Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind

MIT researchers have discovered that using ChatGPT for essay writing reduces brain engagement and learning over time. Through EEG brain scans of 54 students, those who relied on AI performed worse than others across neural and linguistic metrics. The study raises concerns that AI tools may hinder critical thinking and promote passive acceptance of algorithm-driven content.
A new MIT study warns that regular use of ChatGPT could impair memory, brain activity, and critical thinking. Students relying on the AI tool showed significantly lower cognitive engagement than peers using Google or no tools at all. (Representational image: iStock)
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Brain vs Bot: How the Study Was Done
Google Wasn't Great, But Still Better Than ChatGPT
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A Shortcut with a Hidden Toll
What This Means for the AI Generation
It's quick, it's clever, and it answers almost everything—no wonder millions around the world rely on ChatGPT . But could this digital genie be dulling our minds with every wish we make? According to a startling new study by scientists at MIT's Media Lab, the answer may be yes. Researchers have now found that excessive use of AI tools like ChatGPT could be quietly eroding your memory, critical thinking, and even your brain activity.Published on arXiv, the study titled 'The Cognitive Cost of Using LLMs' explores how language models—especially ChatGPT—affect the brain's ability to think, learn, and retain information.To examine what they call the 'cognitive cost' of using large language models (LLMs), MIT researchers tracked 54 students over a four-month period using electroencephalography (EEG) devices to monitor brain activity. The participants were divided into three groups: one used ChatGPT, another relied on Google, and the last used no external help at all—dubbed the 'Brain-only' group.While the AI-powered group initially showed faster results, the long-term findings were more sobering. Students who depended on ChatGPT for essay writing exhibited poorer memory retention, reduced brain engagement, and lower scoring compared to their peers. As the researchers noted, 'The LLM group's participants performed worse than their counterparts in the Brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, and scoring.'Interestingly, students who used Google showed moderate brain activity and generated more thoughtful content than those who leaned on ChatGPT. Meanwhile, those in the Brain-only group had the highest levels of cognitive engagement, producing original ideas and deeper insights. In fact, even when ChatGPT users later attempted to write without assistance, their brain activity remained subdued—unlike the other groups who showed increased engagement while adapting to new tools.This suggests that habitual ChatGPT usage might not just affect how we think, but whether we think at all.The study also points to how this over-reliance on AI encourages mental passivity. While ChatGPT users reported reduced friction in accessing information, this convenience came at a cost. As the researchers explained, 'This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions'.'The team also raised red flags about algorithmic bias : what appears as top-ranked content from an AI is often a result of shareholder-driven training data, not necessarily truth or value. This creates a more sophisticated version of the 'echo chamber,' where your thoughts are subtly shaped—not by your own reasoning, but by an AI's probabilistic guesses.As AI tools become more embedded in our everyday tasks—from writing emails to crafting essays—this study is a wake-up call for students, educators, and professionals. While tools like ChatGPT are powerful assistants, they should not become cognitive crutches.The researchers caution that as language models continue to evolve, users must remain alert to their potential mental side effects. In a world where convenience is king, critical thinking might just be the first casualty.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hans India

12 minutes ago

• Hans India

Reddit Mulls Eye-Scanning Tech to Combat AI Bots and Uphold Anonymity

In a bold move to clamp down on AI-generated bots, Reddit is reportedly in talks to adopt a futuristic identity verification system that scans users' irises. The technology, known as the Orb, is part of the World ID project co-founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. The idea is simple but ambitious: confirm that a user is human—without ever revealing their personal information. According to an exclusive report by Semafor, the social media platform is evaluating the use of World ID to curb the rise of sophisticated AI bots, which have grown harder to detect due to the surge in tools like ChatGPT. If implemented, Reddit users may soon be asked to prove they are real by looking into a shiny, spherical device that scans their eyes. World ID is the cornerstone of Altman's broader initiative, World (formerly Worldcoin). At the heart of the system is the Orb, a biometric scanner that captures a person's iris and face to generate a unique, encrypted digital identity. Once the scan is complete, the original images are deleted, and a secure code—stored locally on the user's phone—serves as proof of their humanity. As Reddit remains rooted in pseudonymity, with millions of users engaging in anonymous dialogue, the platform is treading carefully. Sources told Semafor that Reddit intends to offer 'many' other forms of user verification in addition to World ID, though specific alternatives have not been disclosed. If adopted, the World ID system could let users continue browsing and posting anonymously—but with an added layer of authenticity. The goal is to preserve the platform's community-driven culture while addressing growing concerns about misinformation, spam, and bot activity. The Orb itself has already made its way into various parts of the world. After debuting in six U.S. cities earlier this year, the technology recently arrived in the U.K., with devices now seen in shopping malls and high-street stores in London. Expansion to cities like Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff, Belfast, and Glasgow is expected soon. Tools for Humanity, the company behind the Orb, also plans to place self-service kiosks in select retail locations, much like ATMs. For users who opt in, there's a sweetener—those signing up for World ID receive a portion of the project's native cryptocurrency, Worldcoin (WLD), as a reward. However, this high-tech solution has not come without controversy. World ID has faced regulatory scrutiny across multiple countries. Germany, Argentina, and Kenya have launched investigations into its use, while Spain and Hong Kong have banned it altogether. In South Korea, the firm was recently fined over $800,000 for violating privacy laws. Still, Tools for Humanity asserts that user privacy is central to their mission. They claim no biometric data is stored and that all information is anonymised and encrypted. 'World ID is safer and more privacy-conscious than other systems, such as India's Aadhaar,' said project co-lead Alex Blania, referencing Aadhaar's history of data breaches. With over 1,500 Orb scanners already in operation and plans to roll out 12,000 more, Reddit's potential adoption of this controversial technology underscores a larger dilemma faced by online platforms today: how to preserve human integrity in a digital world increasingly shaped by AI.

Time of India

15 minutes ago

• Time of India

5 reasons why Perplexity AI is Apple's most likely multibillion-dollar acquisition

Apple is reportedly in early-stage talks to acquire the AI startup Perplexity AI in a move to significantly enhance its artificial intelligence offerings. While discussions are underway, involving top executives like services chief Eddy Cue and M&A head Adrian Perica, sources cited by Bloomberg suggest a formal offer is not guaranteed. If completed, the acquisition of Perplexity would represent Apple's largest corporate purchase to date. Here are five key reasons driving Apple's potential buyout. 'The most likely acquisition target in the multibillion-dollar range is Perplexity AI. While the company lacks its own cutting-edge foundation models — like those of OpenAI or Anthropic — it has several advantages that make it a logical fit for Apple,' said Mark Gurman. 5 reasons why Apple may buy Perplexity: Consumer ready product: Gurman says that a primary advantage is its proven, consumer-ready product. With an interface and voice controls, Perplexity's search tool would feel native to Apple's iOS and could replace Google as the default AI-powered search engine in Safari, Spotlight, and Siri. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Pelajari Undo The report says that this can directly address a clear need for Apple, which, despite improving its core AI models, lacks a strong conversational search layer—Perplexity's exact strength. Perplexity's small team: Gurman notes that from a practical standpoint, the acquisition is feasible because Perplexity's team has roughly 250 employees, rich with AI talent . The team is small enough for smooth integration into Apple's Siri and AI engineering teams. Reasonable price tag: Furthermore, its estimated $14 billion valuation is considered reasonable, presenting a high-upside, low-risk investment compared to other AI giants. Timing is critical: With its lucrative search deal with Google threatened by a US antitrust lawsuit, Apple must prepare for a future without Google search. Acquiring Perplexity would finally allow Apple to launch its own branded search engine. Bringing a brand name in-house: Such a deal offers secondary benefits as well, Gurman notes. Bringing the recognisable Perplexity brand in-house would bolster Apple's credibility and recruiting power in the competitive AI community, where it has historically faced challenges. This interest isn't just speculative. Apple's services chief, Eddy Cue, a key dealmaker, publicly praised the startup during the Google antitrust trial earlier this year. "We've been pretty impressed with what Perplexity has done," Cue testified, admitting that "the service sometimes can provide better results than a classic search engine like Google." AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

News18

16 minutes ago

• News18

What Is Perplexity And Why Does Apple Want To Buy This AI Company?

Perplexity is just another AI company but biggies like Apple and Meta are said to be looking for a deal to buy the firm. Perplexity is just another AI company that has built tools like AI assistant, search engine and even has a voice chatbot. But in the last few weeks, reports claim both Meta and Apple have considered buying this company to strengthen its AI tools. Apple's case for a full-fledged AI ecosystem is far more critical because of the Siri delays till 2026, and its overall AI tools failing to light up the market. So what is so special about Perplexity that you have these tech giants linked with and looking to buy this AI company? What Is Perplexity And What It Offers Perplexity is an AI company supported by Amazon chief Jeff Bezos and tech giant Nvidia. It has launched an AI-powered search engine, a voice assistant and even lets you generate AI videos using text prompts. Unlike traditional search engines, Perplexity delivers more conversational and informative responses while citing sources, a feature that enhances transparency. Users can type queries and receive concise, source-backed answers, along with suggestions for related topics. It is making tools that are similar to ChatGPT and Gemini which makes it ripe for a giant like Apple that continues to rely on external forces for its AI push in 2025. Why Does Apple Want To Buy? Apple has internally discussed buying Perplexity, as reported by Bloomberg recently. The company needs a big AI push to jumpstart its ambitions that are lagging for multiple reasons. Apple wants to build its AI service on user privacy which means the dataset to train the AI model is limited. iPhone users can trigger ChatGPT or Gemini to explore more features but that is done by sending the data to the external servers, and Apple does not vouch for the safety of that data. Perplexity is rumoured to be valued around $18-20 billion and buying this AI company opens up internal solutions for Apple and gives them more leeway to build a stronger and more effective Siri, possibly relying on the AI workforce that it acquires with the company. The talks have mostly gone internal among the senior decision makers at Apple but the loud noises around this deal suggests Apple or Meta (or someone else) could pull off buying this company to aid their own AI ambitions and future.