. Earlier this month, Trump directed his administration to investigate Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his predecessor's 'cognitive decline.' Biden has dismissed the investigation as 'a mere distraction.' The post also revives a long-running grievance by Trump that the election was stolen even though courts around the country and a Trump attorney general from his first term found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome. The Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity arm pronounced the election 'the most secure in American history.' It was unclear what Trump had in mind when he called for a special prosecutor, but in the event Attorney General Pam Bondi heeds his call, she may face pressure to appoint someone who has already been confirmed by the Senate. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment Friday. The Justice Department in recent years has appointed a succession of special counsels — sometimes, though not always, plucked from outside the agency — to lead investigations into politically sensitive matters, including into conduct by Biden and by Trump. Last year, Trump's personal lawyers launched an aggressive, and successful, challenge to the appointment of Jack Smith, the special counsel assigned to investigate his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election and his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. A Trump-appointed judge agreed, ruling that then-Attorney General Merrick Garland had exceeded his bounds by appointing a prosecutor without Senate approval and confirmation, and dismissed the case. That legal team included Todd Blanche, who is now deputy attorney general, as well as Emil Bove, who is Blanche's top deputy but was recently nominated to serve as a judge on a federal appeals court. ___

California Gov. Gavin Newsom calls wife ‘first partner,' gets dragged online, including by Riley Gaines
California Gov. Gavin Newsom calls wife ‘first partner,' gets dragged online, including by Riley Gaines

New York Post

time14 minutes ago

  • New York Post

California Gov. Gavin Newsom calls wife ‘first partner,' gets dragged online, including by Riley Gaines

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is getting roasted on social media after he called his wife, Jennifer, 'first partner' in a birthday tribute. 'Happy Birthday to the First Partner of California, the outstanding mother of our four incredible children, and the love of my life,' Newsom wrote to mark his wife's 51st birthday on Thursday. The backlash was swift with women's rights activist Riley Gaines leading the charge, tweeting: 'I can't even fathom my husband unironically calling me his partner????' 3 Governor Gavin Newsom and his wife. X / @CAgovernor Others piled on as they ripped Newsom for being too woke. ''First Partner' is grounds for an immediate divorce,' one raged on X. Another chimed in: 'Have you ever considered marrying your 'partner' so that she's your wife? The first lady? 3 Gavin Newsom speaks at a press conference on June 12. JOHN G MABANGLO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock 'Were you not sure about her gender and wanted to go gender neutral?' I'm so confused … why is it so wrong to use female terms? Are you that misogynistic?' another user questioned. Some mocked the Democrat for still referring to his wife as a 'mother,' even though he avoided saying 'wife.' 3 Jennifer Siebel Newsom speaking at the Milken Institute Global Conference on May 5. REUTERS 'Shame on him, he forgot to call her the birthing person instead of mother,' one person wrote on X, sarcastically. His wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, describes herself as the 'first partner' on the governor's official website and in her own social media bios. 'Jennifer Siebel Newsom chose the title First Partner, as opposed to the traditional title of First Lady, to send a signal of inclusivity, recognizing that one day there will be a woman or LGBTQ+ Governor of California, and to elevate the importance of partnership and the need for, and benefits of, a caring, inclusive government,' her bio on the website reads.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store