Lalu Prasad Yadav Latest: लालू यादव को High Court से झटका, Land For Job घोटाले में खारिज हुई याचिका
ऐश्वर्या शुक्ला
Authored by: |
Navbharat Times• 31 May 2025, 11:10 pm
Lalu Prasad Yadav Latest: लालू यादव को High Court से झटका, Land For Job घोटाले में खारिज हुई याचिका
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Ambedkar's portrait to find a place in all court halls of Karnataka
A photograph/portrait of the chief architect of the Constitution, B.R. Ambedkar, will be displayed at a prominent and suitable place in all the court halls of the High Court of Karnataka as well as in district judiciary across the State. A notification in this regard was issued by the High Court on June 19. A decision to this effect was taken in the meeting of the full court of the High Court of Karnataka recently after considering representations received from the general public, advocates, forums, and organisations, and the communications issued by the Government of Karnataka from time to time requesting the High Court to display the photograph/portrait of Ambedkar, said the notification.
The Hindu
9 hours ago
- The Hindu
Chief Justice calls for coordination between government offices and legal services authority
Kerala High Court Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar has stressed the need for coordination between government offices and the legal services authority. Delivering the inaugural address at 'Legal Services Summit 2025' organised by the Thiruvananthapuram District Legal Services Authority (TDLSA) here on Saturday, the Chief Justice said the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KELSA) was formed under the Legal Services Authorities Act that was enacted to provide access justice to the most vulnerable sections of society. Each of KELSA's schemes was mirrored in statutory enactments that placed responsibility on government offices to perform the same work as the National Legal Services Authority or KELSA schemes did. The Legal Services Summit was important as it brought together all those working towards a common cause, he said. 'The synergy between legal services authority and statutory authority is not optional; it is a necessity,' the Chief Justice said. Almost all schemes of the legal services authority worked in the same areas as government departments did. For these schemes to succeed, KELSA could not work in isolation. And without proper coordination, even the best schemes could not reach the people who need them the most, he said. Giving the example of Samvada or other schemes to help children in trouble or in need of protection, he said these would find their mirror in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and the Right to Education Act. The Women and Child Development department and the Education department played a major role in this area. Giving many more examples, he underlined that the schemes were well planned and there were strong laws, but what was needed was proper coordination and sharing of information by departments with each other and with the legal services authority so that people were not denied justice that they were desperately seeking for. Justice, he said, could not be delivered in isolation. The promise of access to justice would require multi-pronged action, the Chief Justice said. High Court judge and KeLSA executive chairman A. Muhamed Mustaque and High Court judge Raja Vijayaraghavan V. spoke. Nazeera S, principal district and sessions judge and chairperson of TDLSA presided. S. Shamnad, senior civil judge and secretary of TDLSA, welcomed the gathering. Awards were given away to individuals and institutions for their contributions to legal services. A legal awareness session on 'Gender sensitisation and women-centric laws' and 'Free and competent legal services – an overview' was held as well as an interactive session. A legal awareness play scripted by the TDLSA and the Kerala Police was also staged.
Scroll.in
16 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Calcutta HC restraints Bengal from paying monthly stipend to sacked non-teaching staff
The Calcutta High Court on Friday directed the West Bengal government to stop paying monthly stipends to a group of non-teaching staff who had been sacked after the Supreme Court in April found irregularities in the 2016 recruitment process, Live Law reported. On June 9, Justice Amrita Sinha had reserved the judgement in the matter but had stayed the state government's plan to provide monthly stipends of Rs 20,000 to Rs 25,000 to the persons. In its Friday order, the court reinforced that restriction, prohibiting such payments till at least September 26. Sinha issued the direction on a writ petition challenging the provision of the allowance to the staff whose services had been terminated. The petition was filed by a candidate on the waitlist who was not recruited despite being on the merit list, allegedly due to irregularities in the hiring process. On April 3, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's April 2024 order terminating the appointment of about 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff by West Bengal's School Service Commission. The bench passed the order after observing that the recruitment process was 'vitiated by manipulation and fraud'. The top court on April 17 permitted 'untainted' teachers to be retained until the end of the academic year or until fresh appointments are made, whichever was earlier. However, it did not grant relief to the non-teaching staff, or Group C and Group D employees, whose appointments were also cancelled. In response, the state government had announced in April that the sacked non-teaching staff would receive a monthly allowance until the Supreme Court delivered a verdict on its review petitions. On Friday, the High Court criticised the state for attempting to financially assist individuals whose employment had been declared fraudulent by the Supreme Court and directed 'tainted' candidates to 'refund any salary/payment received', Live Law reported. By introducing a stipend scheme, the state was undermining the Supreme Court's decision, the High Court observed. 'Once the highest court of the land has decided the issue of illegal appointment conclusively and opined that the appointments were result of fraud, no person who was the beneficiary of a fraudulent act of the statutory authority ought to be provided any support, that too, from the public exchequer,' the court said. The court also instructed the state government to submit its counter-affidavit addressing the petitioners' claims within four weeks, and allowed the petitioners two weeks after that to file their response, PTI reported. In April 2024, the High Court had passed its direction on the termination of the appointments based on the findings of a re-evaluation of the Optical Mark Recognition sheets from the 2016 recruitment examination in the case. The re-evaluation found that the selected teachers had been recruited against blank Optical Mark Recognition sheets.
