Mahmoud Khalil presser after release: 'Even if they kill me I will still ...'

Columbia University graduate student and Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil has landed in New Jersey, telling reporters that he will continue to fight for his country 'even if they kill me.' Khalil, 30, arrived at Newark Liberty International Airport on Saturday to an eruption of cheers after he was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement for over 100 days. New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez greeted him at the airport and stood by his side as he spoke to the press. Show more
08:03
08:07
10:23
01:11
02:59
03:10
01:25
02:45
13:48
03:31
11:49
04:13
09:10
10:24
02:58
03:41
01:16
10:45
03:16
01:28
04:12
03:29
03:27
01:56
09:11
08:37
13:00
10:50
03:24
09:53
11:26
01:37
08:42

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Today

2 hours ago

• India Today

Exclusive: 'Every Day Is a Fight for Survival in Gaza" says Genocide Scholar Dr. Melanie O'Brien

In an exclusive interview, Dr. Melanie O'Brien, President of the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS), provides critical insights into the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the complex legal framework surrounding genocide prevention. Dr. O'Brien emphasises that understanding genocide requires a comprehensive historical perspective. "In genocide studies, we call genocide a process, not an event, and that's why we look beyond today, beyond yesterday, going back several years to see what has happened in terms of human rights abuses, and particularly persecution and discrimination of a particular targeted group," she The legal definition of genocide centers on specific intent, which Dr. O'Brien notes creates significant challenges in prosecution. "Genocide is defined as the destruction in whole or in part of a group... carried out through one of five different crimes including killing and causing serious bodily or mental harm," she states. "The intent to destroy a particular group is what makes genocide different and also quite difficult to prove in a court of law because you have to be able to prove that the perpetrators intended to destroy that people."Regarding the current situation in Gaza, Dr. O'Brien points to several concerning patterns. "We are seeing indiscriminate bombing, long-term indiscriminate bombing that is killing people, that is destroying livelihoods, that is destroying infrastructure, that is destroying healthcare facilities and healthcare workers," she observes. She particularly highlights the strategic use of humanitarian aid as a weapon: "Denial of humanitarian aid, including food, healthcare, and medicine, is leading to a high likelihood of death. Therefore, you have to say their intent must be to kill, to destroy, at least in part, the Palestinian people of Gaza."advertisementDr. O'Brien also discusses the psychological warfare tactics employed, noting that "Israeli military open firing on people queuing for food, resulting in deaths, is designed to create fear so that people don't even want to try and get food, because that is just another situation where they risk death."The scholar acknowledges the historical context whilst maintaining legal clarity: "The genocide convention came about in part as a result of the Holocaust... The Jewish people have an existential fear that someone will destroy their people because it happened to them." However, she firmly states that "even if Israel had a right to self-defense against an armed attack from Hamas, there is certainly no justification for the commission of genocide."Dr. O'Brien criticises the international community's response, particularly highlighting how "the Security Council system, with the veto power of the permanent five members including the United States, essentially prevents any action from being taken regarding this situation." She notes that while "there are arrest warrants that the International Criminal Court has issued against Benjamin Netanyahu and the former defense minister of Israel Yav Galant, waiting for implementation," meaningful enforcement remains human cost remains paramount in Dr. O'Brien's analysis: "On the ground in Gaza, every individual is hoping they survive each day, not knowing where their food will come from or whether they will be bombed or shot at."Must Watch

Hans India

3 hours ago

• Hans India

Congress sees weakness, but India's diplomacy stands strong in chaotic world

As the world moves from one local war to another, it now seems so right that India stopped the battle with Pakistan at the perfect time. Even though the decision came as a shock to Indians, as each wanted the neighbour to suffer more. However, two months after the April 22 terror attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor, the understanding for effecting a ceasefire was the perfect move towards the yet-to-come climax. The ceasefire understanding is not an end, as India has stated firmly that Operation Sindoor has not ended, and any act of terror emanating from Pakistan will be treated as an act of war. The end is open, and all depends upon Pakistan's conduct. Given the situation created by the wars happening in other places, the pause is complementary. Russia attacked Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and after three years, the two are still fighting. Several countries have tried to broker peace between the two, but every time the murmur happens, the two enter a virulent phase. Nobody knows what the actual number of dead is in both countries, and nobody knows the extent of destruction. Wars are only about death and destruction, and the two have been facing both. If Russia and Ukraine are hiding their pain, the war between Israel and Hamas is well televised and covered, with information flowing instantly. The conflict started on October 7, 2023, when Hamas and several other Palestinian militant groups launched coordinated armed incursions from the Gaza Strip into southern Israel. The barbarity of the attack shocked the world, and Israel rightly launched a counteroffensive. The counterattack has devastated Gaza and continues unabated, even as countries want Israel to stop. However, the conflict has now added a new dimension, which is an attack on Iran. Israel launched the airstrikes on Iran on June 13, and each passing day is witnessing an increase in intensity, and now the US has also entered the scene. The Israeli attack on Iran came unexpectedly as Iran-US talks were ongoing. Israel's midnight attack shocked the Iranians, and the casualties were significant and striking. After the initial shock, Iran has been fighting back, causing huge losses to Israel. With the US bombing three nuclear sites in Iran and threatening to attack more, the war scenario in the Middle East has completely changed. It can worsen, or Iran can just stop, which seems unlikely now. After US strikes, Iran again launched fresh missile attacks on Israel, and the latter also pounded back. Prospects for an immediate end to the Israel-Iran-US conflict appear dim, with all sides in a belligerent attitude. Though European countries and some Muslim-majority countries are trying to get Iran and Israel to stop, things now seem to be difficult. Thousands of people have been displaced, hundreds have died, and infrastructure in places has been badly affected in both Iran and Israel. The war continues, and even if it is halted, it will be a long way from peace and difficult terrain for rehabilitation for those directly affected. Besides, the loss in the economy for Israel, Russia, Ukraine, Iran and all those involved in wars and battles is huge. The lessons are stark, and India did right to halt Operation Sindoor. Wars are no longer about guns and powder. They have gone beyond and involve narrative setting and diplomacy dominance, with the former involving social media vibrancy. India launched Operation Sindoor against terror targets on May 7 in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and struck deep in Pakistan on May 10 after it tried to terrorise with a barrage of drone and missile attacks. Along with this, another fight was initiated, and this was of narrative and diplomacy. India did well in both, but on the internal front, the narrative was getting punctured as the Congress-led opposition has been consistently trying to demean the operation's success and the political decision. The statements of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and his party leaders were lapped up by Pakistan, which has been using these to counter New Delhi's claims. The Congress party has also questioned India's decision to halt Operation Sindoor and has attacked every action taken by the Centre, including diplomatic moves. It has even launched a social media campaign -- "Narendra Surrender" -- and is discrediting the Modi government for agreeing to a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan. The Congress leaders have also slammed the Centre for its diplomatic stance -- or perceived silence -- on international crises, particularly the humanitarian fallout in Gaza and now in Iran. Sonia Gandhi, former Congress president, penned an article criticising New Delhi's silence as a "disturbing departure" from India's moral and diplomatic traditions, urging stronger and more vocal leadership in West Asia. However, such rhetoric, especially when echoed by adversaries like Pakistan, risks undermining India's strategic credibility. In global diplomacy, every public statement is a signal -- not just to the domestic electorate but to allies, adversaries, and neutral observers. Foreign policy should be navigated with caution and consensus, not caught in the crossfire of electoral combat. India's diplomatic posture has traditionally been subtle, working behind the scenes, avoiding knee-jerk reactions, and projecting calm strength. New Delhi's diplomatic approach is often likened to the "duck policy", calm on the surface but paddling hard underneath. In a world ablaze with conflict, India's choice to pause its military campaign was not an act of surrender -- it was a reaffirmation of control. Operation Sindoor remains active in intent, and India's military remains on alert. But wisdom lies not just in launching a war but in knowing when to stop. The larger message is clear: restraint is not a sign of weakness; it is a sign of strategy.

The Wire

3 hours ago

• The Wire

US Activist Mahmoud Khalil Released From Detention, Vows To Keep Protesting

Activist Mahmoud Khalil told reporters he would continue protesting against Israel's war in Gaza, as he reached New York following his release from three months detention at a immigration facility The former Columbia University graduate student has become symbol of President Donald Trump 's clampdown on campus protests. "The US government is funding this genocide, and Columbia University is investing in this genocide," he said to some supporters who greeted him at Newark Airport. "This is why I will continue to protest with everyone of you. Not only if they threaten me with detention. Even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine." Khalil is a legal US resident whose wife gave birth during his 104 days of detention. He said he would also continue to speak up for the immigrants he left behind in the detention center. "Whether you are a citizen, an immigrant, anyone in this land, you're not illegal. That doesn't make you less of a human," he said. AOC welcomes release US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York joined Khalil at the airport and said his detention violated the First Amendment and was "an affront to every American." "He has been accused, baselessly, of horrific allegations simply because the Trump administration and our overall establishment disagrees with his political speech. "The Trump administration knows that they are waging a losing legal battle. They are violating the law, and they know that they are violating the law." This story was originally published on DW.