US strikes Iran: How legendary 88-year-old reporter Seymour Hersh scooped that Donald Trump would attack Iranian nuclear sites
In an age where news breaks on social media feeds faster than newsroom alerts, it wasn't CNN, BBC or The New York Times that first reported the United States' military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
It was Seymour Hersh.
Yes, that Seymour Hersh—the 88-year-old Pulitzer-winning investigative reporter, best known for uncovering the My Lai Massacre in Vietnam and the Abu Ghraib prison abuses in Iraq. And now, in the summer of 2025, the veteran journalist has done it again—beating major media outlets and intelligence briefings by publishing details of the Trump administration's plan to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, nearly 48 hours before the world knew it had actually happened.
The Scoop
On June 19, Hersh published a detailed report via his Substack newsletter, claiming that US B-2 bombers and naval platforms were preparing a "coordinated assault" on Iran's underground nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The piece cited unnamed sources in the intelligence community who warned that the operation was imminent and being conducted with minimal oversight from Congress or America's NATO allies.
At the time, most dismissed it as another speculative post from a journalist long estranged from the legacy media. But by June 22, when US President Donald Trump went on record confirming the strikes—calling the targets 'obliterated'—Hersh had already been vindicated.
The Attack
The strikes, launched late on June 21, targeted three high-profile Iranian nuclear facilities. While initial reports from state media in Iran downplayed the damage, satellite imagery and eyewitness accounts suggested precision airstrikes had indeed hit deep underground bunkers at Fordow and Natanz, as well as key infrastructure in Isfahan.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Yet despite the intensity of the operation, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported no significant radiation spikes, prompting speculation that either:
Iran had preemptively moved or buried sensitive material, or
The sites were largely non-operational or decoy facilities.
Either way, it challenged Trump's claim of having 'wiped out' Iran's nuclear capability.
Déjà Vu: From Nord Stream to Natanz
Hersh's report bore eerie similarities to his controversial 2023 scoop on the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, which he attributed to US covert operations.
At the time, mainstream outlets largely ignored the piece, but subsequent leaks from German and Nordic investigations lent circumstantial credibility to his claims.
The Iran story followed a similar arc: initial media silence, public disbelief, and then abrupt confirmation—except this time, the stakes involved possible nuclear escalation in the Middle East.
The Media Gap
Hersh's scoop once again spotlights the widening chasm between traditional journalism and independent reporting.
A 2023 study by the Reuters Institute found that 62% of US adults now rely on social media, newsletters, and independent platforms for breaking news—often citing speed, authenticity, and ideological distrust of legacy media.
Hersh, for his part, has long been critical of what he calls the 'lapdog press'—journalists too embedded in officialdom to question military narratives or dig beneath the surface. His latest work only reinforces that critique.
Even defenders of legacy media recognize the challenge. In late 2024, Jeff Bezos, owner of The Washington Post, penned a stirring op‑ed titled 'The hard truth: Americans don't trust the news media,' in which he conceded:
'Reality is an undefeated champion. … We must be accurate, and we must be believed to be accurate. It's a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement.'
Bezos's admission—calling out both accuracy and credibility—served as a tacit acknowledgment that even powerful legacy outlets are circling back to the same core demand: fearless, truthful reporting, just as Hersh delivers time and again.
What Next?
Iran, for now, has not confirmed the full extent of the damage but has vowed to retaliate 'at a time and place of its choosing.' Meanwhile, in Washington, Trump faces minimal political backlash, with key GOP figures framing the strike as a 'preemptive blow' to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear bomb.
But the bigger story might be this: Seymour Hersh, nearly nine decades old, once again scooped the world. In an era of TikTok pundits and algorithm-fed outrage, his dogged reliance on old-school sourcing—combined with new-age platforms like Substack—has given him a second act few journalists ever get.
Legacy vs Longevity
While major networks scrambled to confirm what Hersh had already written, one truth remained clear: in the information war, experience still matters. Hersh's longevity in investigative reporting—not in spite of, but because of his outsider status—continues to disrupt the cosy, slow-moving machinery of legacy media. The attack on Iran may or may not spark a wider conflict. But Hersh's scoop has already ignited a different kind of reckoning—one about where we get our news, and who we still trust to tell us the truth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Regime change? Trump says it's inevitable if leaders fail to make Iran great again
A day after striking Iran's nuclear facilities, US President Donald Trump questioned whether there could be a change of government in Iran. In a series of social media posts, Trump praised the US military for the successful operation and stated the current Iranian regime may not be capable to make "MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.""It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to his slogan "Make Iran Great Again." advertisementTRUMP PRAISES US MILITARY, CONFIRMS B-2 RETURNS HOME SAFELYTrump congratulated the US military, saying, "There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter." Trump also confirmed that the B-2 stealth bombers used in the operation had landed safely back in Missouri. "The GREAT B-2 pilots have just landed, safely, in Missouri. Thank you for a job well done!!! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!" he posted. He added that the damage caused by the strikes was major. "The damage to the Nuclear sites in Iran is said to be 'monumental.' The hits were hard and accurate. Great skill was shown by our military. Thank you!" he Trump confirmed that the US military had bombed three major nuclear sites in Iran: Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. He said the strikes were carried out with precision and strength."We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home," he RISE AS IRAN, ISRAEL EXCHANGE MISSILE FIREAfter the strikes, tensions in the Middle East rose sharply. The world is now watching closely to see how Iran will respond to the US attack on its nuclear facilities. According to reports, Tehran has promised to defend itself "at all costs."Meanwhile, missile exchanges between Iran and Israel have continued. An explosion in western Iran reportedly killed at least six military personnel, according to Iranian news outlets. On the other side, earlier Iranian missile strikes caused heavy damage in Tel Aviv, injuring many people and destroying the growing conflict, anti-war protesters have gathered in US cities, urging the government to avoid further CLAIMS IRAN RACING TOWARD NUCLEAR WEAPONSIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also addressed the situation, saying Israel has "interesting intelligence" about the location of Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent. He claimed Iran is rushing toward developing nuclear weapons and must be had to act," Netanyahu said, adding that Iran's goal to produce 300 ballistic missiles per month made the situation even more defended the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, stating they were necessary to stop what he described as a growing threat to regional and global Watch
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Israel has intel on Iran's enriched uranium, will continue strikes: Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel has "interesting intelligence" about the location of Iran's 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent. Addressing a press conference, Netanyahu defended Israeli and US actions against Iran, stating they were necessary to stop Tehran's alleged fast-paced drive toward building nuclear weapons. He also mentioned that Iran intended to produce 300 ballistic missiles each month as another reason behind the had to act," Netanyahu said, referring to the strikes that followed the killing of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in September 2024. He added that Iran's aggressive moves left Israel with no other option. Netanyahu said he spoke directly with US President Donald Trump about the need to act. "I told him of our need to act, and he understood it very well,' he said. 'And I knew that when push comes to shove, he would do the right thing—for America, for the free world, for civilisation."ISRAEL'S STRATEGY IN IRAN AND GAZA TO CONTINUEIn the same press conference, Netanyahu made it clear that Israel will continue its military operations both in Iran and in Gaza. He insisted that these actions are part of a larger goal to secure Israel's future and eliminate threats from all are advancing step by step toward (our) goals," Netanyahu said. "We are very close to achieving them."He claimed that US strike caused serious damage to Iran's Fordo nuclear facility, which is believed to be a central part of Iran's uranium enrichment program. "We are sending them back, we are removing the threat," he assured that Israel would not be drawn into a long and drawn-out conflict. "We will not be dragged into a war of attrition," he stated, "but we will not stop this historic operation before we achieve our goals."According to the Israeli prime minister, more than half of Iran's ballistic missile launchers have already been taken out. He also said that efforts in Iran are helping Israel achieve its goals in Gaza. "Without the Iranian scaffolding, it all collapses," he said, referring to Iran's support for groups like FOR PEACE AND A CEASEFIRE PLAN IN GAZATurning his attention to the Gaza conflict, Netanyahu said the war there could end immediately if Hamas agrees to surrender. "It could end tomorrow. It could end today if Hamas surrenders, lays down all its arms, releases all the hostages. It's over in a moment," he is hoping for a peaceful resolution in Gaza and revealed that negotiations are already underway through mediators. He said Israel is ready to accept a 60-day ceasefire, during which half of the hostages would be released."I have a plan for a permanent peace," he stated. "We're prepared to go into negotiations right now on the proposal that Mr. Witkoff gave."He also hinted that these military actions could help expand diplomatic ties in the region."I can imagine a massive expansion of the peace agreements," Netanyahu added. "I can see collaborations that might seem fantastical right now but maybe you understand they're not fantastical."
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Iran-Israel War: ‘Chernobyl in the Making?' Explosions Rock Iran's Nuclear Plant After US Strikes
Iran-Israel War: Tensions in the Middle East soared further on June 22 as explosions echoed through Iran's southern port city of Bushehr, home to the country's only operational nuclear power plant. The Israeli military claimed responsibility for the strike, saying it also targeted missile launchers in Isfahan and Ahvaz. The timing of the attack – barely hours after the United States struck three Iranian nuclear sites – has raised serious fears of a looming nuclear crisis. While Iranian officials have yet to confirm any damage to the nuclear plant itself, concerns are mounting. Built with Russian assistance, the facility operates using nuclear fuel supplied by Moscow. The same fuel is shipped back to Russia after use to mitigate proliferation risks. As of now, Iranian authorities report no radiation leaks. But the attack is being viewed in international circles as a dangerously provocative move. Rafael Grossi, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), had previously warned that a direct strike on the Bushehr plant could trigger catastrophic consequences. 'A hit on the facility could lead to a massive release of radioactivity, affecting not just Iran but its neighbours as well,' he had said while addressing the UN Security Council. Experts agree that if a direct strike compromises the reactor, the fallout could mirror nuclear disasters of the past. The comparison many are drawing is to Chernobyl. In that 1986 tragedy, a botched test led to an explosion and fire at a reactor in Ukraine, spreading radioactive contamination across Europe and causing long-term health damage to thousands. According to international nuclear safety protocols, any such incident at Bushehr would demand swift protective actions. These would likely include mass evacuations, iodine distribution, food and water restrictions and large-scale radiation monitoring across several hundred kilometres. Russia has issued its own warnings. With more than 600 personnel, including 250 permanent staff, stationed at the Bushehr facility, Moscow had reportedly sought assurances from Israel for their safety. Rosatom chief Alexey Likhachev said any damage to the site could unleash a disaster on the scale of Chernobyl. The Israeli military had previously claimed its mention of Bushehr as a target was a mistake. But the latest strikes tell a different story. As images of smoke rising over Bushehr surface on social media and satellite data, the world is left to reckon with the possibility that a new chapter in warfare – one where nuclear power plants become battlefronts – may be closer than ever imagined. For now, the region holds its breath. Radiation levels remain normal. But questions remain – how close did the world come to a nuclear nightmare? And what happens if the next missile does not miss?
