US Activist Mahmoud Khalil Released From Detention, Vows To Keep Protesting
Activist Mahmoud Khalil told reporters he would continue protesting against Israel's war in Gaza, as he reached New York following his release from three months detention at a immigration facility
The former Columbia University graduate student has become symbol of President Donald Trump 's clampdown on campus protests.
"The US government is funding this genocide, and Columbia University is investing in this genocide," he said to some supporters who greeted him at Newark Airport.
"This is why I will continue to protest with everyone of you. Not only if they threaten me with detention. Even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine."
Khalil is a legal US resident whose wife gave birth during his 104 days of detention. He said he would also continue to speak up for the immigrants he left behind in the detention center.
"Whether you are a citizen, an immigrant, anyone in this land, you're not illegal. That doesn't make you less of a human," he said.
AOC welcomes release
US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York joined Khalil at the airport and said his detention violated the First Amendment and was "an affront to every American."
"He has been accused, baselessly, of horrific allegations simply because the Trump administration and our overall establishment disagrees with his political speech.
"The Trump administration knows that they are waging a losing legal battle. They are violating the law, and they know that they are violating the law."
This story was originally published on DW.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
US Increases West Asia Evacuations, Travel Alerts After Trump Orders Strikes On Iran
In internal and public notices, the US State Department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Middle East. The US State Department has increased emergency evacuation flights for American citizens seeking to leave Israel, directed nonessential staff to depart the US Embassy in Lebanon, and heightened travel advisories across the Middle East due to fears of potential Iranian retaliation against US interests in the region. In internal and public notices, the department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Middle East. In a notice on Sunday, after American strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, the department said it had ordered nonessential personnel and the families of staff at the US Embassy in Beirut to leave Lebanon 'due to the volatile and unpredictable security situation in the region." The notice made no mention of any potential evacuation flights or other assistance for private Americans wanting to leave Lebanon but said those who want to should try to use existing commercial services to depart. At the same time, the department issued warnings to US citizens in Saudi Arabia and Turkey to take extra security precautions given the uncertainty. 'Given reports of regional hostilities, the US Mission to Saudi Arabia has advised its personnel to exercise increased caution and limit non-essential travel to any military installations in the region," the department said in its notice for Saudi Arabia. In Turkey, the department said US personnel 'have been cautioned to maintain a low profile and instructed to avoid personal travel to the US Consulate Adana consular district," which includes the NATO airbase at Incirlik. 'Negative sentiment toward US foreign policy may prompt actions against US or Western interests in Turkey," the statement said. Late Saturday, the department said it was stepping up evacuation flights for American citizens from Israel to Europe and continuing to draw down its staff at diplomatic missions in Iraq. But even before the US airstrikes on Iran were made public by President Donald Trump on Saturday evening in Washington, the US Embassy in Jerusalem had announced the start of evacuation flights for private Americans from Israel. After the US strikes in Iran, security officers at all US embassies and consulates have been instructed to conduct reviews of their posts' security posture and report back to the State Department by late Sunday. First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:36 IST
News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In
Last Updated: While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. After airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, the Trump administration on Sunday signalled openness to renewed diplomacy while maintaining that the US does not seek a wider war. While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly on Sunday after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. Trump's top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shared their views on the Iran conflict. Their unified message highlighted that the US aims to deter Iran's nuclear ambitions, not pursue regime change. At a Pentagon briefing, Hegseth stated, 'America does not seek war," while Vice President Vance told reporters the strikes offered Iran an opportunity to return to negotiations. 'Operation Midnight Hammer," he said, used 'decoys and deception," and encountered no Iranian military resistance, according to Hegseth and Gen. Caine. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth emphasised. Caine confirmed that the US had struck Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, and that all three sites sustained significant damage. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," he said. In a TV interview, Vance refrained from discussing classified intelligence but said he was confident the operation had 'substantially delayed" Iran's nuclear weapons program. 'I think it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon," he added. Vance also noted that the US had negotiated seriously with Iran before resorting to military action. 'I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship… and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears." Secretary of State Rubio told Face the Nation that while there are 'no planned military operations right now against Iran," the US would respond if attacked. 'Unless they mess around and they attack US interests," he warned. Despite President Trump's past promises to avoid extended conflicts, it's uncertain whether Iran views avoiding escalation as in its own best interest. Meanwhile, global reaction has been mixed, with some nations fearing the strikes could further destabilise the Middle East, particularly amid an ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Earlier this month, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure and military leadership, prompting Iranian retaliation and ultimately leading to the US intervention. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, condemned the US strikes, calling them a violation of sovereignty and international law. 'They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities," he said. 'I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy." China and Russia both condemned the attacks, urging a return to political dialogue. Russia called the strikes 'a gross violation of international law," while Turkey warned of the risk of escalation to a 'global level." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the UK was relocating military assets to safeguard its interests, while leaders of Canada, Germany, Italy, and France all supported a swift return to diplomacy. The attacks have also raised concerns about potential disruptions to the global oil supply, with Iran hinting at closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key channel for global energy trade. Oil prices have surged over 20 per cent in the past month as tensions in the region escalated. The Pentagon did not provide new details on Iran's current nuclear capabilities. Hegseth said the operation followed a 60-day window Trump gave Iran to engage in talks. 'Iran found out that when Trump says 60 days… he means it," Hegseth said. 'Otherwise, that nuclear program… will not exist." Caine and Hegseth added that B-2 bombers launched from Missouri, supported by a deception plan involving decoy aircraft, executed the strikes using 14 bunker-buster bombs. The mission ran from 6:40 p.m. to 7:05 p.m. ET on Saturday — approximately 2:10 a.m. in Iran on Sunday. tags : donald trump iran us Location : United States of America (USA) First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:30 IST News world Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
From Fordow to Faridabad: How one nuclear bombing could cause a Chernobyl-style fallout and contaminate India's future
Late on Saturday, American forces launched coordinated strikes on three of Iran's most significant nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz , and Isfahan . Using bunker-busting bombs and Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from 400 miles away, US President Donald Trump ordered a military operation that has since been hailed as 'decisive' by his supporters. 'The president just prevented World War III with this decisive action. This is the 'strength' in 'peace through strength' boldly shown to the world at last,' said Alex Plitsas of the Atlantic Council. In a dramatic scene inside the White House Situation Room, President Trump and Vice-President J.D. Vance monitored the unfolding operation on 21 June. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo Also Read: Countdown to WWIII? Will Iran's response to US strikes spark the first Nuclear-age war? 'This isn't Chernobyl,' say experts, but is that enough? The primary reassurance from Western radiation scientists is that Iran's sites contained enriched uranium, not active reactors like in Chernobyl or Fukushima, as reported by the New York Post. That difference matters. Live Events 'This isn't a Chernobyl scenario,' wrote Aimen Dean on X. 'It's uranium in various stages of enrichment, and even a military strike that destroys centrifuges or disperses material is unlikely to produce a large-scale, long-lasting fallout event.' Still, that doesn't mean the risk is zero. 'With uranium … the radiation doesn't really travel very far,' said Prof Claire Corkhill, Chair in Mineralogy and Radioactive Waste Management at the University of Bristol. But she added, 'You certainly don't want to breathe in uranium particles and you don't want to ingest them either… that will cause damage.' Prof Simon Middleburgh, from Bangor University, pointed to another danger: 'If the centrifuges were to release the uranium hexafluoride, the gas contained within the centrifuges, then it would be a really severe chemical incident.' According to Prof Jim Smith of the University of Portsmouth , 'Highly enriched uranium is about three times more radioactive than non-enriched uranium. But … neither of them are particularly densely radioactive. It wouldn't cause a major environmental contamination problem.' The consensus? The threat is real, but it is local—for now. Also Read: Operation Midnight Hammer: How six bunker busters and 75 precision weapons powered the US's second-largest B-2 strike Nuclear fallout: India in the path of the jetstream Iran may seem distant. But geography—and the winds—say otherwise. The subtropical jetstream, a high-speed air current running west to east, sits directly between Iran and India. It's the same wind system that spread radioactive isotopes from Chernobyl across Europe and from Fukushima to the Pacific. As reported by the Eurasian Times, should even limited contamination occur, Indian cities like Delhi, Amritsar , and Jaipur—along with croplands in Punjab, Haryana, U.P., and Bihar—could be in the path within 48 to 72 hours. The Himalayan belt would also be vulnerable. Fallout here could contaminate glaciers feeding the Ganga and Yamuna rivers. This is not just Iran's problem. It could be India's nightmare. Also Read: After US strike, Iran's 'all-out war' warning puts US forces in Bahrain on edge: What comes next? What makes Iran's nuclear sites so dangerous? Iran's nuclear programme includes: Fordow: A deeply buried enrichment site, once considered impenetrable. Natanz: A major hub for centrifuge operations. Isfahan: A uranium conversion facility. The IAEA confirmed Iran's uranium enrichment had reached 60%—approaching the 90% purity needed for nuclear weapons. 'When you dig uranium out of the ground, it comes in two forms: 99.3% is uranium-238, and 0.7% is uranium-235… what you need in your nuclear reactor,' explained Prof Paddy Regan of the University of Surrey . The enrichment process boosts the uranium-235 content using centrifuges, increasing the explosive potential. This process doesn't involve nuclear fission, meaning no 'nuclear chain reaction' occurs in these sites. But uranium particles—if released—can still poison air, soil, and water. Also Read: US defence secretary hails 'bold & brilliant' Operation Midnight Hammer on Iran: All you need to know No immediate fallout, says IAEA, but warning flags are up The IAEA said it had detected 'no increase in off-site radiation levels' following the US strike. But it was quick to issue a broader caution. Director General Rafael Grossi said, 'Military escalation increases the chance of a radiological release with serious consequences for people and the environment.' His warning echoed an earlier IAEA resolution which states: 'Any armed attack on—and threat against—nuclear facilities devoted to peaceful purposes constitutes a violation of the UN Charter, international law, and the Agency's Statute.' Why India must be on guard India may not be part of the strike. But it will surely feel the consequences. 1. Public Health Risks A single gust carrying uranium dust could push India's already strained healthcare system to the brink. Children, the elderly, and those with respiratory illnesses would be most vulnerable. 2. Food and Water Insecurity Rabi crops in Punjab and Haryana, rice fields in Bihar, and even glacier-fed drinking water in North India are all exposed. One contaminated season could destroy food security. 3. Trade and Tourism Fallout Even minor radiation detection could lead to export bans on Indian grains, spices, or dairy. Tourism hubs—especially pilgrimage sites—could suffer massive losses. Also Read: US strikes Iran's nuclear sites: Vice President JD Vance says war is with weapons programme, not people India's playbook: What must be done India cannot afford to wait. It needs an action plan—now. Radiation Forecasting and Modelling: ISRO, IMD, and IAEA must jointly track and model fallout scenarios. Stockpile Iodine Tablets: Especially for school children and frontline workers. Shield Water Sources : From floating barriers to filtration units, major rivers need defence. Urban Evacuation Plans: Especially for Delhi, Jaipur, and Amritsar. Diplomatic Outreach: Open channels with Pakistan, China, and Gulf nations to exchange air quality data. Israel-Iran war: A diplomatic crisis in the making This strike could also upset delicate balances in South Asia's foreign policy. India–Iran Relations: Key projects like Chabahar Port may be at risk. India–US Ties: Public and parliamentary backlash over Washington's unilateral strike could strain strategic partnerships. SAARC & ASEAN Pressure: India may be forced to choose between neutrality and leadership. UNSC Voice : Delhi could face calls to press for condemnation of nuclear attacks—against its closest military allies. India now has a chance to lead. Not just in reaction, but in rule-making. A Nuclear Infrastructure Non-Aggression Pact (NINAP) could be New Delhi's answer. Key Proposals: Global ban on kinetic attacks on civilian nuclear sites Emergency arbitration powers to the IAEA Real-time global radiation monitoring and alert systems This could be India's next soft-power success—one that protects lives, trade, and diplomacy all at once. When the bombs fell on Iran, the world watched. But India should do more than watch. It must act. The jetstream will not ask for visas. It will not stop at checkpoints. And it will not wait for a press release. This isn't about choosing sides. It's about protecting 1.4 billion people from a cloud we never caused—but might still have to survive. Let India lead. Before the wind changes direction.
