'Iran didn't want a result' - Was Iran just playing with Wadephul?
On Friday, all political observers looked to Geneva in Switzerland where talks with Iran took place at the Intercontinental Hotel.
Together with France, Great Britain and Vice President of the European Commission Kaja Kallas, Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (CDU) negotiated for four hours with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about Iran's nuclear programme.
Wadephul's mission: to dispel concerns about nuclear armament with a new nuclear deal in order to de-escalate the Israel-Iran conflict. Before the meeting, Wadephul demanded "serious readiness" from Iran and to renounce "any enrichment of nuclear material".
"The ball is now in Iran's court," he said.
Euronews learnt that Germany held the talks in confidential consultation with Israel and the US. However, neither country attended the discussions.
Iran requires 'Israeli aggression to stop' for further talks
"There is no room for negotiations with us until Israeli aggression stops," said Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi.
Iran's ambassador to the UN, Ali Bahreini, told Euronews that Iran would present "points" in Geneva that would show Europe's "failure" in the conflict. Europe should stop supporting Israel, he added.
Huge pressure on Tehran before the talks
The pressure on Tehran increased before the meeting. Following the recent Iranian missile attacks, Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said: "A dictator like Khamenei, who is at the head of a country like Iran and has made the destruction of Israel his mission, must not be allowed to continue to exist".
Although political experts predicted "no breakthrough" from the outset, expectations rose due to US President Donald Trump leaving a window of opportunity open for possible de-escalation. He wants to make a decision within "two weeks" as to whether the US will intervene in the conflict alongside Israel.
At the same time, Israel declared that they would be able to destroy deeply bunkered facilities militarily without the US - one of these bunkers is home to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Wadephul's Iran meeting ends without result
After four hours of negotiations, Foreign Minister Wadphul said: "The good result today is that we left the room with the impression that the Iranian side is basically prepared to continue talking about all important issues".
He added that it was important for the US to be involved in further negotiations and a solution.
Iran's foreign minister hints at halting negotiations
Following the Geneva meeting, the Iranian foreign minister said:
"We support the continuation of talks with the three European countries and the European Union," said Foreign Minister Araghchi. "But as long as Israel's attacks continue, we will not negotiate with ANY party."
In an interview with Euronews, political observer Carsten Ovens, head of the European Leadership Network (ELNET), summarises the outcome as follows:
"Foreign Minister Wadephul's efforts are important," Ovens said. "However, Iran was clearly not interested in a result."
Did Iran "play" with the West in Geneva?
Ovens adds: "The talks in Geneva make it clear: Iran is playing with the West and wants to stall for time."
He goes on to say that Iran is "continuing its efforts to develop offensive weapons to destroy the state of Israel and this devalues the diplomatic efforts of the past ten years."
The Iranian regime has "repeatedly undermined the 2015 nuclear agreement and continuously expanded its nuclear capabilities as well as its ballistic missile programme", according to the Middle East expert.
"The EU's adherence to the nuclear agreement was wrong"
German-Iranian FDP politician Bijan Djir-Sarai told Euronews that the negotiations were hopeless from the outset. "Without the USA and Israel, the EU's negotiations are irrelevant," said the foreign policy expert.
IDjir-Sarai believes that it is no longer possible to rely on old strategies such as nuclear treaties and that there needs to be a political rethink.
"The EU's adherence to the nuclear agreement was wrong. A new strategy in dealing with the regime is necessary," he said.
Ovens: "Iran threatens the region and Europe too"
The head of the European Leadership Network is convinced that Iran will not stop increasing its nuclear capabilities. Ovens warns: "A nuclear-armed Iran poses an immediate and existential threat - for the region as well as for Europe."
For some political observers, the German initiative for talks with Iran came as a surprise. A few days ago, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) said that Israel was doing the "dirty work" for everyone with its military action against the Iranian regime. "Otherwise we might have seen months and years more of this regime's terror and then possibly with a nuclear weapon in their hands," said Chancellor Merz.
On Thursday, Chancellor Merz then announced:
"I support the intensive efforts of Foreign Minister Wadephul. Iran is called upon to negotiate an agreement quickly. We want to make our diplomatic contribution to this."
Wadephul's Iran mission also caused irritation in the CDU/CSU's own ranks.
This is because the CDU and CSU are divided on the extent to which negotiations with Iran on its nuclear programmes make sense. Many in the CDU in particular assume that Iran is continuing to build nuclear weapons in underground facilities despite official agreements. What's more, many in the CDU/CSU consider the nuclear agreement with the Iranian regime to be a "sham".
CDU member of the Bundestag Roderich Kiesewetter criticised the agreement to Phoenix:
"What are we negotiating about? The regime has the destruction of Israel as its state doctrine and is continuing to build a nuclear bomb. Instead of nuclear negotiations, Israel's actions should be "politically supported".
CDU foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen expresses a similar sentiment.
He said: "The rulers in Tehran have led Europe around by the nose for years. The nuclear negotiations were not a way to find a solution, but a means of gaining time, building up pressure and obtaining concessions."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
44 minutes ago
- France 24
South Korea counts on shipbuilding to ease US tariff woes
Already hit by sector levies on steel and car exports, Seoul is laser-focused on negotiations over a 25 percent country-specific tariff that has been suspended until July 8. AFP takes a look at what's going on: Why shipbuilding? In the 1970s, South Korea's military leader president Park Chung-hee accelerated the country's heavy industry, designating sectors such as steel and shipbuilding "strategically important" and rolling out state subsidies. At the same time, POSCO was founded -- now one of the world's largest steel producers -- and conglomerate Hyundai built its shipyard in southeastern Ulsan, which started to grow rapidly. European rivals struggled to keep pace. Sweden's Kockums Shipyard filed for bankruptcy in 1987 -- and in a symbolic shift of global shipbuilding power, Hyundai acquired its 140-metre (460-foot) Goliath crane for one dollar. It now towers over southern Ulsan. In the 1990s and 2000s, South Korean shipbuilders such as Hyundai Heavy Industries and Samsung Heavy Industries ramped up investment in research and development, backed by generous government subsidies. The country secured a competitive edge in high-value-added vessels, including LNG carriers, very large crude carriers, and offshore platforms. Now, South Korea ranks as the world's second-largest shipbuilding nation, trailing only behind China. Is it important? South Korea's exports hit a record high in 2024, with analysts pointing to shipbuilding as one of the key drivers. The sector accounted for nearly four percent of total exports and grew by almost 20 percent from the previous year -- reaching $25.6 billion. Shipbuilding directly employs around 120,000 workers -- roughly one percent of the country's total workforce -- with indirect employment significantly higher in industrial hubs like Ulsan. Industry data shows so far this year, new orders have exceeded 13 trillion won ($9.4 billion). In March, Hanwha Ocean secured a landmark $1.6 billion contract to build LNG carriers for Taiwan's Evergreen Marine, one of the largest single orders in the sector this year. - Why is it a 'bargaining chip'? - Trump has showed "significant interest in South Korea-US shipbuilding cooperation," said South Korea's trade, industry and energy minister Ahn Duk-geun in April. Like the Europeans, the US shipbuilding industry has lagged behind South Korea and China, and as a result, the sector is seen as a "highly important bargaining chip in trade negotiations," he added. At an APEC finance ministers' meeting in South Korea in May, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer met Chung Ki-sun, vice chairman of HD Hyundai, the country's largest shipbuilder, before he met Seoul's top officials. "South Korea's shipbuilding and defence industries see a window of opportunity," said Kim Dae-jong, a professor at Sejong University. How does it help the US? Greer also met with the CEO of Hanwha Ocean, the first non-American company authorised to carry out a dry-dock maintenance of a US Navy vessel. The move last September was seen as significant as it signalled that Washington sees South Korea, where it already has 28,000 US troops stationed, as a strategic defence hub. With worries growing about China's expanding naval fleet and potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait, the US has begun seeking reliable overseas shipyards to support its operations in the Asia-Pacific region. The global market for ship maintenance, repair, and overhaul is projected to exceed $60 billion annually, according to industry estimates. Any problems? Despite multi-billion-dollar contracts, data suggests South Korea's shipbuilding industry is losing ground in the global race. China dominates with South Korea's market share dropping, according to industry data. Demand for eco-friendly vessels is rising, and the government need to overhaul regulations "to support the development of next-generation eco-friendly vessels," Rhee Shin-hyung, a professor at Seoul National University, told AFP. South Korea's woeful demographics also make staffing hard. In Geoje -– home to Samsung Heavy Industries -– the number of residents in their 20s and 30s has nearly halved in recent years. Orders are down in 2025 which hints that "the shipbuilding boom may end sooner than the market anticipated," warned Rhee. Global ship orders between January and April fell by almost half the volume recorded during the same period last year. Shipbuilders have been enjoying a "supercycle" but unfortunately the "peak is expected to be lower and the boom shorter-lived compared to the past," Nam Chul, vice president at HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, told AFP.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Bombing Iran, Trump gambles on force over diplomacy
With President Donald Trump's order of strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, the United States -- like Israel, which encouraged him -- has brought the conflict into the open, and the consequences may not be clear for some time to come. "We will only know if it succeeded if we can get through the next three to five years without the Iranian regime acquiring nuclear weapons, which they now have compelling reasons to want," said Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA analyst and supporter of the 2003 Iraq war who is now vice president for policy at the Middle East Institute. US intelligence had not concluded that Iran was building a nuclear bomb, with Tehran's sensitive atomic work largely seen as a means of leverage, and Iran can be presumed to have taken precautions in anticipation of strikes. Trita Parsi, an outspoken critic of military action, said Trump "has now made it more likely that Iran will be a nuclear weapons state in the next five to 10 years." "We should be careful not to confuse tactical success with strategic success," said Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. "The Iraq war was also successful in the first few weeks but President Bush's declaration of 'Mission Accomplished' did not age well," he said. Weak point for Iran Yet Trump's attack -- a week after Israel began a major military campaign -- came as the cleric-run state is at one of its weakest points since the 1979 Islamic revolution toppled the pro-Western shah. Since the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas, which enjoys Iran's support, Israel -- besides obliterating much of Gaza -- has decimated Lebanon's Hezbollah, a militant group that would once reliably strike Israel as Tehran's proxy. Iran's main ally among Arab leaders, Syria's Bashar al-Assad, was also toppled in December. Supporters of Trump's strike argued that diplomacy was not working, with Iran standing firm on its right to enrich uranium. "Contrary to what some will say in the days to come, the US administration did not rush to war. In fact, it gave diplomacy a real chance," said Ted Deutch, a former Democratic congressman who now heads the American Jewish Committee. "The murderous Iranian regime refused to make a deal," he said. Top Senate Republican John Thune pointed to Tehran's threats to Israel and language against the United States and said that the state had "rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace." Abrupt halt to diplomacy Trump's attack comes almost exactly a decade after former president Barack Obama sealed a deal in which Iran drastically scaled back its nuclear work -- which Trump pulled out of in 2018 after coming into office for his first term. Most of Trump's Republican Party and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long seen Iran as an existential threat, attacked Obama's deal because it allowed Tehran to enrich uranium at levels well beneath weapons grade and the key clauses had an end date. But Trump, billing himself a peacemaker, just a month ago said on a visit to Gulf Arab monarchies that he was hopeful for a new deal with Iran, and his administration was preparing new talks when Netanyahu attacked Iran. This prompted an abrupt U-turn from Trump. "Trump's decision to cut short his own efforts for diplomacy will also make it much harder to get a deal in the medium and long runs," said Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, which advocates restraint. "Iran now has no incentive to trust Trump's word or to believe that striking a compromise will advance Iran's interests." Iran's religious rulers also face opposition internally. Major protests erupted in 2022 after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, who was detained for defying the regime's rules on covering hair. Karim Sadjadpour, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote on social media that Trump's strikes could either entrench the Islamic Republic or hasten its downfall. "The US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities is an unprecedented event that may prove to be transformational for Iran, the Middle East, US foreign policy, global non-proliferation and potentially even the global order," he said.
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Trump's remarks in full after US strikes on Iran
Here is what Trump said in full: "A short time ago the US military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. "Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise. "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. "Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier. "For 40 years, Iran has been saying, 'Death to America, Death to Israel.' "They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs, with roadside bombs. That was their specialty, we lost over 1,000 people. "And hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East and around the world have died as a direct result of their hate, in particular, so many were killed by their general Qasem Soleimani. "I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen. It will not continue. "I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before, and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel. "I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done. "And most importantly, I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades. "Hopefully we will no longer need their services in this capacity. I hope that's so. "I also want to congratulate the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan 'Razin' Caine, spectacular general, and all of the brilliant military minds involved in this attack. "With all of that being said, this cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. "Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. "But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes. "There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close. There has never been a military that could do what took place just a little while ago. "Tomorrow, General Caine, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, will have a press conference at 8 am at the Pentagon. "And I want to just thank everybody, and in particular, God. I want to just say we love you, God, and we love our great military, protect them. © 2025 AFP
