logo
Experts link teen vaping to depression and suicide risk

Experts link teen vaping to depression and suicide risk

News2430-04-2025

Living young, wild and free doesn't have to cost you your health.
While often perceived as harmless because it is less dangerous than tobacco, the truth is that vaping is even more addictive, and its health implications are just as serious as those of cigarettes.
Vaping is rising at an alarming rate among South African teenagers, putting them at risk of addiction and harm to their developing brains and mental health.
In a survey conducted in 52 high schools across South Africa, 17.82% of the learners between grades 8 and 12 reported currently using vaping products with 47% vaping within the first hour of waking, suggesting high nicotine addiction. In addition to this 36.7% reported having tried vaping previously.
Research shows that nicotine in vapes can severely impair the developing teenage brain, leading to cognitive difficulties, mental health issues like depression and anxiety, and increased risks of violence, substance use, and suicidal thoughts.
According to a South African study, at least a quarter of South African Grade 12 learners admit to vaping regularly, both as a social activity and stress-coping mechanism, and usage filters down through all high school grades to primary school learners.
While teenagers are well-attuned to the health and addiction risks of conventional cigarettes, the real risks of vaping are obscured by funky flavours and packaging, aggressively youth-targeted marketing and misconceptions about safety, warns member of the South African Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP), Dr Nokuthula Mdaka.
Read more | Missed your child maintenance? Here's how it will affect your credit access
'The brain is still developing up until the age of about 25. The adolescent brain is particularly susceptible to nicotine, which not only 'primes' the brain for addiction but also harms the areas of the brain involved in attention and learning, mood regulation and impulse control.'
Dr Mdaka added that concerns about the rise and potential harm of vaping amongst teenagers extends to 'non-nicotine' vapes – as they are similarly habit-forming with potential to lead to other substance use, mental health issues, and they carry similar physical health risks from the chemical components over and above nicotine.
The link between vaping and mental health is 'bi-directional.' Teens with mental health issues may use vaping to cope, which can worsen conditions like depression and anxiety.
'There is substantial published evidence that teenagers with existing depression or depressive symptoms are more likely to begin vaping, while the incidence of depression, considering suicide and suicide attempts are higher in teenagers that do vape, than in those who don't.
'That half of vape shops in South Africa are within a 5 km radius of a tertiary education institution campus comes as no surprise."
'The danger in the ready availability of vaping products is that young people are being exposed to the harmful effects of nicotine and showing signs of addiction at increasingly earlier ages."
A further concern arises from a local study that found a link between vaping and poor nutrition in young people aged 18-34, with half of vape users consuming unhealthy foods, as well as having lower fruit and vegetable intake than non-smokers and non-vapers. The main factors were money spent on vapes rather than on healthy food, and perceptions that vaping could assist in weight loss.
While vaping is promoted as a means to stop conventional cigarette smoking, Dr Mdaka said the evidence was unconvincing, and could lead to individuals smoking more as vaping appears to be more socially acceptable.
She pointed to the 2022 South African E-Cigarette Survey, which found that one in five (19%) users with no previous smoking history started smoking conventional cigarettes only after using e-cigarettes, while only one in eight (13%) quit conventional smoking after taking up e-cigarettes.
Read more | The key to success after school is starting preparations as early as Grade 9
According to the Tobacco Data Control Initiative, which led the survey, vapes, e-cigarettes and similar products pose health risks to both users and those exposed to the 'second-hand' aerosol emissions, whether they contain nicotine or are nicotine-free. The products have been shown to contain toxicants, carcinogens and flavouring chemicals which can affect the eyes, cause allergic reactions, contribute to fatigue and depression, and affect the respiratory, digestive and central nervous systems.
While marketers of vaping products claim that the aerosol emitted is 'nothing more than water vapour', studies have shown that the particles delivered by vapes are similar to those of cigarettes, and that they reach deep into the lungs and cross into the circulatory system.
Vaping products also contain more than 20 harmful and potentially harmful chemicals at significantly higher levels than in conventional cigarettes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rethinking screen time: Are we modelling healthy habits for our kids?
Rethinking screen time: Are we modelling healthy habits for our kids?

News24

time18 hours ago

  • News24

Rethinking screen time: Are we modelling healthy habits for our kids?

Noel Hendrickson, Getty Images South Africans rank among the highest in global screen time usage, with adults averaging nearly 10 hours daily on devices, raising concerns about the impact on children observing these habits. Experts warn of the mental, emotional, and physical risks excessive screen time poses, from anxiety to poor academic performance. By making small lifestyle changes, such as having device-free family time and using built-in screen-time tools, parents can lead by example and promote a healthier, more balanced approach to technology. South Africa has earned a dubious distinction: its citizens spend more time glued to screens than most other nations. With the average South African adult devoting a staggering nine hours and 37 minutes daily to smartphones, nearly a third of their waking hours, it's clear we're in the grip of a digital addiction. But as parents scroll through social media (which alone consumes 22% of daily usage), what lessons are we teaching our children about healthy technology use? The disturbing cost of screen obsession The SA Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) warns that our screen addiction is fuelling a mental health crisis among young people. The statistics paint a troubling picture: - Adolescents spending more than five hours daily on devices are 70% more likely to have suicidal thoughts than those with less than an hour of screen time. - Even moderate use (four to six hours) increases risks of anxiety and depression compared to peers with just two hours less exposure. - Studies across 14 countries found cellphones consistently disrupt learning - with notifications alone requiring up to 20 minutes for children to refocus. Psychiatrist Professor Renata Schoeman explains the ripple effects: Excessive screen time links to depression, anxiety, poor sleep, declining academic performance, social withdrawal, and exposure to harmful content like cyberbullying or eating disorder promotion. Physical consequences include obesity, eye strain, and poor posture. Parents' confessions: Holding a mirror to our habits Before reading SASOP's findings, I started to think about what my phone usage looks like to my four-year-old after she chastised her father for always being on his phone. After reading SASOP's warning, I wondered about my own usage stats. According to the dashboard in my device's Digital Wellbeing and Parental Controls centre, I spend four to five hours on my phone daily. Screenshot Screenshot Screenshot I contacted other South African parents about their screen habits for this piece. Here's what they shared: Khaya (8h25m): Acknowledges work demands that necessitate usage but vows to be more present. Tinashe (eight to 10 hours): Admits his daughter associates him with his computer. Marilynn (5h45m): Calls her usage 'excessive' and feels guilty. Iavan (5h50m): Justifies nighttime scrolling as 'downtime'. Lerato (7h40m): Shares devices with kids watching YouTube. Hein (10h20m): Acknowledges that his screen time doesn't set a healthy example. Their honesty reminds me of an uncomfortable truth: children learn by observation. 'I don't think it's the healthiest example because my daughter associates me with my computer a lot, however I do try and manage her screen time and encourage breaks for outdoor time or other activities. Sometimes I'll switch everything off and leave music in the background,' says Tinashe. Lerato's screen time. As Schoeman notes: 'We cannot expect children to moderate screen time when they see adults constantly glued to phones.' Practical tools for change The solution isn't shaming ourselves and others or abandoning screens but finding balance. Both Apple and Android devices offer built-in tools: - Screen Time Tracking (iOS/Android): Shows daily/weekly usage per app. - App Limits: Set daily caps on usage for specific apps. - Downtime/Focus Mode: Blocks non-essential apps during set hours. - Bedtime Mode: Silences notifications and grays out screens. - Do Not Disturb: Pauses alerts during family time or work. Schoeman also recommends: - No screens under age two; less than one hour for ages two to five; less than two hours for older kids. - Device-free meals and bedrooms. - Modelling breaks and offline activities. - Overnight device custody for teens. Small changes, big impact As Lerato discovered, simple swaps, like outdoor chores with kids, can reshape family habits. Reflecting on her goals, Marilynn says: 'Ideally, I'd like to take that number down to two hours or so. With all the research around the negative impacts of increased screen time, I feel quite guilty that I'm not setting a better example and do hope to do better.' 'Children don't need perfection,' reminds Schoeman, 'they need consistency.' Putting phones away at dinner or disabling notifications during homework sends powerful messages. With South Africa's screen stats among the world's highest, I find it ironic that we must not forget that our children are watching (us). The question of what our solution to the crisis highlighted by SASOP isn't just about their screen time but ours, too. As the parents, we spoke to demonstrate that awareness is the first step toward change. What will your screen time teach your child today? - To check your screen time on an Android device, open your settings and scroll to Digital Wellbeing and Parental Controls or a similar setting. You can find your screen time report on an Apple device in your control centre.

Is your child's screen time creating a mental health problem? Experts weigh in
Is your child's screen time creating a mental health problem? Experts weigh in

News24

time3 days ago

  • News24

Is your child's screen time creating a mental health problem? Experts weigh in

In a country where adults spend nearly a third of their waking hours scrolling through smartphones, South African children are silently suffering the consequences of our collective screen addiction. The South African Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) is sounding the alarm on what has become a genuine mental health crisis among the nation's youth. The concern has grown so widespread that 'brain-rot'—the term describing the impact of consuming excessive low-quality online content—was recently crowned Oxford Dictionary's Word of the Year. For South African families, this isn't just a clever phrase but a daily reality with serious implications. The numbers tell a troubling story Research reveals a direct connection between screen time and mental well-being. Adolescents spending more than five hours daily on digital devices are 70% more likely to experience suicidal thoughts or actions compared to those with less than an hour of daily screen time. Even moderate usage (4-6 hours daily) significantly increases symptoms of anxiety and depression. South African adults are setting a problematic example, averaging 9 hours and 37 minutes daily on smartphones. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok consume more than 22% of this time. 'If we as adults are addicted, how can they not be?' questions Prof. Renata Schoeman, psychiatrist and SASOP member. 'We cannot expect children to moderate their screen time when they see adults constantly glued to their phones. Children learn by observing. If we don't model healthy digital behaviour, we are silently endorsing screen addiction.' Read more | 3 reasons why you should trade screen-time for cuddles with your little one Beyond mental health: The full impact The consequences extend beyond mental health concerns. Studies across 14 countries found that mobile phones consistently distract students from learning. Even having a phone nearby with notifications interrupts concentration, and once distracted, children may need up to 20 minutes to refocus. Professor Schoeman outlines several specific mental health impacts linked to excessive screen use: Increased risk of depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem Disrupted sleep, especially when screens are used before bedtime Declining academic performance due to concentration issues and reduced motivation Social withdrawal as digital interactions replace face-to-face connections Exposure to harmful content including cyber-bullying and messages promoting disordered eating Physical health also suffers, with screen-addicted children experiencing higher rates of obesity, headaches, eye strain, and poor posture. Finding balance in a digital world Despite these concerns, SASOP isn't advocating for complete digital abstinence. 'It's not about banning screens, it's about balance,' explains Prof. Schoeman. 'There's a big difference between a family movie night and hours of unmonitored scrolling or gaming. The key is to be mindful, involved and consistent.' Read more | Boys in Crisis | A look behind why boy children are 'left' behind in society For parents seeking guidance, Prof. Schoeman offers practical recommendations: Age-appropriate limits: no screens for children under 2 years; maximum 1 hour for ages 2-5; ideally no more than 2 hours daily for older children Prioritise offline activities, particularly outdoors, to support overall wellbeing Model responsible habits by taking breaks and switching off devices during meals and before bedtime Establish device-free zones and times, especially during family meals Take overnight custody of children's devices to ensure proper sleep 'Children don't need perfection from their parents, they need consistency,' Prof. Schoeman emphasises. 'Small, daily changes like putting your phone away at dinner sends a powerful message. And right now, our children need that message more than ever.' In a nation where digital devices have become extensions of ourselves, the most valuable gift we can offer the next generation might be teaching them when—and how—to disconnect.

US aid cuts threaten South Africa's status as powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research
US aid cuts threaten South Africa's status as powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research

Yahoo

time10-06-2025

  • Yahoo

US aid cuts threaten South Africa's status as powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research

South Africa risks losing its status as a powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research as sweeping American funding cuts jeopardise dozens of experimental trials. At least 27 HIV trials and another 20 TB trials in the country have been put at risk by Donald Trump's deep cuts to foreign assistance and global health spending, new analysis shows. Loss of the trials would hit research projects looking for new vaccines into both infections, as well as new long-lasting protective medicines and studies into the best way to treat children. Having intense HIV and TB epidemics as well as world class universities and research institutes has made South Africa a leader in combating the two diseases. Yet while the research has often been led by South African scientists, it has overwhelmingly been conducted with international funding, particularly with 20 years of generous United States government aid spending. Prof Salim Abdool Karim, director of the Centre for the Aids Program of Research in South Africa, said: 'The US is such a big player in our country – South Africa is a powerhouse in medical research because of what the US spends.' The bulk of funding for research came from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the country receiving an estimated £111m ($150m) each year. Prof Ntobeko Ntusi, the president and chief executive of the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), said earlier this year: 'In many ways the South African health research landscape has been a victim of its own success, because for decades we have been the largest recipients of both [official development assistance] funding from the US for research [and] also the largest recipients of NIH funding outside of the US.' Now, unless alternative sources of money can be found, South African academic and research institutes could lose about 30 per cent of their annual income and may be forced to lay off hundreds of staff, the analysis found. 'There's been a huge dependence on US funding. The loss of it for South Africa means the cancellation of a huge amount of research,' said Tom Ellman, director of the MSF's Southern Africa Medical Unit (SAMU). The joint analysis by Treatment Action Group (TAG) and Doctors Without Borders (MSF) of NIH-funded research found 39 TB and HIV clinical research sites are under threat, placing at least 27 HIV trials and 20 TB trials at risk. The effect of cuts could be wider still, with research also funded through other US channels, including the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar), which has been slashed by Donald Trump's administration. Lindsay McKenna, TB project co-director of TAG said: 'Public funding from the US government to South Africa is the scaffold on which pharmaceutical companies, philanthropies, and other governments invest in transformative TB and HIV science.' 'These ongoing funding disruptions by the US government don't just affect US-funded research projects, they put in peril a much wider ecosystem of global research.' Dr Ellman said a combination of the infections found in South Africa, its research base and its strong grass roots activism had combined, with US funding, to make the country so prominent in research. He said: 'For years, South Africa has spearheaded the research and development of critical innovative medical tools for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care of HIV and TB which have saved lives not just within South Africa's borders, but also in communities worldwide.' The country has more HIV patients than any other, with an estimated 8 million currently infected and 105,000 deaths annually. The high prevalence of HIV goes hand-in-hand with a high prevalence of tuberculosis, because TB takes advantage of patients' weakened immune systems. Tuberculosis is the biggest cause of death among those with HIV in South Africa, which recorded 54,000 TB deaths in 2023. At the same time, the country has strong research institutions and universities, and a history of medical innovation, including conducting the first heart transplant in 1969. Finally, the history of the apartheid struggle, and later the fight in the early 2000s to get antiretroviral drugs in the face of government AIDS denialism, has produced well-organised and politically-engaged health activists. According to the joint analysis, HIV trials now at risk include studies into using broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) to find a cure, and also trials into long-lasting anti-HIV preventative jabs. The Brilliant Consortium, a collaboration of African researchers led by the SAMRC working to develop an HIV vaccine, lost all funding even as it was about to begin an early stage vaccine trial. Dr Ellman said: 'I think it would be a disaster if we gave up on the hope of finding an effective vaccine for HIV. All of that has been done with South Africa and without access to South African research and communities, it's not going to be possible.' The emergence of some resistance to antiretroviral drugs has also highlighted the importance of trials to find new drugs which can deal with the phenomenon. HIV trials are also looking at honing and improving existing treatment regimes, as well as simplifying and rolling out expensive techniques first used in the developing world. TB trials at risk include studies for new drugs and shorter, safer regimens for treatment and prevention. The cuts have a ripple effect beyond individual trials, because they also weaken research infrastructure which is used and relied on by other funders. That could have a knock-on effect on trials looking at new TB jab possibilities, including the promising new M72/AS01E vaccine candidate. South Africa is now scrabbling for alternative sources of funding to try to salvage as many of the research projects as possible. Dr Ellman said: 'We call on all potential donors to step up, as without sustained investment, we will never end these deadly epidemics.' Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store