Papal Conclave: What do Cardinals eat during Pope's election?
As 133 cardinals get ready to convene in the Sistine Chapel for the papal conclave on May 7, the world closely monitors the election of the next pope as well as the centuries-old customs that control the process, including the cuisine the cardinals will eat while in seclusion, reported BBC.
Also read: What was Pope Francis' final wish? Here's how late pontiff's popemobile will help children in Gaza
When Pope Gregory X commanded the cardinals to be isolated from the outside world while selecting a new pope in 1274, the strict dietary regulations during the conclave were established, as reported by Legit.
They were only allowed to eat one meal per day after three days, and then only bread, water, and wine after eight days in order to expedite the process. Even though these strict regulations were subsequently relaxed, delivering modest meals is still a common practice today.
During the conclave, cardinals stay at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, a Vatican guesthouse that offers comfort and privacy. The food they are served is purposely plain and simple. Meals are prepared by religious sisters and typically include traditional dishes from the Lazio region, such as soups, pasta, small meat kebabs, and boiled vegetables—similar to basic hospital food. This simplicity is meant to prevent indulgence or distraction, helping the cardinals stay focused on the serious task of electing a new pope, as reported by The BBC.
Cardinals frequently look for more casual settings to discuss the election, even if formal meals are extremely severe. Al Passetto del Borgo and Marcoantonio, two eateries close to the Vatican, serve Italian food like carbonara and rigatoni alla norcina. These places give cardinals a private setting in which to discuss and reach an agreement.
Some of the previous dietary restrictions have been loosened by the Vatican in recent years. Cardinals were permitted to eat in neighbourhood eateries during the 2013 conclave, for example, as their last meals outside of seclusion. The main idea remains the same: simple meals are served during the conclave to help cardinals stay focused on their holy task of choosing the pope.
Also read: Macron Interfering In Pope Election, Had Meeting With Cardinals From…: Reports| Vatican| Francis
As the conclave nears, the world will watch not just for the new pope's announcement, but also for the continuation of these long-standing traditions that highlight the holy and serious nature of the papal election.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
United Behind Iran War Effort, Israelis Express Relief At US Bombing
Israelis expressed relief and optimism Sunday after US President Donald Trump ordered air strikes on Iran, 10 days into a war that has widespread public support. Despite daily nerve-shredding trips to bomb shelters and growing damage around the country, Israelis appeared united behind Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's move to attack Iran on June 13. Trump's decision to authorise overnight bombing raids on Iran's nuclear facilities has provided further reassurance after more than a week of sorties by the Israeli air force. "The war with Iran was inevitable. You knew it would happen sooner or later," Claudio Hazan, a 62-year-old software engineer, told AFP in central Jerusalem on Sunday. "I hope that it will shorten the war, because otherwise Israel by itself would not stop until they get that Fordo place bombed," he explained, referring to the deeply buried Iranian nuclear site targeted by heavy US bombers overnight. Israelis have hunkered down for the last 10 days, with businesses closed, schools shuttered and people urged to stay home. Few have slept a full uninterrupted night since the conflict erupted due to the screeching missile warnings that flash up on mobile phones at all times of day. "We woke up to a Sunday morning of alarms and then we saw that the US attacked," David, a 43-year-old Jerusalem resident, told AFP. "We're all happy that the US is lending a hand, it has always been lending a hand." Israeli President Isaac Herzog told the BBC on Sunday that "now is an opportunity to come to a dialogue of peace, also a dialogue of peace between all nations in the region, including Israelis and Palestinians". ' God Is With Us' Israel's sophisticated air defences have kept Israeli towns and cities relatively safe, shooting down hundreds of Iranian missiles and drones that would otherwise have caused widespread devastation. Dozens have slipped through, however, with three more impacts reported on Sunday morning in the northern port of Haifa and around the coastal hub of Tel Aviv. At least 50 strikes have been acknowledged nationwide and 25 people have died, according to official figures. When a missile blasted her modern apartment block on Thursday in Ramat Gan, near Tel Aviv, resident Renana lamented to AFP that "it will take a long time until this building recovers." But she showed no rancour towards Netanyahu who has deployed Israeli forces in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and now Iran since the attack on Israel by Palestinian group Hamas in October 2023. "The truth is that God is with us and the government should go on with whatever they're doing, which is exactly what should have been done a long time ago," Renana, who did not give her surname, told AFP. 'Sharp Contrast' Israel's usually divided political scene has also lined up behind the attack on Iran, a country generations of Israelis have grown up fearing as a threat to their existence. "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is my political rival, but his decision to strike Iran at this moment in time is the right one," opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote in a Jerusalem Post op-ed last week. A survey carried out by the Israel Democracy Institute in the days immediately after Israel's first strikes on June 13 found that 70 percent of Israelis supported the war, although the results revealed a major divide. Among Jewish Israelis, there was 82 percent support, while only 35 percent of respondents from Israel's Arab minority, who mostly identify as Palestinian, were in favour. Dahlia Scheindlin, an Israeli pollster and political analyst, told AFP that Israelis were much more united behind the Iran campaign than the grinding conflict in Gaza which many saw as a "dirty war". Netanyahu has been criticised for failing to secure the return of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas and accused of prolonging the war for domestic political purposes. He is also subject to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes in Gaza where nearly 56,000 people have been killed, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. "There's a very sharp contrast between how Israelis view the war in Gaza and how they view this war with Iran," Scheindlin said. She cautioned, however, that sentiment could change if it turns into a long conflict.
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
Hard-Hitting World Leaves EU Soft Power Stranded
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Last week, with uncertainty raging over whether the US would join Israel in striking Iran, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto delivered an elegy for a soft-power Europe that looked stranded in a hard-power world. 'We talk about Europe as if Europe counted for something,' he said. 'But its time is over, and I say it with sadness.' It turned out to be a fitting prelude to the weekend's events as Europe's last-ditch push for diplomacy with Tehran ended with American bombers striking Iranian nuclear sites. It speaks to wider anxiety over Europe's geopolitical future as drones and missiles continue to pound Ukraine, tensions rise in the Taiwan strait and the Middle East erupts. Yes, the combination of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump has finally stung the European Union out of complacency, with the prospect of rearmament projects worth €800 billion ($920 billion) sending share prices soaring and industrial capacity whirring into life. German weapons maker Rheinmetall AG, for example, is outperforming tech darling Nvidia Corp. and taking Gucci parent Kering SA's place on the Euro Stoxx 50 index. Yet at the same time, we're a long way from a European defense worthy of the name. Even as military budgets flip to feast from famine, political willpower is showing signs of strain, as are supply chains after decades of undernourishment. Dependence on US security and Chinese components runs deep, making much-needed strategic autonomy look entirely theoretical. And fragmentation along national lines is hampering economies of scale: A new analysis by the Kiel Institute and Bruegel finds Europe has credibly boosted production of artillery shells and howitzers, while output of tanks and infantry vehicles still falls well short of matching Russia's — which would require a sixfold increase. Last week's Paris Air Show showed some of these mixed signals: As the Dassault Aviation SA Rafale circled the skies and Italy's Leonardo SpA talked up industry consolidation, grumbles from some on the sidelines suggested firm orders remain slow and joint platforms lack unity. Rheinmetall's announcement of a partnership with US venture-backed Anduril also raised eyebrows among those who would have preferred to see European startups benefit. A revolution is needed on several levels as North Atlantic Treaty Organization leaders prepare to meet in the Hague to agree on future spending — with 2% of gross domestic product becoming a bare minimum. With Goldman Sachs Group Inc. estimating that spending by euro members will reach 2.8% of GDP by 2027, fiscal divides are still too obvious between countries that aspire to boost their militaries and and those that can actually afford to, with Germany's new position as the world's fourth-biggest military spender pretty much in a league of its own. Incentives like an escape clause from EU fiscal rules and tapping a new €150 billion defense fund are only a start: More levers need to be pulled, from the European Investment Bank's balance sheet to a more defense-focused EU budget. Pension funds will also need to join the effort on a continent that tends to invest its savings abroad. And while defense is firmly within the remit of national member states, there needs to be a serious attempt at knocking down the barriers to a true continental market for materiel. Joint procurement is low and duplication high, with 17 battle tanks on offer in Europe versus one in the US, according to management consultancy firm BCG. Instead of waiting for a Yalta-style moment where leaders agree on how to divide and allocate responsibilities, strong players like France should lead by example with more support for pan-EU collaboration. More industry consolidation may help here, perhaps along the same lines as Franco-German plane-maker Airbus SE. But even more than Airbuses, Europe needs more tech-savvy Andurils of its own. The US currently outspends Europe on research and development by 10-fold; the future of warfare may belong as much to unmanned drones and artificial intelligence as B-52 bombers or F-16s. That means encouraging collaboration between defense and startups, promoting a strong research ecosystem and integrating capital markets. It's not too late to give the old continent a shot of strength. More from Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. More stories like this are available on
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
US strikes Iran: How legendary 88-year-old reporter Seymour Hersh scooped that Donald Trump would attack Iranian nuclear sites
In an age where news breaks on social media feeds faster than newsroom alerts, it wasn't CNN, BBC or The New York Times that first reported the United States' military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It was Seymour Hersh. Yes, that Seymour Hersh—the 88-year-old Pulitzer-winning investigative reporter, best known for uncovering the My Lai Massacre in Vietnam and the Abu Ghraib prison abuses in Iraq. And now, in the summer of 2025, the veteran journalist has done it again—beating major media outlets and intelligence briefings by publishing details of the Trump administration's plan to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, nearly 48 hours before the world knew it had actually happened. The Scoop On June 19, Hersh published a detailed report via his Substack newsletter, claiming that US B-2 bombers and naval platforms were preparing a "coordinated assault" on Iran's underground nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The piece cited unnamed sources in the intelligence community who warned that the operation was imminent and being conducted with minimal oversight from Congress or America's NATO allies. At the time, most dismissed it as another speculative post from a journalist long estranged from the legacy media. But by June 22, when US President Donald Trump went on record confirming the strikes—calling the targets 'obliterated'—Hersh had already been vindicated. The Attack The strikes, launched late on June 21, targeted three high-profile Iranian nuclear facilities. While initial reports from state media in Iran downplayed the damage, satellite imagery and eyewitness accounts suggested precision airstrikes had indeed hit deep underground bunkers at Fordow and Natanz, as well as key infrastructure in Isfahan. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Yet despite the intensity of the operation, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported no significant radiation spikes, prompting speculation that either: Iran had preemptively moved or buried sensitive material, or The sites were largely non-operational or decoy facilities. Either way, it challenged Trump's claim of having 'wiped out' Iran's nuclear capability. Déjà Vu: From Nord Stream to Natanz Hersh's report bore eerie similarities to his controversial 2023 scoop on the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, which he attributed to US covert operations. At the time, mainstream outlets largely ignored the piece, but subsequent leaks from German and Nordic investigations lent circumstantial credibility to his claims. The Iran story followed a similar arc: initial media silence, public disbelief, and then abrupt confirmation—except this time, the stakes involved possible nuclear escalation in the Middle East. The Media Gap Hersh's scoop once again spotlights the widening chasm between traditional journalism and independent reporting. A 2023 study by the Reuters Institute found that 62% of US adults now rely on social media, newsletters, and independent platforms for breaking news—often citing speed, authenticity, and ideological distrust of legacy media. Hersh, for his part, has long been critical of what he calls the 'lapdog press'—journalists too embedded in officialdom to question military narratives or dig beneath the surface. His latest work only reinforces that critique. Even defenders of legacy media recognize the challenge. In late 2024, Jeff Bezos, owner of The Washington Post, penned a stirring op‑ed titled 'The hard truth: Americans don't trust the news media,' in which he conceded: 'Reality is an undefeated champion. … We must be accurate, and we must be believed to be accurate. It's a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement.' Bezos's admission—calling out both accuracy and credibility—served as a tacit acknowledgment that even powerful legacy outlets are circling back to the same core demand: fearless, truthful reporting, just as Hersh delivers time and again. What Next? Iran, for now, has not confirmed the full extent of the damage but has vowed to retaliate 'at a time and place of its choosing.' Meanwhile, in Washington, Trump faces minimal political backlash, with key GOP figures framing the strike as a 'preemptive blow' to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear bomb. But the bigger story might be this: Seymour Hersh, nearly nine decades old, once again scooped the world. In an era of TikTok pundits and algorithm-fed outrage, his dogged reliance on old-school sourcing—combined with new-age platforms like Substack—has given him a second act few journalists ever get. Legacy vs Longevity While major networks scrambled to confirm what Hersh had already written, one truth remained clear: in the information war, experience still matters. Hersh's longevity in investigative reporting—not in spite of, but because of his outsider status—continues to disrupt the cosy, slow-moving machinery of legacy media. The attack on Iran may or may not spark a wider conflict. But Hersh's scoop has already ignited a different kind of reckoning—one about where we get our news, and who we still trust to tell us the truth.
