Researcher receives $54,000 grant to combat dangerous diseases: 'We need to know which species we're dealing with'
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
One Utah State University researcher was recently awarded a $54,000 grant from the American Mosquito Control Association Research Fund to lead an AI-powered effort that will help better identify disease-carrying mosquitoes.
The computer vision-based artificial intelligence technology will help Norah Saarman and her team of ecologists develop new low-cost identification methods for the Culex mosquitoes that carry West Nile virus, according to a news release from the university.
While most people who contract West Nile virus are symptomless, about 1 in 5 develops a fever with other symptoms such as headache, body aches, joint pains, vomiting, diarrhea, or rash, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 1 in 150 people will develop serious symptoms such as inflammation in the brain or meningitis, an inflammation of the membranes that surround the brain and spinal cord.
While Utah isn't known as a hotspot for mosquitoes compared to other regions of the country, a number of mosquito species are spreading their ranges thanks to the warming of our planet. For instance, Culex quinquefasciatus, one West Nile virus vector species, has made its way into the Salt Lake City area over the last few years, according to USU. And one recent study found that several mosquito species populations are set to expand their ranges in North and South America in the coming years, thanks to rising temperatures.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, higher temperatures also increase the risk of human exposure to the disease, as they can accelerate mosquito development, biting rates, and the incubation of the disease within a mosquito.
There has already been a rise in cases of many mosquito-borne diseases in recent years. For instance, the World Mosquito Program called 2024 the "worst year for dengue cases on record."
As we deal with such increased risks of mosquito-borne disease, scientists and communities are fighting back with solutions. For instance, officials in one Florida county are using X-rays to kill invasive mosquitoes. And a $70 million pilot program that tested one malaria vaccine in Africa helped reduce deaths among young children by 13% over a period of four years.
As for Saarman's work, she and her team are looking to help prevent vector-borne disease in the safest, most cost-effective and environmentally friendly ways.
"Doing that means we need to know which species we're dealing with and the pathogens they're infected with as soon as possible," Saarman said. "The power of AI will help us achieve this."
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Earth's Magnetic Field Might Weirdly Be Controlling the Air We Breathe, Scientists Say
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Earth's oxygenated atmosphere and magnetic field make life possible, but scientists have discovered that there's a hidden link between the two that's stronger than we originally imagined. Comparing 540 million years of data from charcoal deposits and magnetic crystals formed from ancient volcanic eruptions, scientists found that the processes creating both increase at the same rate over time, and even experience the same jump in activity levels around 330 million years ago. Scientists aren't yet certain which mechanism is impacting the other—or if there is a third mechanism impacting them both. If you list all of the things that had to go right to make life on Earth possible, our minuscule existence (cosmically speaking) seems all the more amazing. Our Sun is a G-type star with moderate radiation output that doesn't tidally lock our planet. The Earth is situated in our Sun's habitable zone. The planet has maintained a robust atmosphere for hundreds of millions of years, and the dynamo at the planet's heart generates a magnetic field that protects us from the most harmful effects of space radiation. Earth truly is a paradise for life. Although scientists have known about these life-giving aspects of Earth for centuries, they're still discovering surprising connections between them. In a new study published last week in the journal Science Advances, scientists from NASA, the University of Washington, and the University of Leeds in the U.K. discovered a surprising connection between two of Earth's most important life-sustaining features—its oxygenated atmosphere and its magnetic field. It's hardly surprising that the existence of one of these features might impact the existence of the other. After all, Mars (which is also in the Sun's habitable zone) used to have an atmosphere, but without a robust magnetic field, the Red Planet eventually lost that atmosphere to the unrelenting lashing of solar winds. However, the authors of this new paper found that, on Earth, the correlation between these two systems runs much deeper than we previously imagined. 'We find that both exhibit strong linearly increasing trends, coupled with a large surge in magnitude between 330 and 220 million years ago,' the authors wrote. 'Our findings suggest unexpected strong connections between the geophysical processes in Earth's deep interior, the surface redox budget, and biogeochemical cycling.' Analyzing data stretching back to the Cambrian some 541 million years ago, the researchers found that the rise in Earth's magnetic field and the rise in its oxygen levels were very closely aligned—slowly increasing overtime, except for one bout of increased activity lasting from 330 million to 220 million years ago. To map this comparison over the course of hundreds of millions of years, the researchers couldn't rely on direct data—there is no such record for atmospheric oxygen levels, for example. However, they could track the strength of wildfires, which show up as charcoal deposits in the geologic record. This would provide a clue, since a stronger, longer-lasting fire means that there was more oxygen in the atmosphere to fuel said fire. To compare this record with Earth's magnetic field history, the team analyzed certain magnetic crystals that formed in ancient volcanoes and—due to their composition—essentially act like a 'compass frozen in time,' according to Nature. Once plotted side-by-side, the team noticed that the two processes largely increased in lockstep with one another, and even experienced the same increase 330 million years ago. Interestingly, this coincides with the formation of Pangea, though scientists aren't sure exactly if the formation of the supercontinent is related to the increase or a coincidence, as the data does stretch back far enough to compare levels to other supercontinents in Earth's history. So, what's going on here? Well, the researchers aren't exactly sure, but they have a few guesses. The most likely one is that Earth's magnetic field directly impacts oxygen levels, as it protects Earth (and oxygen-producing plants) from solar radiation. However, it's also possible that increased oxygenation coupled with plate tectonics—which drive oxygen toward the liquid outer core that produces the magnetic field—could also play a role. The authors also aren't ruling out the idea that a third, currently unknown mechanism could provide an explanation for this steadily upward trend. 'One single mind cannot comprehend the whole system of the Earth,' Ravi Kopparapu, a co-author of the study from NASA, told Live Science. 'We're like kids playing with Legos, with each of us having a separate Lego piece. We're trying to fit all of it together and see what's the big picture.' While 540 million years is an unfathomably long time compared to our human lifespan (or even our species' existence), it's only around 12 percent of Earth's entire existence, so these trends could simply be coincidental. All we can do is continue searching for answers among the clues that we do have, and try to grasp just how wondrous our home planet really is. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Darwin Loved Worms. They May Have Just Proved Him Wrong About Evolution.
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Is evolution a gradual process or a punctuated one, with rapid evolution taking hold in fits and starts? A new study suggests the latter, as researchers analyzed the genomes of annelids, like earthworms, and found that these creatures experienced rapid evolution when they transitioned to land hundreds of millions of years ago. This supports the idea—first proposed in the early 1970s—of 'punctuated equilibrium,' where evolution kicks in rapidly after a period of relative genetic stability. The famed naturalist and geologist Charles Darwin is, of course, best known for his works on evolution—specifically On the Origin of Species and the Descent of Man. However, one year before his death, he wrote a little-known work excellently titled The Formation of Vegetable Mould, Through the Action of Worms, which detailed the important contributions of the world's 'lowly' creatures. 'It may be doubted,' Darwin wrote, 'if there are any other animals which have played such an important part in the history of the world as these lowly organized creatures.' Now, worms are poised to change the world again—this time in a way that even Darwin couldn't foresee. In a new study published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution, scientists from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and Pompeu Fabra University (UPF) in Barcelona, Spain, sequenced the genomes of various earthworms. Upon doing so, they found that these species (in the phylum Annelida) didn't quite follow Darwin's ideas of evolution, in which change was a gradual process that played out relatively consistently over time. Instead, they followed an evolutionary path first explored in the 1970s called 'punctuated equilibrium.' The idea is simple. According to Darwin's theory, the fossil record should be filled with 'missing link' species that display minute differences over time. But instead, what we see in our geology appears to be whole missing chapters of a genetic mutation. In an attempt to explain this, punctuated equilibrium posits that rapid evolution can occur periodically after millions of years of relative genetic stability. This would explain why we don't see as many 'missing links' as we might expect. By synthesizing the complete genomes of these earthworms and comparing them to other annelid species (such as bristle worms and leeches), the researchers were able to travel back some 200 million years and find one such episode of rapid genetic evolution—when these ancient animals transitioned to living on land. 'This is an essential episode in the evolution of life on our planet, given that many species, such as worms and vertebrates, which had been living in the ocean, now ventured onto land for the first time," Rosa Fernández, lead researcher at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology (part of the CSIC) and senior author of the study, said in a press statement. 'The enormous reorganization of the genomes we observed in the worms as they moved from the ocean to land cannot be explained with the parsimonious mechanism Darwin proposed.' By analyzing the genetic changes happening in this species during this period of rapid evolution, the scientists confirmed that these marine annelids experienced a top-down reorganization of their genetic structure, leaving them unrecognizable. Turns out the humble worm has more to teach us than we thought—though, that likely wouldn't surprise Darwin in the least bit. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
We grew up with food rules, guilt and shame. Our kids don't have to.
Diet culture is everywhere, often putting people in a perpetual cycle of restricting what they eat to try to lose weight, then indulging after feeling deprived, followed by heaps of guilt and shame — and then repeat. Whether parents realize it or not, those internalized messages many of us picked up while growing up — from unhealthy food rules to body dissatisfaction — can be passed down to our children if we're not paying attention. In the fourth episode of their podcast After Bedtime With Big Little Feelings, Big Little Feelings founders Deena Margolin, a child therapist specializing in interpersonal neurobiology, and Kristin Gallant, a parenting coach with a background in maternal and child education, along with Gallant's husband Tyler, discuss how diet culture shaped their own relationships with food and their bodies and how harmful those negative messages can be. For Yahoo's column , Gallant shares five ways parents can help break the cycle of diet culture and raise kids to have a healthy relationship with food and their bodies. For many of us, food wasn't just food — it was rules, guilt, restriction and confusion. Maybe you grew up watching your parents do SlimFast or Jenny Craig, talk about 'cheat days' or cut carbs before vacation. Maybe you were told to finish your plate, and then told to 'watch your attitude' in the same breath. Maybe you lived in a house where all the 'fun food' was off limits, so you snuck it when you could, eating in secret. Or maybe, like so many, you absorbed the quiet, relentless message: Your body isn't good enough unless it's smaller. For Deena, this turned into an eating disorder. For Kristin, it meant years of hating her bigger body. For Tyler, it was the shame of sneaking 'forbidden' foods at friends' houses. Diet culture was the air we breathed. And now, we're trying to raise kids in clean air. But how do you undo decades of conditioning while parenting in real time? Here are five concrete steps you can take. We were handed a script: Be smaller. Eat less. Look 'good.' Don't take up too much space. Today, we're writing a new one. We want our kids to have a relationship with food that's grounded in trust, joy and respect. We want them to move their bodies because it feels good, not to punish themselves. We want them to know, deep in their bones, that all bodies are good bodies. That starts by recognizing how we were shaped, so we can choose something different. You don't have to throw out nutrition to break up with diet culture. You can serve a variety of foods without labeling them 'good' or 'bad.' You can offer structure, like set mealtimes and cues that the kitchen is closing, without control or scarcity. You can also teach kids how different foods help them feel energized, focused and strong — without tying their worth to what's on their plate. This isn't about 'perfection.' It's about consistency, balance and a safe emotional environment around food. We want our kids to feel confident around food. Not obsessive or ashamed. Just … free. That means: Talking about food as fuel. Which foods help us feel strong, full and focused? Letting food be fun sometimes, without making it special or off-limits. Keeping food neutral. Food isn't a reward. It's also not a punishment or a bribe. It's just food. When the pressure is off, kids learn to listen to their bodies and trust them. Let's teach our kids that movement isn't about 'burning off' anything. It's about coming home to your body and feeling alive in it. So run because it clears your mind. Dance because it's fun. Stretch because your body deserves care. That shift? It's powerful. It tells our kids: 'Your body isn't a project. It's a gift.' Here's what we know: Body image isn't just shaped by what your kids hear; it's also shaped by what they see. When they see us treating our bodies with respect — feeding them, moving them, resting them — they learn to do the same. When they see us existing in photos, wearing the swimsuit, eating the cake, being present … they learn that worthiness isn't conditional. Let's build homes where all bodies belong. Where the goal isn't thinness — it's wholeness.
