Low-flying airplanes over Hopewell and two other Virginia cities conducting research

Don't be alarmed if you see two propellor planes flying unusual over the skies of Hopewell over the next few days. They are supposed to be doing that.
It's part of research training conducted by NASA from June 22-26, the agency announced June 20. The two aircraft will take off from NASA's facility at Wallops Island on Virginia's Eastern Shore and conduct various maneuvers such as vertical spirals and flybys at altitudes between 1,000-10,000 feet, lower than most commercial airlines fly.
The planes will fly over such areas as power plants, landfills and urban centers. They will simulate missed approaches at airports and do flybys near runways to collect data on air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.
In Virginia, the planes — a P-3 Orion and a King Air B200 — will fly over Hopewell, Richmond and Hampton. Similar flights will take place in Baltimore and Philadelphia.
The following week, June 29-July 2, NASA will do the same flights over selected spots on the West Coast.
The flights are part of NASA's Student Airborne Research Program, an eight-week summer internship program where undergraduate students get hands-on experience in every aspect of a scientific campaign. According to the NASA announcement, students 'will assist in the operation of the science instruments on the aircraft to collect atmospheric data.'
'The SARP flights have become mainstays of NASA's Airborne Science Program, as they expose highly competitive STEM students to real-world data gathering within a dynamic flight environment,' Brian Bernth, chief of flight operations at NASA Wallops, said in a statement accompanying the announcement. 'Despite SARP being a learning experience for both the students and mentors alike, our P-3 is being flown and performing maneuvers in some of most complex and restricted airspace in the country. Tight coordination and crew resource management are needed to ensure that these flights are executed with precision but also safely.'
For more information about the SARP, visit the NASA website.
This article originally appeared on The Progress-Index: Planes will fly low over Hopewell as part of a student research program

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Health Line

an hour ago

• Health Line

Intermittent Fasting May Be as Effective as Calorie Restriction for Weight Loss

Intermittent fasting resulted in similar weight loss as traditional calorie restriction, according to a new review. One form of intermittent fasting, known as whole-day fasting, did yield slightly more weight loss than caloric restriction. Experts say that the similar results across different diet protocols mean individuals trying to lose weight have more options available to suit their lifestyle. New research suggests that intermittent fasting is as effective as calorie-restricted diets for weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors. A systematic review of nearly 100 randomized clinical trials involving intermittent fasting (IF) and traditional calorie restriction (CR) found that both approaches yielded similar health benefits. The study, published on June 18 in The BMJ, found that IF and CR were equally effective. IF involves designated periods of eating and fasting and places less emphasis on what you eat than when you eat. By contrast, CR targets a specific daily calorie goal and allows any eating schedule. The analysis included several of the most common IF protocols, including: Alternate day fasting (ADF) alternates standard eating days with fasting days or very low calorie days. Time-restricted eating (TRE) restricts food intake to a daily window, typically 8 or 12 hours. Whole day fasting, also known as the 5:2 diet, involves two or three weekly fasting days. All forms of IF and traditional CR produced weight loss compared with no intervention at all — known as an ad libitum, or unrestricted, diet. Of the three primary IF methods, only alternate day fasting resulted in greater weight loss than CR. However, the authors note that longer trials are needed to substantiate their findings. 'This analysis suggests that all three approaches, for the most part, lead to similar weight losses. This is why many of us believe that the best approach to losing weight is finding an approach that matches your lifestyle and is something you can practice for the long term,' said David B. Sarwer, PhD, director of the Center for Obesity Research and Education at Temple University and a spokesperson for the Obesity Society. Sarwer wasn't involved in the research. IF has grown rapidly in popularity over the past decade, but evidence of its health benefits — namely, weight loss and cardiometabolic measures, such as blood glucose — has been inconsistent compared with more traditional, calorie-restricted diets. Although proponents of IF may be disappointed by the latest findings, experts say that similar results across diets mean that people have more options to find a method that works best for them. No clear 'best' when it comes to diet protocols Researchers included 99 randomized clinical trials involving more than 6,500 adults in the systematic review. The average age of participants was 45, and two-thirds were women. A small percentage was considered healthy, but the vast majority (about 90%) had existing health conditions, including overweight, obesity, and both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Participants' average BMI was 31, meeting the standard clinical definition of obesity, which is a body mass index (BMI of 30 or higher. Trials ranged between 3 and 52 weeks — with an average of 12 weeks — and varied in quality. The review found that both IF and CR led to small reductions in body weight compared to an unrestricted diet. Among the different IF protocols, only ADF resulted in slightly more weight loss (nearly three pounds) than CR. Sarwer pointed out that while this may be statistically significant, such additional weight loss would be trivial in improving weight-related health issues. ADF also slightly outperformed both TRE and whole-day fasting in terms of weight loss, but these findings were not deemed significant. ADF also resulted in slight improvements to total and LDL cholesterol compared to time-restricted eating. 'There is no compelling evidence that there is a 'best' diet for weight loss,' said Sarwer. 'Rather, the 'best' approach is one where the person can make small, yet impactful changes to their food choices, eating behaviors, and level of physical activity that cause minimal disruption to their lifestyle and that they can maintain for the long term,' he said. Who benefits from intermittent fasting? Though IF is touted as the diet du jour, there isn't enough compelling evidence to support it yet. Nonetheless, it has been linked to an array of health benefits, including: weight loss improved insulin resistance reduced inflammation brain health The key question, though, is not whether IF is beneficial compared to an unrestricted diet, but whether it's better than CR. That's where things are a little unclear. A 2024 review found that IF and CR were both associated with weight loss and equally effective across cardiometabolic, cancer, and neurocognitive outcomes. However, they noted that IF studies reported greater adherence, meaning people were better able to stick to them for the trial duration. A slightly older study published in NEJM in 2022 also concluded that among people with obesity, TRE wasn't more beneficial than CR. On the other hand, in a clinical trial funded by the NIH, the results of which were published in April 2025, participants who did a variation of whole-day fasting (a 4:3 schedule rather than the more common 5:2) lost 50% more weight than CR (7.6% vs 5% body weight) after one year. The additional weight loss also translated into cardiometabolic improvements, such as blood pressure, total cholesterol, and A1C. Another trial, published in May 2025, found that just three months of TRE led to long-term weight loss, even after participants stopped the protocol. CR isn't perfect either. Though it's long been a standard dietary intervention, it can be harmful, leading to fatigue, nutrient deficiencies, and even depression. For now, experts agree that the right diet solution comes down to the individual. The best diet for you is the one you can stick to. 'Fasting diets are easier to follow because the rules are fairly simple vs trying to start a Mediterranean diet, for example. Some patients who may particularly benefit from a time-restricted diet, for example, are individuals who tend to snack a lot at night,' said Sun Kim, MD, an associate professor of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism at Stanford Medicine who wasn't involved in the research. She also cautions that individuals with diabetes who take insulin should be careful with fasting diets, as they may necessitate adjustments to insulin dosage and scheduling. You should also be cautious with intermittent fasting if you: are over age 65 have a history of disordered eating have low blood pressure are pregnant or nursing Adherence is key to long-term weight loss One final notable finding of the study was that adherence rates dropped precipitously the longer trials went on. Studies shorter than 24 weeks had high adherence, above 80%, while trials longer than 52 weeks typically reported poor adherence. In one trial involving whole-day fasting, adherence crashed from 74% at six weeks to just 22% at 52 weeks. These findings reinforce the idea that diet protocols should not be viewed as 'one size fits all' but rather as tailored to each individual's lifestyle. 'I wish there was an easy solution to weight loss. In our society, there are many forces that push individuals toward weight gain. I always discuss with patients about finding a lifestyle change that they can sustain for the long haul,' said Kim. According to Sarwer, small, sustainable changes are key. 'I'm more likely to suggest that people reduce the number of days a week that they eat ice cream, or reduce the portion size they eat, than to recommend that they stop eating ice cream all together,' he said.

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Regional students participate in University of Idaho's coding and robotics camp

Jun. 21—MOSCOW — It may not be a summer camp in the traditional sense, but the University of Idaho's summer Robotics Coding Camp is helping local students learn skills that can help them in the future. Regional middle and high school students spent a week on the Moscow campus learning about computer programming and engineering. The students typed and clicked away at their computers mastering skills many people don't learn until they are older. Erin Lanigan, UI assistant director of student engagement and STEM outreach, said one of the goals for the program is to help prepare students for entering the workforce where computer science and engineering skills are among the top needs. At this age, they are beginning to decide what they want to do when they grow up. "They have to see it to know they can be it," she said. Moscow Middle School student Corinne Bowersox, 12, already has a job in mind. "I'm actually interested in being a NASA engineer," she said. During this week's camp, she used coding to create her own video game where the goal is to catch fortune cookies and eggs before they hit the floor. She also learned how to control a small robot on wheels. She said coding is an easy way to learn a new hobby and people can share their work with other creators.

Forbes

2 hours ago

• Forbes

2 Ways That ‘Childhood Trauma' Rewires The Brain — By A Psychologist

Research reveals how childhood trauma restructures the brain and immune system in ways that can last ... More well into adulthood. Most well-informed people are aware of how often traumatic childhood experiences are associated with serious mental health conditions later in life. What few people know, however, is how exactly trauma gives rise to these disorders. Some attribute it to emotional scarring, or psychological wounds that live only in the mind. But according to 2022 research from Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health, these wounds are in no way metaphorical. To the brain, trauma can be as real and physical as a cut, a burn or a broken bone. Here are two major ways that childhood trauma physically reshapes the brain, essentially rewiring individuals biologically. 1. Trauma Trains The Body And Brain To Stay On High Alert When a child is exposed to repeated threats, their body and brain have no choice but to adapt. And one of the first systems to respond, in such cases, is the immune system. As you may already know, the immune system's primary purpose is to protect us in situations it perceives to be risky. In most cases, this pertains to illness, injury, infections, viruses, bacteria and so on — but also to stressful situations. Should it sense a threat of any of these kinds, it readies itself to respond. But when abuse, neglect or instability are the norm in a child's life, their immune system remains ready and activated. The body cannot afford to respond to these environmental stressors in the way it would to a specific, localized or short-lived threat; constant threats necessitate constant vigilance. As such, since the immune system believes it's permanently at risk, it operates accordingly at all times. It produces chemical messengers — specifically, inflammatory molecules — to protect the body from infection or injury, but in extreme excess. However, without any physical wounds to tend to, this overproduction gives rise to chronic inflammation. Astoundingly, the 2022 study discovered elevated levels of these inflammatory markers years, even decades, after the participants' trauma. Typically, these inflammatory molecules are transmitted via the bloodstream to whichever site they're needed; in healthy individuals, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) usually prevents them from entering the brain. But, with enough exposure to trauma, this barrier can become much easier to bypass. As a result, these molecules begin crossing into the brain, where they're not usually meant to go. Once they cross the barrier, they begin to interfere with key neurological functions. This, in turn, can significantly impact a child's mood, memory or attention. Notably, if the body never gets the message that it's safe — that is, if a child is constantly exposed to trauma without any breaks — this state of hypervigilance can eventually give rise to serious mental health challenges. And, in severe cases, the brain's physical architecture begins to shift in response to the ongoing sense of danger. 2. Trauma Can Cause White Matter To Fray To understand what this chronic inflammation can do, it helps to think of the brain in the same way you would a town, rather than just an arbitrary collection of parts or lobes. This town is built with two primary materials: white and gray matter. In the simplest of terms, white matter is what keeps your brain running smoothly. It comprises billions of long, fibrous threads that allow your most important brain regions (your gray matter) to communicate with one another. In this case, gray matter would be the neighborhoods of the town, where your thoughts and feelings 'live.' White matter, on the other hand, is the highway system they use to travel. According to the 2022 study, individuals with bipolar disorder who had experienced adverse childhood experiences showed clear signs of white matter disruption. Specifically, their brain scans revealed lower levels of fractional anisotropy, which is a measure used to assess how coherent and structured these white matter tracts are. In essence, the aforementioned inflammation can result in lasting damage to an individual's white matter. In most cases, this means the brain's internal communication system will function less efficiently than that of a person without trauma. When white matter is intact and well-organized, it acts much like well-planned and well-looked after roads: information moves quickly and efficiently across the brain. But once white matter connections are lost, tangled or damaged, those signals slow down or get misrouted — much like cars do on a road with potholes, cracks or fading paint. This is exactly what the brain looks like when it's frequently exposed to trauma in early life: a collection of unkempt, interconnected roads, on which cars struggle significantly to travel. And this kind of 'unkemptness' in the brain's highway system has very real, functional consequences. The study notes that damage to the white matter's structural integrity can lead to miscommunication between some of the brain's most essential regions. In turn, it's considerably more challenging for the emotional centers of the brain to communicate with the areas responsible for logic and regulation. This can lead to dysfunction in: As a result, an individual might feel perpetually on edge without ever really knowing why. Even in situations where they have every logical reason to feel safe, they might struggle to calm themselves down. And despite immense exhaustion or tiredness, they might find themselves lying wide awake at night. Even the smallest, most inconsequential decisions can feel overwhelming, since the mental routes that once effortlessly facilitated those processes can feel as though they're punctuated with delays and detours. Unfortunately, these responses can persist well into adulthood, and well past their years of trauma. That said, this doesn't mean that the brain is 'broken,' nor that it has 'failed.' It just means that the brain has adapted to danger and inflammation in the only way it was designed to: by reinforcing defensive pathways to protect itself. When faced with trauma, the brain makes an executive decision to prioritize survival over flexibility — even if that means day-to-day functioning might be a bit more difficult later on in life. This is a sign of resilience, not failure. The effects of trauma can linger, but so can resilience. Take this science-backed test to find out how you respond to life's challenges: Brief Resilience Scale