Are Tesco Shares Still Worth Buying After Its Q1 Update?
Tesco Express, Sheffield (Photo by Mike Egerton/PA Images via Getty Images)
Tesco shares (LON:TSCO) have had a relatively upbeat reaction over the past week on the back of a solid Q1 trading update. As the stock closes in on its 5-year high of 397p, this begs the question of whether the shares are still worth buying.
Britain's biggest supermarket had quite a stellar quarter, as group sales increased 3.7% to £17.85 billion. More promisingly, the company saw positive sales growth across all its retail divisions – the first time in more than a year.
This strong momentum was primarily driven by Tesco's UK and ROI divisions, where their collective sales rose by 5.4% to £15.39 billion. This was down to the grocer building further momentum in its UK (+0.44% to 28.0%) and ROI (+0.22% to 23.3%) market shares. Particularly, Tesco's premium Finest line did magnificently well in the UK, with sales up an ever-impressive 18.0%, on top of last year's already splendid 12.5%.
Kantar UK & ROI Grocery Market Share
Central Europe's sales also finally turned positive, as sales grew 3.5% to £997 million. This came after a year that was bogged down by tough comps and unfavourable FX from a strong pound. Still, Q1 sales would've been higher had it not been for the same reasons, which pulled growth down from 5.8%. On the flip side, fuel sales continued to suffer with a 10.5% decrease to £1.47 billion, as petrol prices fell back to 2021 levels.
That said, the biggest surprise was Tesco's wholesale division at large, Booker. The arm recorded a 3.5% increment in sales to £2.31 billion, as its core retail (+5.4%) and core catering (+7.3%) sub-divisions outperformed, due to sunny weather encouraging more eating out activity. This managed to offset the continued weakness in tobacco (-9.0%) and Best Food Logistics (-0.8%), although the latter's decline has become less negative.
Thus, management reiterated its FY26 guidance, with expectations for EBIT to come in between £2.70 billion and £3.00 billion. While this is still a reduction as compared to last year's £3.13 billion, this is largely seen as a relatively conservative set of guidance by analysts alike. There's some optimism surrounding the possibility that the figure due in 10 months' time could come in higher than the current consensus of £2.93 billion.
Having said that, there's an argument to be made that the market pricing in a fall in Tesco's EBIT is relatively reasonable, especially given the current macroeconomic environment. After all, the firm is contending with a massive headwind of costs that include around £430 million of wage hikes via national insurance contributions and higher living wages, food inflation, and elevated price competition from its peers.
Nonetheless, the group has some levers to pull to offset some of these cost hikes via its £500m Save to Invest programme. For one, Tesco's market share growth should aid its sales volumes. This should help to keep margins more robust. Additionally, higher-margin items such as Finest food lines and non-food sales like clothing are now making up a bigger portion of customers' baskets.
Moreover, while certain commodity prices such as proteins and seed oils are re-inflating in price, overall food prices should disinflate as the year progresses, as other commodities such as wheat, rice, and sugar prices now back down. Plus, much of the recent increases in grocery inflation may be attributable to supermarkets passing on the spikes in labour costs onto consumers.
Food Commodities Futures Price Growth
The only worry moving forward, though, are the tough comps Tesco faces. With the likes of ASDA and Morrisons lowering their debt pile over the past year, price competition is becoming more intense, as these supermarkets can now afford to invest more in lower prices. As such, Tesco may have to invest in more promotions in order to grow its market share and volumes at the expense of margins, subsequently.
An indication of this may have come in last week's update, as net switching gains were not featured for the first time since Tesco's FY23 results. Therefore, this could be a sign that customer attraction is becoming more of a challenge. That being said, CFO Imran Nawaz did mention that quite a substantial number of promotions (around 32.0%) are still being funded by suppliers, which is a positive from a margin standpoint.
It's certainly a huge positive to see Tesco managing to grow its market share despite the hotter competition in recent months. The FTSE 100 stalwart's food volume growth, together with its excellent cost controls give reason to believe that margins can even remain steady this year, provided the market continues to price rationally, and that price competition doesn't heat up even more.
'We've got the inflationary pressures we're dealing with for Save to Invest, we're feeling good on. So, the drop through is pretty much as anticipated.'
As a matter of fact, the margin story can be supported by two main pillars. The first is the higher margins coming from F&F and other non-food items. With Tesco's toys segment now having moved to a commission model, CEO Ken Murphy has reported better profitability. The second is Booker – with its core catering and core retail businesses which command higher margins – now boasting impressive growth rates.
Nevertheless, there's some caution to note. Most prominently, the UK's macroeconomic outlook doesn't look particularly promising. April's GDP showed a larger-than-forecasted contraction (-0.3% vs -0.1%), with the unemployment rate (4.6%) now at its highest rate in almost 4 years. In fact, the board has cited unemployment as the key metric to monitor on how consumer spending may evolve throughout FY26.
However, assuming April was a blip due to businesses front-loading imports to avoid President Trump's imminent tariffs, and that the unemployment rate will revert back down after the initial national insurance shock, Tesco looks to be in a prime position to keep pushing ahead with further growth. Either way, Murphy thinks the consumer remains still healthy, backed by the fact that real wage growth is still positive.
But from a valuation perspective, Tesco shares look appealing. Provided the UK economy doesn't worsen, FY26 EPS could end up being flat Y/Y, or even come in a tinge higher than FY25's 27.38p, aided by the £1.45 billion worth of share buybacks. On that basis, the stock has a forward P/E of 14.6 – lower than the sector average of 19.0. This leaves room for some upside to complement a decent forward dividend yield of 3.8%.
Tesco EPS Results and Consensus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
See how much an investor needs in an ISA to fund an £888 monthly passive income
Passive income has always struck me as the holy grail of investing. A regular payment landing in my account, without me having to lift a finger. Ideally, generated inside a Stocks and Shares ISA. To generate £888 a month, or £10,656 a year, I'd need to think carefully about what kind of payout I'm aiming for. Many people use the so-called 4% rule, which assumes investors draws 4% a year from a pot without running it down too fast. That would mean needing a hefty £266,400 to hit my income target. That's quite a chunk of change. But I think it's possible to bring that number down a fair bit, depending on the stocks I pick and the yields they offer. One of my favourite second income stocks is FTSE 100 wealth manager M&G (LSE: MNG). A year ago, it was yielding close to 10%. That's since dipped to around 7.9% as the shares have enjoyed a strong run. They've climbed 25% over 12 months, and 60% over five years. Not bad for a stock many wrote off as purely an income play. Possibly including me. M&G isn't without risk. Markets remain shaky, and the long shift to passive investing is still a threat to its active management model. With interest rates staying higher for longer, income seekers may find cash and bonds more tempting than equity income stocks, where capital is at risk. The dividend is set for modest growth, with the board targeting 2% annual increases. But there's still potential. On 30 May, M&G revealed that Japan's Dai-ichi Life will be taking a 15% stake, bringing an estimated $6bn of new investment into its funds over the next five years. That has given sentiment a lift. I suspect share price growth may slow after its strong run, but I think M&G is still worth considering with a long-term view. Even so, I wouldn't pile everything into a single income stock, no matter how juicy the yield. Instead, I'd spread my money around and aim for a more realistic average yield of 5.5%. With a 5.5% yield, I'd need around £193,745 in my ISA to generate £10,656 of annual income and hit that £888 monthly goal. That assumes I live off the dividends, and leave the capital untouched to keep growing over time. That's almost £195,000 which sounds like a lot, and it is. But over a 40-year working life, I think it's achievable. For example, investing just £75 a month at an average growth rate of 7% – roughly in line with the long-term FTSE 100 average – could do the trick. Naturally, there are risks. Stock markets can go down as well as up. Inflation will nibble away at the buying power of that £888. So I'd encourage anyone with long-term ambitions to save more if they can. But this shows that with patience, consistency and a little know-how, building a decent ISA income pot is far from impossible. I'd say income investors might consider buying high-yield stocks where the fundamentals still stack up, while diversifying to help smooth out the ride. The post See how much an investor needs in an ISA to fund an £888 monthly passive income appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Harvey Jones has positions in M&g Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended M&g Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Flights to and from Dubai cancelled after US air strikes on Iran
Flights to Dubai and Doha have been cancelled following the US strikes on Iran. The decision comes after Donald Trump ordered US air strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites. Though not actively involved, the UK Government was briefed before the strikes which saw B-2 stealth bombers and submarine-launched missiles in use. In efforts to calm tensions, the Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary David Lammy had attempted to dissuade the US from aligning with Israel's strikes on Iran, advocating for a move towards de-escalation and diplomatic talks. Nevertheless, President Trump proceeded with the strikes, asserting they had completely destroyed pivotal nuclear facilities. In a Pentagon press briefing today it was announced that 14 bunker-busting bombs were dropped across two of the sites. READ MORE: Road closed as five people rushed to hospital after crash READ MORE: I won't divorce my Egyptian toyboy husband but I wish I'd never met him Before the strikes took place, British Airways (BA) flight from London Gatwick to Dubai was diverted to Zurich Saturday night. The BA109 flight departed from the UK at 9.53pm on Saturday and reached Saudi Arabia before the Boeing 787 Dreamliner changed its course, landing in Switzerland, according to flight-tracking website Flightradar24. All of the airline's flights to Dubai and Doha that were scheduled to depart from Heathrow on Sunday have been cancelled, including return flights, the company said. Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. The US struck three nuclear sites in Iran overnight prompting Tehran to launch a retaliatory ballistic missile barrage against Israel. In a statement, British Airways said: 'As a result of recent events, we have adjusted our flight schedule to ensure the safety of our customers and crew, which is always our top priority. 'We are contacting our customers to advise them of their options while we work through this developing situation.' BA is offering a flexible booking policy for customers already booked onto flights to Dubai and Doha between Sunday and Tuesday who wish to change their dates of travel. According to Gatwick's website, flights to and from the airport to Doha and Dubai are continuing as scheduled. For the latest news and breaking news visit Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. Join the Liverpool ECHO Breaking News and Top Stories WhatsApp community to receive the latest news straight to your phone by clicking here.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thames Water bonds plunge to record low as nationalisation threat grows
Thames Water's bonds have crashed to a record low after the Environment Secretary said it was stepping up contingency plans for the struggling utility giant. The price of Thames Water's debt fell to as low as 67p on Friday, down from 70p at the start of the month, as investors took flight amid fears the Government could nationalise the business. The market reaction was prompted largely by comments from Steve Reed last Thursday, who said that ministers were preparing to put Thames Water into a taxpayer-backed special administration regime. He said: 'The company remains financially stable, but we've stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, as I've said before, including a special administration regime if that were to become necessary.' Falling bond prices signal that investors are also now bracing for the nationalisation of Thames Water, which remains on the brink despite a £17bn rescue proposal put forward by more than 100 of its most senior lenders. Talks are still ongoing over the potential bailout, although uncertainty is mounting after Mr Reed suggested the Government will not waive fines for Thames Water, which is one of the creditors' key demands. Pressures have also intensified after US private equity giant, KKR, unexpectedly abandoned its bid for the business earlier this month. Analysis of Thames Water's finances shows that a £250m bond due to mature in 2034 has been one of the hardest hit by the sell-off. Now valued at 67p, this is down from more than 80p two years ago. Falling bond prices in Britain's biggest water company will be a source of concern for the Government, which is seeking to attract global infrastructure investors as part of its bid to boost growth. Utilities are often deemed a safe haven by funds, therefore, the prospect of lenders incurring steep losses on Thames will be likely to damage investor appetite. There are huge numbers of creditors currently exposed to Thames Water, which has racked up a £16bn debt pile over the past decade, including a raft of different bonds. A special administration regime (SAR) would wipe out the bulk of Thames Water's borrowings, although it would also leave the Government forced to foot the bill for its running costs. A previous report estimated that an SAR could cost the taxpayer up to £4.1bn, piling further strain on the Government's stretched balance sheet. A report from JP Morgan last week said: 'Putting Thames into a SAR would be costly for the government and weaken its already tight fiscal position. 'Also, if Thames Water were nationalised, the Government would inherit all of the company's operational issues and be on the hook for any underperformance.' As well as billions of pounds in running costs, the creditors have calculated that Thames faces more than £1bn in fines and penalties over the coming years. However, despite the financial threat posed to investors and taxpayers, there are growing calls for the Government to nationalise Thames Water. Professor Dieter Helm, an economist and former government adviser, said last week that 'special administration will in the end most likely be necessary, and before 2029'. 'The Government and Ofwat made a major mistake at the outset in not calling in a special administrator,' he said. 'The leading bondholders have little practice experience in running a utility like Thames, and none has previous experience of a long-term major turnaround. 'They will no doubt have opportunities to take the money and run. All of this is likely before the next election, something that the Government should have in mind.' Thames Water was contacted for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
