Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows
Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows
Republicans and Democrats alike are less likely to support renewable energy than they were five years ago, according to a survey released June 5 by the Pew Research Center. Floodlight examines the survey results, which mirror growing pockets of opposition to solar farms, reignited political support for coal plants and moves by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans to kill federally funded clean energy projects.
This shift in opinion dates back to when Democratic President Joe Biden took office, said Brian Kennedy, Pew senior researcher and one of the study's authors. "This isn't a new trend," he said.
Still, Kenneth Gillingham, professor of environmental and energy economics at the Yale School of the Environment, was surprised.
"I see this shift … as a successful effort to link climate change and renewable energy to broader culture war issues," Gillingham said. He added that in the past, "prominent" Republicans supported renewables and sought solutions to climate change, but those stances could now be seen as "disloyal" to Trump.
The survey of 5,085 U.S. adults taken April 28 to May 4 revealed that while 79% of Americans favored expanding wind and solar production in 2020, that number has dropped to 60%. And 39% of Americans today support expansion of oil, coal and natural gas - almost double the 20% that supported it in 2020.
Combustion of fossil fuels - in transportation, energy generation and industrial production - is the No. 1 cause of climate change.
Much of the change in opinion is driven by Republicans, whose support of oil and gas grew from 35% in 2020 to 67% today. But Democrats also indicated less support for renewable energy and more for fossil fuels than five years ago.
While many results reflect Trump's policies opposing most renewables and boosting fossil fuels, Pew found a few notable exceptions: 69% of all respondents favor offshore wind - a technology Trump has specifically targeted.
Both Democrats and Republicans indicated stronger support for nuclear power, with Republicans' favorable opinions increasing from 53% in 2020 to 69% in 2025. Democrats' support rose from 37% to 52%. The Trump administration has signaled support for a nuclear renaissance, despite its high cost.
There were wide partisan splits on several topics. In March, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced it would scale back environmental regulations. Pew asked whether it was possible to do that and still protect air and water quality: 77% of Republicans said yes and 67% of Democrats said no.
Pew didn't ask the respondents why their attitudes have shifted. But Kennedy said in Pew's past surveys, Republicans have expressed concern about the economic impacts of climate change policies and transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources.
Mike Murphy, a Republican consultant and electric vehicle backer, said when the environmental benefits of clean technologies are touted, it polarizes Republicans. Instead, Murphy said messages should be about pocketbook issues - like lower fuel costs - and jobs.
"It's hard for pro-climate people to understand," said Murphy, who has advised dozens of state and national GOP campaigns including John McCain's 2008 presidential bid. "(They think) we just need to shout louder and hit people over the head about climate, climate, climate. The key is you want to talk about jobs and national security and other events that naturally resonate a lot more with right-of-center people."
That's what Murphy's groups, the EV Politics Project and the American EV Jobs Alliance, are trying to do to depoliticize electric vehicles. "Whenever electric cars are seen through a climate lens," Murphy said, "their appeal narrows."
It's a strategy also being used by the Electrification Coalition, a left-of-center pro-EV group. Ben Prochazka, the coalition's executive director, echoed Murphy's strategy, adding that EVs have "become overly politicized and caught in the culture wars, impacting markets and ultimately hurting our ability to realize their many benefits for all Americans."
Prochazka noted that once introduced to EVs, consumers support them: "EV drivers love their vehicles, with more than eight out of ten reporting that their next car will also be electric."
Perhaps those practical messages are getting through. In the Pew survey, electric vehicles were the one item that saw an uptick in support - 4 percentage points in the past year.
But popular support might not be enough to stop Congress from killing a $7,500 electric vehicle credit, which Murphy said would be "policy disaster."
Republicans, he said, are in a "real squeeze," because "they don't have enough money for the tax cuts the president has promised."
Murphy said: "It's easier for Republicans to cut Biden electric cars … than it is for them to cut more Medicaid."
Gillingham is still optimistic that solar, wind and other greenhouse gas-reducing technologies will move forward - because they are the cheapest.
"The continued decline in the price of renewable energy and battery technologies, as well as other new technologies, is a reason to continue to have hope that the worst impacts of climate change can be addressed," he said.
Published by Canary Media, Renewable Energy World
Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powers stalling climate action.
This story was produced by Floodlight and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
‘It was a bloodbath': Cruz, Carlson feud offers preview of 2028
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and conservative media personality Tucker Carlson doubled down on their feud over U.S. involvement in the escalating war between Israel and Iran, with each releasing their own podcasts on Friday following up on the fiery debate earlier this week. The ongoing war of words between the two high-profile conservative thought leaders — both of whom have left the door open to a possible 2028 presidential run — could offer a glimpse at what the first Republican presidential primary of the post-Donald Trump era might look like. 'It was a bloodbath,' Cruz said of his appearance on Carlson's podcast on an episode of 'Verdict with Ted Cruz,' the show he hosts. 'The two of us, frankly, beat the living daylights out of each other for two hours straight.' Carlson and Cruz's contentious conversation — in which both men repeatedly shouted at each other and traded personal insults — revealed fissures on the right between pro-Israel Republicans urging the White House to launch an attack on Iran and conservative isolationists who hope the president will uphold his commitment to keep the U.S. out of foreign conflicts. On Friday, both insisted on their respective podcasts that the other was leading the U.S. down the wrong path. Carlson said Cruz's ominous warnings of Iran's nuclear capabilities were part of an effort to 'justify American involvement in regime change.' '[Carlson] has gotten to a place of hardcore isolationism that I think is really dangerous,' Cruz said on his podcast. Cruz and Carlson's disagreement over the U.S.' policy over the escalating conflict in the Middle East will play out in the coming days. Trump told reporters in New Jersey on Friday he's taking 'a period of time' to decide whether to strike Iran, and that the self-imposed two-week timeframe to launch a strike the White House announced on Thursday would be the 'maximum.' But the two men may also find themselves in competing lanes of the 2028 Republican presidential primary, where the intraparty debate between war hawks and isolationists could be a fault line for Republican primary voters. Carlson said he would consider running for president in 2028 in an episode of his podcast last year, while conceding in the same breath, 'I don't think I'd be very good at it.' 'I would do whatever I could to help,' he told fellow conservative podcast host Patrick Bet-David. 'I want to be helpful.' Cruz, who ran for president against Trump in a bitterly-contested 2016 primary that was punctuated with personal attacks, has not closed the door on a 2028 presidential run. When asked about the possibility of running in 2028 by POLITICO in April, Cruz said he's focused on delivering legislative victories for Republicans — even as he uses his new post heading the Senate Commerce Committee to put his stamp on the direction of the party. Perhaps further forecasting another dynamic of the 2028 primary, Trump refused to show a preference for Carlson or Cruz's position, instead offering praise to both men when asked about the interview. 'Tucker is a nice guy. He called and apologized the other day, because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciated that,' Trump told reporters on Thursday. 'And Ted Cruz is a nice guy. He's been with me for a long time.'
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Cuomo the a--hole
POLITICAL ANAL-YSIS: The word 'asshole' has become so closely associated with mayoral primary front-runner Andrew Cuomo that one needs not even name him — the profane sobriquet is enough. 'I'd rather have an asshole than a progressive,' a retired lawyer named Robert told mayoral candidate Brad Lander at a farmer's market on the Upper West Side Sunday. 'Those are the choices we have: a socialist or an asshole.' Everyone in earshot knew who he was talking about. Zohran Mamdani is the socialist. Cuomo is the asshole. The former governor has a well-earned reputation for domineering and bullying. So does the president of the United States of America. And the semi-apologetic line from many Cuomo supporters has been 'we need an asshole to fight an asshole.' That argument has made it into print, emphasizing that it has become too widespread for squeamish editors to avoid the curse word. 'He'd stand up to Donald Trump. He's an asshole, but he's our asshole,' The Atlantic wrote last week, summarizing the case for Cuomo. Actor and activist Cynthia Nixon responded — speaking from the position of somebody who ran against Cuomo in the 2018 primary for governor, and who knows assholes from a four-decade career in Hollywood. 'I don't think that we need our own sphincter to challenge Trump,' she said at an anti-Cuomo rally ahead of the No Kings march in Manhattan Saturday. Cuomo 'is bought and bossed, not just by random billionaires or corporations, but in many cases, by the exact same billionaires and corporations that bought Donald Trump four more years,' she added. 'Andrew Cuomo is not our asshole. Say it with me!' The crowd, soaked in the rain, yelled back: 'Andrew Cuomo is not our asshole!' It's not just supporters who've dubbed him with the term. 'He's an abuser and an asshole,' state Sen. Gustavo Rivera said when asked if Cuomo was a tough guy. 'There's one thing about having that as an option available to you and play it as a card. It's another thing to operate like that on a day to day basis.' You can buy a 'Cuomo is an asshole' flag on Amazon for $9.00 — with the image of the Democratic donkey replacing the word. Cuomo has been associated with the word going back a decade, at least. 'You gotta fight asshole with asshole,' a democratic operative told POLITICO early in 2016, selling Cuomo as an anti-Trump campaign surrogate for Hillary Clinton. It came up again when Cuomo was earning national acclaim for his covid pandemic briefings. 'Stop trying to make Andrew Cuomo happen,' Current Affairs wrote in 2020. 'Andrew Cuomo is an asshole.' And Cuomo's alleged assholery came up again in 2021, after women came forward accusing him of sexual harassment. Comedian John Oliver devoted the opening monologue of his show to the 'colossal asshole.' The Daily Beast also published an essay: 'Cuomo Is Not Your Dad. He's Your Dad's Asshole Boss.' The expletive is coming up again, as Cuomo runs for mayor. But as he heads into primary day as the favorite in the race, Cuomo's campaign continues to emphasize his get-stuff-done ethos over any criticisms of his personality. 'New Yorkers know Andrew Cuomo fights for them and has produced a real record of results that improve their lives, that cut through the bureaucracy and cut through the mediocrity and got stuff done,' Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said. 'They know he is the only candidate with the experience and the record to fix what's broken. And after 12 long years, put city hall back on the right track,' he added. 'Since this word is apparently now fair game, nobody better blush when I start using it to talk to reporters.' — Jeff Coltin FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL ADAMS SAYS BALLOT NOT SO SECRET AFTER ALL: City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams went back on her word today and clarified who she wants her supporters to rank on their ballots after her. 'I encourage New Yorkers to rank the full slate of Working Families Party candidates,' Adams said in a statement. The candidates on the WFP slate include Mamdani, Brad Lander, Adams and Zellnor Myrie, in that order. Adams did not specify what in order her supporters should rank the slate. The announcement came after Adams declined to back those candidates — and repeatedly refused to answer if she voted for Mamdani and Cuomo amid an internal debate among her aides, POLITICO reported Thursday. 'I still believe in the secrecy of the ballot, and I voted for me and my community,' Adams told reporters after voting in Jamaica, Queens. In her statement today, Adams clarified that she does not think Cuomo should be on voters' ballots. 'His record is part of the same pattern of neglect that our communities, and so many New Yorkers, have faced,' she said of the former governor. — Jason Beeferman FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: A state-of-the-race memo released today by the Working Families Party reviews its strategy and lays out its progress with Primary Day just around the corner. Its mission for 2025? Combat the disillusion that led 900,000 Democratic voters in New York State to sit out the 2024 election. Its strategy? Present the choices as working families versus billionaires. 'Even small increases in turnout among our base could tip the balance in critical races across the state,' local party co-directors Jasmine Gripper and Ana María Archila wrote. In New York City, the third party endorsed Mamdani as its first choice in the Democratic primary for mayor, followed by Lander, Adams and Myrie. It lauded the Mamdani-Lander cross-endorsement, which came late in the cycle as Cuomo continues to lead almost every poll. The party's ranked endorsement was also relatively late in a cycle dominated by Cuomo. One of its choices broke with party leadership: state Sen. Jessica Ramos endorsed Cuomo and got dropped from the slate altogether. Myrie hasn't done any cross-endorsements, but said he'd rank the party's slate, as did Adrienne Adams today, as noted above. And it argued that Cuomo, 'the candidate favored by Trump's billionaires,' is hitting his ceiling in polling. A recent Marist poll found Cuomo leading Mamdani by 10 points in the final round of a ranked-choice voting simulation, and Mamdani's critics argue he too has hit his ceiling. The third party — whose line Cuomo was accused of seeking to nix in 2020 — is also backing Dorcey Applyrs for Albany mayor, Sharon Owens for Syracuse mayor and Sean Ryan for Buffalo mayor. — Emily Ngo SPEAKING OF MEMOS: Moderate national think tank Third Way released its own memo today urging New York City Democrats not to rank Mamdani, writing, 'Leaving aside Mamdani's positions that some believe border on antisemitism, it is his proud affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) that worries us most.' The memo excerpts parts of the DSA platform. And the group argued that Mamdani as mayor would help Trumpism and hurt Democrats nationwide in upcoming elections. 'Republican attack ads in swing districts attaching moderate Democratic candidates to Mamdani and the DSA practically write themselves,' Third Way said in its memo. Asked whether Cuomo as mayor would also hurt the Democratic brand nationally, given his sexual harassment allegations and having taxpayers foot his legal costs, Third Way co-founder Matt Bennett told reporters, 'I don't want to get into Cuomo and whether he is or isn't a good candidate for New York. ... I will point out the things that you noted are personal to him and very hard to connect to other Democrats.' — Emily Ngo FROM THE CAMPAIGN COFFERS THE CAP STAYS: The city's Campaign Finance Board threw cold water on a request from Mamdani to raise the spending cap for mayoral candidates. In a statement today, the board said there is no legal mechanism allowing it to relax the roughly $8 million expenditure limit for primary candidates. 'We understand the challenge posed by independent spenders to the goals of the matching funds program,' spokesperson Timothy Hunter said in a statement. 'The Campaign Finance Board closely monitors spending by all campaigns as well as independent spenders and provides expenditure relief when permitted by law.' The democratic socialist sent a letter to the board seeking more leeway to counteract two super PACs supporting Cuomo. Together, they have flooded the race with a record $19 million to boost the former governor and attack Mamdani. 'Andrew Cuomo is trying to buy this election,' Mamdani said at a press conference outside the Campaign Finance Board's headquarters. 'He has a super PAC, that is now the best funded super PAC in New York City's history … that is ensuring that every New Yorker, when they turn on their television, they open their mailbox, and they watch a video on YouTube will be met with yet another attack ad that is lying about myself and this campaign.' The board said it can only raise the cap in response to excess spending from other campaigns operating outside the public matching system — such as Ray McGuire's mayoral bid in 2021 — and not super PACs. — Amira McKee and Joe Anuta LANDER'S LAST STAND: Brad Lander's campaign is throwing $320,000 into an attack ad against Cuomo, in a final effort to curb the former governor's lead in the final days of the race. Titled 'Cost,' the ad tears into Cuomo's record as govenor, citing the numerous sexual harassment allegations that precipitated his resignation in 2021. Cuomo denies the allegations, but his contentious record has been picked apart by his competitors. Lander, the candidate who has been the most consistently tough on Cuomo, zeroed in on the claims during the final mayoral debate last week. The ad also claims the former governor is funded by 'Trump's billionaire donors,' echoing a Mamdani ad last week. Playbook reported that Cuomo received nearly $400,000 from GOP or Conservative Party donors, and his super PAC received funds from high-profile Trump donor and billionaire Bill Ackman. Cuomo has said some of those donors, and specifically Ackman, gave to him before ever donating to Trump and insists he is unmoved by campaign contributions to him or his super PAC. The ad could be a boost for Mamdani, who cross-endorsed Lander last week. Lander's polling a distant third in the race. The ad features a clip of Ocasio-Cortez, who endorsed Mamdani as her first pick, telling voters, 'do not rank Andrew Cuomo on your ballot.' One of the last major expenditures of Lander's run, the ad leaves it all on the table as the bookish city comptroller delivers an energetic finale to a slow-to-build campaign. — Amira McKee IN OTHER NEWS — ADVICE FOR THE NYT: Twelve veteran political observers weighed in to give their opinion on The New York Times' 'vexing' editorial on the mayor's race. (Vital City) — ERIC ADAMS SAYS NEVERMIND ON HEALTH PLAN: Mayor Eric Adams pulled the plug on a Medicare Advantage move for New York City retirees. (POLITICO Pro) — 'FUCK THE DECORUM': Justin Brannan explains why 'people want fighters' to represent them in the Democratic party. (Interview Magazine) And WELCOME TO THE WORLD: Victor Botnick, born on 6/13 to Jeanette and Mark Botnick, a Bloomberg alum. pic. Missed this morning's New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump says Harvard agreement on international students may be announced within a week
President Donald Trump on Friday said a deal with Harvard University, related to its policies surrounding international students, may be announced within a week. "Many people have been asking what is going on with Harvard University and their largescale improprieties that we have been addressing, looking for a solution," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so." The president noted the university "acted extremely appropriately" during negotiations, applauding leadership's apparent commitment to do "what is right." "If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be "mindbogglingly" HISTORIC, and very good for our Country," Trump wrote. The announcement came as Federal Judge Allison Burroughs on Friday issued a preliminary injunction, allowing Harvard University to continue hosting international students, despite a Trump executive order. It is a major legal victory for the Ivy League school, which has been fighting a variety of restrictions imposed by the administration. The temporary court order stays in effect until the case is fully decided on the merits. Harvard University sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), challenging the revocation of Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). Without the program, current and future international students would be barred from attending the university. Harvard alleged the revocation was the culmination of a retaliatory campaign by the Trump administration on academic freedom at Harvard. Attorneys argued the policy is an infringement of the university's Due Process and First Amendment rights, in particular Harvard's constitutional right to be free of retaliatory action for protected speech, as well as violating the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The order states the revocation cannot be used to negatively affect visa applications, deny entry to the U.S., or be used as a reason to claim a visa holder has lost their non-immigrant status. Harvard University did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
