US Agency to Microsoft: Get your product naming right, everything is not Copilot; Microsoft responds ….
The
Better Business Bureau
's
National Advertising Division
has called out
Microsoft
for its confusing overuse of "
Copilot
" branding across AI products, recommending the company modify its advertising claims and clarify product functionality differences. Microsoft disagrees with the findings but says it will comply with the watchdog's recommendations.
The NAD reviewed Microsoft's Copilot advertising and found that the company's "universal use of the product description as 'Copilot'" creates consumer confusion, as customers "would not necessarily understand the difference" between various AI tools bearing the same name. The watchdog specifically criticized Microsoft's claim that Copilot works "seamlessly across all your data," noting that
Business Chat
requires manual copying and pasting to achieve the same functionality as Copilot in individual Office applications.
Microsoft's productivity claims under fire
NAD also challenged Microsoft's productivity statistics, recommending the company discontinue or modify claims that "67%, 70%, and 75% of users say they are more productive" after using Copilot for extended periods. The watchdog determined that while the study demonstrates perceived productivity improvements, it doesn't provide objective evidence of actual productivity gains.
The criticism comes amid Microsoft's years-long branding confusion around Copilot products. The company has repeatedly rebranded its AI tools, with Business Chat evolving from a Teams chatbot to Business Chat for Microsoft 365 Copilot, while Bing Chat Enterprise became simply "Copilot" before further rebranding.
What Microsoft has to say
Microsoft's AI at Work chief marketing officer
Jared Spataro
defended the company's approach, stating they "take seriously our responsibility to provide clear, transparent, and accurate information to our customers." He highlighted customer success stories, including Barclays deploying Copilot to 100,000 employees and Dow identifying millions in potential savings.
A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed the company disagrees with NAD's conclusions about advertising implications but will follow the recommendations. This latest scrutiny adds to Microsoft's long history of product naming challenges, with employees previously joking that the company would have called Apple's iPod the "Microsoft I-pod Pro 2005 XP Human Ear Professional Edition with Subscription."
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Microsoft and OpenAI may call off their partnership: What is the biggest reason of dispute between the two companies
Microsoft is prepared to abandon high-stakes negotiations with OpenAI over their multibillion-dollar partnership as the ChatGPT maker pursues conversion to a for-profit company, according to sources familiar with the discussions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The software giant has considered halting complex talks with the $300 billion AI startup if critical issues, including Microsoft's future stake size, remain unresolved. The two companies had issued a joint statement emphasizing their "long-term, productive partnership" and expressing optimism about continuing to "build together for years to come." However, the Financial Times reports that Microsoft would rely on its existing commercial contract through 2030 if negotiations fail, unless offered terms equal to or better than current arrangements. Revenue-sharing deal at center of dispute Under their current agreement established in 2019, Microsoft holds exclusive rights to sell OpenAI's models and receives 20% of revenues up to $92 billion. The companies have battled over Microsoft's equity stake in a restructured OpenAI, with discussions ranging from 20% to 49% ownership in exchange for Microsoft's $13 billion investment. OpenAI faces a year-end deadline to complete its corporate conversion or risk losing billions in investor funding, including a potential $10 billion reduction from SoftBank's $30 billion commitment. The transformation requires Microsoft's approval and faces legal challenges from Elon Musk and former OpenAI employees. Diversification strategy emerges Microsoft has begun diversifying beyond OpenAI models, reflecting CEO Satya Nadella's belief that leading AI models will become commoditized. The company recently made Musk's xAI model Grok available to cloud customers, signaling reduced dependence on OpenAI technology. The partnership strain extends to computing infrastructure, with former Microsoft executives noting significant friction over OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's demands for faster access to more powerful systems. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now OpenAI has since signed deals with CoreWeave and Oracle for additional capacity, reducing its exclusive reliance on Microsoft's Azure platform. One Microsoft-adjacent source suggested the company views the "status quo" as acceptable, questioning what Microsoft gains by surrendering revenue rights for equity ownership.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
40% of American employees login before 6 AM: Why work-life boundaries no longer exist in the US
40% of American employees login before 6 AM: Microsoft report reveals. The American workday has quietly stretched into something unrecognizable. What once had a clear beginning and end has now morphed into a 24/7 cycle of logins, pings, and late-night meetings. According to Microsoft's latest Work Trend Index , a staggering 40% of employees in the U.S. begin their digital workday before 6 a.m. It doesn't stop there—29% log back in after 10 p.m., and the average worker fields over 117 emails and 150 Teams messages daily. This isn't just a shift in schedule—it's a breakdown in boundaries. As hybrid and remote models dominate, work has become omnipresent, creeping into mornings, evenings, and weekends. Microsoft calls it the "infinite workday," and it's not just a catchy phrase—it's a reflection of how fragmented, chaotic, and exhausting the modern workplace has become. The workday that never ends For today's American worker, the day no longer starts with a commute or ends with a log-off. It begins the moment they pick up their phone—often before the sun rises—and stretches late into the night. What used to be an office job has now become a permanent background process, running silently but constantly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo The data paints a concerning picture: a significant portion of employees now check emails before dawn, handle Teams notifications during meals, and return to unfinished tasks long after traditional hours. With evening meetings up 16% year-over-year, many are left feeling like the office has followed them home—and never leaves. Why the chaos? The causes of the infinite workday are complex—but not surprising. At the core is a culture of availability. With hybrid and remote work, employees are physically untethered from the office—but digitally always present. That sense of availability, combined with pressure to stay visible and productive, drives people to respond earlier, stay online longer, and rarely disconnect. Microsoft found workers are interrupted every 1.75 minutes, resulting in 275 distractions per day. Despite the appearance of high activity, actual productivity suffers as attention is splintered across meetings, emails, chats, and calls. Even the meeting calendar contributes to the chaos: 57% of meetings are unscheduled or ad hoc 10% are added with less than one hour's notice Most occur during natural productivity windows, hijacking the day's most valuable mental space Instead of creating clarity, the digital tools meant to streamline work have overloaded it—fueling constant responsiveness, fragmented focus, and ultimately, burnout. Rethinking work at the core While Microsoft suggests that AI tools—like Copilot—could be part of the solution by handling routine admin, summarizing meetings, or drafting responses, it's clear that technology alone won't fix a broken system. Even Microsoft warns: if work isn't restructured, AI will simply accelerate the chaos rather than resolve it. To reclaim the workday, organizations need to move beyond tools and commit to intentional work design. This includes: Re-establishing boundaries: Define clear start and end times for work, and normalize not being 'always available.' Protecting focus time: Reduce impromptu meetings and preserve blocks of time for deep, uninterrupted work. Redefining productivity: Shift away from activity metrics (emails sent, meetings attended) and toward outcome-based measures. Embracing asynchronous work: Encourage communication that doesn't require immediate responses, easing pressure on employees to be constantly 'on.' Most importantly, leadership must model these changes. When leaders normalize digital disconnection, decline unnecessary meetings, and champion flexibility, they send a powerful message: balance is not just allowed—it's expected. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
India.com
8 hours ago
- India.com
Not Elon Musk, but THIS man would have become world's richest person with Rs 103896000000000 if he kept…, not Bezos, Mukesh Ambani, Zuckerberg, name is…
Not Elon Musk, but THIS man would have become world's richest person with Rs 103896000000000 if he kept..., not Bezos, Mukesh Ambani, Zuckerberg, name is... The net worth of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, the fourth richest person in the world at present. He is often known for his philanthropy. But do you he could have accumulated assets and had worth money which would have been more than what Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos had combined. Yes, its true. Bill Gates would have accumulated three times Elon Musk's current wealth, if Bill Gates had held on to his Microsoft shares and not devoted to philanthropy. Musk is currently valued at $409 billion, according to Forbes. Bill had once owned 11.2 million shares Before Microsoft went public in 1986, Bill owned 11.2 million shares, representing nearly 49% of the company, worth around $200 million at the time. If he had kept all his holdings, those shares would have grown through stock splits to 3.2 billion, giving him and Melinda a 43% stake in the company today, worth an estimated $1.4 trillion. Not just this, Melinda French Gates, Bill's former wife and co-founder of the Gates Foundation, would also rank as the world's third-richest person with a projected net worth of $300 billion. Gates promised to donate 99% of income in philanthropy However, according to Forbes, the couple could have collected roughly $100 billion in after-tax dividends over the decades. This amount alone would have made Bill wealthier than all but the top 18 of the world's more than 3,000 billionaires. In May, Gates pledged to donate 99% of his more than $100 billion fortune over the next 20 years to accelerate his philanthropic efforts through the Gates Foundation.
