Hungarian filmmakers in the shadow of Trump's tariff threat

Earlier this week, the US President Donald Trump posted on his social media site that he plans to impose a 100 per cent tariff on films produced outside the United States.
"The US film industry is dying at a rapid pace. Other countries are offering all sorts of incentives to lure filmmakers and studios away from the U.S. (...) Therefore, I am authorising the Department of Commerce to immediately begin the process of imposing a 100 per cent tariff on all foreign-made films coming into our country," Donald Trump said in his post.
Back in 2010, soon after becoming Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán overhauled the film support system after 2010, with Hollywood producer Andy Vajna (Rambo, Total Recall, Evita) at the centre of the reforms.
Vajna set up a new system of state support for Hungarian films, with a greater emphasis on saleability. He also used his connections to bring Hungarian artists into the fold, resulting in a new Hungarian Oscar after decades and a good showing for Hungarian films at the Cannes Film Festival.
The Hungarian state gave a corporate tax credit of 25 per cent and then 30 per cent on production costs in Hungary, with the aim of benefiting the domestic production base. Several large studios were set up, professional crews strengthened, and income from foreign labour increased.
Vajna's death in 2019 has left a noticeable dent in the support system for Hungarian films, which has recorded fewer international successes. Still, the growth of Hungarian production companies has not slowed. Between 2018 and 2023, service revenues quadrupled, with government film commissioner Csaba Káel estimating they will reach nearly $1 billion.
Around 85-90 per cent of Hungarian film spending is US-sourced, writes Károly Radnai, managing partner of Andersen Adótanácsadó Zrt.
Despite accounting for 90% of the revenues of the Hungarian film industry, which employs 20,000 people and is also identified by Prime Minister Orbán as a strategic sector, film industry players reached by Euronews are taking a wait-and-see stance.
"The intention to make more films in the United States and export fewer films overseas is not something that has just been invented, but has been heard louder and louder for 4-5 years," Mihály Tóth, marketing director of Origo Flmstúdió, told Euronews. The current situation is an exclamation mark: we understand that there is such a need. We also want more films to be shot in Hungary. "
"The decision to shoot American films in Hungary was not made by us, but by American filmmakers, on the simple basis of where a film can be produced most efficiently. Nobody understands the kind of customs clearance system that is now being suggested, because you can't tax a cultural product in this way," added Mihály Tóth.
He also had questions for Gergő Balika, producer of Mid Atlantic Films, who told Euronews that he did not know the basis for the duty. What qualifies as a foreign-made film? Would the duty apply only to cinema films, or would it also apply to works made for streaming?
Balika also stressed that even a film shot in Hungary has a myriad of work processes in the US. Overall, he said that this is now a tentative announcement, which shows the direction of US intentions, but details are still to be seen.
The problem is also theoretical at the moment because making a film is a long process.
According to Mihály Tóth, Origo's clients are undoubtful, and that the work in progress must continue. How the rules will change along the way and the timing of these changes remain to be seen, but work has to continue in the meantime.
"Today's rain will affect the filming outside more than this announcement," Mihály Tóth told Euronews. Like him, Gergő Balika also sees it as unlikely that production of big productions that are already booked (such as the next two seasons of the 3-body-problem) will be brought back to the US.
However, several sources have pointed out that the global film industry cannot be pinned down. A Mission: Impossible or a James Bond movie is not shot in one country, and that will not change.
"For example, filming a Harry Potter movie requires a medieval castle. It costs more money to build that than to go to a castle and shoot a scene there. To suddenly have medieval castles in a country where there are none, you can't expect that, because economically it doesn't go anywhere," said Mihály Tóth.
Csaba Káel, the head of the Hungarian National Film Institute, the central organisation of the Hungarian film industry, expressed a similar view in a one-paragraph statement.
"Hungarian film studios are currently full of international and domestic productions. Working out the details of possible US safeguard tariffs affecting the domestic film industry and their introduction is a longer process. In the meantime, we are discussing further cooperation and co-production opportunities with our foreign partners on several continents around the world that will benefit the Hungarian film industry."
The fluidity of the issue is reflected by the fact that President Trump later promised to hold talks with representatives of the US film industry, and the White House said that no final decision on tariffs for films made abroad has yet been made.
Responding to questions from journalists, Trump stressed that film production and the relocation of filming abroad had "decimated" the US film industry and that he wanted to help, not harm, the industry, which receives financial and other support abroad.
"We are watching the international news. What I was really looking forward to was the reaction from the United States, and the governor of California said that California has a successful support model, so why don't they take it to the federal level? This kind of reaction is a good message, structural problems should be addressed locally," said Mihály Tóth. However, Gergő Balika thinks the US government may eventually pressure studios to keep more of their film production work at home.
According to Károly Radnai, managing partner of Andersen Adótanácsadó Zrt, the real target may not be Hungary, but Canada, the UK and Australia. As it is a service, the problem cannot be dealt with by classical customs measures, which means that Hungary can negotiate with the US independently of the EU for facilitations or exemptions.
"It would be important," Radnai writes, "for the Hungarian government to act as soon as possible and use the good relations with the Trump administration to assert our country's interests diplomatically."
Is Harry Styles now living in Berlin? According to the German daily tabloid Bild, the British singer has bought a flat in the capital - and TikTok users report having spotted him in Berlin-Mitte: dressed in blue, friendly, generous - he is even said to have paid for taxis for strangers.
But why is Harry Styles really in Berlin? A source revealed to Britain's The Sun newspaper that the pop star is currently working on a new album. And why Berlin of all places? Styles is following in the footsteps of one of Britain's greatest music legends: David Bowie.
The singer has been spotted several times with producer Kid Harpoon - the man behind his hit album Harry's House from 2022, including the global number one hit "As It Was", the best-selling song of the year worldwide.
"Harry wanted to take a break after the mega-success of his last tour and the release of Harry's House," says the inside source. "Now he's working hard on his next album - and like Bowie once did, Berlin seems to inspire him. Harry loves the mysterious. Just like Bowie used to."
David Bowie lived in Berlin's Schöneberg neighbourhood between 1976 and 1978 - a time that shaped him both musically and personally. His iconic song "Heroes", inspired by a pair of lovers at the Berlin Wall, was written during this period.
Berlin was a place of retreat for Bowie: far away from the cameras in London and Los Angeles, and far away from the addiction problem that increasingly burdened him. Together with Iggy Pop, he lived in a small flat at 155 Hauptstraße, painted, composed - and sought peace and quiet.
"I think Bowie wanted to find himself again in Berlin - and he succeeded," says director Francis Whately, who produced the documentary Bowie in Berlin.
Of his so-called "Berlin trilogy", "Heroes" is probably the best known. It's also worth mentioning the atmospheric instrumental piece "Neuköln" (with only one "l"), which has been described by critics as a picture of the mood.
Bowie remained connected to the city. In 1987 he returned to play a live concert in West Berlin - so close to the border that many East Berliners gathered along the wall to listen. Bowie heard people on the other side singing along and later called it "one of the most emotional performances I've ever experienced."
Bowie also produced the entire soundtrack to the iconic Berlin film Christiane F. - Wir Kinder vom Bahnhof Zoo, which tells the story of drug-addicted teenagers from Gropiusstadt.
The comparison is obvious. Like Bowie, Styles also breaks with gender norms in fashion, wearing skirts, pearl necklaces and silk blouses.
But not everyone is convinced. Bowie's former producer criticised the attempt to sell Styles as a "modern Bowie" suggesting the context and zeitgeist were too different.
Styles himself, however, has repeatedly described Bowie as a role model; an "absolute hero" who "can do no wrong".
Does he consciously place himself in Bowie's tradition? Perhaps. But Berlin today is no longer the Berlin of yesteryear. While Bowie was able to live almost anonymously in Schöneberg, Styles is unlikely to go unnoticed for long in Mitte.
Apparently, most Berliners knew who Bowie was - and didn't care. Perhaps Styles, who has already been spotted in Berlin without bodyguards, is hoping for the same kind of anonymity?

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

France 24

an hour ago

• France 24

From attendances to NBA-style walkouts: Club World Cup talking points

AFP Sport looks at some of the main talking points at the tournament so far: Political shadow FIFA have faced criticism for their increasingly close links to US President Donald Trump and his administration. Ahead of the tournament, UEFA accused FIFA chief Gianni Infantino of prioritising "private political interests" after he turned up late for FIFA's own congress because he met with Trump in the Middle East. Infantino was in the Oval Office again on Wednesday with a delegation from Juventus, as they shared an awkward exchange with Trump as he questioned them on transgender athletes. "It was a bit weird," said Juventus and USA forward Timothy Weah. "When he started talking about the politics with Iran and everything, it's kind of, like... I just want to play football, man." Meanwhile some fans were worried by reports ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers were providing "security" at Club World Cup stadiums. Plainclothes ICE officers have been targeting what they say are "undocumented" migrants. To this point they do not appear to have apprehended any match-going supporters. European teams not getting it all their own way Europe's leading clubs are the richest in the world and it would be a surprise if the winner of the inaugural 32-team Club World Cup came from a different continent. However, the evidence so far is that Europe's representatives are not having it all their own way. Up to Friday, clubs from Europe had won only half of 16 games against opponents from other continents, with South America showing it can more than hold its own. Paris Saint-Germain lost to Botafogo, while Chelsea were blown away by Flamengo. Real Madrid could not get the better of Saudi side Al-Hilal, but Europe sent far more clubs (12) than any other continent and it still looks likely that over half of the teams in the last 16 will be European. Attendances hold up despite empty seats There has been a lot of talk about empty seats, with the low point being the attendance of 3,412 in Orlando for Mamelodi Sundowns against Ulsan HD. There were also barely 22,000 at Chelsea's win over Los Angeles FC in Atlanta, leaving around 50,000 empty seats in the stadium in Atlanta. Yet the average attendance over the first seven days at the tournament was 36,135. That is higher than the average in La Liga, Serie A or Ligue 1 over the last season. The games featuring South American teams have seen some incredible atmospheres, especially in Miami for Friday's clash between Bayern Munich and Boca Juniors. "Amazing, amazing," said Bayern coach Vincent Kompany when asked about the crowd, with passionate Boca fans making up the vast majority of the 63,587 attendance. "It is one of these things: if you are not here it is sometimes hard to understand, but being here is an experience, a privilege." Waiting for the weather Several matches have been held up because of inclement weather. Common public safety protocols in the US mandate that outdoor sports events are suspended for at least 30 minutes if lightning or thunder is seen or heard in the nearby area. Two matches in Orlando, a regular location for tropical storms, have been suspended, while games in East Rutherford and Cincinnati have also been interrupted. National team coaches preparing for the 2026 World Cup must consider the best way to prepare their players to cope with such delays. Climate change has been linked to an increase in frequency and intensity of storms and extreme weather conditions. 'Showbiz' NBA-style walkouts Organisers have jumped on the chance to make each game a show in the style of a traditional American sporting event, including having players come out onto the field one by one as their names are announced, like in the NBA. "Why not bring it to the Premier League," replied Chelsea's Romeo Lavia when asked if it could become a thing in England. "It's a bit of a showbiz thing, isn't it? I quite like it." Not everyone agrees with Lavia. "It's a bit slow. I find it a bit strange. It seems like putting on a show for the sake of it. It seems a bit pointless," said the Porto coach, Martin Anselmi.

Euronews

3 hours ago

• Euronews

'Iran didn't want a result' - Was Iran just playing with Wadephul?

On Friday, all political observers looked to Geneva in Switzerland where talks with Iran took place at the Intercontinental Hotel. Together with France, Great Britain and Vice President of the European Commission Kaja Kallas, Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (CDU) negotiated for four hours with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about Iran's nuclear programme. Wadephul's mission: to dispel concerns about nuclear armament with a new nuclear deal in order to de-escalate the Israel-Iran conflict. Before the meeting, Wadephul demanded "serious readiness" from Iran and to renounce "any enrichment of nuclear material". "The ball is now in Iran's court," he said. Euronews learnt that Germany held the talks in confidential consultation with Israel and the US. However, neither country attended the discussions. Iran requires 'Israeli aggression to stop' for further talks "There is no room for negotiations with us until Israeli aggression stops," said Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi. Iran's ambassador to the UN, Ali Bahreini, told Euronews that Iran would present "points" in Geneva that would show Europe's "failure" in the conflict. Europe should stop supporting Israel, he added. Huge pressure on Tehran before the talks The pressure on Tehran increased before the meeting. Following the recent Iranian missile attacks, Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said: "A dictator like Khamenei, who is at the head of a country like Iran and has made the destruction of Israel his mission, must not be allowed to continue to exist". Although political experts predicted "no breakthrough" from the outset, expectations rose due to US President Donald Trump leaving a window of opportunity open for possible de-escalation. He wants to make a decision within "two weeks" as to whether the US will intervene in the conflict alongside Israel. At the same time, Israel declared that they would be able to destroy deeply bunkered facilities militarily without the US - one of these bunkers is home to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Wadephul's Iran meeting ends without result After four hours of negotiations, Foreign Minister Wadphul said: "The good result today is that we left the room with the impression that the Iranian side is basically prepared to continue talking about all important issues". He added that it was important for the US to be involved in further negotiations and a solution. Iran's foreign minister hints at halting negotiations Following the Geneva meeting, the Iranian foreign minister said: "We support the continuation of talks with the three European countries and the European Union," said Foreign Minister Araghchi. "But as long as Israel's attacks continue, we will not negotiate with ANY party." In an interview with Euronews, political observer Carsten Ovens, head of the European Leadership Network (ELNET), summarises the outcome as follows: "Foreign Minister Wadephul's efforts are important," Ovens said. "However, Iran was clearly not interested in a result." Did Iran "play" with the West in Geneva? Ovens adds: "The talks in Geneva make it clear: Iran is playing with the West and wants to stall for time." He goes on to say that Iran is "continuing its efforts to develop offensive weapons to destroy the state of Israel and this devalues the diplomatic efforts of the past ten years." The Iranian regime has "repeatedly undermined the 2015 nuclear agreement and continuously expanded its nuclear capabilities as well as its ballistic missile programme", according to the Middle East expert. "The EU's adherence to the nuclear agreement was wrong" German-Iranian FDP politician Bijan Djir-Sarai told Euronews that the negotiations were hopeless from the outset. "Without the USA and Israel, the EU's negotiations are irrelevant," said the foreign policy expert. IDjir-Sarai believes that it is no longer possible to rely on old strategies such as nuclear treaties and that there needs to be a political rethink. "The EU's adherence to the nuclear agreement was wrong. A new strategy in dealing with the regime is necessary," he said. Ovens: "Iran threatens the region and Europe too" The head of the European Leadership Network is convinced that Iran will not stop increasing its nuclear capabilities. Ovens warns: "A nuclear-armed Iran poses an immediate and existential threat - for the region as well as for Europe." For some political observers, the German initiative for talks with Iran came as a surprise. A few days ago, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) said that Israel was doing the "dirty work" for everyone with its military action against the Iranian regime. "Otherwise we might have seen months and years more of this regime's terror and then possibly with a nuclear weapon in their hands," said Chancellor Merz. On Thursday, Chancellor Merz then announced: "I support the intensive efforts of Foreign Minister Wadephul. Iran is called upon to negotiate an agreement quickly. We want to make our diplomatic contribution to this." Wadephul's Iran mission also caused irritation in the CDU/CSU's own ranks. This is because the CDU and CSU are divided on the extent to which negotiations with Iran on its nuclear programmes make sense. Many in the CDU in particular assume that Iran is continuing to build nuclear weapons in underground facilities despite official agreements. What's more, many in the CDU/CSU consider the nuclear agreement with the Iranian regime to be a "sham". CDU member of the Bundestag Roderich Kiesewetter criticised the agreement to Phoenix: "What are we negotiating about? The regime has the destruction of Israel as its state doctrine and is continuing to build a nuclear bomb. Instead of nuclear negotiations, Israel's actions should be "politically supported". CDU foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen expresses a similar sentiment. He said: "The rulers in Tehran have led Europe around by the nose for years. The nuclear negotiations were not a way to find a solution, but a means of gaining time, building up pressure and obtaining concessions."

Euronews

6 hours ago

• Euronews

Exclusive: Belarus releases political prisoners in surprise decision

Belarus has released a group of political prisoners on Saturday, in a US-brokered deal with President Aliaksandr Lukashenka, Belarusian opposition sources told Euronews. Exiled Belarus opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya's husband Siarhei Tsikhanouski is among the released. Lukashenka's regime arrested him in 2020 as the then-Belarusian opposition presidential candidate and Lukashenka's direct opponent. The surprise release was brokered by US envoy Keith Kellogg, a longtime advisor to US President Donald Trump, who travelled to Belarus earlier this week for talks with Lukashenka. Since last year, Lukashenka has been regularly pardoning small numbers of imprisoned government critics in what analysts saw as a signal that Minsk was seeking to ease tensions with the West. In the run-up to the January 2025 presidential elections, Lukashenka has pardoned prisoners convicted of extremism, claiming that it was a "humane gesture" toward those who had "gone astray". Kellogg, US special envoy for Russia's war against Ukraine, has said privately that the trip to Minsk could help kickstart peace talks aimed at ending Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, according to two of the sources. Earlier, exiled opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya told Euronews that Lukashenka "cannot be trusted' and Belarus is not a place for negotiations because Lukashenka "is part of this war". Lukashenka is a key ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin and has allowed him to stage part of his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 from Belarus. "He's a co-aggressor and he's serving Putin's interest, and he cannot be trusted at all," Tsikhanouskaya told Euronews. She described Russia's war in Ukraine as a blessing for Lukashenka and that he did not want it to stop. "(The government) is producing a huge amount of stuff for Russian army, and in this atmosphere of sanctions against Lukashenka's regime, it's a good source of income for him," she added. Who is Siarhei Tsikanouski? Previously a popular blogger, Siarhei Tsikhanouski decided to run against Lukashenka in the 2020 presidential elections and was arrested in spring, long before the summer protests in Belarus. Tsikhanouski was first given 'administrative detention' which prevented him from filing his candidacy before the deadline. His wife Tsikhanouskaya filed her candidacy instead, emerging as a leading opposition candidate. A Minsk court sentenced Tsikhanouski to 18 years in prison with the harshest possible conditions. He has not been allowed family visits and telephone calls. He has also not been allowed to meet with his lawyer confidentially, read, send letters, or receive letters and parcels. In 2023 he was given a new sentence of 1.5 years in prison in addition to the 18-year sentence he was already serving on the charge of 'disobedience to prison administration'. Tsikhanouskaya had no contact with her husband since he was jailed. She previously told Euronews that she did not know if he was alive. 'My children write letters to him, but they get no response. They ask if their father is okay, if he is still alive—it's an incredibly painful situation. My husband's imprisonment is my personal pain, but my goal is to free all political prisoners,' the Belarusian opposition leader said in an earlier interview with Euronews.** Lukashenka claimed victory in the 2020 presidential election deemed fraudulent by the EU and external observers, triggering mass protests. They were violently crushed by police, with tens of thousands of peaceful protesters arrested, and countless detainees suffering torture and other ill-treatment. Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya went into exile for fear of prosecution. Many of her close associates, including her closest companion during the election campaign, Maryia Kalesnikava, were jailed. According to the Belarusian human rights centre Vyasna, over 50,000 people have been detained on political grounds after mass protests broke out following Lukashenka's 2020 presidential election win, and at least 5,472 people have been convicted in politically-motivated criminal cases. The United Nations estimates that around 300,000 Belarusians have left the country since then, with most going to Poland and Lithuania. Even today, between 15 and 20 people are being detained in Belarus every day. In 2023, Tsikhanouskaya was sentenced to 15 years in prison.