Political parties guarded on effectiveness of Durban's R70. 9 billion 2025
There were mixed reactions to the eThekwini Municipality's R70.9 billion budget at a council meeting on Thursday.
Image: Willem Phungula
WHILE the majority of political parties approved the eThekwini Municipality's R70.9 million budget for 2025/2026 at a council meeting yesterday, many were sceptical about whether the objects of the exercise would be achieved.
Some questioned whether the budget represented fair enough returns to ratepayers for their monthly outlay, considering the municipality's well-documented service delivery shortcomings.
However, the municipality maintained that the budget was took into account their extensive public consultations, where they received the following comments: High tariffs were unaffordable;
Ward committees were not active;
Poor maintenance of leaking water pipes and sewers;
Request for improvements of streetlights;
Improvement in the replacement of electricity meters;
Road rehabilitation of existing roads was lacking, as they are full of potholes and storm disaster damage;
Delayed progress in housing projects;
Poor building and maintenance of social facilities such as halls, sports fields, pools, and verges;
Insufficient youth programmes.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
eThekwini Mayor Cyril Xaba emphasised that the budget was set on a trajectory to improve service delivery and technological innovation.
Xaba promised more unannounced site visits and acknowledged that delays in responses to service delivery complaints costed the city.
'We will continue to adopt a financially sustainable revenue model,' he said.
According to the municipality, it made amendments to the draft budget after public consultation by reducing water, refuse removal, and sanitation tariffs.
ANC councillor Zama Sokhabase said the budget was designed to reshape eThekwini's future and stimulate economic growth with the revitalisation of public spaces and working together for the public.
Sokhabase said the budget wiould also focus on health programmes such as teenage pregnancy.
Andre Beetge, a DA councillor, said they have heard the same rhetoric year after year, with items adopted several years ago that were not implemented. Plans can be tabled, but the proof remained in service delivery.
Beetge said the DA will not support a fairytale budget.
IFP councillor Mdu Nkosi stated that the budget would deliver on the municipality's trading services, which included water, sanitation, cleaning, and solid waste management, to keep the city clean.
Nkosi said The budget aimed to generate quick wins, gain service delivery momentum, and provide essential services.
Councillor Jay Singh, representing the United Independent Movement (UIM), rejected the budget.
He condemned the electricity tariff increase as a measure that unfairly targeted compliant ratepayers while failing to address revenue leaks and the city's debt.
Singh said the budget lacked concrete plans to dismantle the 'electricity and water mafia' networks profiting from illegal connections in informal settlements.
Zwakele Mncwango, of ActionSA, said the tariff increases were high and the budget failed to provide a budget for public transport and crime prevention, adding that the city also failed to collect debt because of poor financial management.
Imtiaz Syed, President of Active Citizens Coalition (ACC), said that 75% of the budget was contributed by ratepayers, which he described as an injustice and penalised those who worked daily to pay their bills.
Syed said it also did not deal with the informal settlement growth, which was prejudicing ratepayers.
Patrick Pillay, leader of the Democratic Liberal Congress (DLC), said he did not support tariff increases that were way above the inflation rate.
Pillay said the budget was providing a social package, one of a kind, when compared to other municipalities, that would bring great relief to pensioners, grantees, and the unemployed.
Sunitha Maharaj, of the Minority Front, said the ordinary ratepayers needed the same investment in their infrastructure to enjoy the benefits of their payments to the city's coffers.
Aslam Shaheed, the leader of the Truly Alliance (TA), said that while the budget vision was bold, it must be grounded in the realities that residents faced daily.
'We should implement a monthly performance review framework directly tied to key budget items, which would provide transparent updates, progress of infrastructure repairs, job creation, and catalytic investments. This would be responsible governance,' Shaheed said.
zainul.dawood@inl.co.za
The eThekwini Municipality R70.9 billion budget for the 2025/26 financial year has been adopted today at a full council meeting held at the Inkosi Albert Luthuli International Convention Centre in Durban.
Image: Zainul Dawood
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
27 minutes ago
- The Citizen
How to miss a miracle: Just don't try
The National Development Plan was visionary, but today its only value is as a mirror. The plan was the government's flagship strategy to create a more equal society and an environment of accelerated economic growth … Picture: Shutterstock I found a dusty copy of the original National Development Plan (NDP) published in August 2012 while moving offices last week. Paging through the 500-page glossy book, I was again reminded that it was an excellent document – well ahead of its time. But the irony is stark, as it now represents one of the biggest pipedreams in South Africa's democratic history. The plan was the government's flagship strategy to create a more equal society, with all proposals centralised to establish an enabling environment where businesses could grow and flourish to accelerate economic growth. The goal was average economic growth of over 5.4% between 2011 and 2030. Unemployment was targeted to drop to 14% by 2020 and to 6% by 2030. The government adopted the plan amid dancing girls and fireworks, proudly labelling it the magic blueprint for a prosperous future in South Africa. Read more SA expresses sadness, offers condolences to India after Air India crash [VIDEO] Well, that didn't quite happen. But it isn't a surprise. I also remember the ANC's elective conference in Mangaung a few months later, in December 2012, where Jacob Zuma was re-elected as ANC president. During his victory speech in a packed and boisterous venue, he feverishly brandished the plan in the air and shouted above the noise: 'This is the plan that will take South Africa forward.' The crowd noise tapered off and turned to discontented mumbling. A Cosatu official I had been speaking to bent down and muttered: 'It's a DA plan. It will never happen. Over my dead body.' That was nearly 13 years ago. It might as well have been the blueprint for the tallest building in the world, where the only execution was the theft of the building materials. ALSO READ: What is the National Development Plan, and will its hopes become a reality? No execution, but reviews continue … The National Planning Commission still exists, and it regularly publishes reviews of the original plan's failures. The cynic in me says it could be one commission Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana can cut as part of his austerity plan. The NDP still sports a beautiful cover, with crisp, glossy pages and an expertly crafted layout – a really professional document. Yet, despite its elegance, it has become a prime example of how a visionary and audacious plan, without execution, is ultimately not worth the paper it's printed on. It's a waste of money. Today, South Africa has no clear blueprint for its future. The government of national unity (GNU) is positive, but the leadership is currently focused on stabilising coalitions and tackling short-term crises. Beyond the immediacy, there is a vacuum of long-term strategic thinking. A positive development, however, is the GNU's stated focus on growth and job creation – core goals that echo the original intent of the NDP. ALSO READ: SA's expanding safety net: Millions more to receive social grants by 2030 Worth another (good) look Perhaps the plan's lasting value lies in its function as a mirror. If politicians and policymakers were to reread it today – really read it – they might come to a sobering realisation: the country's current economic policies are not working. This will require an aggressive reassessment of key policies: revisiting empowerment policies and frameworks, policies not to nationalise plundered and dysfunctional state-owned enterprises but to re-establish powerful, independent institutions like the Scorpions to combat corruption, and fundamentally rethinking how South Africa fights crime to restore the rule of law. We don't need another glossy plan. We need brave decisions, practical policy shifts, and the political will to act. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Is R700 million for a national dialogue worth it?
Before the government spends R700 million on a(nother) national dialogue, it is reasonable to ask what the dialogue promises to deliver, is this worth more than R700 million and what are the chances the stated objectives will be achieved, ask the author. Before the government spends R700 million on a(nother) national dialogue, it is reasonable to ask what the dialogue promises to deliver, is this worth more than R700 million and what are the chances the stated objectives will be achieved. Dr Oyama Mabandla, a member of the national dialogue preparatory task team, asks us to give the national dialogue a chance, reminding us that '[t]he national dialogue is an attempt to reinvigorate and fix a dangerously adrift democracy. It will involve the entire populace, instead of the self-selecting and incestuous elites, who have been producing one after another failed plan, while the rest of us have been spectators.' But of course it won't involve the entire populace and the outcome will be a big report that no one reads. How can it be anything other than this? Even if you could speak to everyone. What then? Which ideas do you implement and which do you ignore? No member of the task team can do anything other than talk and although conversations matter, you need executive power to change things and you get executive power through lots of votes. The reason we have elections is that you can't involve the whole populace of 63 million people in any dialogue, no matter how important. So we compromise and although they are very far from perfect, elections are the only way we have to get a sense of what citizens want. South Africans didn't decide to give the ANC 40% of the vote in the last election to teach anyone a lesson, as experts love to tell us. A gogo voted for the DA because she believed they would give her grandchildren the best future and a young, first-time voter put their X next to Juju's face because they believe the EFF will give them the best opportunities, but most didn't even do that. Voting is the only opportunity you have to not get the government all the other idiots deserve. It is only in those few minutes in a cubicle where you can actually get something changed. The national dialogue is not even that. You can say as much as you want in conversations and you will be ignored. This is not personal. It is the very heart of how democracy works. No one vote counts for anything unless millions of others agree with you and then that vote really counts. I have no idea why President Cyril Ramaphosa feels like a(nother) national dialogue will yield anything positive (aside from the events' organisers who will no doubt be skimming their 25%) or why borrowing R700m to fund this will yield more in value than the R700m, plus interest, that will be spent. (We currently borrow around R1 billion per day, so the national dialogue is an extra 17 hours or so of borrowing, which somehow doesn't feel that bad. But it is). It's all about social compacting, we are told. But what is this magical phrase loved by many and understood by few? Does Ramaphosa love social compacting more than Trump loves tariffs? Will the national dialogue make more people less poor or will everyone just be R700mn poorer? Social compacting would pop up in masterplans in the Department of Trade Industry and Competition for example, and mostly seemed to mean that a small number of dominant companies could meet with the government, without minutes or recordings, to determine how the rest of the industry should work. It failed even with the full power of government and the largest companies in the country behind it. South Africans, when you ignore the loudest and emptiest vessels, talk with each other just fine (even if that is mostly to complain about the government). The problem is that South Africans are getting poorer and most citizens don't believe the government, irrespective of which party is in charge, can fix that. That is why so many people don't bother voting. The most important first step to economic transformation is to make it easier for more people not to be poor. The three great social ills in South Africa of poverty, unemployment and inequality, leaves out the fourth great ill which is lack of economic freedom. The EFF hijacked this term for their version of communism, but economic freedom allows people to solve their own problems. Not another pile of the Master's Plans, pushed down onto South Africans, but allowing them more freedom to do what they believe is important for them. But the government doesn't trust its own citizens, so you can be "given" a free house shitty house after waiting decades but you can't sell it, because the government doesn't believe you can be trusted with your own money. You wait for decades because with free stuff, the demand always outstrips the supply and no one has an incentive to increase the supply. We know poor people will pay for houses if they can own them, because poor people currently pay for houses they cannot own. Rich people have economic freedom and poor people are not allowed to make their own economic decisions and so remain poor. We have the only national dialogue that matters, which are the conversations which happen in parliament. Have your say and vote and you are part of the dialogue. Spending R700m so you can be told by a(nother) group of people how they can lift you from poverty, as long as you do as you are told, is a terrible idea.
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
SA can't go rogue any longer
SA needs to forsake revolutionary affiliations and reset its relations with the Western democracies. South Africa's solidarity with a ragbag of international terror organisations and rogue states in the Middle East is not returning the benefits the ANC hoped for. Instead of this alliance of outlaws being the next big thing in geopolitics, it's imploding. Over the past 20 months, the Iranian orchestrated 'axis of resistance' – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Assad regime in Syria and the Houthi in Yemen – that for decades kept the region ablaze in pursuit of wiping Israel from the face of the earth, has been virtually obliterated. Now it is Iran's turn. Over the course of just a week, Israel has reduced Iran's feared military, terror and repressive apparatus to ruins. The Jewish state has control of Iranian skies, has subverted the banking system and has been so successful at assassinating Iran's military and nuclear leadership elite that cadre promotion, rather than being coveted, is now a death sentence. The regime held a single negotiating card. Its most important nuclear enrichment plant, at the mountain redoubt of Fordow, appeared untouchable. That was literally trumped when the US president on Saturday dropped bunker-busting bombs on three Iranian nuclear installations. ALSO READ: US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign It's a dangerous escalation. But, then again, Trump has never seen a bandwagon that he doesn't yearn to take charge of. Following Trump's decision, the latest Middle East developments will worsen SA's already fraught diplomatic relationship with the US. When President Cyril Ramaphosa attended the G7 summit in Canada, the meeting he had announced with Trump did not materialise. Whether this was a calculated snub by Trump or, as the SA delegation insists, simply because of his early departure to deal with the conflict in Iran, remains to be seen. It is nevertheless curious that not a word was exchanged between the two men, especially given the expectations raised by what Ramaphosa had hailed as a triumphant visit to the White House. ALSO READ: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond? The G7 summit shows how fringe our Middle East foreign policy has become. In spite of waning support by some member countries for Israel's actions in Gaza, especially from some EU countries, the summit's position on the Israel-Iran conflict was remarkably unambiguous. 'Israel,' the G7 statement read, 'has the right to defend itself and we reiterate our support for the security of Israel. Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror and it must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.' This is at odds with SA's stance. It is with Iran itself that SA has developed the warmest relationship. SA facilitated Iran's entry into Brics. There have been inter-ministerial engagements to strengthen political, economic and cultural cooperation. They worked together on SA's International Court of Justice case accusing Israel of genocide and there are claims, as yet unproven, that Iran rewarded the ANC by bailing it out with a few hundred million rands when the party almost went bankrupt last year. All this put SA on a conflict course with the US. SA's response to Trump's order cutting off aid has been to fixate on concerns regarding land seizures and race-based discrimination. It has ignored US displeasure over 'egregious actions' in the international arena. As the order puts it, 'South Africa has taken aggressive positions towards the United States and its allies, including accusing Israel, not Hamas, of genocide.' The ANC has been unwilling to address these issues. Serendipitously for SA's long-term interests, the linchpin around which the 'axis of resistance' turned is on course to being neutralised by Israel. This will reshape the Middle East and afford SA an opportunity the ANC must seize – forsake revolutionary affiliations and reset relations with the Western democracies. NOW READ: Apartheid then, apartheid now: Israel's aggression is no different
