
Nuvama cuts target price for Mahanagar Gas (MGL) after analyst meet; Here's why
By Markets Desk Published on June 8, 2025, 20:43 IST
Nuvama Institutional Equities has cut its target price on Mahanagar Gas Ltd (MGL) to ₹1,224 (from ₹1,305 earlier), while retaining its Reduce rating, citing concerns over deterioration in sourcing mix, potential margin pressure, and policy uncertainties in the City Gas Distribution (CGD) sector.
Following its recent analyst interaction with MGL management, Nuvama said that while healthy volume growth momentum is likely to continue in the near term, structural headwinds remain.
Volume growth to remain strong
MGL's management expects double-digit volume growth to sustain, driven by several initiatives: Ongoing expansion of gas infrastructure — targeting addition of 180 km of steel pipelines and 250 new CNG stations by 2030
Marketing incentives for CNG — where MGL is partly covering the capital cost of vehicle conversion to CNG
Offering a 10 percent discount to fuel oil prices for new PNG industrial customers for three years
CNG price competitiveness — with CNG currently 47 percent cheaper than petrol and 12 percent cheaper than diesel, leaving headroom to cut prices if needed
Gradual pickup in LNG fuelling for long-haul trucks, as capital costs decline over time.
In addition, MGL sees further potential upside from: The merger of fast-growing UEPL
Greater utilisation of exclusive CNG fuelling infrastructure for BEST buses
Possible regulatory tailwinds if ICE vehicle phase-out recommendations in Mumbai Metropolitan Region are implemented
Development boost from the ramp-up of Navi Mumbai airport.
Rising sourcing costs to weigh on margins
However, Nuvama cautions that MGL's gas sourcing mix is deteriorating faster than expected: The share of Administered Pricing Mechanism (APM) gas is declining, as more gas gets reclassified under New Well Gas (NWG), which is priced at a 20 percent premium.
The shift, previously occurring at 7–8 percent annually, is now expected to accelerate to 10–12 percent per year.
As a result, input gas costs will rise, putting pressure on margins.
Industry-wide, Nuvama expects greater consolidation as lower profitability forces smaller or non-core players to divest CGD assets. MGL, with its net cash balance sheet, is open to inorganic growth opportunities if valuations are attractive.
Valuation de-rating risk due to policy overhang
Nuvama further notes that policy uncertainty and ad-hoc government interventions could lead to valuation de-rating across the CGD sector, similar to the trend seen in Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs), which trade at a significant discount.
As a result of these headwinds, Nuvama has cut its FY26–27 EBITDA estimates for MGL by 2 percent and lowered its target price to ₹1,224.
'We retain our Reduce rating, as the sector faces margin headwinds, input cost pressures, and policy-related uncertainties,' the brokerage said.
Disclaimer: The views and target prices mentioned in this article are as stated by Nuvama Institutional Equities. They do not represent the opinions or recommendations of this publication. Readers are advised to consult their financial advisors before making any investment decisions.
Markets Desk at BusinessUpturn.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Hormuz On A Knife‑Edge: Qatar's LNG Warning Sends Insurance And Freight Costs Exploding
Qatar's Energy Minister and CEO of QatarEnergy Saad Sherida al-Kaabi speaks during a press ... More conference in Doha on September 1, 2024. (Photo by KARIM JAAFAR / AFP) (Photo by KARIM JAAFAR/AFP via Getty Images) Fresh alarm. In a 20 June Reuters exclusive, Doha confirmed that it hauled ExxonMobil, Shell and TotalEnergies into a closed-door meeting two days earlier, warning that one stray missile in the Strait of Hormuz could instantly wipe out one-fifth of global LNG supply. Asian spot prices obeyed the signal—jumping 11 percent to $14/mmBtu before London markets had fully digested the headline. One narrow waterway still moves the world. Hormuz pinches to 21 nautical miles at its choke and carries roughly 20 million barrels of oil—about one-fifth of global seaborne supply—plus a similar share of LNG every day. Close the channel and power stations from Houston to Hong Kong scramble for fuel while tanker queues lengthen by thousands of nautical miles. Chokepoint concentration. The International Energy Agency calculates that only about 6.5 million barrels a day can shift quickly to Fujairah, SUMED or inventories; the balance simply waits. Price-shock amplitude. Additional-war-risk premiums (AWRP) on very-large crude carriers have rocketed from 0.05 percent to 0.25 percent of hull value—roughly a US $225 000 surcharge on each $90 million ship—and forward Brent markets now build in triple-digit scenarios for any prolonged disruption. Policy bandwidth. True spare capacity inside OPEC clocks in near three million barrels a day and sits inside the same blast zone, leaving diplomacy—so far untested in open conflict—to carry most of the burden. Backup pipes replace only a sliver. Saudi Arabia's East-West line and the UAE's Habshan–Fujairah bypass together provide about 2.6 million barrels a day of spare capacity, barely one-eighth of normal Hormuz throughput. Even a coordinated drawdown of strategic storage could not keep two-thirds of Gulf exports moving if the strait closed for a week. Insurance costs shout before oil charts whisper. Since 13 June, tanker underwriters have priced the region as an active war zone. A five-fold jump in AWRP lands before a single barrel is lifted, signalling risk faster than futures curves can. For a refiner, those premiums flow straight into delivered crude costs within days. Freight rates leap in lock-step. Gulf-to-Asia VLCC rates hit $2.14 per barrel on 17 June—60 percent higher in just five days—and charterers now fix ships day-to-day rather than locking in multi-month contracts. The volatility premium migrates down the supply chain, raising break-even prices for refiners, airlines and petrochemicals alike. Qatar's tankers loiter outside the Gulf. QatarEnergy has instructed LNG carriers to remain east of Hormuz until the day before loading. AIS data confirm a multi-year low in Persian-Gulf-bound empty tankers—evidence of growing caution even as contractual volumes continue to flow. Spare capacity sits where missiles can reach it. RBC Capital Markets pegs genuine OPEC spare capacity at roughly three million barrels per day, nearly all within Hormuz's threat ring. Every new headline—whether a cease-fire whisper or another drone strike—moves Brent and insurance quotes long before drilling rigs or pipelines can respond. Economic ripples extend well beyond crude. Higher tanker premiums bleed into LNG freight, lifting electricity costs that keep AI data centres humming. European refiners, already paying roughly €70 per tonne of CO₂, see margins flip negative once reroute costs stack up; Asian importers instead burn through stockpiles that last weeks, not months. Insurance leverage unseen since the late 1980s now shows up in airline ticket prices and industrial power bills. Numbers translate geopolitics into P&L. U.S. energy-agency models suggest each $10 oil shock trims about one-tenth of a percentage point from U.S. GDP. BloombergNEF freight curves add another $1.60 per barrel for a Cape of Good Hope detour plus $0.80 in bunker fuel. War-risk elasticity studies show that 70 percent of an insurance premium embeds into headline freight within a fortnight—effectively turning geopolitical anxiety into everyday costs at the pump. Strategic takeaway remains uncomplicated. Boards cannot micromanage every contingency, but they can widen risk limits, diversify shipping lanes and co-fund a GCC–EU 'Hormuz Alternative Route Task-Force.' The planning bill is trivial next to today's $225 000 voyage surcharge. In the absence of bold collective action, every forward-freight contract will continue to price a toll for geopolitical complacency. Better to pre-empt that charge than pay it in arrears.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
LNG exports to primarily drive North America's gas processing capacity additions by 2030
Natural gas processing in North America is experiencing a significant surge, driven by a confluence of factors including growing LNG (liquefied natural gas) exports, increased domestic demand and a strategic pivot towards cleaner energy sources. As the region capitalises on its abundant natural gas reserves to meet growing LNG demand, a significant increase in LNG liquefaction capacity is anticipated, particularly from the US and Canada, which will require corresponding increases in liquefaction and processing facilities. To meet the projected demand, new liquefaction plants and associated infrastructure are being developed in North America, leading to increased gas processing capacity. The US is a major player in this expansion, with plans to significantly increase its LNG export capacity. Growth will necessitate more gas processing infrastructure to handle the increased volume of natural gas being liquefied for export. Prudhoe Bay II is a major upcoming gas processing plant, with substantial capacity additions of 3.9 billion cubic feet per day (bcfd) during the outlook period. Alaska Gasline Development Corp is the operator as well as equity owner of this planned sweetening-type plant, which is set to become operational in 2030. Canada stands second, accounting for 1.3 bcfd of capacity additions by 2030. Arcres Attachie 05-20-084-24 002, Kobes Phase 1 and Kobes Phase 2 are some of the major gas processing plants with significant capacity additions by 2030. Mexico accounts for the remaining gas processing capacity additions in the region, with Papan Expansion accounting for all of the 150 mmcfd capacity addition by 2030. Coastoil Dynamic SA de CV is the operator of the planned fractionation plant, while Coastal Contracts Bhd and Nuvoil SA de CV hold 50% equity each in the plant, which will commence operations in 2025. Further details of global gas processing capacity and capital expenditure analysis can be found in GlobalData's new report, 'Gas Processing Industry Outlook by Capacity and Capital Expenditure with Details of All Operating and Planned Processing Plants to 2030.' "LNG exports to primarily drive North America's gas processing capacity additions by 2030" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio


Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Japan Boosts Effort to Curb Methane Leaks From LNG Supply Chains
Japan is strengthening efforts to curtail methane emissions from liquefied natural gas as it sticks with a fossil fuel that's accelerating climate change. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said it will collaborate with the United Nations' Oil and Gas Methane Partnership 2.0 program and MiQ, a methane certification non-profit, to verify emissions from LNG imports into Japan.