Angela Pownall: I got rid of my gas cooktop because research shows it's harmful to our health
Australia may have cemented its love affair with gas with the recent extension of Woodside's North West Shelf project in WA until 2070, but at home I've said goodbye to gas.
I hadn't given much thought to my gas cooktop until recently.
It was old and a bit grubby but its replacement certainly wasn't at the top of my to-do list around the home.
Until I read a
new US study
which found that high gas stove usage at home without proper ventilation 'greatly increases cancer risks.'
Even more worrying is the finding that children's cancer risk by gas stove exposure is almost double than that for adults.
Scientists from Stanford University measured the emissions from gas cooktops in 87 American kitchens.
They also tracked the pollutants' spread to other rooms and measured how long they lingered in other parts of the house, including bedrooms which was of particular concern, given we spend a third of our lives in bed.
High-efficiency ventilation was found to substantially reduce benzene exposure, but the report authors said there is no safe limit for long-term exposure.
Research findings like this are not new, with the Stanford report citing previous studies showing that exposure to gas and propane stoves is harmful to human health under certain conditions.
And that combustion produces numerous pollutants, including nitrogen dioxide (an irritant that causes respiratory disease and aggravates asthma), carbon monoxide (which reduces the blood's ability to carry oxygen), formaldehyde and benzene (which are both known human carcinogens).
With a toddler at home, the guilt of my ignorance about this weighed heavily on me.
Thankfully it was a quick and easy process to swap over to an electric cooktop, and switch off my gas supply.
According to Energy Consumers Australia,
disconnecting from the mains gas network will save me nearly $400 a year on my energy bill
.
Energy Consumers Australia's latest survey
showed only 24 per cent of West Australians are planning to cancel their gas supply within the next 10 years — the lowest in the country.
But I suspect many more would consider it if they were aware of the health risks of gas cooktops.
Why aren't our government health departments and health promotion organisations alerting the public to these dangers?
The ACT and Victorian governments have implemented policies to prevent new residential mains gas connections.
While stating this is being done to reduce fossil fuel emissions, there will be long-term health benefits for generations of residents.
Unfortunately WA is not moving in the same direction.
WA Premier Roger Cook said in 2023
WA would not follow Victoria in banning gas connections to new homes.
It's a stance that needs to change in response to mounting evidence that gas cooktops pose an unnecessary risk to health, particularly that of our children.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
Angela Pownall: I got rid of my gas cooktop because research shows it's harmful to our health
Australia may have cemented its love affair with gas with the recent extension of Woodside's North West Shelf project in WA until 2070, but at home I've said goodbye to gas. I hadn't given much thought to my gas cooktop until recently. It was old and a bit grubby but its replacement certainly wasn't at the top of my to-do list around the home. Until I read a new US study which found that high gas stove usage at home without proper ventilation 'greatly increases cancer risks.' Even more worrying is the finding that children's cancer risk by gas stove exposure is almost double than that for adults. Scientists from Stanford University measured the emissions from gas cooktops in 87 American kitchens. They also tracked the pollutants' spread to other rooms and measured how long they lingered in other parts of the house, including bedrooms which was of particular concern, given we spend a third of our lives in bed. High-efficiency ventilation was found to substantially reduce benzene exposure, but the report authors said there is no safe limit for long-term exposure. Research findings like this are not new, with the Stanford report citing previous studies showing that exposure to gas and propane stoves is harmful to human health under certain conditions. And that combustion produces numerous pollutants, including nitrogen dioxide (an irritant that causes respiratory disease and aggravates asthma), carbon monoxide (which reduces the blood's ability to carry oxygen), formaldehyde and benzene (which are both known human carcinogens). With a toddler at home, the guilt of my ignorance about this weighed heavily on me. Thankfully it was a quick and easy process to swap over to an electric cooktop, and switch off my gas supply. According to Energy Consumers Australia, disconnecting from the mains gas network will save me nearly $400 a year on my energy bill . Energy Consumers Australia's latest survey showed only 24 per cent of West Australians are planning to cancel their gas supply within the next 10 years — the lowest in the country. But I suspect many more would consider it if they were aware of the health risks of gas cooktops. Why aren't our government health departments and health promotion organisations alerting the public to these dangers? The ACT and Victorian governments have implemented policies to prevent new residential mains gas connections. While stating this is being done to reduce fossil fuel emissions, there will be long-term health benefits for generations of residents. Unfortunately WA is not moving in the same direction. WA Premier Roger Cook said in 2023 WA would not follow Victoria in banning gas connections to new homes. It's a stance that needs to change in response to mounting evidence that gas cooktops pose an unnecessary risk to health, particularly that of our children.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The Manopause: Is there such a thing as male midlife hormone shift?
Hot flushes, insomnia, joint pains, loss of libido: for many women, the menopause is no fun. Why exactly women become infertile decades before they die is a much-debated mystery in evolutionary biology. Besides humans, the only other mammals whose females experience so early a menopause in the wild seem to be some species of whale. But equal opportunity is the spirit of the age. These days health influencers, supplement companies and even some doctors talk about a male version of the menopause—variously called the 'manopause', 'andropause', or, for jargon-lovers, 'ADAM,' which stands for 'androgen deficiency in the ageing male'. Symptoms include a flagging libido, tiredness, shrinking muscles and growing body fat. Supplement companies, health influencers and some doctors are talking about the 'manopause', but is it real? Credit: Getty Images Do men really suffer from menopause, or something like it? On one level, obviously not. Menopause is defined by the end of a woman's menstrual periods, and therefore the loss of her ability to reproduce, usually by her early 50s. Men, by contrast, can stay fertile well into old age. (For instance, Al Pacino, an American actor, fathered a child at 83.) In menopause, a woman's levels of the sex hormones oestrogen and progesterone fall sharply and suddenly. In most men levels of testosterone (the main male sex hormone) likewise start falling during middle age. But unlike in women there is no sudden drop. Levels decline gently, at a rate of around 1 per cent a year, and often stay within the normal range for a man's entire life. Sometimes symptoms that might be ascribed to a 'manopause' may arise from the realities of middle-aged life. Tiredness is a common result of juggling work with family responsibilities. Flabbiness and atrophying muscles are the wages of years of sedentary office work and too little exercise. On the other hand, some proportion of men suffer from male hypogonadism, a medical condition in which the testicles do not produce as much testosterone as they should. Estimates of its prevalence vary widely: one review paper, published in 2020, cited one American study of ageing men that estimated 20 per cent of those in their 60s might be sufferers. But a separate European study put the figure for the same age group at just 3.2 per cent. The causes of hypogonadism are not always clear. But unlike the female menopause, it is not an inevitable consequence of ageing. Loading Menopausal women can be treated with hormone-replacement therapy (HRT). This aims to replace the missing sex hormones, and thus relieve unpleasant symptoms, using tablets or gels. Similarly, a growing number of men take testosterone-replacement therapy (TRT) to the same ends. Prescriptions have boomed in the past 20 years, though there is not yet a firm consensus on when men actually need it. Still, testosterone—the original anabolic steroid—really is, in some ways, a fountain of youth. Men taking it will put on muscle, lose fat and recover faster from exercise (hence why taking testosterone is considered doping in most sports). The pros and cons of TRT are a subject for another article. But take care: side-effects can include baldness and, ironically, infertility. Add external testosterone and the body will compensate by making less. Reduced production in the testes can slow or even stop sperm production. By trying to relieve the symptoms of the supposed male menopause, men who take TRT risk replicating the defining feature of the female original.
The Age
3 days ago
- The Age
Trust in IVF is broken – it must be restored
The fertility industry in Australia is big business. Its annual revenue is $800 million. The two largest IVF companies, Virtus Health and Monash IVF, make more than half that money, revenue built on people's dreams and desperate hopes. The financial and emotional investment in making a dream of bringing a child into the world a reality is profound. IVF providers are often the last resort for aspiring parents when nature seems to have conspired against them. They are the facilitators of that hope. Patients put their trust in them. It should never be broken. And yet, as recent news reports and developments have shown, it is. This is unconscionable. This is human life after all. An error in the delivery of this precious gift is devastatingly traumatic to those involved. The Age has recently reported on two incidents involving Monash IVF. In one, a woman received the wrong embryo at its Clayton clinic in June, and in 2023 at its Brisbane facility, an embryo transfer error led to a Queensland woman giving birth to a stranger's baby. A few years earlier, Monash paid $56 million in compensation to settle a class action involving 700 families affected in a bungled genetic testing program. The error might have caused healthy embryos to be tossed out. Monash chief executive Michael Knaap resigned this month. Loading Australia's health ministers agreed last week to a three-month review to look into the best model for an independent accreditation body to oversee the assisted reproductive technology sector. The states' health secretaries will also examine a possible realignment of the state-based regulators, their axing for a national regulator, and if registration requirements should be extended to embryologists and scientists involved in fertility processes. The Age welcomes these developments. At present, the industry operates under a self-accreditation and licensing system under the Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee. Queensland is the only state not to endorse a national body, having only recently adopted a regulation scheme. Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas said last week that the present system was not working. 'It simply doesn't pass the pub test that the people that provide the service are also the ones that determine who provides the service,' she said. It is equally troubling that, as Thomas conceded, the errors that are made public may represent only a percentage of the true figure of fertility patient complications across the industry. 'I think it's concerning that, in fact, there may well be more errors that we don't know about, and that is because the body that currently accredits fertility care providers is made up of fertility care providers,' she said.
