Can Maharaja Suheldev vs Gazi Salar Masud Pitch Swing 2027 UP Battle? BJP Hopes So
Last Updated:
Suheldev holds symbolic value among the Rajbhar and Pasi communities, both considered crucial in eastern Uttar Pradesh's caste arithmetic
Maharaja Suheldev vs Gazi Salar Masud was the underlying message as Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath addressed a public gathering in Bahraich on Tuesday.
On the face of it, it was a cultural event celebrating a largely folkloric warrior-king from the 11th century. But scratch the surface and political meaning emerges: the BJP, analysts say, is shaping a sharp counter-narrative to the Samajwadi Party-led PDA (Pichhda, Dalit, Alpsankhyak) pitch by resurrecting historical memory loaded with communal, cultural, and caste resonances.
The Suheldev Vijayotsav, marked by the unveiling of a 40-feet tall equestrian statue of Maharaja Suheldev at Chittora Lake, became the stage for the chief minister to launch a blistering ideological assault. Targeting the SP and Congress, Yogi accused them of appeasing 'foreign invaders" for Muslim votes and glorifying figures like Gazi Salar Masud—a medieval figure buried in Bahraich, revered by many but labelled an 'invader" by the Right-wing.
In his speech, Yogi invoked Suheldev's legendary victory against Salar Masud and thanked those who stopped organising events in Masud's name. 'Bahraich should celebrate Suheldev's legacy, not that of Salar Masud. He was an invader, and a symbol of slavery," said the CM, adding that the annual fairs in honour of Masud promoted a 'ghulami ki mansikta" (slavery mindset).
He also linked the issue to temple politics, asking rhetorically: 'Who were those who opposed the Ram temple in Ayodhya? Who stood against the Kashi Vishwanath corridor?" and answered it himself — 'They were the same people who praised invaders like Gazi."
Yogi also oversaw the ceremonial 'ann-prashan' of five infants, all named Suheldev, in a symbolic gesture of passing heritage to the next generation. He distributed cheques of Rs5 lakh each to entrepreneurs under the Mukhyamantri Yuva Udyami Yojana and emphasised the BJP's commitment to honouring 'real national heroes."
Political analysts see more than just cultural revivalism in this script. According to Shashikant Pandey, head of department of political sciences at Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, 'This event was a clear attempt to polarise non-Yadav OBCs under a unifying Hindutva banner. By pitting Suheldev against Salar Masud, the BJP is aiming to split the PDA bloc — especially among Rajbhar, Pasi and other backward castes who claim Suheldev as part of their legacy."
Suheldev holds symbolic value among the Rajbhar and Pasi communities, both considered crucial in eastern Uttar Pradesh's caste arithmetic. The Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party (SBSP), led by Om Prakash Rajbhar, is back in NDA fold after a brief SP alliance. The Suheldev vs Masud binary, political observers say, could help the BJP strengthen its hold on non-Yadav OBCs by offering a civilisational pride narrative in place of caste-based mobilisation.
Rajbhar Vote A Key Target
According to Pandey, the event in Bahraich carried a layered political messaging aimed at more than just countering the Samajwadi Party's PDA narrative. 'Beyond the visible cultural symbolism, this was also a strategic outreach to the Rajbhar community," he said. 'Suheldev is a revered figure among Rajbhars, and invoking him at such a grand scale is BJP's attempt to emotionally consolidate that vote bank, which has shown volatility in recent years."
Pandey pointed out that there are approximately 70-80 lakh Rajbhar voters in Uttar Pradesh, spread predominantly across eastern districts such as Azamgarh, Ghazipur, Mau, Ballia, Deoria, and of course, Bahraich. 'The Rajbhars can swing the outcome in 25 to 30 assembly seats, and their alignment with SBSP under Om Prakash Rajbhar has earlier given both SP and BJP key electoral advantages," he noted. 'By placing Suheldev in direct contrast to Salar Masud, the BJP is not only reinforcing Hindu pride but also ensuring that caste pride aligns with religious and nationalist sentiment — a classic saffron strategy."
Yogi Blames SP-Congress
The UP CM also blamed the Samajwadi Party and Congress for turning a blind eye to 'foreign aggressors" in pursuit of Muslim votes. 'When we celebrate Sardar Patel, SP sings praises of Jinnah. When we talk about Maharaja Suheldev, they rush to talk about Gazi Miyan's marriage," said Yogi, ridiculing past efforts to promote what he termed 'appeasement politics."
He thanked those who stopped events associated with Gazi Salar Masud and called for a complete halt to commemorations in the names of invaders. 'Prime Minister Narendra Modi has made it clear — national heroes must be honoured, not invaders," Yogi asserted.
The Statue & The Symbolism
The newly inaugurated bronze statue of Maharaja Suheldev — touted as India's tallest of a warrior on a rearing horse — stands at Chittora Lake, eight kilometres from Bahraich town. Sculpted by Padma Shri awardee Ram Sutar under the supervision of the UP Lalit Kala Akademi, the statue is part of a larger memorial whose foundation was laid virtually by PM Modi in February 2021.
The Historical Fog
Suheldev's historicity remains contested. There is little mention of him in 11th-century Persian chronicles. His tale surfaces in the 14th-century Ajaib-ul-Khusurowi by Amir Khusrau and then more prominently in the 17th-century Mirat-e-Masudi, a hagiographic account of Salar Masud.
According to these sources, Suheldev was the son of King Moolraj of Shravasti and led a coalition of local rulers to resist Muslim advances in the Terai belt. The defining battle is said to have taken place near Bahraich around 1033 AD, where Suheldev defeated and killed Salar Masud. However, historians like Dr Rajkishore of Bahraich say Suheldev is more a 'hero of legend than history," with multiple castes — Rajbhars, Pasis, Bhar, even Jains — claiming him as their own.
One account even suggests Suheldev adopted Jainism, possibly because Brahmin priests would not anoint kings from 'lower castes." In eastern UP's folklore, however, Suheldev is remembered as the 'defender of the land" against Islamic expansion.
A Battle of Memory and Identity
Tuesday's event, thus, wasn't just about remembering a long-forgotten king, but about scripting a new narrative—one where historical memory, myth, caste identity, and political ideology converge.
In the run-up to the 2027 state elections, such symbolic battles over statues, festivals, and forgotten figures are likely to intensify. As one local BJP leader said off the record, 'In Purvanchal, it's not just about who votes. It's about whose story is told louder. And Suheldev is now our story."
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
BJP congress news18 specials samajwadi party Suheldev Bhartiya Samaj Party The UPShot UP election Yogi Adityanath
Location :
Lucknow, India, India
First Published:
June 11, 2025, 16:40 IST
News elections Can Maharaja Suheldev vs Gazi Salar Masud Pitch Swing 2027 UP Battle? BJP Hopes So
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
West Bengal BJP chief faces flak over ‘sex workers' remark
West Bengal Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president and Union Minister of State for Education Sukanta Majumdar has landed into a controversy for a remark directed at sex workers in Kolkata's Sonagachi area. The Trinamool Congress on Saturday (June 21, 2025) criticised Mr. Majumdar's remarks and demanded an 'unconditional apology' from the BJP leader. During an altercation with the police on Friday (June 20, 2025), Mr. Majumdar compared Bengal's law and order situation with 'sex workers.' Several leaders of the ruling Trinamool Congress spoke against Mr. Majumdar and said that not only the BJP leader insulted sex workers but all the women in the State. 'Sex workers are among the most marginalised and exploited women in our society. They battle stigma, survive abuse, and yet show unimaginable courage just to feed themselves and their children. And what did @BJP4IndiaState President @DrSukantaBJP do? He dragged them through the mud, using their lives and livelihoods as a slur to attack the people of Bengal. Shame on you, BJP. And shame on you, Sukanta Majumdar. You owe every sex worker, every woman, and every resident of Bengal an UNCONDITIONAL APOLOGY,' the TMC posted on X. .@BJP4India State President @DrSukantaBJP owes sex workers an UNCONDITIONAL APOLOGY for his DISGRACEFUL, DEHUMANISING remarks. Using one of the most vulnerable groups in our society as a punchline for political mudslinging is INEXCUSABLE. Those who spew such filth have no moral… — All India Trinamool Congress (@AITCofficial) June 21, 2025 Senior Trinamool Congress leader Kunal Ghosh said that the BJP leader was referring to sex workers of Sonagachi as an 'expletive'. West Bengal Minister Sashi Panja said that though Sukanta Majumdar claims to be a teacher, but his remarks are 'very disgusting, very disparaging and very disgraceful'. 'He has said that the law and order situation or the law in Bengal can be equated to Songachi sex workers. This is so humiliating to Sonagachi sex workers and we stand by them.' Dr Panja, who represents the constituency where Sonagachi is located. The West Bengal ruling party said using one of the 'most vulnerable groups in our society as a punchline for political mudslinging is inexcusable' and added that those 'who spew such filth have no moral right to occupy any Constitutional office'. The remark by the BJP president comes at a time when the BJP leadership is demanding action against Trinamool Congress leader Anubrata Mondal, who used vile language against the mother and wife of the officer-in-charge of Bolpur Police station. An FIR has been filed against Mr. Mondal and the National Commission for Women has sought an action taken report from the police for the TMC leader's remarks. While the police are of the opinion that there is no necessity to arrest the TMC leader, the State ruling has let off Anubrata Mondal without any punishment after he tendered a public apology.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Former Corporators Ramp Up Public Outreach In Build-Up To Civic Polls
1 2 3 Nagpur: With civic election procedures gaining momentum, former corporators across the city have become increasingly active in reconnecting with their wards and addressing unresolved civic issues, filling the vacuum created by over three years under the civic administration. Already, the senior rung of leaders in the BJP camp, including CM Devendra Fadnavis, Union minister Nitin Gadkari, and even guardian minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule, have started holding Janta Darbars. In Prabhag 26, senior BJP leader and former corporator Dharmapal Meshram recently conducted a detailed review of persistent civic problems. Acting on a slew of complaints from residents, particularly dysfunctional street lights and domestic electricity issues, Meshram held meetings with officials from the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL) and Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC). Meshram called a joint meeting involving Mahavitaran officials, party workers, and citizens to address household power issues. He also instructed the electrical department to immediately repair defunct street lights and install new ones where necessary to restore street illumination in the area. With their party in power in the state, former corpoators from the BJP are also ensuring that NMC officials remain present in their wards to address the issue of civic amenities raised by the citizens. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Meshram pressed executive engineers from NMC's electric, NMC's PWD, and even MSEDCL officials to sort out issues of residents. Meshram is not alone. Vijay aka Pintu Zalke, another former corporator, has also intensified his public outreach. Like others, he has been trying to fill the political void left by the dissolution of the NMC's general body in March 2022 which led to bureaucratic governance without elected representation. With polls likely in the coming months, Zalke and others have begun directly engaging with citizens, addressing grievances, and reviving their grassroots presence. Former BJP city chief Jitendra Kukde, too, has returned to active fieldwork in his former ward. "As I was busy with both Lok Sabha and Assembly elections after being appointed city president, I missed regular interactions with people of my Prabhag," said Kukde, who was later replaced by Dayashankar Tiwari. Now out of party office, Kukde is back on the ground, attempting to rebuild his image and rapport with voters. Several ex-corporators have also reopened their contact offices to directly receive complaints. Former women corporators from opposition camps like Sneha Nikose and Shakshi Raut have become proactive, addressing issues like sewer blockages, irregular garbage collection, low water pressure, and damaged public infrastructure. These efforts come as citizens grow increasingly frustrated with the lukewarm response of the civic officials. With many wards still plagued by basic issues — ranging from faulty street lights and choked drains to uncollected garbage — former corporators are leveraging this discontent to re-establish their political relevance. The surge in activity suggests that while the municipal body remains under administrative control, the unofficial race for the civic body's 151 seats has already begun on the ground.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC: Organised crime grave economic & security threat
Nagpur: Organised crime is not limited by borders and has a devastating impact on the country's economy and internal security by enabling terrorism , Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court observed while overturning a lower court order that denied police custody of a member of a crime syndicate. Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, while granting seven-day police custody to Lalu Yadav , 33, under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), said, "organised crime is a serious threat to society and is fuelled by illegal wealth generated by contract killing, extortion, narcotics trade, ransom kidnappings, money laundering, and protection rackets." The court rejected the special MCOCA court's May 3 ruling, which denied police custody on the limited ground that the probe was focused on tracing bank accounts and property. Justice Joshi-Phalke said the special court failed to consider crucial aspects of the investigation, including the accused's ongoing role in a larger organised crime syndicate. "MCOCA can be invoked even if direct crime involvement is absent, but syndicate nexus is established," the judge said. "Black money generated by organised crime has had a serious adverse effect on our economy. These syndicates have made a common cause with terrorist gangs," the court said, while affirming that MCOCA empowers agencies to intercept communications and pursue complex networks that threaten national security. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The oldest stars whose fans don't even know they're still alive Reportingly Undo The court was hearing a revision plea filed by the state against the lower court's refusal to grant police custody. Yadav was arrested in a March 14 assault case registered in Yerla, Kalmeshwar, where he and a co-accused allegedly attacked a man with a sickle. Though the case was initially registered under Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), further investigation revealed a pattern of serious, repeat offences allegedly committed for pecuniary gain — prompting the application of MCOCA. The prosecution submitted that Yadav had at least nine criminal cases against him, with seven still pending. "He is a repeat offender operating for economic gain. His actions fit the definition of continuing unlawful activity under MCOCA," the state counsel contended, while urging custodial interrogation to investigate deeper links within the crime syndicate. The high court agreed, stressing that even if an individual may not have committed a particular act of organised crime directly, their nexus with a syndicate or with repeated unlawful acts could still justify invoking MCOCA. "A nexus with the crime syndicate is enough to attract the Act," Justice Joshi-Phalke said, citing Supreme Court's precedent in the Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma case. She ruled that police must be given a fair opportunity to probe syndicate structures, pecuniary trails, and unlawful activities under the wider framework of MCOCA. "In light of the legislative intent, denial of custody would amount to frustrating the purpose of the law," the court said while quashing the lower court's orders.
