Third-party review ranks Mitchell site fourth for possible state prison, recommends initial Lincoln Co. site
Jun. 2—PIERRE — A Mitchell site ranked fourth out of six options in a third-party "refresh" look at the potential sites for a new state men's prison in South Dakota.
A study from Arizona-based Arrington Watkins Architects looked at six options for a South Dakota men's correctional facility and based on a site analysis ranked the existing Lincoln County site owned by the South Dakota Department of Corrections as the top option for the Project Prison Reset panel to consider during its next meeting on Tuesday, June 3 in Pierre.
The Mitchell site was described as "remote but promising" but scored 2,040 points out of a maximum 2,975 points when the sites were being sized up on a point scale from 1-to-5 and then multiplied by an importance factor out of 100 points. The Lincoln County plan scored 2,355 points, followed by a Huron plan at 2,220, a Worthing site plan at 2,045 points was third and the former Citibank site in northern Sioux Falls and Mitchell both scored at 2,040 points to tie for fourth.
The most important elements for the new prison included location (within 30 miles of Sioux Falls), proximity (not located close to a major interstate, railroads and waterways), size (a minimum site of 126 to 160 acres for a full site) and available site utilities. The Lincoln County site scored a 5 in location, proximity and site size. Mitchell scored 3s in location and proximity and a 5 for size but did not score higher than a 4 in any other category.
Among the positives in the Mitchell site analysis included the 160-acre land size, the generally flat land and the ability to develop a maximum of 1,728 beds. However, the nearby city lagoons for wastewater would still require a lift station, adding costs to the project, infrastructure improvements would have to be made to the site and the plan noted the site could have escape issues.
"The location is 70 miles from Sioux Falls, which results in added costs for inmate transportation and support services," the study said. "It is also located just over one mile from Interstate 90, and within a mile of a railroad and the James River, which provides potential escape routes for inmates."
Proposals from Aberdeen and Grant County were eliminated due to their remote distances from Sioux Falls, while five other sites closer to Sioux Falls were eliminated due to buildability issues with the land and the proposed sites. The remaining six sites were then considered for a conceptual plan and a "test fit," Arrington Watkins said.
"The goal of the concept plans is to take the resulting buildable area left on each site after site analysis and represent a prison size and bed count that could utilize each site," the study said. "They are not a proposal for what should or should not be built on each site."
The Lincoln County site is located about 10 miles south of Sioux Falls between Harrisburg and Canton on a 160-acre site that the state of South Dakota owns. Earlier this year, it was projected to cost $825 million to build the 1,500-bed facility. Nearby landowners to the proposed site have voiced opposition to the plan and to how the state was moving ahead with a largely secretive process to approve the prison.
In February, a bill in the South Dakota Legislature to fund the remainder of the prison project failed, leading to Gov. Larry Rhoden to appoint the Project Prison Reset task force to reassess the plan. That brought on the consideration of potential new sites around the state. The state has already spent more than $60 million on the previous design and prep work for the initial Lincoln County plan.
In Monday's latest look at the prison options, Arrington Watkins said the existing Lincoln County site is "10 miles from Sioux Falls, is not in proximity to major interstates, railroads, or major waterways, has the size for a full build of 1,728 beds ... is ranked high for site access, and only scored poorly for site utilities and potential additional cost during development."
"The property is already owned by the DOC and is adjacent to another 160-acre parcel owned by the DOC that can be used for future expansion or support functions," the report said. "This is a strong candidate for phase one development now. ... Lincoln County was followed on the ranking system by the Huron site, which also scored well, but is very remote and directly adjacent to a major highway. Our recommendation for site selection for phase 1 development of the men's capacity plan is the Lincoln County site."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Footage Shows China Firing Water Cannon at US Ally Near Disputed Territory
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Philippines has released footage showing the Chinese coast guard deploying water cannons to drive away a fisheries bureau vessel operating within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone. Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry via email for comment. Why It Matters China claims the South China Sea as its territory, citing vague historic rights. Beijing has dismissed as invalid a 2016 decision by a Hague-based arbitral court that rejected these claims. Since 2023, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has pushed back against the growing presence of Chinese maritime forces within the country's exclusive economic zone. This challenge has been met with Chinese blockades at disputed features and increasingly forceful measures, raising concerns that a miscalculation could trigger Manila's Mutual Defense Treaty with Washington and draw the United States into a conflict with China. What To Know On Friday morning, four vessels from the Philippine Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources arrived at Scarborough Shoal—a rich fishing ground—to distribute fuel subsidies to more than 20 local fishing boats, Philippine coast guard spokesperson Jay Tarriela wrote on X (formerly Twitter). At around 10 a.m., Chinese coast guard ships moved in and began conducting "aggressive maneuvers," Tarriela said. One Chinese vessel came within 16 yards of the Philippine ship BRP Datu Taradapit, about 18 miles southwest of Scarborough Shoal, carrying out blocking maneuvers and firing its water cannon, at one point striking the port quarter of the Philippine vessel, according to Tarriela. A Chinese coast guard ship fires its water cannon as it seeks to obstruct a Philippine fisheries bureau mission near Scarborough Shoal, a traditional fishing ground within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone. A Chinese coast guard ship fires its water cannon as it seeks to obstruct a Philippine fisheries bureau mission near Scarborough Shoal, a traditional fishing ground within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone. Philippine Coast Guard Another Chinese coast guard cutter fired its water cannon at the BRP Datu Tamblot, another fisheries bureau vessel, about 20 miles southeast of the shoal, but did not strike the boat directly. Tarriela said the Chinese ships monitored in the area included six coast guard vessels, two navy warships, and a number of ships belonging to the so-called Maritime Militia—paramilitary vessels that China describes as patriotic fishermen. "Despite the unprofessional and illegal actions of the Chinese Coast Guard, which endangered Filipino crew members and fishermen, BFAR vessels remained resolute in their mission to protect local fishing boats," Tarriela said. Chinese coast guard spokesperson Liu Dejun, in a statement, accused the Datu Taradapit of "approaching and intruding" into the waters around Scarborough Shoal and said the coast guard had taken "necessary measures" to drive it away. "The Philippine side's actions have seriously violated China's sovereignty and violated international law and relevant provisions of Chinese law. The frequent provocations and nuisances by the Philippine side cannot change the fact that Scarborough Shoal belongs to China," he added. Scarborough Shoal sits about 140 miles west of the Philippines' Luzon Island and nearly 700 miles from China's southernmost province of Hainan. The area is well within the Southeast Asian country's exclusive economic zone, which extends 230 miles from its coastal baselines. What People Are Saying The National Maritime Council, which operates under the Philippines' presidential office, in a statement: "These actions violate international law, specifically UNCLOS [the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea] and the 2016 arbitral ruling and jeopardize the safety of Philippine personnel and local fishing communities." Bao Yinan, a maritime policy analyst, wrote for Chinese think tank the South China Sea Probing Initiative in an June 21 article: "Given that disputes between China and the Philippines in certain parts of the South China Sea in recent years have not been properly resolved, with periodic escalations occurring over the past two years, the likelihood of the two countries resolving their disputes through negotiation or judicial means in the short term appears minimal." What Happens Next Neither China nor the Philippines has signaled any willingness to back down. Tensions remain high, though the intensity of confrontations has eased somewhat since a June 2024 clash that left one sailor injured.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Housing plan could "redline" Des Moines, former Sen. Jack Hatch says
Des Moines' proposed citywide housing strategy faces criticism from several influential affordable-housing advocates. Why it matters: Housing affordability is an increasing concern throughout Iowa. Des Moines' strategy could influence regional development and decide whether low-income families can find homes in the state's largest city or will be pushed out. Catch up quick: Last year, the City Council hired the Maine-based urban planning firm CZB to develop DSM's first citywide housing strategy. The study addresses long-term goals of enhancing neighborhoods and maximizing the millions of dollars the city allocates annually for revitalization. Driving the news: Housing developer Jack Hatch, a former state senator, criticized the plan in a June 2 letter to the council, saying it misrepresents how affordable housing works and could "redline" the city by halting low-income housing projects. He warns that the report misrepresents the city as being overwhelmed with low-income housing and ignores the economic advantages that such projects provide. Zoom in: The recommendations involve redeveloping about 300 blocks of the city through a combination of voluntary acquisitions and demolitions, reducing the areas from being 100% low- and very-low-income to roughly 30-35%. A pause on most low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) projects — one of the country's most common tools for creating affordable housing — could also lead to a more even distribution of housing options across the metro by shifting more low-income projects to suburbs, according to a CZB presentation last month. The intrigue: City Councilperson Josh Mandelbaum also expressed concern in a June 4 op-ed published by Bleeding Heartland, a community blog, saying affordable-housing options would worsen if the report were fully adopted. Councilperson and real estate agent Linda Westergaard accused the report of using "scare tactics" during a February meeting when she questioned the proposal to level a wide swath of the city's older housing. What's next: Public feedback about the proposal is being reviewed, and council members are expected to discuss it during a July 14 work session.
Business of Fashion
2 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
Amazon's Premium Beauty Push May Be a Buffer Against Trump's Tariffs
Amazon's defense against tariffs for its coming Prime Day? Luxury goods. President Donald Trump's tariffs have spurred some Amazon sellers who source products from China and other heavily tariffed countries to bow out of the company's Prime Day, one of its biggest sales events of the year, to protect their margins. Amazon Prime Day is now a four-day shopping event exclusively for Amazon Prime members, taking place this year from July 8 to July 11. The Seattle-based e-commerce company is hoping that recent sales growth in high-margin cosmetics in its Amazon Premium Beauty category will cushion the impact of tariffs on Prime Day sales revenue and consumer sentiment. 'Beauty has become, in the past few years, more of an essential item in consumers' minds,' even in hard financial times, said Anna Mayo, vice president of NielsenIQ's Beauty Vertical unit. Amazon Premium Beauty was initially shunned by luxury cosmetic players who feared the platform would harm their image when it was launched in 2013. But those days are gone. Now, the online retailer is promoting products from top beauty and haircare brands including Estée Lauder's Clinique, Olaplex and L'Oréal's Urban Decay. During last year's Prime Day event, US shoppers spent $14.2 billion, up 11 percent year on year, according to Adobe Analytics. Top cosmetics brands can charge high prices and often do not offer steep discounts on Prime Day compared with electronics, apparel and home goods. This year, Adobe Analytics expects beauty product discounts to have 'milder' discounts of 10 to 17 percent, whereas electronics deals are expected to range from 14 to 22 percent off, said Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights. That, coupled with the ease of shipping small packages of most products, means that Amazon Premium Beauty merchandise has higher margins than other products sold on Prime Day. Amazon 'doesn't make a huge margin in most of the categories of stuff that it sells online,' said Renee Parker, co-founder of consultancy firm Invinci and a former Amazon executive. 'They are making a lot of money on premium beauty products because ... [they're] small and expensive, and you can ship a ton of them.' Vitamins and supplements are successful for similar reasons. Amazon Premium Beauty sales gathered steam after the e-commerce giant began clamping down on counterfeits and top beauty companies needed new ways to reach customers, said Alfonso Emanuele de Leon, a beauty industry veteran and partner at FA Hong Kong Consultancy. Amazon was previously viewed as a pariah by luxury beauty brands because of the cheap merchandise on the website, but is no longer perceived that way, said Emanuele de Leon. 'Huge Acceleration' Sales at Amazon Premium Beauty rose by nearly 20 percent to $15 billion between April 2024 and April 2025, outpacing the 14 percent growth for beauty products outside the specialised e-commerce store, according to NielsenIQ. It also outpaced the year-over-year growth of 5% for online store sales in the first quarter, NielsenIQ said. L'Oréal chief executive Nicolas Hieronimus said during the company's annual meeting in April that having products on Amazon led to a 'huge acceleration' in expanding its US market share. Estée Lauder has launched 11 brands on Amazon's US site since March 2024. More than 75 percent of Estée's finished goods sold in the US originate from the US or Canada and are therefore protected by existing trade agreements, Roberto Canevari, Estée Lauder's global supply chain executive vice president, said at a conference in June. Lauren Gordon, vice president of Amazon at Estée Lauder, said that Prime Day and Amazon's other 'high-traffic shopping moments' give the company a chance to 'attract both new and existing customers.' Melis del Rey, general manager for health and beauty for Amazon US stores, said her team has been 'very proactive' in working with premium brands to determine tariff impacts. 'At a high level, most of the premium brands' sourcing strategies are local, and therefore, the [tariff] impact is less imminent,' del Rey said. Amazon Premium Beauty is an invite-only program for brands shipped and sold by Amazon and third-party sellers. The department has grown to more than 10,000 products, and brands' eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis. Brands like Dyson and Estée Lauder's Aveda pay an extra 15 percent commission to Amazon for every website sale, and the third-party seller approach allows major brands to control pricing and inventory. Adding prestige brands including Unilever's Dermalogica has helped the company compete with beauty retailers Ulta Beauty and Sephora, which is owned by LVMH, and also attract older, higher-income shoppers at a time when TikTok Shop is scooping up younger customers. By Arriana McLymore; Editors: Nick Zieminski and Matthew Lewis Learn more: How Amazon Fits Into the New Beauty Playbook The mega e-commerce player is set to become the biggest beauty retailer in the US, but its complexity and inflexibility is a turn-off for many brands with premium positioning. If they don't bite the bullet, the losses will add up.
