South Dakota tobacco tax shift burns up mosquito control money for cities, counties
A move to put more tobacco tax money toward South Dakota's day-to-day government expenses might mean more mosquito bites — and a greater risk of West Nile virus — after July.
Gov. Larry Rhoden signed Senate Bill 54 into law on Friday. It reduces the amount of yearly tobacco tax revenue used to help people quit and avoid smoking from $5 million to $2 million. The rest of the money raised annually by the tax — more than $40 million, typically — goes to the state's general fund.
Backers of the bill said smoking rates have dropped, the need for prevention is lower, and the state needs the money to pay for its expanded Medicaid program. Opponents called the move foolish, citing spikes in the use of nicotine vape products as a blind spot in tobacco prevention that could cause public health trouble down the road.
One piece of the tobacco tax change didn't get much attention, though.
For the past 10 years, South Dakota has funneled a half-million dollars of the sin tax bounty it collects annually from tobacco users into mosquito control grants for cities and counties.
Those grants, cities and counties learned last week, won't be available for the next fiscal year, which starts July 1.
The goal of the grant program was to reduce the risk of West Nile virus, the most severe version of which can be deadly. Fifty-four South Dakotans have died from West Nile since 1999.
The loss of the grant money could impact smaller communities more than larger ones. Joe Kippley, public health director for the city of Sioux Falls, said his department anticipated the loss and has budgeted to continue mosquito spraying.
In smaller towns, the loss of grant funding could be a little harder to replace.
After this summer, 'we're not sure what will happen,' Viborg Finance Officer Brandy Skonhovd said.
The story of how cigarette dollars turned into insecticide grants begins in 2006.
That's the year voters passed Initiated Measure 2, which slapped an additional $1-per-pack tax on cigarettes and an extra 25% tax on other forms of tobacco on top of the state's existing tobacco taxes.
The first $30 million of tax revenue generated as a result went to the state's general fund, the measure specified, after which $5 million would be put in the Tobacco Prevention and Reduction Trust Fund and used for anti-smoking programming.
Tax collections beyond $35 million would split between the Property Tax Reduction Fund, the Education Enhancement Tobacco Trust Fund and the Health Care Tobacco Trust Fund.
That setup had shifted by 2014.
That's the year Doneen Hollingsworth, who was the secretary of the Department of Health, asked lawmakers to sign off on using a half-million dollars from the $5 million anti-smoking fund for mosquito control grants.
The recession of 2007 through 2009 tightened budgets, she said. The state had already begun to dip into that fund to pay for things like childhood immunizations, she told them, and there was a new problem to address in 2014.
The federal money for West Nile monitoring and mosquito control made available to states when the virus first emerged had dried up. Then-Gov. Dennis Daugaard proposed using tobacco tax money that year, Hollingsworth said, 'to address this urgent public health issue' by keeping the grant money flowing to local governments.
That wouldn't break the law, Hollingsworth assured the Legislature's Joint Appropriations Committee.
The state, in 2014 and today, gets about a million anti-smoking dollars a year from the federal government. As long as that money is available, she said, the state could skim up to a million prevention trust fund dollars off the top and still meet voters' expectations.
'We've always spent at least $5 million on tobacco prevention and control,' she said.
Since then, the state has spent about $5 million from the fund to control mosquitoes. Grant awards, used for chemicals or the equipment needed to spray it, are tied to the prevalence and risk of West Nile in local communities.
During debate on this year's legislative Senate Bill 54, Bureau of Finance and Management Commissioner Jim Terwilliger told lawmakers it never made much sense to tie the grants to tobacco funding.
'That's an example of the different things that I think can go away, and we could be smarter with these funds,' the commissioner told the Senate Appropriations Committee in February, during his pitch for reducing the amount of tobacco tax money the state spends on anti-smoking programs.
Terwilliger rattled off statistics on lower smoking rates among teens and adults in the years since voters passed the tobacco tax, too, and said South Dakota spends more on anti-tobacco programming than other states.
Jennifer Stalley, Midwest policy director for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, was on hand to refute Terwilliger point-by-point in her opposition testimony.
But she and Terwilliger saw eye to eye on one thing.
'I would tell you that I don't think that fits within the letter of the law,' Stalley said of the use of tobacco money for mosquito control.
Lawmakers' passage of SB 54 put an end to the $500,000 carve-out for West Nile, and appropriators didn't supplement the state budget with any replacement funds to keep the grants going.
Tia Kafka, spokeswoman for the state Department of Health, said the state will continue parts of its West Nile virus programming. That includes federally funded risk prediction modeling and a federally funded epidemiologist to serve as the program's overseer.
Also continued will be the state's West Nile Virus dashboard, which shows modeled risk and the mapped results of the mosquito collection efforts that attempt to catalog the prevalence of the mosquito species that spread the virus.
'However, very limited mosquito testing will occur in 2025, and the program's sustainability beyond that year is uncertain,' Kafka said.
Virus modeling predicted 60 cases for 2024; the dashboard lists 21 total West Nile cases and one death from the disease. The Health Department's website does not show a prediction for 2025.
It costs Viborg around $2,500 to buy the insecticide used to reduce West Nile risk, according to Skonhovd, the city finance officer. The city got $8,000 last year, though, to pay for new equipment.
The spraying in and around the southeast South Dakota town of 834 starts in May and continues into the fall.
'When we have football games, we try to keep the mosquito population down for those,' Skonhovd said.
Paul Kosel runs the mosquito control program for Groton, population 1,355. Kosel is also the newspaper publisher and information technology supervisor for the community, bordered by wetlands on the eastern side of Brown County. That county has long been the state's most reliably risky for West Nile in the two-plus decades the disease has been endemic in South Dakota.
'Trying to do mosquito control in Groton is a living nightmare because we're surrounded by water,' Kosel said.
Kosel and Skonhovd both say they feel confident they'll be able to pay for this year's work with the money that's available until July 1, when the tobacco-funded grant spigot turns off with the end of the state's fiscal year.
After that, they both hope the state finds a way to keep things going. Insecticide and equipment can be a strain on a small-town budget.
'It's not cheap, that's for sure,' Kosel said.
Larger cities could have an easier time. Joe Kippley, public health director for the city of Sioux Falls, set aside $750,000 for mosquito control this summer. Last year, the city received $20,000 from the state for spraying, but Kippley said the city knew the money would go away this year, and that it had previously set its budget up to withstand the expense of spraying with or without state help.
'We do not budget for these grant dollars annually because they are distributed through an application process and are therefore not guaranteed each year,' Kippley said in an emailed statement. 'The discontinuation of this funding will not impact the city's mosquito control program and services.'
This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: Tobacco tax shift burns up mosquito control money for cities, counties
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds demand Oregon Health Plan data in crackdown against immigrant coverage
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Federal officials are seeking the personal data of the Medicaid-funded Oregon Health Plan as part of a crackdown on coverage for undocumented immigrants. The request, as first reported by , comes after the Department of Homeland Security provided immigration officials with similar data from California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, D.C. 'Just wrong': Oregon advocates say SCOTUS decision targets transgender youth Oregon, like these states, has expanded medical coverage to undocumented residents through state-funded programs. On Monday, Gov. Tina Kotek said her office is reviewing the order. 'I think it's very important, to a degree that we can, that we do not share personal information,' Kotek said. 'Always comfortable with aggregated information, but when we start sharing personal medical information that could be misused, that's a challenge for me.' The state of Oregon has until the end of July 2025 to comply. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Miami Herald
20 hours ago
- Miami Herald
In Southern California, many are skipping health care out of fear of ICE operations
LOS ANGELES – Missed childhood vaccinations. Skipped blood sugar checks. Medications abandoned at the pharmacy. These are among the health care disruptions providers have noticed since Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations began in Southern California earlier this month. Across the region, once-busy parks, shops and businesses have emptied as undocumented residents and their families hole up at home in fear. As rumors of immigration arrests have swirled around clinics and hospitals, many patients are also opting to skip chronic-care management visits as well as routine childhood check-ups. In response, local federally qualified health centers — institutions that receive federal funds and are required by law to provide primary care regardless of ability to pay — have been scrambling to organize virtual appointments, house calls and pharmacy deliveries to patients who no longer feel safe going out in public. 'We're just seeing a very frightening and chaotic environment that's making it extremely difficult to provide for the health care needs of our patients,' said Jim Mangia, president of St. John's Community Health, which offers medical, dental and mental health care to more than 100,000 low-income patients annually in Southern California. Prior to the raids, the system's network of clinics logged about a 9% no-show rate, Mangia said. In recent weeks, more than 30% of patients have canceled or failed to show. In response, the organization has launched a program called Healthcare Without Fear to provide virtual and home visits to patients concerned about the prospect of arrest. 'When we call patients back who missed their appointment and didn't call in, overwhelmingly, they're telling us they're not coming out because of ICE,' said Mangia, who estimates that 25% of the clinic's patient population is undocumented. 'People are missing some pretty substantial health care appointments.' A recent survey of patient no-shows at nonprofit health clinics across Los Angeles County found no universal trends across the 118 members of the Community Clinic Assn. of L.A. County, President Louise McCarthy said. Some clinics have seen a jump in missed appointments, while others have observed no change. The data do not indicate how many patients opted to convert scheduled in-person visits to telehealth so they wouldn't have to leave home, she noted. Patients have also expressed concerns that any usage of health services could make them targets. Earlier this month, the Associated Press reported that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shared the personal data of Medicaid enrollees with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, including their immigration status. No specific enforcement actions have been directly linked to the data. 'The level of uncertainty and anxiety that is happening now is beyond the pale,' McCarthy said, for patients and staff alike. County-run L.A. General Medical Center issued a statement on Thursday refuting reports that federal authorities had carried out enforcement operations at the downtown trauma center. While no immigration-related arrests have been reported at county health facilities, 'the mere threat of immigration enforcement near any medical facility undermines public trust and jeopardizes community health,' the department said in a statement. Los Angeles County is among the providers working to extend in-home care options such as medication delivery and a nurse advice line for people reluctant to come in person. 'However, not all medical appointments or conditions can be addressed remotely,' a spokesperson said. 'We urge anyone in need of care not to delay.' Providers expressed concern that missing preventative care appointments could lead to emergencies that both threaten patients' lives and further stress public resources. Preventative care 'keeps our community at large healthy and benefits really everyone in Los Angeles,' said a staff member at a group of L.A. area clinics. He asked that his employer not be named for fear of drawing attention to their patient population. Neglecting care now, he said, 'is going to cost everybody more money in the long run.' A patient with hypertension who skips blood pressure monitoring appointments now may be more likely to be brought into an emergency room with a heart attack in the future, said Dr. Bukola Olusanya, a medical director at St. John's. 'If [people] can't get their medications, they can't do follow-ups. That means a chronic condition that has been managed and well-controlled is just going to deteriorate,' she said. 'We will see patients going to the ER more than they should be, rather than coming to primary care.' Providers are already seeing that shift. When a health team visited one diabetic patient recently at home, they found her blood sugar levels sky-high, Mangia said. She told the team she'd consumed nothing but tortillas and coffee in the previous five days rather than risk a trip to the grocery store. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.


Time Business News
a day ago
- Time Business News
Boost Revenue with Emergency Medical Services Billing: Top Solutions for EMS Providers in 2025
Emergency medical services (EMS) are a lifeline, literally. EMS providers face unique, high-pressure challenges daily, from saving lives in the field to managing time-sensitive transports. Yet, beyond the flashing lights and rapid response is a lesser-known but equally critical challenge: billing. In 2025, maximizing revenue through proper emergency medical services billing is more essential than ever. While the demand for emergency care rises, so does the complexity of billing. Regulations evolve, coding gets stricter, and reimbursement protocols are increasingly demanding. That's why EMS providers from rural squads to large urban fleets, must reimagine how they handle billing if they want to keep their operations financially viable and future-ready. Let's unpack the key strategies and solutions that EMS providers should prioritize to stay ahead. Understanding Emergency Medical Services Billing in 2025 EMS billing isn't just about sending an invoice; it's a specialized process requiring intimate knowledge of medical coding, insurance structures, compliance standards, and state-specific regulations. It is imperative that every service, regardless of whether it is an advanced life support (ALS) transport call or a basic life support (BLS) call, be coded accurately and submitted for timely reimbursement. Key components of effective emergency medical services billing include: Accurate documentation by EMS personnel Proper coding (HCPCS Level II and CPT codes) Payer-specific guidelines Compliance with Medicare/Medicaid regulations Timely submission and resubmission of claims Failure in any of these areas leads to claim denials, revenue leakage, and increased administrative strain. H2: Why Billing for EMS is So Challenging? Unlike clinic or hospital billing, billing for EMS comes with its own set of complications: On-the-go documentation: EMS crews must document services in the field, sometimes in chaotic or rushed environments. Multiple payers involved: Medicaid, Medicare, private insurers, and sometimes patients themselves. Complex service classification: ALS vs. BLS, emergency vs. non-emergency, mileage calculations, and supply charges. Variable compliance rules: Federal, state, and even municipal codes may influence how services are billed. In short, EMS billing requires both speed and precision, something many in-house teams struggle to maintain. H2: The True Cost of Poor EMS Billing Practices A mishandling of billing can result in the EMS agency losing more than just financial resources: Delayed cash flow impacting payroll and operations Reduced reimbursement rates from repeated errors Increased audits and compliance fines Decreased morale from overworked administrative teams It's for that reason that you should develop a strong relationship with a team that specializes in billing services for emergency response teams in order to achieve the best results. H2: How Emergency Medical Services Billing Solutions Are Growing As we move deeper into 2025, EMS billing has embraced a tech-first, compliance-driven approach. The best solutions combine automation, expert oversight, and real-time analytics to maximize collections and minimize denials. Here's what modern EMS billing looks like: Cloud-based claim systems with secure access Auto-flagging of errors before submission Detailed reporting dashboards for transparency Mobile-friendly documentation platforms for field EMTs Real-time eligibility checks for better billing accuracy Billing services for EMS that adopt these tools aren't just staying compliant, they're also getting paid faster and more consistently. H2: Must-Have Features in EMS Billing Services If you're considering outsourcing or upgrading your emergency medical services billing, make sure the solution includes: Dedicated EMS billing specialists trained in field-specific codes Credentialing support for providers Denial management and appeals handling Compliance monitoring aligned with federal/state law Revenue cycle analytics to help forecast and improve cash flow The services may even include patient communication tools as well as bilingual support, enhancing the patient's post-care experience as well as reducing the chances of missed payments. H2: Benefits of Outsourcing Emergency Medical Services Billing Instead of burdening your internal team with an increasingly technical and time-consuming task, outsourcing to a specialized EMS billing provider can deliver serious benefits: Faster reimbursement turnaround Higher clean-claim rates Reduced staffing pressure Full compliance assurance Access to industry insights and analytics One such company providing comprehensive billing support is Med Tek. Known for helping EMS teams streamline operations and increase collections, Med Tek has enabled providers to shift their focus back to emergency care, where it truly belongs. H2: Real-World Impact: A Look at the Numbers Agencies that implement efficient billing services for EMS have reported the following results: Up to 35% faster claim processing Over 90% clean claim rate on first submissions A 25-40% increase in overall collections within the first year These results don't happen by chance, they're a product of process optimization, smart tools, and real EMS expertise. H2: How to Choose the Right Billing Partner for Your EMS Agency? If you are looking for a new billing partner, ask these questions before making a commitment: Do they specialize in EMS billing or just general medical services? Can they show proven success in billing for EMS agencies of your size? Are they offering tech-enabled solutions with compliance monitoring? Will they provide performance metrics and regular reporting? Do they assist with credentialing and payer enrollment? Choosing the right partner is about more than price; it's about reliability, transparency, and long-term results. H2: The Future of EMS Billing: What to Expect Looking ahead, EMS billing will become even more data-driven. Artificial intelligence will play a greater role in claim scrubbing, predictive analytics will guide revenue strategies, and real-time tracking will be standard. EMS providers that invest in these advancements now will gain a head start on financial health, operational clarity, and regulatory readiness. Whether you're a municipal EMS department or a private ambulance service, having a proactive billing partner could be the most impactful decision you make in 2025. H2: Final Thoughts Financial clarity is just as important as operational readiness when it comes to today's high-stakes emergency medical environment. Emergency medical service providers can not only sustain their mission, but also expand it by focusing on better billing practices for emergency medical services. A strong strategy can help unlock growth and peace of mind, whether you need help navigating compliance, increasing collections, or managing billing services for emergency response units. Don't let outdated billing hold you back. Make 2025 the year you upgrade how your agency handles reimbursement and starts flourishing, not just surviving. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. Please consult with a certified EMS billing consultant for personalized recommendations. TIME BUSINESS NEWS