7 Gulf World Marine Park dolphins OK'd to be transferred to another facility: NOAA

The Brief
Dolphins are being transferred from Gulf World Marine Park in Florida's Panhandle amid deepening welfare concerns and investigations.
7 of the 11 dolphins will be transferred to a facility in St. Augustine, Florida. Four others expected to be transferred.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, USDA, and FWC have launched investigations or are assisting with investigations.
PANAMA CITY BEACH, Fla. - Seven of the 11 dolphins at Gulf World Marine Park in Florida's Panhandle have received approval to be transferred to another facility in Florida.
NOAA Fisheries confirmed to FOX 35 on Monday that it issued an emergency waiver on May 30 to transfer 7 bottlenose dolphins, and that it anticipates issuing another emergency waiver for the remaining four dolphins when a new facility is found to house them.
Gulf World Marine Park has been under scrutiny over the last several weeks and months following the deaths of five dolphins and concerning inspection reports from the USDA's Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service.
FOX 35 reached out to the USDA on Monday for an update.
What they're saying
"On May 30, NOAA Fisheries issued an emergency waiver to transport 7 bottlenose dolphins to Marineland Dolphin Adventure in Florida. A separate waiver for the remaining 4 rough-toothed dolphins will be issued as soon as Gulf World makes arrangements with a facility that can receive them," NOAA said in a statement.
The seven dolphins have been cleared to be transferred to Marineland Dolphin Adventure in St. Augustine, Florida. That marine park is owned by The Dolphin Company, which owns Gulf World Marine Park and three other facilities in Florida, as well as a number of facilities in Mexico and Central America.
The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service released a new statement on Monday.
"APHIS has been in regular contact with NOAA and continues to work collaboratively with state and federal partners. Facilities are required to notify NOAA regarding the movement of marine mammals."
"APHIS takes its mission to ensure the humane treatment of animals covered by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) very seriously. We continue to conduct inspections and work with facilities to ensure they are in compliance with regulations under the AWA," a spokesperson said in a previous statement.
Enforcement actions by the USDA can include letters of warning, fines, animal license suspensions and/or revocations.
The backstory
At least five dolphins have died at Gulf World Marine Park in Palm Beach County, Florida, sparking outrage and protests about animal rights activists, and investigations by federal and state agencies, including USDA, FWC, and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier.
Federal inspection reports note several concerns found within the facility, including dolphin holding tanks filled with algae, broken water filters, lack of shade, and deteriorating facilities.
One report notes that a dolphin died during a public show in March 2025, but trainers did not respond quickly due to not being able to see the dolphin at the bottom of the tank due to the level of algae.
The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has conducted 19 inspections at Gulf World Marine Park since 2014.
The most recent inspections were conducted on Jan. 8 and March 4, 2025. Those inspection reports detail a facility seemingly in disrepair:
"All the dolphin pools still have an excessive amount of at least 6 inches of algae bloom along all the walls and bottom of pools and clumps of algae floating in pools" - March 4 inspection
"When the APHIS inspector was standing above the main pool, looking down into the water, it was difficult to see the dolphins if they are approximately three feet below the water" - March 4 inspection
"At the time of the inspection, there is no working filter for dolphin east pool which went down on November 13, 2024. According to staff, the filtration for dolphin west is only functioning at 50 percent" - Jan. 8 inspection
"There is an abundance of algae growth in multiple dolphin pools with the inspector scraping algae off a step that was almost 6 inches in length" - Jan. 8 inspection
"The facility has lost six maintenance employees in the past three months leaving them with two maintenance employees. Additionally the facility has lost seven animal care employees in the past three months" - Jan. 8 inspection
"At the time of the inspection, the penguins had been moved to an indoor room due to colder temperatures. The room where the animals are housed appears to be an storage space with carpet, old sound equipment with cords hanging down the cabinets, paint for crafts in the area, dust and debris throughout the room" - Jan. 8 inspection
"The perimeter around the dolphin stadium pool is in the early stages of disrepair with paint flaking off right at the edge of the pool" - Jan. 8 inspection
"The facility still has not provided shade over the far side of dolphin east pool where dry guest interactions are done, or the over the main show stage where the dolphins station for food during training sessions with the trainers or during public guest interactions after shows" - Jan. 8 inspection
"Along the far wall of the sea lion stadium pool where a seal was swimming, rust is still coming through the wall and running down the wall and into the water" - Jan. 8 inspection
FOX 35 Orlando reached out to The Dolphin Company and Gulf World Marine Park on Friday for comment, but did not hear back.
According to its website, The Dolphin Company operates 21 dolphin experiences and marine aquariums in the United States, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Italy.
There are four in Florida:
Gulf World, Panama City
Marineland, St. Augustine
Miami Seaquarium, Miami
Dolphin Connection, Duck Key
It's unclear if the state's investigation includes the other Florida facilities. USA Today reported that Mexico-based The Dolphin Company filed for bankruptcy protection earlier this year.
The Source
The information in this article comes from statements and/or social media posts from Attorney General James Uthmeier, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the USDA Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service, public USDA inspection reports, local and national media reports, and a March 24 news release from the City of Panama Beach.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CBS News

5 hours ago

• CBS News

Florida Attorney General proposes "Alligator Alcatraz" as immigration detention site in Everglades

Florida's attorney general has proposed a temporary detention facility called "Alligator Alcatraz," which he wants to build in the Everglades to house what he calls "criminal aliens." As of now, the area is an old airstrip used as a pilot training facility and is surrounded by pythons and alligators. In a video posted on social media platform "X", Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said: "Efficient. Low cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility because you don't need to invest that much into the perimeter. People get out. There's not much waiting for them, other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide." Uthmeier says the facility would sit on the already constructed runway, hold more than 1,000 beds, and be surrounded by the Everglades — though it is not part of Everglades National Park. Many are rejecting the idea, citing environmental concerns — including Executive Director of Friends of the Everglades, Eve Samples. "This site is really important to Friends of the Everglades. It's actually the reason Friends of the Everglades was founded by Marjory Stoneman Douglas in 1969, to stop what would have been the world's largest airport from being built right there," said Samples. "We call on the governor to put a stop to this proposal right now. It's a terribly bad idea...," continued Samples. Officials haven't shared the projected cost of the project but say it could be operational within 30 to 60 days after construction.

Yahoo

8 hours ago

• Yahoo

State says Miami can't move city election without voter input. Who's right?

Next week, the Miami City Commission is scheduled to take a final vote on a proposal to move the city from odd- to even-year elections, canceling the upcoming November election and pushing it to 2026 without voter approval. Depending on who you ask, the proposal could be viewed as a common-sense reform measure that will boost the city's low voter turnout, or a power grab by Miami's elected officials, who will get an extra year in office if the change is approved — including those who are term-limited. The issue hasn't just made waves in local political circles. It's raised legal questions that have traveled as far as Tallahassee, pitting the city against Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida attorney general. The strained relationship between the governor and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez — who has been lobbying behind the scenes for the election date change — likely doesn't help, either. But beyond the local political drama at play, one question remains: Is it legal for the city to delay its elections without voter input? Last week, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier issued a written opinion saying the city of Miami can't move its election date without voter approval, and DeSantis concurred in a social media post. Uthmeier handed down his opinion in response to a request from City Commissioner Miguel Angel Gabela. 'If the City of Miami is to amend its charter, either to move the date of municipal elections or to change the terms of office for elected officials, then the change may only proceed by a vote of the electors,' Uthmeier said. But in a written opinion the next day, City Attorney George Wysong argued that Miami commissioners were on solid legal ground to move the election date themselves. He cited not only a relevant state law but also a judge's decision in a similar dispute saying such a date change was allowable. In his opinion, Wysong relied in part on a recent case against the city of North Miami. Here's the background: In 2023, council members in North Miami voted to move the date of the local election from odd- to even-numbered years with the goal of attracting more voters to the polls when county, state and federal candidates would also be on the ballot. Council members approved a couple of ordinances to change both the city charter and code to move the local election date to November 2024 — triggering a lawsuit by a handful of North Miami residents. They argued that the date change could not be made without a referendum vote on the city charter because it extended the term limits of sitting council members and the mayor. Their legal challenge failed when a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judge sided with the North Miami Council members, saying their vote on moving the election date was allowed under Florida law. 'The statutory language is clear and unambiguous: the governing statutes authorize a municipality to change its election date, and extend the terms of its sitting council members as a consequence of the election date change, by ordinance and without approval by popular referendum,' Circuit Judge Reemberto Diaz ruled in May 2023. In his ruling, Diaz also cited Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi's legal opinion in 2013 involving a smaller Florida city, Arcadia. 'The Attorney General concluded that the City of Arcadia could amend its charter by ordinance to change the date of its election to coincide with federal, state, and county elections, and to extend the terms of its sitting officers resulting from the date change, without voter approval by referendum,' Diaz wrote. Diaz's decision, the first of its kind in the state of Florida, was affirmed by a three-judge panel of the Third District Court of Appeal in Miami-Dade County. The ruling, however, was not reviewed by the full appellate court or the Florida Supreme Court. Attorney Edward Guedes, who represented the city of North Miami in the case, said that because the appeals court simply upheld the trial court's ruling without elaborating in a written opinion of their own written, 'Technically that kind of decision is not binding precedent.' Nevertheless, Guedes said Florida law allows municipalities to change the election date via ordinance and without voter input. 'It is very, very clear that the Florida Legislature authorized this kind of election date-changing by cities, and to do so by ordinance notwithstanding a charter,' Guedes told the Miami Herald on Friday said. He emphasized that making the change, however, is 'a one-time shot.' 'This isn't just a mechanism for cities to abuse the process and sitting elected officials to continuously extend their terms in office, because it's a one-shot alignment,' Guedes said. 'Once you align, that's it. You're done.' Miami attorney Juan-Carlos Planas, who filed the lawsuit challenging the city of North Miami, said Diaz's ruling was wrong. Planas said the key state law cited by the North Miami Council members when they changed the local election date only applied to non-chartered towns and cities in Florida. Planas said a chartered city like North Miami required a referendum vote for a couple of fundamental reasons. Council members voted to change the city charter by switching the municipal election from odd- to even-numbered years without first holding a referendum vote on the charter itself. And, in doing so, they also extended the members' term limits, again without the referendum vote. Planas, who ran unsuccessfully as a Democrat for Miami-Dade supervisor of elections last year, said the city commissioners in Miami are making the same mistake. 'I do think the city of Miami has to change their charter first before the commissioners vote on changing the election date,' Planas told the Herald on Friday. 'But they have a problem: they can't change the city charter without a referendum vote of the people.' Guedes said changing the election date via ordinance only and without a change to the charter is legally sound, essentially making it so the provision of the charter specifying elections take place in odd years is 'no longer viable.' However, he noted that that approach 'could get complicated.' 'Not because I think the legal outcome will change,' Guedes said. 'It's just that it may create confusion.' Planas also said the Miami commissioners are compounding their mistake by changing the municipal election date by ordinance only, without addressing that it conflicts with the city charter. 'Why aren't they doing that?' he asked.

Bloomberg

13 hours ago

• Bloomberg

US Climate-Data Retreat Gives China a New Opportunity

The economic and political importance of monitoring the weather — or at least the effects of weather — was clear to the ancient Egyptians. They came up with the ' nilometer,' a device measuring Nile River flooding that could predict agricultural (and thus tax) yields. It also was likely clear to foreign intelligence agents breaching Australia's Bureau of Meteorology in 2015 (China denied any involvement). From farmers to insurers to homeowners, understanding the weather, how it's changed and what it may do next is of vital economic importance. But in the US, with polarized views on the proven science of climate change, even collecting data has become a partisan issue. The Trump administration for example has cut swathes of spending and personnel tied to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA.