Strange 1.4 million-year-old fossil traced to previously unknown human relative 'nutcracker man'
A 1.4-million-year-old fossil jaw discovered in a South African cave in 1949 has now been identified as that of a previously unknown human relative species dubbed the 'nutcracker man'.
Researchers have believed since the 1960s that the fossil jaw, unearthed at the Swartkrans archaeological site, belonged to an early human species called Homo ergaster.
But new X-ray scans of the jaw and other fossils found at the site have helped create virtual 3D models that offer a better understanding of the internal and external structures of the extinct species.
The new findings, detailed in a study published in the Journal of Human Evolution, have led researchers to conclude that the jaw doesn't in fact belong to H ergaster.
It comes from a new species of the genus Paranthropus, nicknamed the 'nutcracker man' due to the fossil's massive size and huge molar teeth.
The researchers specifically assessed the fossil's dentine – the hard, dense, bony tissue that forms the bulk of a tooth below the enamel – and then compared it with those of other human relatives.
They found the fossil's teeth features differed from previously discovered specimens of the genus known as P aethiopicus, P boisei and P robustus.
'Altogether, the results show that SK 15 unambiguously falls outside the variation of H ergaster and that it's most compatible with the morphology of Paranthropus,' the researchers wrote in the study.
They categorised the fossil as belonging to a newfound species, which they named P capensis.
'We tentatively attribute SK 15 to Paranthropus capensis, a more gracile species of Paranthropus than the other three currently recognized species of this genus,' they said.
The newly discovered species 'very likely' split from P robustus over 2 million years ago.
This means at least two Paranthropus species – P robustus and P capensis – may have coexisted in the South African region 1.4 million years ago, likely inhabiting different ecological niches with varying diets.
The researchers called for further testing of preserved specimens of the genus Paranthropus to look for P capensis fossils mixed with them. 'The presence of other P. capensis specimens mixed among the current hypodigm of P robustus should be tested further, in particular by revising the fossil assemblages from Swartkrans,' they said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Two students win awards for natural history work
Two students studying for doctorates have been awarded grants for their natural history work. Societe Jersiaise has given the Nigel Queree Environment Award for 2025 to Joshua Smith for his project assessing grazing practices. The study group gave the Roderick Dobson Award to Rees Monet for his work aimed at improving the protection of coastal sharks and skates in the Channel Islands. The group said Nigel Queree had been one of Jersey's most prominent environmentalists and Roderick Dobson one of the island's most distinguished field naturalists. Mr Smith is a PhD student at the Jersey International Centre for Advanced Studies. His project, 'Mow vs Moo', is aimed at comparing the success of different options of grass management in terms of biodiversity and carbon stocks. University of Exeter PhD student Mr Monet is tracking key species in his study, including the critically endangered Tope shark and three commercially important skate species. Societe Jersiaise said it continues to welcome applications for grants which are detailed on its website. More news stories for Jersey Listen to the latest news for Jersey Follow BBC Jersey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to Grants for island artists studying seaweed South African plant removed from strip of land Societe Jersiaise
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Researchers discover surprising method to put gluttonous snakes to work: 'Pest control with fangs'
According to new research from a South African university, puff adders could help control rodent populations with incredible efficiency. The research, led by Graham J. Alexander of the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, revealed that the snakes could be much better at dealing with pests than previously assumed. Found throughout Africa and parts of the Arabian Peninsula, the snakes tend to be quite lazy, moving slowly and preferring to ambush prey at night, per the Smithsonian. Because of their slow digestion and infrequent feeding, it was commonly thought that the reptiles were a poor choice for pest control. However, when presented with abundant food sources, they are very greedy creatures; they will eat about 12 times more than they need to survive for sustained periods. Some of the snakes observed consumed 20 times above maintenance levels. In human terms, that's a bit like eating 57 slices of pizza at your next visit to Costco. While such incredible gluttony is a problem in captivity, it can be an asset in the wild, at least when an animal is native to an area. Floridians are all too aware of the devastating impact of invasive snake species. With extreme weather events caused by planet-heating pollution becoming more frequent and severe, one of the consequences is a threat to food security. As higher temperatures are causing rodent populations to explode, there is an urgent need to bring their numbers under control, and adders could form part of the answer. The advantages of using snakes are clear. They'll do the work of a pesticide for free and with no risk of contaminating crops or water sources. "Pest control with fangs," as South African outlet Good Things Guy cleverly put it. It also demonstrates that the most effective measures to protect the planet often occur at the local level. As the study suggests, adders are highly adaptable creatures, and when presented with an abundant food source, such as vermin running wild in crops, they'll tuck in with staggering enthusiasm. "These findings highlight the importance of snakes as potential ecosystem stabilizers and for the control of agricultural rodent pests," the abstract concludes. Would you live in a home made of bacteria? Absolutely Depends on the cost Depends how it looks No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Great White Sharks Were Scared From Their Habitat by Just 2 Predators
No sea creature inspires terror – rightly or wrongly – as much as the white shark does. With its sleek body optimized for hunting, razor sharp teeth, and its (somewhat undeserved) reputation for enjoying human flesh, the 'great' white (Carcharodon carcharias) is widely regarded as one of the ocean's top predators. And that's true, it is – but there's something even the great white fears. Watch the video below for a summary of the research that revealed a predator other predators fear: From 2017, scientists have documented that the sharks have made themselves extremely scarce off the coast of South Africa, where they usually congregate. Initially, the strange disappearance was blamed on human activity, such as overfishing. But, in 2022, research confirmed in detail the true culprit: a pair of orcas (Orcinus orca), nicknamed Port and Starboard for the distinctive kinks in their dorsal fins, hunting the sharks and slurping out their delicious, nutritious, vitamin-rich livers. Once upon a time, the fishing town of Gansbaai on the South African coast was something of a mecca for shark-spotters – so heavily populated with the predators that nearby Dyer Island is considered the great white shark capital of the world. Over the last few years, however, the sharks' presence has been diminishing. In addition, since 2017, at least nine great white sharks have washed ashore at Gansbaai, several of them missing livers (and some without their hearts) – the hallmark of an orca attack. And white sharks aren't the only prey. Port and Starboard have been implicated in a broadnose sevengill shark killing spree, wiping out at least 17 in a single day. The wounds on these sharks are distinctive, and have been traced to the same pair of orcas. It's likely, scientists believe, that the pair are responsible for many more great white deaths that haven't washed ashore. We know from other studies that the presence of orcas can drive great white sharks away pretty adroitly. One study in 2020 found that great whites will scarper away, without fail, from preferred hunting waters off the coast of San Francisco if an orca makes an appearance in the region. In a study from 2022, using long-term sighting and tracking data from tagged sharks, a team of scientists led by marine biologist Alison Towner of the Dyer Island Conservation Trust found that orcas are the reason sharks are starting to avoid what used to be some of their favorite spots. "Initially, following an orca attack in Gansbaai, individual great white sharks did not appear for weeks or months," Towner explained. "What we seem to be witnessing though is a large-scale avoidance (rather than a fine-scale) strategy, mirroring what we see used by wild dogs in the Serengeti in Tanzania, in response to increased lion presence. The more the orcas frequent these sites, the longer the great white sharks stay away." Over the course of five years, the team tracked 14 sharks that had been GPS tagged as they fled the area when orcas were present. Sightings of great white sharks are also down, quite significantly, in several bays. This is a huge deal. Only twice before had great white sharks been noted as absent for a week or more in Gansbaai since record-keeping began: a period of one week in 2007, and a period of three weeks in 2017. The new absences, the researchers said, are unprecedented. They're also ongoing. In a paper published earlier this year, Towner and her colleagues documented two sightings of Port and Starboard attacking sharks and eating their livers. Worryingly, these attacks are altering the ecosystem. In the absence of great white sharks, copper sharks (Carcharhinus brachyurus) are moving in to fill the vacant ecological niche. These sharks are preyed upon by great whites; with no great whites around, the orcas are hunting the coppers instead. And, notably, they're doing so with the skill of predators who have had experience in hunting large sharks, the researchers said. "However, balance is crucial in marine ecosystems, for example, with no great white sharks restricting Cape fur seal behavior, the seals can predate on critically endangered African penguins, or compete for the small pelagic fish they eat. That's a top-down impact, we also have 'bottom up' trophic pressures from extensive removal of abalone, which graze the kelp forests these species are all connected through," Towner said. "To put it simply, although this is a hypothesis for now, there is only so much pressure an ecosystem can take, and the impacts of orcas removing sharks, are likely far wider-reaching." It's also worth considering the reasons why orcas might be hunting sharks. Their livers are rich sources of nutrition, huge, plump, and full of fats and oil that the sharks use to fuel their epic migratory journeys across the ocean. But it's unclear how the orcas figured this out, or why they might seek the shark livers as a preferred source of nutrition. It's possible that some orcas are adapting to preferentially hunt sharks, perhaps in response to declining numbers of their preferred prey. An unrelated pod in the Gulf of California has developed its own techniques for hunting whale sharks, too. However, given that great white populations are declining worldwide, the added pressure of an efficient predator is a cause for concern. "The orcas are targeting subadult great white sharks, which can further impact an already vulnerable shark population owing to their slow growth and late-maturing life-history strategy," Towner said. "Increased vigilance using citizen science (e.g. fishers' reports, tourism vessels), as well as continued tracking studies, will aid in collecting more information on how these predations may impact the long-term ecological balance in these complex coastal seascapes." The team's research has been published in the African Journal of Marine Science, and African Journal of Marine Science. An earlier version of this story was published in July 2022. Solid Rock Caught Flowing 1,700 Miles Beneath Surface in Experimental First Hundreds of Mysterious Giant Viruses Discovered Lurking in The Ocean Scientists Just Solved a 100-Million-Year-Old Mystery About Platypus Sex
