Temperatures rise in UK's assisted dying debate amid claims of ‘chaotic' process

Supporters and opponents of the
UK's
landmark Bill to legalise
assisted dying
– known by its detractors as assisted suicide – gathered in different verdant corners of sunny Westminster on Friday as MPs debated inside the House of Commons.
Those supporting a change in the law to allow terminally ill patients in England and Wales to seek medical help ending their own lives gathered beneath an array of bright pink banners on the lawns of Parliament Square. 'My dying wish is dignity,' they said.
Around the corner, at the statue of King George V off Abingdon Street, opponents of the proposal struck a darker tone, holding mocked up headstones engraved with a warning about the apparent watering down of oversight of future assisted deaths: 'RIP – 'strictest safeguards in the world.''
Pink to support the right to die, and headstones for the sanctity of life. Therein was captured the incongruity of Britain's national conversation about the right, or otherwise, to an assisted death. Increasingly fraught and tetchy, the mood of the national debate was reflected inside the Commons chamber, as MPs grew frustrated as they ran out of time to speak.
READ MORE
It was originally thought MPs might get their final say on Friday on Labour MP Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which passed its crucial second reading in the Commons last November by 330 votes to 275.
But there have been so many amendments proposed since, the speaker of the House, Lindsay Hoyle, has kicked the crucial vote out until at least June 13th, and possibly later. Even then, many MPs on Friday complained the Bill was being rushed through parliament without proper scrutiny.
[
Assisted dying: Do we understand it properly?
Opens in new window
]
One Labour MP, Naz Shah, described the process as 'chaos . . . a disservice to parliament and our constituents. We shouldn't be playing games with people's lives like this.' She complained of only being told by Leadbeater that her amendment might be accepted when she arrived in the Commons that morning, leaving her no time to study the wording.
Prime minister
Keir Starmer's
government is ostensibly neutral on the Bill, although everybody knows that he favours it. He has granted a free vote, meaning MPs are not party whipped and can vote with their conscience.
As the government did not bring the Bill forward, it has been proposed as a private members' Bill by Labour backbencher, Leadbeater. This means, however, that it can only be scrutinised during the time set aside each week for private Bills, Friday mornings and afternoons until 2.30pm.
Opponents say such a landmark proposal should have been proposed by the government, allowing it to be scrutinised at greater length during government time in the parliamentary week. Supporters, meanwhile, believe they still have the numbers to push it through the House.
They must wait until next month to find out.
[
Assisted dying: 'If I cannot consent to my own death, who owns my life?'
Opens in new window
]

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Irish Times

an hour ago

• Irish Times

Military Maverick: a British war hero who later aided the IRA

Military Maverick: Selected letters and war diary of 'Chink' Dorman-Smith Author : Lavinia Greacen ISBN-13 : 978-1036102272 Publisher : Pen and Sword Books Guideline Price : £ 29.99 This book of letters and diaries has won for its Dublin-based editor Lavinia Greacen the distinction of being shortlisted for the Templer Prize, the equivalent for military historians of the Booker. It builds on a path-breaking biography she wrote of Eric Dorman-Smith, known as Chink because with his narrow head and pointed ears he resembled his regiment's mascot, a chinkara antelope. He was chief of staff and strategic adviser to Gen Claude Auchinleck when, in July 1942, Auchinleck stopped in his tracks Germany's ace general Erwin Rommel, who had been sweeping all before him, advancing into Egypt. This was not enough for British prime minister Winston Churchill, who was pressing for an immediate counter-offensive, which would have been disastrous. He sacked Auchinleck and Dorman-Smith. Bernard Montgomery, who then took charge and refused to be hurried, got all the credit when he routed Rommel's army at Alamein some months later. Only postwar, when Rommel's letters were published, revealing that his hopes of victory had been blighted when checked by Auchinleck, was it realised how much of the credit for the ultimate British victory belonged to him and Dorman-Smith. READ MORE Meanwhile, embittered by his experience, Dorman-Smith had retired to his stately home in Cootehill, changed his name to Dorman O'Gowan, campaigned against Partition and even facilitated and advised IRA activists raiding the North in the 1950s. He made to sue Churchill for libel for a reference in his war memoirs, forcing Churchill to insert a footnote exculpating Dorman O'Gowan from blame for the reverses that preceded his dismissal. Chink's occasional diaries and letters, many written to the woman who was to become his second wife in 1949, contain perceptive, if somewhat partisan, observations on important historical events and those involved. They are linked together by commentaries written by Greacen and military historian John Lee. The end product gives an insight into Chink's personality, his intellectual arrogance and social insecurity spawning a contempt he did not conceal for what he called 'blue bloods', who dominated the top ranks of the British army. This, and a lack of interpersonal skills, marginalised him and ultimately ruined his career. The book also contains Chink's correspondence with his close friend Ernest Hemingway, who idolised him and used him as a model for several characters in his novels. Cantwell in Across the River and into the Trees is said to be based on Chink and his fate. The earlier In our Time was dedicated to Dorman-Smith.

Irish Independent

4 hours ago

• Irish Independent

British parliament votes in favour of assisted dying law – but support for it narrows

Some 14 MPs switched from voting in favour of the Bill to against while only one switched from voting no to voting yes. ©Press Association Today at 21:30 British MPs have paved the way for assisted dying to become legal in England and Wales despite some switching sides to oppose a new law – reducing its majority by more than half. Kim Leadbeater described backing for her Bill in the Commons as 'a convincing majority', after the number was slashed from 55 in November to 23 on Friday.

Irish Examiner

5 hours ago

• Irish Examiner

Irish Examiner view: You are as old you are portrayed

One of our contributors from Co Dublin, commenting on the work of a columnist, has observed that ageism is the last remaining prejudice in Ireland, and the most stubborn. It should, she argues, be designated a hate crime. Her comments conclude a week in which the subject of old age has been high on the public agenda, and which was marked by a landmark vote in the parliament of our next-door neighbours to establish a legal right to assisted dying in England and Wales, an option which is predominantly, although not exclusively, exercised by more senior people. Much of the criticism of the negative portrayal of older people has been laid at the door of the advertising industry, which is accused of simultaneously using unflattering stereotypes and over-promoting services such as death insurance, care homes, funeral parlours, and mobility aids. One company, a manufacturer of ready meals, was criticised for its 'offensive' presentation of older people — depicting them as grumpy and intolerant, and implying many are lonely and isolated. A survey of 4,000 adults of all ages found that more than a third thought people over the age of 55 were negatively projected in ads. Almost half said ads that showed older people as unable to understand or use technology were potentially offensive. More than a fifth of those surveyed believed that depicting ageing as something to be 'fought', especially in beauty advertising, had the potential to cause harm by influencing how an older person saw themselves, or how society might view and treat them. One industry which won't have to worry about its advertising position — because it won't be permitted to actively promote itself — will be the assisted-dying service, whose introduction has taken a step forward after a free third vote in Britain's House of Commons delivered a majority of 23, down from 55 last November. Although it faces further opposition in Britain's House of Lords, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill opens the way for such services to be introduced before the end of this decade. It will allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure, and psychiatrist. Northern Ireland may have its own opportunity to consider such legislation. This is a profound and controversial legal change, with strong, emotional, and sometimes fanciful arguments being put on all sides. Evangelists are pitched against humanists. Lawyers and doctors are divided. But what is clear is that it is as radical as the reforming legislation on capital punishment, abortion, and homosexuality introduced by the 1960s Labour government. Catholic bishops in Britain this week were warning of the impact on the role of care homes and hospices. Scotland, Jersey, the Isle of Man, and France have already recognised the right to die. England and Wales will most likely be next. We may find, however, that it won't be long before that debate gathers any pace in Ireland. Unsettling news raises temperature That old quip about summer consisting of three sunny days followed by a thunderstorm may have a certain contemporary resonance, but it is clear that we must become much more familiar with the sight of the mercury rising, or whatever has replaced mercury in the health-and-safety-conscious thermometers of 2025. Although we have all been enjoying the seasonal sunny weather, Met Éireann has warned that an 'unsettled' period is on the way. While that might mark a setback for the picnic and barbecue plans, there is rather more unsettling information for us to consider. It's not so much that climate change is going to change the flavour of gin and tonic by altering the composition of juniper berries, its key botanical, although that will certainly be an attention- grabber for some. But what should concern us all is that the planet's carbon budget to meet the internationally-agreed rate of 1.5C has just two years left at the current rate of emissions. The carbon budget measures how much carbon dioxide can still be emitted by humanity while offering a fighting chance of meeting temperature targets. Currently, the world is on track for a catastrophic temperature rise of 2.7C. The latest prediction comes less than a fortnight after the Environmental Protection Agency identified more than 100 key risks to Ireland, with extreme wind, coastal erosion, and flooding among the biggest threats. Rock star David Bowie was not a particularly cheerful soothsayer (depending on which of his multiple personalities was addressing you), but even his apocalyptic 1971 classic gave us Five Years notice of impending disaster. Whatever metric is used, the latest news provides more evidence that time has nearly run out. Ireland may be judged by the friends we keep Spain is one of Ireland's closest allies in Europe. We are in lock step with it over the future of Palestine and opposition to trading with the occupied territories. We are collaborators in the International Court of Justice genocide case against Israel. Where we part company is on matters relating to Nato, the mutual defence organisation comprising 32 countries. Spain has been a member since 1982, following two unsuccessful coups within a country emerging from the bleak three-decade dictatorship of Francisco Franco. We, like Austria and Switzerland, have a constitutional commitment to neutrality. For that reason, we will be highly interested bystanders when Nato meets on Tuesday for a summit at the Hague, which has every appearance of being highly problematical —not least because the US has run out of patience with European countries taking what it regards, with some justification, as a free ride in matters of their own defence. Washington and the Pentagon are principally concerned right now with what is happening between Iran and Israel, and attempting to discern China's plans for the future. Increasingly, the White House perceives Ukraine as a European problem which must be resolved within Europe. Part of the solution, Donald Trump believes, is a meaningful increase in military expenditure. There are good arguments for challenging this. One of them is that the US is simultaneously saddling Europe with tariffs. Another is that the US military-industrial complex expects to be significant beneficiaries of any additional spending. Just how helpful it is for Spain's prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, to release his views on the eve of a difficult conference, we will be able to judge next week. He has made a pre-emptive strike by declaring that any increase to 5% of GDP would be incompatible with Spain's welfare state and its vision of the world. Sánchez, who is struggling with political divisions in Madrid and a raucous argument over corruption in the awarding of government contracts, says he wants a 'more flexible formula' that would either make the target optional or allow Spain to opt out. 'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices. As a sovereign ally, we choose not to,' he wrote in a letter to Nato secretary general, the Dutchman Mark Rutte. Spain is a back marker among western nations allocating only about 1.3% of its GDP to defence spending. Next week's meeting has been choreographed to persuade Trump to continue to support Europe's defence. It has been cut back to a single working session and its shortening should prevent Trump from leaving early, as he did from this week's G7 meeting in Canada. For Ireland, what happens here is of significance even though we are not in Nato. We have our own unresolved issues with Trump and a recent report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies placed us at the bottom of the European table of 38 countries for defence spend. In this dangerous world, that is not a tenable position. In this case, it is worth creating some perceptual distance between Dublin and the Palace of Moncloa. Read More Irish Examiner view: Sobering truths about miscarriages