Inside Universal's big bet on How To Train Your Dragon, its first foray into live-action adaptations
Mason Thames as Hiccup with Toothless the dragon in How To Train Your Dragon. PHOTO: UIP
Inside Universal's big bet on How To Train Your Dragon, its first foray into live-action adaptations
NEW YORK – In 2020, Dean DeBlois publicly blasted live-action remakes of animated films as 'lazy' studio endeavours.
The Canadian writer-director had, along with American film-maker Chris Sanders, made the 2002 Disney animated Lilo & Stitch and the 2010 DreamWorks Animation release How To Train Your Dragon.
DeBlois said he viewed such remakes as 'a missed opportunity to put something original into the world'.
Then, two years later, he received a call from Universal Pictures president Peter Cramer asking if he would be interested in directing a live-action version of How To Train Your Dragon.
'At the expense of seeming like a hypocrite, I thought, well, I'm either going to sit here and pout and watch somebody else do it,' the 55-year-old said in a video interview, 'or I could jump in and shoulder the blame or help to change the narrative.'
With the reboot – which is showing in Singapore cinemas – earning over US$197 million (S$252 million) worldwide, DeBlois is enthusiastically attached to the type of movie he formerly criticised.
Director Dean DeBlois (left) and actor Gerard Butler at the premiere for How To Train Your Dragon in Los Angeles on June 7.
PHOTO: REUTERS
A lot could have gone wrong. He had never made a live-action feature before Universal put him in charge of the US$150 million remake, and the genre as a whole is facing increased scepticism from audiences and studios alike.
Yet, so pleased were the Universal executives after seeing a cut of the new Dragon, Mr Cramer said, that they rushed to greenlight a live-action adaptation of How To Train Your Dragon 2, to be directed and written by DeBlois and released in theatres in 2027.
How To Train Your Dragon – a retelling of the story of Hiccup, a pacifist Viking teenager who forms a bond with a once-feared dragon named Toothless on the Isle of Berk – represents the studio's first foray into live-action adaptations of animated films.
Executives chose this property over Shrek (2001 to present) or Despicable Me (2010 to present) because of 'the human and creature drama at the centre of it', Mr Cramer said.
Surprisingly, the original Dragon was only the fifth most popular animated film of 2010, trailing Toy Story 3, Shrek Forever After, Tangled and Despicable Me.
But in the years since, the Dragon franchise – including two sequels in 2014 and 2019, which DeBlois wrote and directed – has found a large and devoted following.
The animated trilogy drew a combined US$1.65 billion at the global box office, and there have been three television spin-off series.
At Epic Universe, Universal's new ly opened theme park in Orlando, Florida, there is an entire Isle of Berk land with rides, a live stage show, dragon meet-and-greets and 'Viking-ish' food.
Here is how the new movie took flight.
Widening the audience
When DeBlois worked on the animated How To Train Your Dragon, he recalled Jeffrey Katzenberg, the DreamWorks Animation chief at the time, frequently reminding him: 'Don't forget the five-year-olds' in the audience.
That was not the case this time.
Universal, whose parent company acquired DreamWorks Animation in 2016, was adamant that the new film cater not only to young viewers, but also to adults who had grown up with the original and those who had never heard of it.
'They were saying, 'Embrace the fact that this is an all-audience movie. We want teenagers. We want people in their 20s,'' DeBlois said. 'We were encouraged to think bigger.'
So, while still aiming for a PG rating, the crew built large-scale practical sets at Titanic Studios in Belfast, North Ireland, including a 360-degree Viking training arena, to shoot immersive action sequences.
English composer John Powell returned to make his sweeping score even more epic. And for those aerial shots and roller-coaster-esque flying sequences, the film-makers took a helicopter over Iceland, the Isle of Skye and the Faeroe Islands to capture expansive footage, including of the craggly islet Tindholmur, which served as the basis for their fictional Berk.
Assembling the Vikings
Hiccup (Mason Thames, left) and Astrid (Nico Parker, right) in How To Train Your Dragon.
PHOTO: UIP
To embody the endearingly awkward Hiccup (originally voiced by Canadian actor Jay Baruchel), the film-makers cast Mason Thames, a Texas native who had starred in the Universal horror film The Black Phone (2021).
For Astrid, an ambitious Viking girl and Hiccup's love interest, they selected biracial British actress Nico Parker, who had her big break in Disney's 2019 live-action Dumbo remake.
Both 17-year-old Thames and 20-year-old Parker grew up as passionate fans of the animated Dragon trilogy. Thames once dressed as Hiccup for Halloween, and Parker – daughter of British actress Thandiwe Newton and British director-screenwriter Ol Parker – recalled going to see the original in theatres with her family four times.
When the cast was announced, however, some fans expressed outrage that Astrid would no longer be blonde and blue-eyed, as she had been portrayed in the animated films (though she was voiced by American actress America Ferrera, whose parents are from Honduras).
'It's one thing if people just love the animated movies, and their version of a perfect live-action is a play-by-play with people who look exactly the same,' Parker said. 'But when it comes from a place of real hate towards any kind of inclusivity, it's not an opinion that keeps me up at night.'
In a rare move, Universal brought back Gerard Butler, who originally voiced Hiccup's dad, Stoick the Vast, to reprise his role as the imposing chief of Berk.
Gerard Butler (left) and Toothless in How To Train Your Dragon.
PHOTO: UIP
The actor 's work on the original had involved simply saying his lines in a recording booth. This time, he spent hours each day getting a bushy chest-length beard applied before suiting up in 3D-printed armour with ancillary weapons.
'It was incredibly heavy,' the 55-year-old Scotsman said of the wardrobe. 'The first time I put it on, I panicked that this whole movie was going to crash because Gerry Butler couldn't handle the 90-pound (40kg) costume.'
Unleashing the dragons
Before Thames arrived on set in Belfast, he fretted that 'it was just going to be a bunch of blue screens and a tennis ball as Toothless', he said. Instead, the actors often performed opposite giant foam dragon heads and operational puppet bodies.
T hen, t o help digitally transform the dragons into believably menacing beasts, DeBlois turned to animation supervisor Glen McIntosh, an expert in paleontology who had animated dinosaurs in the Jurassic Park (1993 to 2001) and Jurassic World (2015 to present) franchises.
'Dean wanted the dragons to have the feeling that they were evolved animals, not creatures of fantasy,' McIntosh said. 'So, even though they are creatures of fantasy, they had to look like they weren't just cobbled together.'
Each dragon breed is, therefore, grounded in specific real-life animal traits. A Deadly Nadder like Stormfly, for instance, is influenced by the winged arms of a bat, the head of a parrot, and the legs and talons of a golden eagle.
Hiccup (Mason Thames) and the dragon Hideous Zippleback in How To Train Your Dragon.
PHOTO: UIP
And then there is Toothless. Unlike the fearsome menagerie that surrounds him, Toothless – a Night Fury with traits of a black panther and a salamander – needed to retain an extra layer of cuteness and relatability, while still looking as if he belonged in the same world as the others.
The animators spent 2½ years updating their hero creature. Toothless' more cartoonish expressions, like raised eyebrows, were swopped out for head tilts or tail swishes that mimic those of a curious dog or cat.
As they added intricacies like textured scales, McIntosh said, their guiding mandate was always, 'Is this something you would still want to pet?'
Looking ahead
DeBlois had considered opening the film with a new flashback from Stoick's point of view. But the final cut faithfully follows its animated predecessor, including three shot-for-shot scenes.
Still, there are some subtle surprises, as when Astrid voices her desire to be chief of Berk one day, something that was never expressed in the animated version. It is a line that leaves open the possibility of future plot deviations.
'There's an opportunity going forward to maybe colour outside of the lines a little bit more,' DeBlois said.
In May, the director was still drafting the Dragon sequel script, and he said there had not been any discussions about a third live-action film. Mr Cramer also could not 'definitively answer' if Universal would complete the trilogy.
'We do have ambitions and hopes,' the studio head said. 'But, you know, one movie at a time.' NYTIMES
How To Train Your Dragon is showing in Singapore cinemas.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
10 hours ago
- International Business Times
AI Startup Midjourney Launches Image-to-Video Creation Model V1- Here is All You Need to Know
Right after getting into legal trouble with entertainment giant Disney, AI startup has launched its image-to-video generation model V1. The new tool allows users to convert images into short video clips and is available to the users for free. The new offering is available today via Midjourney's website, and it's available to all customers, including those who want to use a free account. Faster video rendering is limited to those users who pay for a subscription, which begins at $10 a month. The move positions the platform in competition with AI-powered video creation. V1's launch is a significant step forward for Midjourney, which has spent the majority of its time creating visually rich static images. With the new tool, the start-up is going after users who want to animate the visuals they create, offering features that strike a balance between simplicity, customization, and affordability. Despite the fact that the tool is available to all the Midjourney users free of cost at the preliminary level, one aspect of concern is the GPU usage by the tool, as the process of video generation is more resource-intensive, requiring eight times more GPU time per second of video. Hence, the users have to allocate GPU time carefully, especially when using the fast mode available under standard subscriptions. The company has also provided Relax Mode to heavy users or creative professionals, but it is accessible only to Pro-tier users and higher. This mode allows unlimited videos at no extra cost, but with longer waiting times, it can at times be up to 10 minutes for one animation. "The pricing model still gives you a massive cost advantage," the company says—reportedly being over 25 times cheaper than any of the current AI video generation tools on the market. Though the new tool is not far from controversy, like many other artificial intelligence models. Midjourney was sued for copyright infringement by major media companies, including Disney and NBCUniversal. The lawsuit claims that the platform enables unauthorized derivative works by reproducing characters and images from popular franchises. The studios said Midjourney has essentially become a "virtual vending machine" for pirated offerings, citing instances using characters from Star Wars, Toy Story, Marvel, and The Simpsons. The company has not publicly addressed the lawsuit or issued a public statement about the legal questions raised about V1. Midjourney founder David Holz has called the video model a "stepping stone" to more sophisticated applications, such as real-time, three-dimensional environments that users can interact with. As far as the actual animation process is concerned, Midjourney V1 is designed to be user-friendly as seen below: Users begin by uploading an image—either created within Midjourney or imported from another source. After the image is generated, an "Animate" button lets users transform the static image into a video. The system produces four 5-second video clips from the chosen image. These clips can be extended by four-second increments, up to a total of 21 seconds. Currently, the videos are silent, with no audio features supported. At present two animation modes are available: First, automatic mode , which applies system-suggested motion effects to the image. Second, manual mode lets users guide the animation through descriptive prompts. which applies system-suggested motion effects to the image. Second, manual mode lets users guide the animation through descriptive prompts. Users can also choose between two camera movement styles: Low Motion keeps the camera largely stationary, and High Motion introduces dynamic movement of both the subject and the camera. This new offering introduces an intuitive way to blend static visuals with motion, enhancing creative storytelling possibilities on the platform. Netizens were quick to upload the videos generated by the tool, which shows the kind of interest this tool has generated as seen above.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
At Art Basel, dealers reap rewards by sidestepping politics and war
ABOUT halfway through the opening day of Art Basel's fair in Switzerland, the dealer Larry Gagosian was sitting on a bench near his booth. Crowds—incredibly thick when the art fair opened to VIPs at 11 am —had dispersed a bit as grandees shuffled into the convention centre courtyard for lunch, queuing up for sausages, oysters and ice cream cones. Gagosian, though, seemed content to stay inside, overseeing a presentation that included an early Cy Twombly painting priced at over US$30 million. 'We've sold quite a few things, considering the state of the world,' he said. 'I'm encouraged that initially we've been doing quite a bit of business. We live in a crazy time, and I think that a lot of people want to take refuge in some other universe.' (Art Basel's VIP days ended June 18; public days are June 19–22.) It's true that Basel's week of dinners and cocktail parties and talks and openings have felt a world apart from the current geopolitical realities plaguing most of the globe. That was the case at Unlimited, an exhibition sector adjacent to Art Basel's main fair where many of the massive artworks on display were pleasantly inoffensive; and it was particularly true in the main fair, where gorgeous abstract paintings sat easily alongside landscapes and portraits. Expensive or cheap, new or historical, it didn't matter: Nearly every artwork on offer at the fair was lovely and apolitical. Playing it safe 'I think people brought fairly safe material,' said the American adviser Suzanne Modica, who was walking down the aisles of Art Basel to meet a client. 'Obviously, people are bringing things to sell.' That's in large part because the art market slump has lasted so long that it's arguably a permanent condition. As such, dealers, seemingly desperate to turn a profit, appeared just as reticent to go out on a limb as their collectors. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up 'There's a severe correction currently in the market, meaning that everybody just wants to keep it running,' said Loa Haagen Pictet, the chief curator of Collection Pictet, who observed a preponderance of feel-good paintings and sculptures. 'There's a lot of colourful and exuberant art, a lot that's sort of surrealist but joyful,' she continued. 'It's out there, trying not to bring us down.' As a result, the few artworks that took an overtly political stand stood out starkly. At the Liste fair, which traditionally has cheaper work from smaller, younger galleries, the Dutch artist Jonas Staal had filled Laveronica gallery's booth with pictures of burning yachts. Price: 10,000 euros (US$11,480) for smaller work; 19,000 euros for a larger light box depicting a fake still of CNN whose chyron read 'Jeff Bezos' Super Yacht Set On Fire'. 'It's a political statement,' said the gallery's owner Corrado Gugliotta. 'But on the other hand, I have understood after the many years that I've done things like this, the market is able to absorb everything.' And in the main fair, Sprüth Magers had a large piece by American artist Barbara Kruger titled Untitled (WAR TIME, WAR CRIME), which included the phrase, among others 'CLASS WAR, BIDDING WAR, TRADE WAR, COLD WAR' and sold on the first day for US$650,000. 'We didn't go the route of other galleries and bring safer works only,' said senior director Andreas Gegner. 'It's always tempting to do that, but I think it's more important to stick to your identity and bring works that are maybe, on the face of it, more difficult.' A very good start Before the first day was over, it seemed that for many galleries, a less combative strategy had paid off. David Zwirner sent out a release that it had sold 68 works ('so far'), including a hanging mesh sculpture by Ruth Asawa for US$9.5 million. Hauser & Wirth reported selling 33 pieces, including a mixed media work by Mark Bradford for US$3.5 million. Thaddaeus Ropac gallery reported more than 20 sales, including a US$1.8 million painting of two upside-down figures by Georg Baselitz. 'We've had a very good start,' says Hauser & Wirth's partner and president Marc Payot. 'It's fantastic to see such a resilient market in what's all and all difficult times.' But if you looked closely enough, reality had seeped ever so quietly into the fair after all. 'There are certainly clients of our clients who've not been able to travel in the last 48 hours from Lebanon and Israel, who'd been intending to come,' said Art Basel CEO Noah Horowitz, speaking in a conference room above the fair. 'So that's material. But on the other hand, we've seen, yet again, the global art world coming around an event like Art Basel and celebrating art, and celebrating the privilege of being in this community.' BLOOMBERG
AsiaOne
a day ago
- AsiaOne
Wendy Williams had "no idea" her ex-husband Kevin Hunter was planning to file a $321m lawsuit over her guardianship, Entertainment News
Wendy Williams had "no idea" her "money-grubber" ex-husband Kevin Hunter was planning to file a US$250 million (S$321 million) lawsuit over her guardianship. Kevin Hunter, who was married to presenter, Wendy Williams from 1999 until 2020 filed a lawsuit on Tuesday (June 17) demanding a jury trial and naming 48 defendants who he claims have violated Wendy's constitutional rights by facilitating a guardianship order which came into force in 2022 — but Wendy has insisted she's not involved with the legal challenge. She told TMZ: "[I had] no idea [he was filing the suit]. Nor do I want him to be a part of my life like that, no. Because I'm divorced forever... "He's a money-grubber; he's always been that way. It's good to know that he's doing such evil things — again. He won't win." Amongst those named in the legal papers are Wendy's legal guardian Sabrina Morrissey, the judge presiding over her guardianship Lisa Sokoloff, Wells Fargo, her assisted living facility and several lawyers. The complaint states: "Guardianship is a civil death. In New York, more than 28,000 adults, including Williams), are being abused, neglected, and defrauded under the care of court-appointed guardians." The Wendy Williams Show host was placed under legal guardianship in 2022 before it was revealed the following year that she had been diagnosed with aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. LaShawn Thomas, the attorney who filed the lawsuit, acknowledged that Wendy is "not legally aware of all the evidence that supports our claims that she should not be forced to suffer from this guardianship." The statement to People read: "I plan on laying out sufficient evidence to support our claims and ensure that her rights are vindicated, and she is made whole financially." Hunter's lawsuit is not looking for an end to the former broadcaster's guardianship but his requests include a "new impartial guardian", the unsealing of her case's files, her release from "involuntary confinement", a full forensic accounting and US$250 million in relief for financial loss, repetitional damage, emotional distress, legal costs and the deprivation of Wendy's liberty. Kevin has been named as a co-plaintiff in the case and wants to be appointed as Williams' "next friend" — a party who can legally act "on behalf of an individual unable to assert their own rights and when no guardian is acting in their best interests". [[nid:719262]]
