Man jailed for sexual assaults at Christian pilgrimage site

A man who sexually assaulted five women at a Christian pilgrimage site in the Republic of Ireland has been jailed for a total of four years.
Tomas Gallagher, 42, of Rathanlacky, Dunkineely, County Donegal, was handed a five-year prison sentence, with the final 12 months suspended, for a range of offences committed in 2022 at St Patrick's Purgatory on Lough Derg.
Appearing before Letterkenny Circuit Court, the court heard Gallagher deceived his victims into helping him fix washing appliances in a laundry room before subjecting them to a series of sexual acts.
In sentencing Gallagher, the judge described his crimes as "egregious acts of violence in a sacred place of pilgrimage".
Judge John Aylmer said an aggravating feature in the case was the ages of some of the victims, two of whom were teenagers, as well as the breach of trust involved.
He described the incidents against the women, who cannot be named to protect their identities, as "deceitful and premeditated".
Gallagher pleaded guilty to a total of seven charges involving five different women at St Patrick's Purgatory, which was recently designated a national pilgrimage site.
He pleaded guilty to six charges of sexual assault.
He also admitted that, during the same period and at the same location, he attempted to invite, induce, counsel or incite a child to engage in sexual touching.
A prosecuting barrister and senior garda (Irish police officer) outlined the details of Gallagher's offending when he worked both as a maintenance man at the retreat and a boat driver, taking pilgrims to and from the island.
Statements given to police by his victims described how Gallagher had approached them, asking them to help him in the laundry room as he needed help fixing various machines, such as washing machines and and tumble dryers, before he sexually assaulted them.
One woman eventually came forward and told a person in charge what had happened to her, which led to others coming forward with complaints of a similar nature against Gallagher.
Gallagher was interviewed by Gardaí (Irish police) on three occasions and initially denied anything untoward had happened.
However, he later admitted the offences and entered a guilty plea.
Victim impact statements from three women were read out in court, while two of the victims chose to read their own statements.
One fought back tears as she spoke of how, despite being the victim, she felt ashamed and disgusted by what had happened.
Another victim said she was made to feel vulnerable and intimidated but was afraid to speak up sooner, fearing she would not be believed.
The court heard from a woman who said she failed exams because of Gallagher's depraved acts. She said she later completed the exams, was proud of herself and was determined not to allow her attacker to ruin her life further.
A teenage victim said she had to attend counselling, while another woman, who gave her evidence by video link, said Gallagher's attack had made her distrusting of men as a result of his actions.
Gallagher took to the witness stand and said he "truly regretted" his actions and was sorry for the hurt and pain he had caused his victims and their families.
The judge said Gallagher came before the court on an early plea and appeared genuinely remorseful.
He said the accused man was fully cooperative with the probation service and had undergone counselling.
In relation to the charges against the children, Gallagher was sentenced to five years in prison.
He was given a sentence of three-and-a-half years on the other charges with the sentences to run concurrently.
The last 12 months of the sentence was suspended for a period of 12 months on condition that Gallagher enter a bond to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for 12 months following his release from prison and on condition that he continue under the supervision of the probation service.
In a statement from the Diocese of Clogher, the Prior of Lough Derg, Monsignor La Flynn, apologised to Gallagher's victims "unreservedly for the hurt they have suffered".
He said that, along with the then operations manager at Lough Derg, he was made aware of allegations of sexual assault in 2022.
"In accordance with safeguarding policies and procedures, the allegations were immediately reported to An Garda Síochána (Irish police) for investigation," Monsignor La Flynn said.
"The member of staff was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. He has since voluntarily resigned from his employment.
"The Diocese of Clogher, of which Lough Derg is a constituent part, and the management of Lough Derg are fully committed to adhering to the highest standards, practices, policies, and procedures for safeguarding, and to cooperating fully with the statutory authorities in all such cases."
He urged anyone with "a concern or complaint, either now or from the past" to come forward and speak to the diocese and statutory authorities.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Buzz Feed

7 hours ago

• Buzz Feed

People Are Debating If Millennials Look Younger Than They Are

If you're a millennial who's ever been told "there's no way you're that old" or gotten carded well into your 30s, you're part of a bigger trend. The phenomenon of millennials looking younger than their actual age has become a hot topic across social media, with everyone trying to figure out what's behind our apparent age-defying powers. So when u/Logical-Plum-2499 asked if millennials generally look younger than they really are and why, the responses revealed some pretty fascinating insights about everything from our sunscreen habits to lifestyle choices. Here's what people had to say: "I have barely ever seen my boomer parents drink a glass of water. Every millennial I know has a giant emotional support water bottle." "Let's just talk about air quality. Since the 1970s, we have reduced air pollution by roughly 90% in North America. I'm thinking this is a key factor." "The lip fillers. They age people up so fast. I'm sure there are a lot of women walking around with really well-done fillers so you can't even tell, but why are you fucking with your face in your 20s?!" "In my experience, it isn't plastic surgery or filler — it's mostly that older generations' skin looked rougher and drier, and they styled themselves so dowdy and frumpy. They looked like they'd all had four kids and were too tired to brush their hair." "Millennials are younger-looking at the same age than the generations before us because fewer of us smoked, and we were more health-conscious in general. There are definitely millennials in their 40s who are now getting into all the things that are supposed to make you look younger, but we're generally doing it at the age it was designed to help. We are the beneficiaries of the research that was done by boomers looking for the same effect. Gen Z looks older than we did at that age because some of their beauty regimens take an actual toll." "Sunscreens have greatly improved in my lifetime. In the '80s, you could find SPF 4, 8, and maybe 16. They claimed to be waterproof but didn't last very long in water. Parents didn't understand that you need to reapply. I'm Irish, so I had some second-degree burns from a day at the pool or beach. SPF 50 probably came along in time to prevent major burns for millennials and Gen Z. The waterproof factor has also become so much better." "My dermatologist said millennials are her lowest-risk group for skin damage because we were the first kids to have helicopter parents chasing us around with sunscreen. Guess all that embarrassing poolside sunscreen application paid off." "Many of the younger crowd don't go outside nearly as often as people used to — less damage from the sun, so skin stays younger." "My facialist recently remarked on younger people undergoing buccal fat removal, and said this is one of the worst things people can do as 'you'll need that fat as you age.' Otherwise, you end up with a sunken-looking face." "Our style of dress plays a big role. I remember growing up, women over 35 often dressed matronly. It was common to give up things like sex appeal or wearing short skirts, spaghetti straps, crop tops, etc. — unless you were a celebrity. These days, women don't really follow the whole 'what to wear when you're over 30' mindset. They're not locked into specific hairstyles or clothing based on age, and that shift changes how old someone looks a lot." "Less of us have kids, so we have less stress." "Less of us perform physical jobs that are outside all day, too." "Perspective is part of it. The older I get, the younger young people look to me. Same as how sometimes people my parents' age will say I'm youthful-looking, yet I see a badly aging slug." "I don't think millennials look younger than they really are. I think millennials look their age. If anything, previous generations looked older than they were because of smoking, sun tanning, lead poisoning, and haircuts that have aged poorly. Meanwhile, Gen Z thinks millennials look young because they think anyone over 25 is geriatric." "Gen Z has social media during their teen years, so their style is very curated compared to millennials. That's why when you compare high school pics, Gen Z looks so much older. The poorly put-together outfits and teenage awkwardness (seen with millennials) makes people look properly young." "I think we look younger because Gen Z makes themselves look so much older." "The delayed-aging millennial vs. premature-aging Gen Z that kids these days are fretting about is by far my favorite pop culture trend. Warms the cockles of my cold, dead heart." What do you think — do millennials really look younger than previous generations did at the same age? Have you noticed this trend in your own life? Share your theories and observations in the comments below!

NBC Sports

8 hours ago

• NBC Sports

Immigration agents will have easier access to Chargers, Rams home games

The recent incident involving federal agents attempting to enter the parking lots at Dodgers Stadium has a bright-line connection to other L.A.-area sporting events that will begin in fewer than two months. SoFi Stadium will be hosting 19 total NFL games featuring the Chargers and the Rams. Unlike Dodger Stadium, where the gates can be accessed only through a parking-lot area not open to the public, the gates at SoFi Stadium are fully open to the public and not within an area to which access can be denied. Which means that federal agents can, if they choose, gather at the gates to SoFi in search of those who are or who may be authorized to be present in the United States. It's still not entirely clear what happened at Dodgers Stadium on Thursday. The team said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers were denied entry to the parking lot. ICE called that claim 'false.' Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told NBC News that Customs and Border Protection vehicles 'were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement.' That wasn't the end of the matter. On Friday, the Dodgers donated $1 million to 'toward direct financial assistance for families of immigrants impacted by recent events in the region.' That wrinkle raises an obvious question. Will the other Los Angeles teams follow suit? Immigration continues to be a hot-button issue, throughout the country. But it's one thing to secure the border and/or to remove immigrants who have engaged in documented wrongdoing. The indiscriminate snatching and grabbing of human beings by federal officers who are inexplicably wearing masks raises very real questions about who we are and what we are becoming. Right or wrong, these actions create real trauma for immigrants and their families. By contributing $1 million to the effort, the Dodgers have underscored the simple reality that the chest-thumping mass deportation effort has real consequences for those who are taken away, and for those who have left behind. Maybe you're wired to say in response, 'Eff around and find out.' Or maybe you're actually inclined to believe and lives the lessons of the New Testament, and not to simply pretend to be a Christian.

a day ago

Court blocks Louisiana law requiring schools to post Ten Commandments in classrooms

NEW ORLEANS -- A panel of three federal appellate judges has ruled that a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in each of the state's public school classrooms is unconstitutional. The ruling Friday marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the mandate violates the separation of church and state, and that the poster-sized displays would isolate students — especially those who are not Christian. The mandate has been touted by Republicans, including President Donald Trump, and marks one of the latest pushes by conservatives to incorporate religion into classrooms. Backers of the law argue the Ten Commandments belong in classrooms because they are historical and part of the foundation of U.S. law. The plaintiffs' attorneys and Louisiana disagreed on whether the appeals court's decision applied to every public school district in the state or only the districts party to the lawsuit. 'All school districts in the state are bound to comply with the U.S. Constitution,' said Liz Hayes, a spokesperson for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. The appeals court's rulings 'interpret the law for all of Louisiana,' Hayes added. "Thus, all school districts must abide by this decision and should not post the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.' Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said she disagreed and believed the ruling only applied to school districts in the five parishes that were party to the lawsuit and that she would seek to appeal the ruling. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' order stems from a lawsuit filed last year by parents of Louisiana school children from various religious backgrounds, who said the law violates First Amendment language guaranteeing religious liberty and forbidding government establishment of religion. The mandate was signed into law last June by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. The court's ruling backs an order issued last fall by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles, who declared the mandate unconstitutional and ordered state education officials not to take steps to enforce it and to notify all local school boards in the state of his decision. Law experts have long said they expect the Louisiana case to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, testing the conservative court on the issue of religion and government. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says Congress can 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion.' The high court found that the law had no secular purpose but served a plainly religious purpose. In 2005, the Supreme Court held that such displays in a pair of Kentucky courthouses violated the Constitution. At the same time, the court upheld a Ten Commandments marker on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol in Austin.