Man Abandons Grieving Partner in Economy After Getting a Free Upgrade to Business Class on 14-Hour Flight

Her partner and his brothers were upgraded to business class on a 14-hour flight, but she was left alone in economy
She was already grieving and anxious, but no one offered to switch so she could sit with her partner
Now, she's questioning whether her emotional reaction was fair or a red flag about the relationshipA woman is seeking support from the Reddit community after a distressing experience on a long-haul flight with her partner and his two brothers.
In her post, the woman explained that the group was traveling overseas using staff travel benefits, thanks to her partner's mother, who works for an airline.
'We check in for our flight home and are told the only staff travel option is economy, which is fine by me and his brothers,' she shares, explaining that they had arranged seats so she and her partner could sit together.
However, as they waited to board, everything changed when the airline worker announced that her partner and his brothers had been upgraded to business class, leaving her alone in economy.
'My partner asked if I could be upgraded too, but there wasn't space,' she recalls. She insisted she didn't care about flying economy, but told them that she "didn't want to sit alone for a long flight.'
She was already feeling fragile, having just learned that a friend's child had died. On top of that, she was stressed about work obligations after landing. 'I told my partner I was anxious and didn't want to sit alone. He felt bad but didn't offer to stay with me,' she explains.
Her discomfort grew when neither of her partner's brothers offered to swap seats so she could stay with him. 'Being the only one not upgraded also sucked. Even though his brothers didn't mind flying economy, neither offered to swap so I could stay with him,' she writes.
As boarding time approached, she found herself overwhelmed with emotion. 'We boarded soon after, and I was in tears telling him I didn't want to sit alone,' she admits. However, he didn't listen.
She spent the lengthy flight reflecting on her partner's decision. 'I had 14 hours to stew over the fact that my partner didn't even consider staying with me,' she says, adding that sitting together was a big part of the travel experience for her.
Trying to keep perspective, she messaged him during the flight that she "was comfortable and grateful for the staff travel, but still upset I was alone."
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
When they landed, she struggled to put her emotions into words. 'I didn't want to speak to him when we landed, but I told him it was a big deal to me,' she writes.
She told him that she "never wanted to travel with him again" if it meant she had to fly "alone.'
"I knew I was being irrational and admitted it, but was genuinely upset," she writes. "Even if he'd offered to stay, I would've insisted he take the upgrade, but he didn't.'
While she decided to drop the issue, her partner brought it up again later, leading her to second-guess herself. 'He said my reaction ruined his flight. I get that - I could've just accepted it,' she admits.
Now, she's left wondering if her feelings were justified or if she was in the wrong for being so upset.
Read the original article on People

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

28 minutes ago

• Yahoo

US tariffs and blowing the budget ‘among cost concerns for holidaymakers'

Two-thirds (66%) of people are planning a holiday abroad this year, a report has found. But nearly four-fifths (78%) are worried about the impact that US trade tariffs may have on prices in destinations abroad and over half (53%) plan to avoid destinations where they believe tariffs could affect resort prices. Over three-quarters (77%) said that exchange rates are a big concern for them. Post Office Travel Money's Holiday Spending Report also found that holidaymakers rated Spain, Turkey and Thailand as being the 'best value for money' out of 39 worldwide destinations. More than half (52%) of holidaymakers said they will budget more for their next holiday due to increased costs. Over four-fifths (82%) said that they had set a budget, averaging £377, on their last trip. But seven in 10 (71%) admitted blowing their budget, by £140 on average. Laura Plunkett, head of travel money at the Post Office, said: 'This year's holiday spending research again demonstrates that holidaymakers don't always set a realistic budget and overspend by large amounts as a result.' The Post Office used two surveys of more than 2,000 people, carried out in April and May, for its research.

Travel Weekly

3 hours ago

• Travel Weekly

Is AI something we need to embrace ... or survive?

Richard Turen Consider this one in an ongoing series of columns that will eventually be written by AI, I'm sure. I was not anxious to open the door to this subject. Perhaps articles about AI's potential impact on our industry should best be written by those who study and design AI in the tech sector or at universities. Many travel advisors I speak to say they will embrace AI when it can do more. Some think it is a threat in terms of eliminating the need for professional, human advisors. Why, after all, rely on the travel knowledge and experience stored in one single brain when you can more quickly access the collective wisdom of tens of thousands? In our time together, I have not addressed in depth the potential impact of AI. I do not want to try to predict where it/we are headed. I do not want to pretend that I have any scientific expertise in the field. But I thought it might be helpful to devote some space to just talking through some of my observations over the past several years regarding the impact of amateur or, if you prefer, "artificial" intelligence on our industry. I have been keeping files on the progress of AI over the years, knowing I would write about it at some point when I felt I had a handle on the subject. Any objective observer would look back and marvel at the progress that has been made in technology in a few years and, all too often, in just a few months. Should we be worried? Should we be unusually proactive? Or should we do the one thing we as a profession never do: Should we actively communicate to our clients that AI is a potentially destructive way to enable a machine to plan the best moments of one's life? In wondering what the future might hold for our little shops that sell the world, I decided to start with the source: "While AI is gaining ground in the tourism sector, this does not mean that travel agents will disappear. On the contrary, their role is evolving. Rather than focusing on flight and hotel research, they can now focus on their true expertise: advising, guiding and offering unique experiences." That is not an altogether reassuring statement. If we lose the ability to compete with AI in flight planning and accommodations, does that mean that we all need to convert to the highest level of personal FIT planning? And will that be profitable? Do we want to engage in a profession where we are no longer trusted to do 75% of what most of us do for a living? I did not write the statement. Google AI wrote it in response to my question. It is the only part of this column I did not write. And it is interesting in terms of Google AI's confidence that it will soon be taking over several of the most critical functions we fulfill. And there is a question left unanswered: If our "true expertise" is offering "unique experiences," how will we compete with a technology that can scan tens of thousands of unique experiences at any destination in the world within moments.? A comment from respected Stanford professor Fei-Fei Li illustrates the major goal of AI and its immediate focus. She said there was a phrase from the 1970s that AI "is a machine that can make a perfect chess move while the room is on fire." Machines lack contextual understanding. Travel industry skeptics, and I am not one of them, claim that the lack of conceptual understanding is the reason that AI will never replace the home-based IC or the office-based corporate agent. Let's continue this conversation next time -- there may, after all, be a new AI breakthrough to report.

Skift

3 hours ago

• Skift

Hotels vs. Online Travel Companies: Who Owns the Customer in the AI Era?

There's been a battle between online travel companies and hotels for decades. There will be no truce in the age of AI. Who owns the customer in the generative AI era: Search companies like Kayak or hotels? In other words, where is the travelers' loyalty and who controls their contact information and payments? That's been a battle between online travel companies and hotels for decades. Cloudbeds CEO Adam Harris described the status as "coopetition" at Skift's recent Data + AI Summit. He said hotels would be "pumping their hands up and down" if Google and the largest ad spenders in travel – namely Booking, Expedia and Airbnb – "all disappeared overnight." The challenge for hotels in the generative AI era is th