Is Africa splitting in two? Scientists uncover fiery force tearing the continent apart faster than predicted
iStock Scientists have uncovered a massive superheated force beneath East Africa that's rapidly tearing the continent apart. The East African Rift, once thought to take tens of millions of years to split, may now form a new ocean in just one to five million years.
Deep beneath the sun-scorched plains of East Africa, something extraordinary is unfolding—something so vast in scale that it could eventually reshape the very face of our planet. A new study has revealed that the East African Rift System (EARS), the 2,000-mile-long tear that runs from Ethiopia to Malawi, is ripping apart the continent at nearly double the previously estimated speed.
According to a report from the Daily Mail , this dramatic process, long thought to be glacially slow, is being accelerated by a powerful and ancient force surging from the depths of the Earth—a massive upwelling of superheated rock known as the African Superplume. Scientists say this 'giant hot blob' is not only pushing tectonic plates apart but also elevating the continent by hundreds of meters. And its influence is far greater—and faster—than once believed.
At the heart of this seismic drama lies the boundary between the Somali Plate and the Nubian Plate, where GPS tracking has long recorded their gradual separation. But new research led by scientists from the University of Glasgow, using advanced isotope tracing and high-precision mass spectrometry, now suggests that this process is being driven from deep within the Earth's mantle—far deeper than surface tectonic activity alone could explain.
By studying the isotopes of the noble gas neon from Kenya's Menengai geothermal field, researchers traced the chemical signature back to the core-mantle boundary. It's a smoking gun that confirms the presence of the African Superplume—an enormous reservoir of molten rock fueling the continental rift. "We've always known the surface was changing, but now we know the true power lies far below," said lead author Professor Fin Stuart. "This upwelling force is not only driving the plates apart, it's lifting the entire region."
The consequences of this tectonic ballet are already visible on the surface. In 2005, a sudden swarm of over 400 earthquakes in Ethiopia's Afar region opened a staggering 37-mile-long fissure in just days. In 2018, another colossal crack tore through Kenya's Great Rift Valley, halting traffic and making headlines around the world. As the rift continues to widen—now at around 0.2 inches per year—the stage is being set for an entirely new ocean to form. According to marine geophysicist Ken Macdonald, 'The Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea will eventually flood into the East African Rift Valley. A new ocean will be born.' In the distant future—possibly within just one to five million years—countries like Somalia, eastern Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania could drift away from the mainland, creating a new continent altogether. Meanwhile, landlocked nations such as Uganda and Zambia might find themselves with coastlines, completely reshaping regional geopolitics and trade routes.
— Rainmaker1973 (@Rainmaker1973)
Beyond the astonishing visuals and dramatic forecasts, this research underscores a profound truth: our planet is in constant, powerful motion. What appears to be solid and eternal underfoot is, in reality, shifting, cracking, and transforming.
The East African Rift is not just a tear in the Earth's crust—it's a preview of planetary rebirth, a glimpse into the same elemental forces that once shaped the Atlantic Ocean and will eventually redraw the map once again. So, are the continents breaking apart faster than we imagined? The science says yes—and East Africa is just the beginning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind
MIT researchers have discovered that using ChatGPT for essay writing reduces brain engagement and learning over time. Through EEG brain scans of 54 students, those who relied on AI performed worse than others across neural and linguistic metrics. The study raises concerns that AI tools may hinder critical thinking and promote passive acceptance of algorithm-driven content. A new MIT study warns that regular use of ChatGPT could impair memory, brain activity, and critical thinking. Students relying on the AI tool showed significantly lower cognitive engagement than peers using Google or no tools at all. (Representational image: iStock) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Brain vs Bot: How the Study Was Done Google Wasn't Great, But Still Better Than ChatGPT Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Shortcut with a Hidden Toll What This Means for the AI Generation It's quick, it's clever, and it answers almost everything—no wonder millions around the world rely on ChatGPT . But could this digital genie be dulling our minds with every wish we make? According to a startling new study by scientists at MIT's Media Lab, the answer may be yes. Researchers have now found that excessive use of AI tools like ChatGPT could be quietly eroding your memory, critical thinking, and even your brain on arXiv, the study titled 'The Cognitive Cost of Using LLMs' explores how language models—especially ChatGPT—affect the brain's ability to think, learn, and retain examine what they call the 'cognitive cost' of using large language models (LLMs), MIT researchers tracked 54 students over a four-month period using electroencephalography (EEG) devices to monitor brain activity. The participants were divided into three groups: one used ChatGPT, another relied on Google, and the last used no external help at all—dubbed the 'Brain-only' the AI-powered group initially showed faster results, the long-term findings were more sobering. Students who depended on ChatGPT for essay writing exhibited poorer memory retention, reduced brain engagement, and lower scoring compared to their peers. As the researchers noted, 'The LLM group's participants performed worse than their counterparts in the Brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, and scoring.'Interestingly, students who used Google showed moderate brain activity and generated more thoughtful content than those who leaned on ChatGPT. Meanwhile, those in the Brain-only group had the highest levels of cognitive engagement, producing original ideas and deeper insights. In fact, even when ChatGPT users later attempted to write without assistance, their brain activity remained subdued—unlike the other groups who showed increased engagement while adapting to new suggests that habitual ChatGPT usage might not just affect how we think, but whether we think at study also points to how this over-reliance on AI encourages mental passivity. While ChatGPT users reported reduced friction in accessing information, this convenience came at a cost. As the researchers explained, 'This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions'.'The team also raised red flags about algorithmic bias : what appears as top-ranked content from an AI is often a result of shareholder-driven training data, not necessarily truth or value. This creates a more sophisticated version of the 'echo chamber,' where your thoughts are subtly shaped—not by your own reasoning, but by an AI's probabilistic AI tools become more embedded in our everyday tasks—from writing emails to crafting essays—this study is a wake-up call for students, educators, and professionals. While tools like ChatGPT are powerful assistants, they should not become cognitive researchers caution that as language models continue to evolve, users must remain alert to their potential mental side effects. In a world where convenience is king, critical thinking might just be the first casualty.
Economic Times
19 hours ago
- Economic Times
'Humans were never built to run': Harvard professor says walking beats workouts for a longer, healthier life
In an old podcast interview and his book Exercised, Professor Daniel Lieberman debunks the myth of constant intense exercise. He explains that evolutionary biology favors walking and rest over running and heavy workouts. While moderate activity is vital, Lieberman emphasizes that humans are biologically wired for energy conservation, not for high-performance athleticism. Harvard evolutionary biologist Daniel E. Lieberman argues in his book Exercised that humans weren't built to run marathons or engage in extreme fitness routines. Instead, we evolved for moderate movement like walking. (Representational image: iStock) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Evolution Didn't Design Athletes — It Designed Survivors Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Culture of Overexertion Walk Before You Run — Literally Renowned evolutionary biologist Daniel E. Lieberman , a professor at Harvard University , is turning heads — and slowing down treadmills — with his thought-provoking book Exercised. The core message? Contrary to popular belief, humans didn't evolve to run marathons or grind through intense workouts. Instead, our ancestors spent far more time sitting, walking, and conserving energy than sprinting or strength on the High Performance podcast, Lieberman debunks the modern fitness myth : 'We have to do this weird thing called exercise, which is voluntary physical activity for the sake of health and fitness — something nobody did until very recently.'Lieberman explains that while physical activity is crucial, the kind we idolize today is historically unnatural. Our ancient relatives only moved as much as survival demanded — usually through moderate walking, hunting, gathering, or building shelter.'Humans are unusually fat creatures,' Lieberman says with a smile, adding that biologically, our bodies are wired to store energy, not burn it off unnecessarily. From an evolutionary perspective, excessive exercise could even be seen as studies challenge the modern 'no pain, no gain' philosophy. While 150 minutes of activity a week — roughly 21 minutes a day — can reduce mortality by 30%, pushing beyond that can sometimes invite injury or burnout. 'It's not about running marathons. Just walking a bit more each day can do wonders,' Lieberman warns against the growing culture of overtraining and pushing limits, especially among younger generations influenced by performance-driven social media. While elite athleticism is impressive, he emphasizes that the average human body simply wasn't built to endure constant strain.'The obsession with optimum performance is overrated,' he said during the podcast. 'High performance is just achieving your goals and staying active — it doesn't need to mean winning medals.'At the heart of Lieberman's philosophy is the humble act of walking. More than a biological necessity, he presents it as a sustainable, natural form of exercise that aligns with how our bodies evolved. Ancient humans walked the equivalent of Los Angeles to New York every year — not because they wanted to, but because they had modern times, incorporating simple changes like walking an extra metro stop or opting for stairs over elevators is more aligned with our evolutionary design than lifting weights for hours or pushing through rigorous cardio you've ever felt guilty for not signing up for that spin class or skipping leg day, Lieberman's research is a breath of fresh, science-backed air. His message is clear: being active is important — but balance is before you lace up for your next run, consider his advice. Maybe it's time we all gave our legs — and guilt — a little rest. After all, evolution might just be on your side.
Economic Times
a day ago
- Economic Times
Harvard doctor's simple tip can boost your happiness in one minute. A startup CEO is already practicing it
iStock Harvard doctor Trisha Pasricha proved that one-minute chats with strangers can boost happiness, echoing a University of Chicago study. In a parallel tale, startup CEO Harsh Pokharna found the same truth during spontaneous meetups in Jaipur, reinforcing that real connection starts offline. (Representational image: iStock) It wasn't a research lab or a stethoscope that Harvard doctor Trisha Pasricha turned to recently—it was the simple, brave act of chatting with strangers while waiting in line. A physician, an instructor at Harvard Medical School, and the Ask a Doctor columnist for The Washington Post, Dr. Pasricha tested a charming scientific theory on the bustling platforms of Boston's Green Line: that one-minute conversations with strangers can actually make you happier. 'It is scientifically proven that you can boost your happiness in one minute by talking to a stranger,' she began in a video she shared on Instagram, proceeding to engage unsuspecting commuters in playful and warm exchanges. Whether she was joking about being a Celtics fan or asking if someone wanted to be a pediatrician, the result was almost always the same—people smiled, talked, and lingered in conversations they hadn't planned for. The experiment wasn't just a cute social video. It was rooted in evidence. According to Dr. Pasricha, several studies, including one from the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business in 2014, showed that people who spoke to strangers during their daily commute felt more positive afterward—even though they originally assumed their fellow travelers wouldn't be interested. 'I had a great time,' Dr. Pasricha said, visibly moved by the simplicity of connection. 'Most people were down to just keep talking for minutes and minutes on end.' Interestingly, this scientific truth found a surprising echo in the world of tech entrepreneurship. Harsh Pokharna, the CEO of Bengaluru-based fintech startup OkCredit and an IIT Kanpur alumnus, unintentionally embarked on a social experiment of his own. During a break in his hometown Jaipur, Pokharna posted a casual Instagram story inviting people to hang out. What began as boredom soon turned into an unexpectedly fulfilling journey of human connection. From random DMs to heartfelt discussions about therapy, dating, and dreams, Pokharna's days became filled with spontaneous meetups that mirrored the spirit of Pasricha's scientific adventure. 'There were no rules, no agendas—just organic human connection,' Pokharna noted, as he sipped coffee, played badminton, and took walks with strangers who soon felt like old friends. Both Pasricha and Pokharna's experiences—one rooted in medical science, the other in lived curiosity—prove the same point: in an era dominated by curated lives and digital walls, the art of spontaneous conversation is a quiet rebellion. It's free, it's freeing, and it might just be the one-minute happiness hack we all need. Pasricha's dare at the end of her video is more than an Instagram caption—'I dare you to try this with a stranger today'—it's an invitation to revive something ancient and humane: unfiltered, real-world connection. For a society struggling with loneliness, digital fatigue, and emotional burnout, it may be time to treat these micro-interactions not as throwaway moments, but as therapeutic encounters. Both the doctor and the startup CEO, from Harvard labs to Jaipur streets, remind us that wellness isn't always found in a prescription bottle or a productivity app. Sometimes, it's waiting in line with a stranger, ready to say hello. ( Originally published on Jun 19, 2025 )
