Man Who Killed 6 in Sydney Mall Stabbing Was 'Not Psychotic,' Likely Acted Out of 'Hatred for Women,' Ex-Doctor Testifies
Joel Cauchi, the man who fatally stabbed six people in a Sydney mall on April 13, 2024, carried out the attack due to his "hatred towards women,' his former doctor has reportedly testified in court
'That was nothing to do with psychosis. He couldn't have organized himself to do what he did. I think it might have been due to his frustrations, sexual frustration, pornography and hatred towards women," the doctor reportedly told an inquest on Tuesday, May 13
The suggestion goes against evidence from other psychiatric experts that Cauchi did have a psychotic episode during the attackJoel Cauchi, the man who fatally stabbed six people in a Sydney mall on April 13, 2024, did not have a psychotic episode and most likely acted out due to 'his hatred towards women,' his doctor has reportedly revealed in court.
A psychiatrist who previously treated Cauchi, 40, for several years before the attack made the bombshell claim in an inquest on Tuesday, May 13, 2025. This contradicts evidence from other psychiatric experts suggesting that Cauchi was 'floridly psychic' during the attack, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Guardian reported.
The Queensland doctor, referred to as "Dr. A" for legal reasons, alleged in court that Cauchi did not have a psychotic episode, as this didn't fall in line with him having the capabilities to organize the planned attack, according to the outlets.
'That was nothing to do with psychosis,' Dr. A said, per The Guardian. 'He couldn't have organized himself to do what he did. I think it might have been due to his frustrations, sexual frustration, pornography and hatred towards women.'
Cauchi stabbed and killed six people and injured 12 others at a Westfield mall in Sydney on April 13. He was fatally shot by a responding police officer. Ash Good, 38, whose 9-month-old daughter was also injured in the attack, died in the hospital, News.com.au and The Telegraph previously reported.
Dr. A treated Cauchi at a private clinic from 2012 to 2020. He had been completely unmedicated since 2019 and was weaned off the antipsychotic medications, Clopine and Abilify, years before the attack. The doctor reportedly told the inquest the medication 'would have made no difference," per SMH.
According to the outlet, Cauchi's mother, Michele, had tried to warn Dr. A and his nurses that her son was declining in late 2019, saying that Cauchi was scrawling messages about being under 'satanic' control and was obsessing over pornography and sexually transmitted diseases.
Dr. A denied in the inquest that his former client showed signs of reemerging psychosis at the time and stands by the decision to wean him off his medication, per SMH.
'It was my decision, and his decision,' Dr A told the inquest on Tuesday, per SMH. 'I was listening to the patient … I did not fail in my care of Joel. I have no error on my behalf.'
'It wasn't psychosis, it wasn't even early warning signs of relapse, it was based on his fear of STDs, it was based on his sexual frustration, he told us later about prostitutes and women and sex,' Dr. A added.
Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.
During a press conference on April 14, per 9 News Australia, Queensland Police Acting Asst. Comm. Roger Lowe said that he was "aware this individual has suffered from mental health" issues, referring to Cauchi.
Cauchi's family said in a statement after the April 13 attack, per the BBC, "We are absolutely devastated by the traumatic events that occurred in Sydney yesterday. Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and friends of the victims and those still undergoing treatment at this time. Joel's actions were truly horrific, and we are still trying to comprehend what has happened."
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 days ago
- New York Post
Brain dead, pregnant Atlanta nurse kept on life support to grow fetus gives birth to 1lb 13oz preemie named Chance: ‘He's just fighting'
A pregnant woman who has been brain dead since February — and kept alive via life support in order to comply with Georgia's abortion law — gave birth prematurely to a baby boy, ending the months-long medical and ethical ordeal at an Atlanta hospital. Atlanta nurse Adriana Smith, 31, gave birth on June 13, three months premature via C-section, to a baby who weighs 1 pound 13 ounces and is currently in the neonatal intensive care unit at Emory University Hospital Midtown, according to local reports. Smith's family members named the baby Chance and hope he'll get a fighting one himself. Advertisement 5 Adriana Smith gave birth prematurely to a baby boy while brain-dead. GoFundMe 'He's expected to be OK,' Smith's mother April Newkirk told local outlet 11 Alive. 'He's just fighting. We just want prayers for him. Just keep praying for him. He's here now.' Advertisement Newkirk previously told the press that the boy could be born with a variety of health problems and that the family is hoping his name brings him good fortune, according to reports. As the grandmother prays for her grandbaby's tenuous health, Newkirk's daughter Adriana Smith, who turned 31 over the weekend, will finally be taken off of life support, the outlet reported. 'It's kind of hard, you know. It's hard to process,' she said tearfully. 5 Smith gave birth on June 13, three months premature via C-section, to a baby who weighs 1 pound 13 ounces and is currently in the neonatal intensive care unit at Emory University Hospital Midtown. GoFundMe Advertisement Smith entered herself into Emory University Hospital, where she worked as a nurse, in February, with severe headaches. At the time, she was nine weeks pregnant. She was discharged from the hospital with medication, but soon returned due to the intensity of the headaches. A CT scan revealed multiple blood clots in her brain. Her health deteriorated while at the hospital, where, within hours, she was declared brain dead. Smith was then moved to Emory Midtown, where doctors have utilized life-supporting technologies to keep her alive to be in compliance with the state of Georgia's LIFE Act, commonly referred to as the 'heartbeat bill.' Advertisement 5 Smith entered herself into Emory University Hospital, where she worked as a nurse, in February, with severe headaches. At the time, she was nine weeks pregnant. GoFundMe That law bans any abortion after six weeks of pregnancy and provides fetuses with full legal rights and protections. Newkirk said that doctors had told the family that Smith was being kept alive to maintain compliance with the law, according to The Guardian. 'We didn't have a choice or a say about it,' she said before Chance's birth. 'We want the baby. That's a part of my daughter. But the decision should have been left to us – not the state.' Many believed that Chance would not survive due to the circumstances of his gestation, which further impelled critics of the pro-life policy. 5 Smith was then moved to Emory Midtown, where doctors have utilized life-supporting technologies to keep her alive to be in compliance with the state of Georgia's LIFE Act, commonly referred to as the 'heartbeat bill.' GoFundMe 'The chances of there being a healthy newborn at the end of this is very, very small,' Steve Ralston, director of the maternal fetal medicine division at George Washington University, told The Washington Post. The hospital's decision to keep Smith alive drew heavy criticism from pro-choice advocates who claimed the dizzying ethical conundrum and extreme heartache are a result of bad legislation. Advertisement 'Because of Georgia's cruel abortion ban, Adriana Smith's family is living through a nightmare,' Reproductive Freedom For All President and CEO Mini Timmaraju said in a statement in May. 5 Smith gave birth at Emory University Hospital Midtown. REUTERS 'Families deserve the freedom to make their own decision about their loved ones, and prolonging their suffering isn't just horrible policy; it's inhumane. Anti-abortion politicians, including Donald Trump and Governor Kemp, need to be held accountable,' the statement concluded. State representatives also weighed in as the controversy reached its peak. Advertisement 'This is not healthcare. This is sanctioned cruelty,' State Democrat Rep. Kim Schofield said in a statement. The hospital has not publicly commented on the case, citing patient privacy laws. Smith, who also has a 7-year-old son, was due to be taken off life support on Tuesday, 11 Alive reported.
Cosmopolitan
5 days ago
- Cosmopolitan
Tattle Life exposed: Meet the people who took down the toxic gossip forum's secret publisher
When lifestyle influencer Em Sheldon heard about Tattle Life, a gossip forum on celebrities and influencers, from a prominent beauty journalist in 2019, she was 'horrified' to discover there was an entire thread dedicated to her on the website. 'I couldn't believe it,' she explains over the phone. 'I had one day where I read everything about myself about six years ago, and it was the worst thing I've ever done.' Sheldon's experience on Tattle Life was particularly harrowing; as an influencer with nearly 300,000 followers across her channels. she's grown a thick skin in order to deflect and ignore rude comments, be they about her personality or her appearance. However, it was the malicious and frenzied attempts to find out personal things about her family that left Sheldon unsettled – and the final straw came when she found out that someone on Tattle Life had paid the land registry to find the address of Sheldon's estranged family member (at the time, not even she knew where they lived). After receiving very worrying messages regarding her safety and her privacy, Sheldon knew she had to take further action. She had heard about other influencer friends being doxxed on the site, or being scared to attend events. 'I had to call the police,' she explains. 'I was scared. The trolling had effectively become stalking.' While she chose not to press charges in the end, Sheldon was far from the only one who had faced problems due to Tattle Life. The infamous online forum, once dubbed 'the most hate-filled corner of the internet', had harangued celebrities and influencers since its inception in 2018. It became infamous for its thousands of threads bitterly and forensically analysing people's lives on social media, and while it claims to have a "zero-tolerance policy to any content that is abusive, hateful, harmful and a team of moderators online 24/7 to remove any content that breaks rules in minutes', many reports suggest otherwise, with many claiming damaging and harmful content is left online for years. According to Sheldon, she knew of influencers asking the site to remove private information, but never received a reply. It has been reported that the site draws in as many as 12 million visitors a month, while the Center for Countering Digital hate estimates that Tattle Life generated $371,347 (£276,770) in Google Ad revenue within just a six month period, as reported by The Guardian. However, an investigation launched by Irish couple and entrepreneurs, Neil and Donna Sands, resulted in the pair winning a total of £300,000 of libel damages after they successfully sued Tattle Life – and after reporting restrictions were lifted at Belfast's High Court last week, Sebastian Bond was finally able to be named as the operator of the site. It was Alan Kennedy and Finn Duggan of Nardello & Co, a global investigations firm brought into the case by Gateley Legal, who managed to uncover Bond. It was an impressive feat, with numerous other attempts to dig into who the real founder was leading nowhere. 'We knew we had a challenge on our hands,' Kennedy tells Cosmopolitan UK. 'There's a lot of satisfaction on both our parts when we succeeded.' Despite being experienced operators in this field, it was by no means easy to uncover Bond. Nardello & Co were bought onto the case almost three years ago and spent hours poring over the digital footprints that eventually led to Bond – himself an influencer, boasting vegan cooking account Nest & Glow, with 135,000 followers. To be able to properly ensure they had the right man behind the forum (Bond also used the pseudonyms 'Bastian Durward' and 'Helen McDougal'), the pair established almost a 20 year timeframe for the 43-year-old – going as far back as his university days. Kennedy describes the process as effectively being a jigsaw identification. 'It was important to see what details were in the public domain – the architecture of Tattle Life itself, the content, social media accounts, domain registration records – and seeing what was anchored to reality and what was fiction.' Duggan adds just how granular the level of detail is needed in order to certify an identity match; the pair looked at Bond's use of grammar throughout his 20 year internet career and looked for incidents where the style of language would marry up. 'Although Bond was very careful about being anonymous, he just couldn't help himself from using names and codes that were significant to him,' he says. 'There was a Tattle Life companion site called Lime Goss, and Bond had a UK-registered company called Yuzu Zest Limited, so he clearly had a thing for citrus fruits. 'It sounds silly but when you put these things together, it can be quite sophisticated.' Worryingly, Kennedy and Duggan believe the trolling and dis-and-misinformation, like that found on Tattle Life, may merely be the tip of the iceberg. While they cannot discuss other cases for legal reasons, they can confirm they have seen an increase in what they dub 'black PR campaigns' with increasingly sophisticated operators. However, the pair believe exposing Bond may be a warning shot to others out there who think they can get away with this kind of malicious online behaviour. 'Anonymity can breed maliciousness,' Duggan says. 'I hope exposing Bond has a real effect.' Tattle Life is still active and online at the time of reporting, but Sheldon hopes Bond's name being out there may prove to be the catalyst that finally takes the website down. She has Tattle Life blocked on her phone and internet browsers to stop herself seeing harmful content. 'There's still so much fear out there,' she says. 'I know people who have been afraid to post. I'm surprised people haven't killed themselves because of it. 'But now, I feel some relief that this has finally been taken seriously. It shows the internet is not an anonymous place, and this level of hatred won't be tolerated.' Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.
The Hill
6 days ago
- The Hill
White House denies reporting by Guardian on VA benefits: ‘totally FALSE story'
The Trump administration on Monday denied reporting by The Guardian that said new Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals could refuse care to veterans based on factors like marital status and political affiliation due to an executive order by President Trump. The Guardian earlier Monday published a report saying VA hospitals are implementing new rules in response to Trump's executive order in January, which would permit workers to deny care to veterans based on characteristics not protected by federal law. On the first day of his second term, Trump signed an executive order titled 'Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,' which ordered the federal government to recognize only two biological sexes. According to the documents it obtained, The Guardian reported that 'doctors and other medical staff can also be barred from working at VA hospitals based on their marital status, political party affiliation or union activity.' VA press secretary Peter Kasperowicz, a former politics editor at Fox News Digital, reportedly did not deny that veteran patients could be denied care and physicians could be dismissed based on their marital status or political affiliation when reached by The Guardian. But White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly adamantly denied The Guardian's reporting. Writing on the social media platform X, Kelly addressed the article's writer, Aaron Glantz, saying, 'Aaron, this is a totally FALSE story that The Guardian should retract immediately. Fearmongering with our Veterans to try to score clicks for your failing 'news outlet' is pathetic and shameful.' The VA also responded on X, writing, 'This story is disinformation. All eligible Veterans will always be welcome at VA and will always receive the benefits and services they've earned under the law.' The Hill has reached out to The Guardian for comment. According to those who work with veterans benefits, some hospitals have begun updating their bylaws, but the extent of what effect these changes are having is unclear. According to Kyleanne Hunter, CEO of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, the VA has historically been 'very expansive' in its anti-discrimination policies, which have gone beyond federally protected classes. In response to Trump's executive order earlier this year, some bylaws have 'shrunk' so that anti-discrimination policies only encompass federally protected classes like race, religion and sex. She notes, however, that there don't appear to be any rules that mandate discrimination based on unprotected classes. 'There are over 140 different VA medical centers as hospitals that each have their own set of bylaws that exist. So we don't know how many different hospitals this has actually been changed at,' Hunter told The Hill. 'We're trying right now to really gather the information we can, to see how widespread the changes of bylaws might actually be, as well as to engage and understand how it is actually impacting our veterans,' added Hunter. She lamented that VA employees are getting in the crosshairs of this dispute while they seek to provide care to veterans. 'The VA employees that we have talked to and connected with are personally very, very committed to continue to serve all veterans and are concerned that the way in which this is being discussed will continue to destroy morale among VA employees,' Hunter said.
