EU eyes action over Hungary's planned Russian-style law – DW – 05/21/2025
Can the EU rein in the Hungarian government and discourage it once again from pushing through a "transparency law" that critics say amounts to a crackdown on activists and media?
Tens of thousands of Hungarians took to the streets over the weekend after the Hungarian government tabled new legislation to monitor foreign funding for NGOs and media outlets or anyone deemed a threat to what it sees as Hungarian sovereign interest.
The bill is labeled "Transparency of Public Life' and the government says it is aimed at protecting Hungary's sovereignty from outside interference. But activists say it mimics Russia's foreign agent law and would similarly offer the Hungarian government sweeping powers to crack down on the press and critical voices in civil society.
The protests are the latest cry for help from Hungarians looking at the European Union to rein in their government.
Some of the protesters in front of the parliament in the Hungarian capital Budapest held a big flag of the European Union imprinted with the English word HELP.
Hungarians want the EU to notice how their government is violating the EU's values and rein it in. Image: Ferenc Isza/AFP
What is Hungary's new 'transparency law?'
If the draft bill were to turn into law, activists say, the government could control media outlets and NGOs or even dissolve them.
In December 2023, Hungary passed a national law on the "Defence of Sovereignty" and established what it called a Sovereignty Protection Office (SPO) to investigate organizations that use foreign funds to influence voters.
With the new law, that agency will be responsible for investigating all kinds of organizations and authorized to blacklist those who receive foreign funding without prior government approval.
If blacklisted, organizations will also lose access to donations through Hungary's annual 1% income tax contribution scheme, potentially pay a fine of 25 times these funds, and their owners will be made to declare their assets.
Reports suggest that the country's secret services have been authorized to assist SPO in any investigations.
Tineke Strik, Hungary rapporteur of the European Parliament, told DW that Hungary's transparency bill was aimed at "dissolving all organizations, all media outlets, even punishing all individuals, that criticize the government. That is exactly what the Russian law does."
Russia's foreign agent law was adopted in mid-2022, in what human right organizations described as a smear campaign to discredit legitimate Russian civic activism.
"The law expands the definition of foreign agent to a point at which almost any person or entity, regardless of nationality or location, who engages in civic activism or even expresses opinions about Russian policies or officials' conduct could be designated a foreign agent, so long as the authorities claim they are under 'foreign influence,'" the NGO Human Rights Watch said.
DW speaks with Viktor Orban's main rival, Peter Magyar
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hungary's 'transparency' bill 'authoritarian'
Peter Magyar, the leader of Hungary's opposition Tisza party and the only Hungarian politician seen to be a credible challenger to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's 14-year grip on power, also accused the government of adopting Russian-style legislation to strip funding for activists and journalists, including through EU grants. He said it was "copying its master, [Russian President ] Vladimir Putin."
A statement signed by 300 international organizations including the human rights organization Amnesty International described the bill as an "authoritarian attempt to retain power" that "aims to silence all critical voices and to eliminate what remains of Hungarian democracy."
The non-profit group Transparency International said the new bill threatened to "end civil society" and, if passed, would empower the government to "persecute with impunity."
It said the law would apply to EU grants and foreign donations as small as €5 ($5.70), and that "vague language" adopted in the bill left "wide room for political misuse, threatening a broad swath of civil society — including independent media, watchdog organizations, and ordinary citizens engaged in public life."
Last year, Georgia adopted a similar law amidst much uproar at home and in Brussels. The move is suspected to have scuttled the country's chances of joining the EU.
But while Georgia is an EU candidate nation, Hungary is a full-fledged member of the bloc.
Anger in Hungary at Pride ban and restriction of freedoms
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
How can EU ensure Hungary aligns with the bloc's value system?
Zsuzsanna Vegh, a program officer at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, said that theoretically the EU could move ahead with the Article 7 procedure it first initiated in 2018.
The Treaty on the European Union outlines a procedure for addressing serious and persistent breaches of EU values by member states underArticle 7 . It allows for the suspension of certain rights, including voting rights in the Council of the European Union, if a member is determined to be in repeated violations of the EU's fundamental principles, such as weakening rule of law, democracy and freedoms.
"The EU could declare that there is indeed systematic violation of democracy and rule of law in Hungary and suspend its voting rights" in the Council of the European Union, where the bloc debates and decides its policies, Vegh said.
"But that is still a political decision and it is unlikely."
In April, Hungarians protested against a government decision to ban gay pride marches. Image: Peter Kohalmi/AFP/Getty Images
Some European parliamentarians have advocated that the EU slash Hungary's funding to force it to reduce corruption that has an adverse impact on the EU's financial interests. But experts say the same method could also be effective in encouraging Hungary to stick to the EU's value system.
"We urge the European Commission to increase pressure on Viktor Orban's government to cease violating EU values and EU Laws by immediately suspending all EU funding for Hungary in line with the applicable legislation to protect the Union's financial interest," more than two dozen EU parliamentarians wrote in a letter to the European Commission on May 20.
Vegh said that while some funds for Hungary had already been cut there was no precedent of the EU cutting all funding marked for a member state.
However, Teona Lavrelashvili, a visiting fellow with the Wilfried Martens Center in Brussels, said this could be done.
"Yes, the European Union can suspend funds to Hungary if its new transparency bill — or any law — undermines the rule of law or threatens the EU's financial interests. This power comes from the Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism."
She contended that a law that weakens civil society also undermines the EU's overall economic interests.
Some experts argue that the EU could suspend Hungary's voting rights to teach it a lesson and make it align with the EU's value system, but that is still seen as a step too far. Image: Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP Photo/picture alliance
What can the EU do next?
The EU also has other options that it can resort to before cutting funds intended to aid economic development in Hungary and thus to benefit the general population.
Back in 2017, it managed to dissuade Hungary from introducing a similar transparency law by initiating an infringement procedure, a multilayered process through which the EU expressed its displeasure to Hungary. Upon no change in Budapest's attitudes, Brussels eventually took Hungary to the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU)
The court concluded that Hungary had "introduced discriminatory and unjustified restrictions on foreign donations to civil society organizations."
Since the new bill was tabled last week, the EU has refrained from scolding Hungary and merely said it is waiting to see whether it is enacted into law.
Vegh believes another infringement procedure is the EU's likely next step.
But the fact that Hungary is trying to push through the law again, may require the EU to change its approach and take a more stern stand.
Edited by: A. Thomas
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Belarus: Jailed opposition leader Tsikhanouski released – DW – 06/21/2025
Siarhei Tsikhanouski was jailed by the authoritarian regime of Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko in 2020 after challenging him in an election. The release coincided with a visit by a US special envoy. Belarus' newspaper on Saturday reported that opposition leader Siarhei Tsikhanouski had been released from prison, where he had been incarcerated since 2020. Tsikhanouski, one of the leaders the country's opposition movement, was pardoned, according to rights group Viasna. A regime-critical blogger, Siarhei Tsikhanouski intended to challenge Alexander Lukashenko for the presidency but he was locked up by the strongman before the election. Tsikhanouski's wife, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who ran against Lukashenko in her husband's place and has played a leading role in the Belarus opposition since, released a video of his release on Saturday, thanking the US for its efforts. Tsikhanouski's release coincided with a rare high-level visit to the country by US Special Envoy for Ukraine, General Keith Kellogg. Kellogg was in Minsk for talks with Lukashenko, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, in an effort to facilitate an end to Moscow's ongoing war of aggression in Ukraine. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by Sean Sinico
DW
9 hours ago
- DW
What's next for Ukrainians returning from Russian prisons? – DW – 06/20/2025
Humiliation, subjugation, torture — Ukrainian prisoners of war often recount degrading treatment and other horrors. What they choose to do after returning home from Russia varies widely. When Yuriy Hulchuk returned to Ukraine after two and a half years of Russian captivity, he seemed strangely emotionless. A video on social media shows his mother hugging him upon his return, but he doesn't react. Days later, he spoke about the torture he suffered while a prisoner of war. Hulchuk, 23, was born and raised in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv. He studied foreign languages and although he didn't graduate, he was an exchange student in Hungary and Germany and also traveled throughout Europe and China. When he couldn't find any work, he enlisted in the Ukrainian army in December 2021 to make ends meet. That's how Hulchuk ended up in the 36th Brigade of the Ukrainian Marine Corps, fighting in the Ukrainian city of Mariupol when the full-scale Russian invasion of his country began in 2022. In April 2022, Hulchuk was captured by Russian forces and spent the next two and a half years in prison, including in the village of Olenivka in Donetsk, in the Russian-occupied part of eastern Ukraine. The Olenivka prison colony has been described as a "concentration camp" because of the conditions there. In July 2022, over 50 Ukrainian prisoners of war held in Olenivka were killed in an explosion that ripped through the barracks. Ukraine and Russia blamed each other for the incident. An analysis by the United Nations found Russia was likely at fault. Hulchuk was also held in western Russia in Ryazan, as well as in Mordovia, a Russian republic. He returned home in September 2024 a prisoner exchange, To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Another Ukrainian man, Vlad Zadorin, 26, has also spoken of systematic torture in Russian prisons. Zadorin joined the Ukrainian military in 2019 and served in the 35th Brigade of the Ukrainian Marine Corps. At the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion he was stationed on Snake Island in the Black Sea, where he was captured by the Russian navy. Almost two years later, in January 2024, he too returned home as part of a prisoner exchange. Despite both men reporting similar experiences, today Zadorin and Hulchuk have very different attitudes towards those who tormented them. "I've been advised to publish the full name and address of the employee of the secret IK-10 [Russian prisons are numbered and start with IK] camp in Mordovia," Hulchuk said. "He's a medic there, a cruel man who likes to use electric shocks. There are guys there not afraid of beating you, with hands, feet, a pipe or a wet rag." Hulchuk said dogs were also used to torture prisoners and that electric shocks were administered to prisoners' genitals. Still, he said he does not want to reveal the name of the man who tortured him. "To me, what he did was just part of all the evil things that were done to me," he said. "If I were to take revenge on the Russians who treated me so badly in captivity, then I'd also have to take revenge on Ukrainians who treated me badly." It's easier to forget and to look ahead, he said. Zadorin has a different opinion. "I hate the Russians deeply because they inflicted so much pain and humiliation on us," he said. He dropped to almost half of his original weight of 120 kilograms (265 pounds). When he came out of prison, he weighed just 60 kilograms. "I had to eat mice, toilet paper and soap," he said. Zadorin recounted severe physical violence in prison, like being hit over the head with bottles. "And I'm supposed to love them and consider them brothers?," he asked. "They came to kill me and my family without us ever having done anything to them." Zadorin said he could identify every one of his torturers. "Sooner or later, everyone involved in such war crimes will be punished," he insisted. "That's already happening in some cases." Both Hulchuk and Zadorin said they received generous payouts from the Ukrainian state to compensate them for their time in captivity. Funds were transferred to Hulchuk's parents' bank account the whole time he was in prison and he used the money to buy an apartment in Kyiv. Returned prisoners can receive a disability pension due to suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD. Almost every returned prisoner of war is diagnosed with it and, as Zadorin pointed out, imprisonment can now be grounds for a disability pension. He plans to get a disability certificate soon. Hulchuk plans to take another route. "Being classified as disabled also has disadvantages," he said. "For example, it's hard to find a job — even though you get aid payments. I've never thought about taking up this option because it's important to me that I don't see myself as an invalid. I say to myself, 'I'm healthy.'" Both Hulchuk and Zadorin said that after they returned, they were free to decide if they wanted to return to military service. "The superiors are relaxed about it and ask if you want to resign or not," said Zadorin, who terminated his contract with the army. "It was left up to me if I wanted to continue to serve or if I wanted to leave the armed forces," Hulchuk confirmed. "I decided to leave because I've served enough. It was the only real option for me. And as far as I know, a lot of the returned prisoners leave the army too. Only a few stay in." Since he departed from the military, Hulchuk hasn't had a fixed job. He works part-time as an English teacher. He is also learning German, taking singing lessons and going to the gym. "I just want to live quietly this year, to recover physically and mentally," he said. "Then I want to go to Germany, study there and find a job." "You don't want unmotivated men on the front lines — they'll get killed themselves and will cause those around them to be killed," Zadorin explained. "That's dangerous." Zadorin said he sees himself as working on a digital front line these days. After the end of his military contract, he settled in Odesa and now works for Break The Fake, an organization that fights Russian disinformation. Zadorin also regularly discusses his experiences in the media and at events around Europe. He said Russian authorities don't accurately classify all the Ukrainians they capture as prisoners of war. Some Ukrainian soldiers are listed as killed or missing in action. Zadorin said he believes there are more Ukrainians held in Russian prisons than publicly stated numbers would suggest. There are over 250 locations in Russia where they're being held, Zadorin said, adding that he was in seven himself. "Some have conditions that are normal prison conditions, where detainees are beaten less and possibly get enough to eat, " he recounted, adding that the conditions at each site also determine whether a Ukrainian prisoner returns home as a "normal person."
DW
a day ago
- DW
Putin says 'all of Ukraine is ours' as he eyes Sumy city – DW – 06/20/2025
Russian President Vladimir Putin has revived a controversial narrative, claiming that theoretically "all of Ukraine is ours." He also sparked more immediate concerns with comments about seizing Ukraine's city of Sumy. Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared that Russians and Ukrainians are "one people" and that, in that sense, "all of Ukraine is ours." The assertion underscores Moscow's continued underlying rejection of Ukrainian sovereignty and raises renewed alarm over Russia's territorial ambitions. Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on Friday, Putin issued a series of provocative remarks, notably stating: "We have a saying… where the foot of a Russian soldier steps, that is ours." He was responding to a question about Russia's objectives for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, launched in February 2022. The Russian leader emphasized that while Russia "never doubted" Ukraine's sovereignty after its 1991 independence, it had declared itself a neutral state — a stance he accused Ukraine of having abandoned. Reiterating a longstanding narrative, he said Russians and Ukrainians were essentially the same nation — a position Kyiv and its Western allies categorically reject. "I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian peoples to be one people. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours," Putin said. Ukraine said Putin's comments showed his "disdain" for the peace process. "Putin's cynical statements demonstrate complete disdain for US peace efforts," Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga said in a post on X. "The only way to force Russia into peace is to deprive it of its sense of impunity." Among the key developments, Putin said he did not "rule out" the capture of the northeastern Ukrainian city of Sumy, which lies roughly 30 kilometers (just over 18 miles) from the Russian border. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "We have no objective to take Sumy but, in principle, I do not rule it out," he said, accusing Ukrainian forces of persistently shelling Russian border areas. He added that Russian troops had already penetrated up to 12 kilometers into Ukrainian territory in the Sumy region to create what he called a protective "buffer zone." Sumy, though not among the five Ukrainian regions Moscow claims to have annexed — Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, and Crimea — has been a frequent target of Russian attacks. It also served as a launching point for a Ukrainian counteroffensive into Russia's western Kursk region last August, during which Kyiv's forces briefly captured dozens of settlements before being pushed back by Russian troops — bolstered by thousands of North Korean soldiers, according to reports. Putin's remarks come amid growing skepticism over the viability of peace negotiations, with Moscow continuing to demand further Ukrainian territorial concessions as a precondition for any ceasefire.
