Irish Examiner view: You are as old you are portrayed
One of our contributors from Co Dublin, commenting on the work of a columnist, has observed that ageism is the last remaining prejudice in Ireland, and the most stubborn.
It should, she argues, be designated a hate crime.
Her comments conclude a week in which the subject of old age has been high on the public agenda, and which was marked by a landmark vote in the parliament of our next-door neighbours to establish a legal right to assisted dying in England and Wales, an option which is predominantly, although not exclusively, exercised by more senior people.
Much of the criticism of the negative portrayal of older people has been laid at the door of the advertising industry, which is accused of simultaneously using unflattering stereotypes and over-promoting services such as death insurance, care homes, funeral parlours, and mobility aids.
One company, a manufacturer of ready meals, was criticised for its 'offensive' presentation of older people — depicting them as grumpy and intolerant, and implying many are lonely and isolated.
A survey of 4,000 adults of all ages found that more than a third thought people over the age of 55 were negatively projected in ads.
Almost half said ads that showed older people as unable to understand or use technology were potentially offensive.
More than a fifth of those surveyed believed that depicting ageing as something to be 'fought', especially in beauty advertising, had the potential to cause harm by influencing how an older person saw themselves, or how society might view and treat them.
One industry which won't have to worry about its advertising position — because it won't be permitted to actively promote itself — will be the assisted-dying service, whose introduction has taken a step forward after a free third vote in Britain's House of Commons delivered a majority of 23, down from 55 last November.
Although it faces further opposition in Britain's House of Lords, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill opens the way for such services to be introduced before the end of this decade.
It will allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure, and psychiatrist.
Northern Ireland may have its own opportunity to consider such legislation.
This is a profound and controversial legal change, with strong, emotional, and sometimes fanciful arguments being put on all sides.
Evangelists are pitched against humanists. Lawyers and doctors are divided.
But what is clear is that it is as radical as the reforming legislation on capital punishment, abortion, and homosexuality introduced by the 1960s Labour government.
Catholic bishops in Britain this week were warning of the impact on the role of care homes and hospices.
Scotland, Jersey, the Isle of Man, and France have already recognised the right to die.
England and Wales will most likely be next.
We may find, however, that it won't be long before that debate gathers any pace in Ireland.
Unsettling news raises temperature
That old quip about summer consisting of three sunny days followed by a thunderstorm may have a certain contemporary resonance, but it is clear that we must become much more familiar with the sight of the mercury rising, or whatever has replaced mercury in the health-and-safety-conscious thermometers of 2025.
Although we have all been enjoying the seasonal sunny weather, Met Éireann has warned that an 'unsettled' period is on the way. While that might mark a setback for the picnic and barbecue plans, there is rather more unsettling information for us to consider.
It's not so much that climate change is going to change the flavour of gin and tonic by altering the composition of juniper berries, its key botanical, although that will certainly be an attention- grabber for some. But what should concern us all is that the planet's carbon budget to meet the internationally-agreed rate of 1.5C has just two years left at the current rate of emissions.
The carbon budget measures how much carbon dioxide can still be emitted by humanity while offering a fighting chance of meeting temperature targets.
Currently, the world is on track for a catastrophic temperature rise of 2.7C. The latest prediction comes less than a fortnight after the Environmental Protection Agency identified more than 100 key risks to Ireland, with extreme wind, coastal erosion, and flooding among the biggest threats.
Rock star David Bowie was not a particularly cheerful soothsayer (depending on which of his multiple personalities was addressing you), but even his apocalyptic 1971 classic gave us Five Years notice of impending disaster. Whatever metric is used, the latest news provides more evidence that time has nearly run out.
Ireland may be judged by the friends we keep
Spain is one of Ireland's closest allies in Europe. We are in lock step with it over the future of Palestine and opposition to trading with the occupied territories. We are collaborators in the International Court of Justice genocide case against Israel.
Where we part company is on matters relating to Nato, the mutual defence organisation comprising 32 countries. Spain has been a member since 1982, following two unsuccessful coups within a country emerging from the bleak three-decade dictatorship of Francisco Franco.
We, like Austria and Switzerland, have a constitutional commitment to neutrality.
For that reason, we will be highly interested bystanders when Nato meets on Tuesday for a summit at the Hague, which has every appearance of being highly problematical —not least because the US has run out of patience with European countries taking what it regards, with some justification, as a free ride in matters of their own defence.
Washington and the Pentagon are principally concerned right now with what is happening between Iran and Israel, and attempting to discern China's plans for the future.
Increasingly, the White House perceives Ukraine as a European problem which must be resolved within Europe.
Part of the solution, Donald Trump believes, is a meaningful increase in military expenditure.
There are good arguments for challenging this. One of them is that the US is simultaneously saddling Europe with tariffs. Another is that the US military-industrial complex expects to be significant beneficiaries of any additional spending.
Just how helpful it is for Spain's prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, to release his views on the eve of a difficult conference, we will be able to judge next week. He has made a pre-emptive strike by declaring that any increase to 5% of GDP would be incompatible with Spain's welfare state and its vision of the world.
Sánchez, who is struggling with political divisions in Madrid and a raucous argument over corruption in the awarding of government contracts, says he wants a 'more flexible formula' that would either make the target optional or allow Spain to opt out.
'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices. As a sovereign ally, we choose not to,' he wrote in a letter to Nato secretary general, the Dutchman Mark Rutte.
Spain is a back marker among western nations allocating only about 1.3% of its GDP to defence spending. Next week's meeting has been choreographed to persuade Trump to continue to support Europe's defence. It has been cut back to a single working session and its shortening should prevent Trump from leaving early, as he did from this week's G7 meeting in Canada.
For Ireland, what happens here is of significance even though we are not in Nato. We have our own unresolved issues with Trump and a recent report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies placed us at the bottom of the European table of 38 countries for defence spend.
In this dangerous world, that is not a tenable position. In this case, it is worth creating some perceptual distance between Dublin and the Palace of Moncloa.
Read More
Irish Examiner view: Sobering truths about miscarriages
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
17 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Cosmetic procedure legislation has been 'just sitting on somebody's desk' for eight years, medic says
Stalled legislation around regulating cosmetic procedures like botox and fillers is "just sitting on somebody's desk" for eight years with "no impetus to push it forward" until a death occurs, a leading medical practitioner has warned. A decision is expected from the Government shortly about recommencing drafting of legislation to regulate such cosmetic procedures. It comes amid concern at the lack of regulation in the area, amid high-profile cases in the UK about botox and other procedures in recent weeks. The Patient Safety (Licensing) Bill was approved by the then government in December 2017 and subsequently underwent pre-legislative scrutiny. It was then referred to the Office of the Attorney General for drafting. However, it has not progressed since then. Currently, botox is supposed to be only available through prescription, under the administration of qualified doctors and dentists. However, it is arriving into Ireland regularly, as seizures conducted by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) show. Last year, some 1,709 units of fake or illegal products claiming to contain botulinum toxin were seized, compared with just 26 in 2020. Unlike botox, dermal filler is not yet subjected to stringent regulations, meaning that people can be administered it in unsafe settings and environments. Botox survey This week's Irish Examiner Women's Health Report shows that a growing number of women – particularly those under 34 – feel positive towards cosmetic treatments and plastic surgery procedures including brow lifts, 'nose jobs', and breast augmentation. Just over a tenth (12%) of the 1,078 women interviewed for the IPSOS B&A survey conducted over a two-week period had undergone a procedure involving botox or fillers. Of those who had undergone botox or anti-wrinkle injections, 82% would consider doing it again. Almost half who underwent either of these two procedures admitted to having done them for a confidence boost. Similarly, 47% of those who had lip fillers or injections also said they done it for confidence. Just 50% said they had done the latter for anti-aging purposes – compared with 66% who said they had done botox or anti-wrinkle injections for anti-aging reasons. Dublin-based aesthetic medical practitioner Dr Eithne Brenner said regulation in Ireland is slow. 'I think it (legislation) has just been sitting on somebody's desk and there is no impetus to push it forward. Until we get something shocking like an Irish death, I don't think we are going to get enough change. We are behind in terms of legislation and we really need it.' A statement from the Department of Health said: 'A decision is now being sought from the Government to recommence drafting of the Patient Safety (Licensing) Bill. A memo for Government will be considered at Cabinet shortly.' Last week in the UK, 14 people from County Durham and Darlington experienced "adverse reactions" including eye drooping and double vision following "botulinum toxin" injections. Of those, 10 people had required treatment. Read More Register of approved practitioners offering botox and fillers to be established
Irish Examiner
17 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: You are as old you are portrayed
One of our contributors from Co Dublin, commenting on the work of a columnist, has observed that ageism is the last remaining prejudice in Ireland, and the most stubborn. It should, she argues, be designated a hate crime. Her comments conclude a week in which the subject of old age has been high on the public agenda, and which was marked by a landmark vote in the parliament of our next-door neighbours to establish a legal right to assisted dying in England and Wales, an option which is predominantly, although not exclusively, exercised by more senior people. Much of the criticism of the negative portrayal of older people has been laid at the door of the advertising industry, which is accused of simultaneously using unflattering stereotypes and over-promoting services such as death insurance, care homes, funeral parlours, and mobility aids. One company, a manufacturer of ready meals, was criticised for its 'offensive' presentation of older people — depicting them as grumpy and intolerant, and implying many are lonely and isolated. A survey of 4,000 adults of all ages found that more than a third thought people over the age of 55 were negatively projected in ads. Almost half said ads that showed older people as unable to understand or use technology were potentially offensive. More than a fifth of those surveyed believed that depicting ageing as something to be 'fought', especially in beauty advertising, had the potential to cause harm by influencing how an older person saw themselves, or how society might view and treat them. One industry which won't have to worry about its advertising position — because it won't be permitted to actively promote itself — will be the assisted-dying service, whose introduction has taken a step forward after a free third vote in Britain's House of Commons delivered a majority of 23, down from 55 last November. Although it faces further opposition in Britain's House of Lords, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill opens the way for such services to be introduced before the end of this decade. It will allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure, and psychiatrist. Northern Ireland may have its own opportunity to consider such legislation. This is a profound and controversial legal change, with strong, emotional, and sometimes fanciful arguments being put on all sides. Evangelists are pitched against humanists. Lawyers and doctors are divided. But what is clear is that it is as radical as the reforming legislation on capital punishment, abortion, and homosexuality introduced by the 1960s Labour government. Catholic bishops in Britain this week were warning of the impact on the role of care homes and hospices. Scotland, Jersey, the Isle of Man, and France have already recognised the right to die. England and Wales will most likely be next. We may find, however, that it won't be long before that debate gathers any pace in Ireland. Unsettling news raises temperature That old quip about summer consisting of three sunny days followed by a thunderstorm may have a certain contemporary resonance, but it is clear that we must become much more familiar with the sight of the mercury rising, or whatever has replaced mercury in the health-and-safety-conscious thermometers of 2025. Although we have all been enjoying the seasonal sunny weather, Met Éireann has warned that an 'unsettled' period is on the way. While that might mark a setback for the picnic and barbecue plans, there is rather more unsettling information for us to consider. It's not so much that climate change is going to change the flavour of gin and tonic by altering the composition of juniper berries, its key botanical, although that will certainly be an attention- grabber for some. But what should concern us all is that the planet's carbon budget to meet the internationally-agreed rate of 1.5C has just two years left at the current rate of emissions. The carbon budget measures how much carbon dioxide can still be emitted by humanity while offering a fighting chance of meeting temperature targets. Currently, the world is on track for a catastrophic temperature rise of 2.7C. The latest prediction comes less than a fortnight after the Environmental Protection Agency identified more than 100 key risks to Ireland, with extreme wind, coastal erosion, and flooding among the biggest threats. Rock star David Bowie was not a particularly cheerful soothsayer (depending on which of his multiple personalities was addressing you), but even his apocalyptic 1971 classic gave us Five Years notice of impending disaster. Whatever metric is used, the latest news provides more evidence that time has nearly run out. Ireland may be judged by the friends we keep Spain is one of Ireland's closest allies in Europe. We are in lock step with it over the future of Palestine and opposition to trading with the occupied territories. We are collaborators in the International Court of Justice genocide case against Israel. Where we part company is on matters relating to Nato, the mutual defence organisation comprising 32 countries. Spain has been a member since 1982, following two unsuccessful coups within a country emerging from the bleak three-decade dictatorship of Francisco Franco. We, like Austria and Switzerland, have a constitutional commitment to neutrality. For that reason, we will be highly interested bystanders when Nato meets on Tuesday for a summit at the Hague, which has every appearance of being highly problematical —not least because the US has run out of patience with European countries taking what it regards, with some justification, as a free ride in matters of their own defence. Washington and the Pentagon are principally concerned right now with what is happening between Iran and Israel, and attempting to discern China's plans for the future. Increasingly, the White House perceives Ukraine as a European problem which must be resolved within Europe. Part of the solution, Donald Trump believes, is a meaningful increase in military expenditure. There are good arguments for challenging this. One of them is that the US is simultaneously saddling Europe with tariffs. Another is that the US military-industrial complex expects to be significant beneficiaries of any additional spending. Just how helpful it is for Spain's prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, to release his views on the eve of a difficult conference, we will be able to judge next week. He has made a pre-emptive strike by declaring that any increase to 5% of GDP would be incompatible with Spain's welfare state and its vision of the world. Sánchez, who is struggling with political divisions in Madrid and a raucous argument over corruption in the awarding of government contracts, says he wants a 'more flexible formula' that would either make the target optional or allow Spain to opt out. 'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices. As a sovereign ally, we choose not to,' he wrote in a letter to Nato secretary general, the Dutchman Mark Rutte. Spain is a back marker among western nations allocating only about 1.3% of its GDP to defence spending. Next week's meeting has been choreographed to persuade Trump to continue to support Europe's defence. It has been cut back to a single working session and its shortening should prevent Trump from leaving early, as he did from this week's G7 meeting in Canada. For Ireland, what happens here is of significance even though we are not in Nato. We have our own unresolved issues with Trump and a recent report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies placed us at the bottom of the European table of 38 countries for defence spend. In this dangerous world, that is not a tenable position. In this case, it is worth creating some perceptual distance between Dublin and the Palace of Moncloa. Read More Irish Examiner view: Sobering truths about miscarriages
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Historic vote sees MPs back legalising assisted dying in England and Wales
ASSISTED DYING IS a step closer to being made legal in England and Wales after the proposed legislation cleared the House of Commons in a historic vote – albeit with a narrower majority. More than 300 MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Yes campaigners wept, jumped and hugged each other outside parliament as the vote result was announced, while some MPs appeared visibly emotional as they left the chamber. Others lined up to shake hands with Kim Leadbeater, the Bill's sponsor through the Commons. Kim Leadbeater has been the MP behind the assisted dying bill PA PA Last October, the Dáil voted to 'note' a report completed by the Oireachtas committee on assisted dying. That vote was not to approve recommendations in the report but rather 'take note' at the fact that the report had been completed and published. The Assisted Dying Bill was tabled by People Before Profit TD Gino Kenny in 2020. Kenny lost his seat in last year's General Election. In a post on social media today, Kenny described the Westminster vote as a 'monumental decision'. He described assisted dying as a 'profound issue that transcends politics and needs careful navigation through legislation'. He called on the Irish government to 'take note and prepare a legal framework for voluntary assisted dying'. 'Compassion and dignity has won,' he added. Meanwhile, Northern Ireland's Department of Health said it has no plans to propose new laws in the Stormont Assembly. 'In Northern Ireland, assisting or encouraging suicide or killing someone on compassionate grounds remains a criminal offence,' it adds. Commons vote Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation has taken another step in the UK parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. Advertisement This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer remained supportive of the Bill, voting yes today as he had done last year. Campaigners in Parliament Square, central London, ahead of the vote PA PA Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch voted no and urged MPs to vote against the legislation. She described it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'. Today was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Britain suggested 73% of those asked last month were supportive of the Bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75%.
